Fogelson, Lindsay A.

OBJECTIVES: Estimated glomerular filtration rate is more accurate with combined creatinine and cystatin C equations (eGFRcr-cys) than creatinine alone. This study created and evaluated a cefepime dosing nomogram based on eGFRcr-cys for initial dosing in the critically ill. DESIGN: Pharmacokinetic modeling and simulation study. SETTING: Academic medical center. PATIENTS: Critically ill adults treated with cefepime. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Data from 120 patients with baseline cystatin C and follow-up cefepime levels were used to develop a nomogram based on eGFRcr-cys and weight for initial cefepime dosing. The predicted proportion of patients who achieved a free cefepime concentration above the minimum inhibitory concentration of the organism for 100% of the dosing interval in the first 24 hours (100% ƒT > MIC at 24 hr) was compared between administered doses and those predicted by the nomogram doses. Overall drug exposure was estimated with the free area under the concentration time curve from 0 to 24 hours (ƒAUC0–24) and compared between administered and nomogram doses. Achievement of 100% ƒT > MIC at 24 hours was predicted to be significantly better with the nomogram compared with the administered dose (76% vs. 38%; p < 0.001). The median ƒAUC0–24 as predicted by the nomogram (666 mg·hr/L) was slightly higher than the actual ƒAUC0–24 with administered doses (612 mg·hr/L; p = 0.01), but the nomogram led to fewer ƒAUC0–24 values which were either too high (> 900) or too low (< 300) (7% vs. 20%; p = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: Use of a cystatin C-inclusive dosing nomogram for cefepime could improve target attainment without increasing the risk of potentially toxic levels in the critically ill.

In this qualitative study, we explored perspectives of patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) and their families on the Get to Know Me board (GTKMB). Of the 46 patients approached, 38 consented to participate. Of the 66 family members approached, 60 consented to participate. Most patients (26, 89%) and family members (52, 99%) expressed that GTKMB was important in recognizing patient's humanity. Most patients (20, 68%) and families (39, 74%) said that it helped to build a better relationship with the provider team. 60% of patients and families commented that the GTKMB was used as a platform by providers to interact with them. Up to 45 (85%) of the family members supported specific contents of the GTKMB. In structured interviews (11 patients, 7 family members), participants additionally commented on ways providers used the GTKMB to communicate, support patient's personhood, and on caveats in interacting with GTKMB. Critically ill patients and families found the GTKMB helpful in preserving personhood of patient, fostering communication, and building relationships with clinicians.