Vijayvargiya, Prakhar

Abstract Based on expert consensus, the American Society of Transplantation recommends 7–14 days of preventive antibiotic therapy for solid organ transplant recipients from donors with positive blood cultures. We evaluated management and outcomes of kidney transplant recipients from these donors.

Abstract Background Fungal infections following pancreas transplantation carry significant morbidity and mortality with an estimated incidence of 3 to 28%. The American Society of Transplantation (AST) suggests considering fluconazole prophylaxis in pancreas transplant recipients (PTR) at high-risk of invasive candidiasis (IC). However, optimal dosage and duration of prophylaxis is unclear. Weekly fluconazole for prevention of IC has been previously reported in liver and bone marrow transplant recipients. We analyzed outcomes of once weekly fluconazole prophylaxis in PTR. Methods We retrospectively reviewed all pancreas transplants performed at our institution from January 2017 through September 2021. PTR at high-risk for IC were defined per AST criteria as those with enteric drainage, vascular thrombosis, and post-perfusion pancreatitis. Patients received once weekly oral fluconazole 200 mg for 12 weeks post-transplant for IC prophylaxis. We analyzed incidence of breakthrough IC within the first 6 months post-transplant. Results We identified a total of 22 PTR, all of whom received simultaneous kidney transplantation from deceased donors. Of these, 12/22 (55%) were male and 11/22 (50%) were African American. Median age at the time of transplantation was 39 years (IQR 34-46). The most common indication for transplantation was type 1 diabetes mellitus (17/22, 21%) with associated nephropathy. No donor organ cultures were positive for fungi and all pancreas transplants were performed using enteric drainage. Notably, one patient developed pancreas allograft thrombosis while another developed pancreatitis. No patients required early discontinuation of fluconazole due to intolerance or side effects and none developed breakthrough IC within 6 months post-transplant (Table 1). Table 1. Conclusion Weekly fluconazole prophylaxis has not been previously studied in PTR. In our cohort, this approach was well tolerated, with no cases of IC at 6 months post-transplantation in patients at high-risk. Randomized controlled clinical trials are needed to define the optimal strategy in this population. Disclosures M. Rizwan Sohail, MD, Aziyo Biologics: Honoraria|Boston Scientific Corporation: Honoraria|Medtronic: Grant/Research Support|TRYX: Grant/Research Support.

Abstract Background Mycoplasma hominis, Ureaplasma urealyticum, and Ureaplasma parvum may cause post-transplant infections in lung transplant recipients. We evaluated routine pretransplant screening for these Mollicutes. Methods We retrospectively reviewed records of lung transplant recipients at our tri-site institution from 01/01/2015 to 11/15/2019. M. hominis and/or Ureaplasma polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was performed on pretransplant recipient urine specimens and donor bronchial swabs at the time of transplantation. Development of Mollicute infection and hyperammonemia syndrome (HS) was recorded. Results A total of 268 patients underwent lung transplantation during the study period, of whom 105 were screened with at least 1 Mollicute PCR. Twelve (11%) screened positive; 10 donors, 1 recipient, and 1 both. Among positive donors, 3 were positive for M. hominis, 5 for U. urealyticum, and 4 for U. parvum. Preemptive therapy included doxycycline, levofloxacin, and/or azithromycin administered for 1–12 weeks. Despite therapy, 1 case of M. hominis mediastinitis and 1 case of HS associated with Ureaplasma infection occurred, both donor-derived. Of those screened before transplant, cases with positive screening were more likely (P < 0.05) to develop Mollicute infection despite treatment (2/12, 17%) than those who screened negative (1/93, 1%). Conclusions Pretransplant recipient urine screening had a low yield and was not correlated with post-transplant Mollicute infection, likely because most M. hominis and U. parvum/urealyticum infections in lung transplant recipients are donor-derived. Routine donor bronchus swab PCR for M. hominis, U. urealyticum, and U. parvum followed by preemptive therapy did not obviously impact the overall incidence of Mollicute infection or HS in this cohort.

Abstract Background Based on expert opinion, solid organ transplant recipients from donors with bacteremia are treated with 7-14 days of pre-emptive antibiotic therapy (PAT). However, studies addressing necessity, optimal duration of therapy, and outcomes in kidney transplant recipients (KTR) are lacking. Methods We retrospectively reviewed all kidney transplants performed at our institution from 01/01/2015-01/01/2021 to identify those cases where matched deceased donors had positive blood cultures. Bacteremia was defined per CDC criteria. We analyzed rate of infection in the KTR with the same organism identified in the donor blood culture within 30 days of transplantation. Results A total of 56 KTRs with donor positive blood cultures were identified. Demographic data are summarized in Table 1. Twenty of 56 cases (35.8%) had bacteremia and 36 (64.2%) had organisms classified as common commensals. The most common organisms in the bacteremia group were Gram-negative bacteria (12/20) and Staphylococcus aureus (6/20). Most common commensals were coagulase-negative staphylococci (26/36) (Table 2). All KTR received preoperative antibiotics at the time of transplantation, primarily cefazolin (15/20), and vast majority received TMP/SMX prophylaxis, for Pneumocystis jirovecii, post-transplant (19/20). PAT was administered in 70% (14/20) cases of bacteremia for a median of 8.5 days (IQR 7-14), while six cases were left untreated (Table 2). In contrast, majority of cases with common commensals were not treated (75%, 27/36). Of the cases treated (9/36), median duration of therapy was 7 days (IQR 5-14). No cases of infection with the same organism identified in the donor blood culture were reported in KTR within 30 days of transplantation. Conclusion KTR donors with bacteremia who were treated received a median of 8.5 days of PAT with no instances of breakthrough infection. In contrast, majority of donor blood cultures with organisms classified as common commensals were not treated and did well. Future studies are needed to assess whether perioperative antibiotics coupled with TMP/SMX prophylaxis post-transplantation are sufficient in select cases of transplantation from donors with bacteremia. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Abstract Background Conventional blood cultures were compared to plasma cell-free DNA–based 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) gene polymerase chain reaction (PCR)/next-generation sequencing (NGS) for detection and identification of potential pathogens in patients with sepsis. Methods Plasma was prospectively collected from 60 adult patients with sepsis presenting to the Mayo Clinic (Minnesota) Emergency Department from March through August 2019. Results of routine clinical blood cultures were compared to those of 16S rRNA gene NGS. Results Nineteen (32%) subjects had positive blood cultures, of which 13 yielded gram-negative bacilli, 5 gram-positive cocci, and 1 both gram-negative bacilli and gram-positive cocci. 16S rRNA gene NGS findings were concordant in 11. For the remaining 8, 16S rRNA gene NGS results yielded discordant detections (n = 5) or were negative (n = 3). Interestingly, Clostridium species were additionally detected by 16S rRNA gene NGS in 3 of the 6 subjects with gastrointestinal sources of gram-negative bacteremia and none of the 3 subjects with urinary sources of gram-negative bacteremia. In the 41 remaining subjects, 16S rRNA gene NGS detected at least 1 potentially pathogenic organism in 17. In 15, the detected microorganism clinically correlated with the patient’s syndrome. In 17 subjects with a clinically defined infectious syndrome, neither test was positive; in the remaining 7 subjects, a noninfectious cause of clinical presentation was identified. Conclusions 16S rRNA gene NGS may be useful for detecting bacteria in plasma of septic patients. In some cases of gram-negative sepsis, it may be possible to pinpoint a gastrointestinal or urinary source of sepsis based on the profile of bacteria detected in plasma.

AbstractBackgroundNeutropenia is a risk factor for development of infections; however, the direct effect of neutropenia on development of bloodstream infection (BSI) is not known. D‐index, which is area between the neutrophil time curve and a neutrophil count of 0.5 × 109/L, incorporates the combined effect of severity and duration of neutropenia. We aimed to evaluate whether D‐index can be used as a marker for BSI in patients with allogeneic stem cell transplantation.MethodWe conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing allogeneic stem cell transplantation between January 1, 2005, and September 30, 2015. The primary outcome measure was the development of BSI within 30 days of transplantation.ResultsA total of 714 patients were included in the study of whom 101 developed BSI. Patients with BSI had a significantly higher median D‐index value compared with patients who did not have BSI (4990 vs. 3570, P < .001). As a marker, the performance of the D‐index was similar to that of the duration of profound neutropenia (P = .18) and significantly better than the total duration of neutropenia (P = .001).ConclusionThe D‐index performed better than the total duration of neutropenia as a marker for BSI in patients with allogeneic stem cell transplantation. There was no difference between D‐index and, a more easily calculable indicator, duration of profound neutropenia.

Abstract Background Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) outcomes have significantly improved at the expense of other age-related diseases including chronic kidney disease. Early reports of people living with HIV (PLWH) undergoing deceased-donor kidney transplantation (DDKT) showed poor outcomes, but these have notably improved after introduction of antiretrovirals. Despite years of experience, the optimal induction immunosuppression (IIS) in PLWH remains subject of debate. Large-scale studies describing the current ISS practices in PLWH undergoing DDKT are lacking. Here, we describe the U.S. national trends of IIS used in PLWH undergoing DDKT from 2000 to 2018 using the United Network of Organ Sharing (UNOS) database. Methods We analyzed the UNOS database to determine the selection of IIS in PLWH undergoing first-time DDKT between 1/1/2000 and 12/31/2018. Cases with unknown HIV status at the time of transplant were excluded. Age, sex and demographics were analyzed. The regimen used for IIS was compared based on HIV serostatus and the change in induction regimen was trended over time. Results A total of 139,650 cases underwent DDKT during the study period. Among these, 1,384 were identified as HIV-positive. PLWH were significantly younger than HIV-negative (49±10 years vs. 51.6 ± 15.3 years; p&lt; 0.001) (Table 1). A greater proportion of men was seen in the PLWH group compared to HIV-negative persons (76.2% vs. 60.4%; p&lt; 0.0001). In the HIV-negative group, 12.1% undergoing DDKT did not receive IIS compared to 16.4% in PLWH (p&lt; 0.0001). Medications that have significantly increased in use with years in PLWH included rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin (rATG), steroids, and basiliximab (3.54, 3.25, 2.28, respectively; p&lt; 0.001). On our trend analysis (Figure 1), the percentage of PLWH receiving any IIS is increasing by 4.04% each year (p&lt; 0.001). Table 1 Figure 1 Conclusion Our study suggests that IIS is an increasing practice in PLWH undergoing DDKT, predominantly using rATG, steroids, and basiliximab. Understanding the current practices might lead to further studies to determine the long-term outcomes after different induction regimens in PLWH. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Abstract Background The etiology of febrile neutropenia in patients with hematological malignancy is identified in only 20–30% of cases. Sinus computed tomography (CT) is often used, regardless of symptoms, to rule out rhinocerebral source of infection. There are no clear guidelines on when to perform sinus CT in this population. In this study, we evaluated the role of sinus CT in febrile neutropenic patients. Methods We retrospectively reviewed medical records of all adults (age ≥18 years) with febrile neutropenia (T≥ 38.3ºC, ANC &lt; 0.5 x 109/L) and hematological malignancies who underwent sinus CT from January 2014 to May 2020. We present the preliminary analysis of the impact of sinus CT findings on the management of febrile neutropenia. Results 47 patients with a total of 56 episodes of febrile neutropenia met the inclusion criteria. The median age at presentation was 57 years (IQR: 42 - 68 years). The most common underlying malignancy was acute myeloid leukemia (51%), followed by myelodysplastic syndrome (19%). At presentation, 47% had refractory disease, 21% were newly diagnosed, 15% had relapsed, 15% were in complete remission, and 2% were in partial remission. Of the total 56 episodes, 29 (52%) had symptoms of rhinorrhea (20%), facial pain (14%), and sinus congestion (14%). The remaining 27 of 56 episodes (48%) had no sinus symptoms. Sinus CT was abnormal in 48 of 56 episodes (86%); the most common finding was mucosal thickening (47/48; 98%), followed by air-fluid levels (7/48; 14.5%), partial opacification (6/48; 12.5%), complete opacification (2/48; 4%), and bony invasion (2/48; 4%). The source of febrile neutropenia was attributed to the CT sinus findings in 9 cases (9/48; 29%), leading to a change in therapeutic management. All 9 patients were symptomatic, with evidence of necrosis in 22% (2/9) and purulence in 22% (2/9) on nasal endoscopy. Table 1 Conclusion Mucosal thickening is a frequent and non-specific imaging finding, particularly in patients without sinus symptoms. Sinus CT findings in patients with febrile neutropenia without sinus symptoms had no impact on clinical management. Consequently, sinus CT may be reserved for patients presenting with sinus symptoms. Disclosures M. Rizwan Sohail, MD, Aziyo Biologics (Consultant)Medtronic Inc (Consultant, Research Grant or Support)

Abstract Background Cutibacterium species are common pathogens in periprosthetic joint infections (PJI). These infections are often treated with β-lactams or clindamycin as monotherapy, or in combination with rifampin. Clinical evidence supporting the value of adding rifampin for treatment of Cutibacterium PJI is lacking. Methods In this multicenter retrospective study, we evaluated patients with Cutibacterium PJI and a minimal follow-up of 12 months. The primary endpoint was clinical success, defined by the absence of infection relapse or new infection. We used Fisher’s exact tests and Cox proportional hazards models to analyze the effect of rifampin and other factors on clinical success after PJI. Results We included 187 patients (72.2% male, median age 67 years) with a median follow-up of 36 months. The surgical intervention was a 2-stage exchange in 95 (50.8%), 1-stage exchange in 51 (27.3%), debridement and implant retention (DAIR) in 34 (18.2%), and explantation without reimplantation in 7 (3.7%) patients. Rifampin was included in the antibiotic regimen in 81 (43.3%) cases. Infection relapse occurred in 28 (15.0%), and new infection in 13 (7.0%) cases. In the time-to-event analysis, DAIR (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] = 2.15, P = .03) and antibiotic treatment over 6 weeks (adjusted HR = 0.29, P = .0002) significantly influenced treatment failure. We observed a tentative evidence for a beneficial effect of adding rifampin to the antibiotic treatment—though not statistically significant for treatment failure (adjusted HR = 0.5, P = .07) and not for relapses (adjusted HR = 0.5, P = .10). Conclusions We conclude that a rifampin combination is not markedly superior in Cutibacterium PJI, but a dedicated prospective multicenter study is needed.