Back to Authors

Abad, Cybele L R

0000-0002-5183-8239

Mayo Clinic

Department of Medicine, Section of Infectious Diseases, University of the Philippines Manila, UP-PGH, Manila, Philippines.

Citations 2

D‐index as a marker of bloodstream infections in patients with allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation
Vijayvargiya, Prakhar , Abad, Cybéle Lara R. , Garrigos, Zerelda Esquer , O’Horo, John C. , Walker, Randall C., Tande, Aaron J. , Abad, Cybele L R , Esquer Garrigos, Zerelda , Tande, Aaron , O'Horo, John C , Hogan, William J.

Transplant Infectious Disease | February 16, 2021 | Volume: 23 | Issue: 4 | Pages: No page available

10.1111/tid.13588 Get It

AbstractBackgroundNeutropenia is a risk factor for development of infections; however, the direct effect of neutropenia on development of bloodstream infection (BSI) is not known. D‐index, which is area between the neutrophil time curve and a neutrophil count of 0.5 × 109/L, incorporates the combined effect of severity and duration of neutropenia. We aimed to evaluate whether D‐index can be used as a marker for BSI in patients with allogeneic stem cell transplantation.MethodWe conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing allogeneic stem cell transplantation between January 1, 2005, and September 30, 2015. The primary outcome measure was the development of BSI within 30 days of transplantation.ResultsA total of 714 patients were included in the study of whom 101 developed BSI. Patients with BSI had a significantly higher median D‐index value compared with patients who did not have BSI (4990 vs. 3570, P < .001). As a marker, the performance of the D‐index was similar to that of the duration of profound neutropenia (P = .18) and significantly better than the total duration of neutropenia (P = .001).ConclusionThe D‐index performed better than the total duration of neutropenia as a marker for BSI in patients with allogeneic stem cell transplantation. There was no difference between D‐index and, a more easily calculable indicator, duration of profound neutropenia.
Donor derived Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection after solid‐organ transplantation: A comprehensive review
Abad, Cybéle Lara R. , Abad, Cybele L R , Razonable, Raymund R.

Transplant Infectious Disease | July 29, 2018 | Volume: 20 | Issue: 5 | Pages: No page available

10.1111/tid.12971 Get It

AbstractBackgroundMycobacterium tuberculosis may be transmitted via the allograft to cause a morbid and potentially fatal infection after solid organ transplantation (SOT). We reviewed all reported cases of donor‐derived tuberculosis (DDTB) to provide an update on its epidemiology, clinical course, and outcome after SOT.MethodsMEDLINE, OVID, and EMBASE were reviewed from its inception until December 31, 2016 using key words donor‐derived infection, tuberculosis and solid organ transplant or transplantation.ResultsWe retrieved 36 cases of proven (n = 17), probable (n = 8), and possible (n = 11) DDTB among 16 lung, 13 kidney, 6 liver, and 1 heart recipients. Most patients were male (21/35, 60%) with median age of 48 (range 23‐68) years. Median time to clinical presentation or diagnosis was 2.7 months (range 0.2‐29). The most common donor risk factor was residence in a TB‐endemic area (13/28, 46.4%). Fever was the most frequent presenting symptom (20/36, 56.5%). Diagnosis of tuberculosis was mostly made via AFB smear or mycobacterial culture (30/36, 83.3%). Allograft involvement was expectedly common; there were almost equal proportions of pulmonary (36%), extra‐pulmonary (28%) and disseminated (36%) cases. All cases of pulmonary TB were identified only among lung transplant recipients. The median duration of TB treatment was 10.5 (range 3‐24) months. Graft loss occurred in four (4/22, 18.2%) patients. All‐cause mortality was 25% (9/36); four of nine deaths were attributed to TB.ConclusionsDonor‐derived TB presents early after SOT, most commonly as fever, and carries a high mortality risk. Donors should be screened, with particular attention to TB risk factors. Fever during the early post‐operative period should prompt a thorough evaluation for DDTB in endemic regions and among patients with “at‐risk” donors.