Back to Authors

Vollmer, Kathryn J.

Mayo Clinic

Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey

Citations 3

Adequacy of cefepime concentrations in the early phase of critical illness: A case for precision pharmacotherapy
Frazee, Erin N. , Chang, Jack , Bjergum, Matthew W., Gajić, Ognjen, Jannetto, Paul J. , Mara, Kristin C. , Meade, Laurie A., Vollmer, Kathryn J., Scheetz, Marc H. , Group, For the BLOOM Study, Frazee, Erin N , Scheetz, Marc H , Mara, Kristin C , Gajic, Ognjen , Rule, Andrew D. , Group, For the BLOOM Study

Pharmacotherapy: The Journal of Human Pharmacology and Drug Therapy | January 17, 2023 | Volume: 43 | Issue: 11 | Pages: 1112-1120

10.1002/phar.2766 Get It

AbstractStudy ObjectiveIn critically ill patients, adequacy of early antibiotic exposure has been incompletely evaluated. This study characterized factors associated with inadequate cefepime exposure in the first 24 h of critical illness.DesignProspective cohort study.SettingAcademic Medical Center.PatientsCritically ill adults treated with cefepime. Patients with acute kidney injury or treated with kidney replacement therapy or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation were excluded.InterventionNone.MeasurementsA nonlinear mixed‐effects pharmacokinetic (PK) model was developed to estimate cefepime concentrations for each patient over time. The percentage of time the free drug concentration exceeded 8 mg/L during the first 24 h of therapy was calculated (%ƒT>8; appropriate for the susceptible breakpoint for Pseudomonas aeruginosa). Factors predictive of low %ƒT>8 were explored with multivariable regression.Main ResultsIn the 100 included patients, a one‐compartment PK model was developed with first‐order elimination with covariates for weight and estimated glomerular filtration rate based on creatinine and cystatin C (eGFRSCr‐CysC). The median (interquartile range) %ƒT>8 for cefepime in the first 24 h of therapy based on this model was 85% (66%, 100%). Less than 100% ƒT>8 during first 24 h of therapy occurred in 70 (70%) individuals. Lower Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score (p = 0.032) and higher eGFRSCr‐CysC (p < 0.001) predicted a lower %ƒT>8. Central nervous system infection source was protective (i.e., associated with a higher %ƒT>8; p = 0.008).ConclusionsDuring early critical illness, cefepime concentrations were inadequate in a significant proportion of patients. Antimicrobial optimization is needed to improve the precision of pharmacotherapy in the critically ill patients.
46: Population Pharmacokinetic Evaluation of Cefepime in Critically Ill Adults
Barreto, Erin, Bjergum, Matthew W., Vollmer, Kathryn J., Meade, Laurie, Fogelson, Lindsay A., Jannetto, Paul J. , Frazee, Erin N. , Scheetz, Marc H. , Mara, Kristin C. , Gajic, Ognjen , O’Horo, John C. , Reid, Joel M. , Rule, Andrew D.

Critical Care Medicine | December 18, 2020 | Volume: 49 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 24-24

10.1097/01.ccm.0000726212.71169.16 Get It

Cystatin C: A Primer for Pharmacists
Teaford, Hilary R. , Barreto, Jason N. , Vollmer, Kathryn J., Frazee, Erin N. , Frazee, Erin N , Barreto, Jason N , Rule, Andrew D.

Pharmacy | March 10, 2020 | Volume: 8 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 35

10.3390/pharmacy8010035 Get It

Pharmacists are at the forefront of dosing and monitoring medications eliminated by or toxic to the kidney. To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of these medications, accurate measurement of kidney function is paramount. The mainstay of kidney assessment for drug dosing and monitoring is serum creatinine (SCr)-based estimation equations. Yet, SCr has known limitations including its insensitivity to underlying changes in kidney function and the numerous non-kidney factors that are incompletely accounted for in equations to estimate glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). Serum cystatin C (cysC) is a biomarker that can serve as an adjunct or alternative to SCr to evaluate kidney function for drug dosing. Pharmacists must be educated about the strengths and limitations of cysC prior to applying it to medication management. Not all patient populations have been studied and some evaluations demonstrated large variations in the relationship between cysC and GFR. Use of eGFR equations incorporating cysC should be reserved for drug management in scenarios with demonstrated outcomes, including to improve pharmacodynamic target attainment for antibiotics or reduce drug toxicity. This article provides an overview of cysC, discusses evidence around its use in medication dosing and in special populations, and describes practical considerations for application and implementation.