Giannini, Caterina

Abstract Background Glioblastoma IDH-wildtype (GBM) may be diagnosed histologically (hGBM) or based on molecular features when microvascular proliferation and histologic necrosis are absent (mGBM). Clinical and radiographic distinction between hGBM and mGBM remains unclear. Methods 101 hGBM cases were matched to 109 mGBM cases by age, sex, year of diagnosis, and TERT promoter mutation (TERTp) status. Clinical outcome, radiographic, and molecular features were compared across mGBM and hGBM. Results Median time from first MRI to diagnosis was longer for mGBM versus hGBM (34 vs 7 days, p < .001). mGBM more often presented with seizures (51% vs 26%, p < .001), gliomatosis pattern (12% vs 2%, p = .005), basal ganglia involvement (17% vs 0%, p < .001). Contrast enhancement appeared on MRI for 98% (96/98) of hGBM and 50% (54/107) of mGBM (p < .001). mGBM with non-enhancing MRI were rarely multifocal (2% vs 30%, p < .001). mGBM harbored fewer total copy number alterations (median 20 vs 16.5, p = .029), less often had EGFRamp (34% vs 48%, p = .051), isolated chromosome 10 loss (84% vs 96%, p = .013), and CDKN2A/B homozygous deletion (56% vs 77%, p = .005). Median overall survival was longer for mGBM (2.16 vs 1.44 years, p < .001), and for mGBM without MRI contrast enhancement versus hGBM with enhancement (3.11 vs 1.62 years, adjusted p = .003). mGBM without +7/−10 or without CDKN2A/B homozygous deletion had longer survival and time-to-progression versus hGBM with these alterations. Conclusion mGBM with MRI enhancement may represent undersampled or early/evolving hGBM. mGBM that are non-enhancing, present with seizures, prolonged time to diagnosis, absent CDKN2A/B alteration or +7/−10 may represent other IDH-wildtype entities.

Abstract Background DNA methylation profiling can be used to robustly predict postsurgical outcomes and response to radiotherapy (RT) for meningioma patients. To allow for seamless integration of these complementary models into clinical practice, a practical framework is needed. Methods We leveraged a cohort of nearly 2000 surgically-treated meningiomas with DNA methylation profiling and clinical outcomes data. Existing methylation-based prediction models were dichotomized to yield four risk groups: low and high recurrent risk, each with RT sensitive and resistant subgroups. Risk groups were correlated with progression-free survival in the context of existing biomarkers including extent of resection and WHO grade. Results We first demonstrated that all risk groups benefit from gross total resection. All “high-risk, RT sensitive” tumors (n = 306, 15.7%) also benefited from adjuvant RT: after GTR, median PFS increased from 4.68 (4.13-9.48) years to not reached (P = .003); after subtotal resection (STR), from 2.12 (1.59-3.02) to 4.09 (3.41-not reached) years (P = .004). “Low-risk, RT sensitive cases” (n = 1207, 61.8%) also benefited from RT after STR (median PFS 7.39 (6.66-12.8) vs. 16.53 (10.35-not reached) years, P = .03), suggesting that RT be considered in these patients. Neither “low-risk RT resistant” (n = 84, 4.3%) nor “high-risk RT resistant” (n = 356, 18.2%) cases benefited from RT, and the latter group was associated with universally poor outcomes. Conclusions We identify methylation-defined risk groups of meningioma for which additional benefit is gained from adjuvant RT, leading to a clinical decision-making framework for straightforward integration of molecular models into clinical practice.

Abstract Glioblastoma (GBM) diagnosis integrates morphology and tumor molecular alterations. Patients with classic morphology are designated as histologic GBM (hGBM). Patients without classic morphology harboring TERT promoter mutation (TERTp), or epidermal growth factor receptor amplification (EGFRamp), or combined gain of chromosome 7 and loss of 10 (+7/-10) designate molecular GBM (mGBM). We compared radiographic features, genomic alterations, and clinical outcome between hGBM and mGBM. 109 mGBM Mayo Clinic cases diagnosed between 1993-2021 were matched to 101 cGBM by age, sex, year of diagnosis, and TERT promoter (TERTp) status. Clinical and radiographic data abstraction was blinded. Progression-free and overall survival were compared across groups in the subset of patients who received standard of care. Contrast enhancement was present on index MRI (MRI at diagnosis) for 98% (96/98) hGBM and 50% (54/107) mGBM (p<0.0001) patients. mGBM tumors harbored fewer total copy number alterations (median of 16.5 vs 20, p=0.029) and were less likely to have CDKN2A/B homozygous deletion (56% vs 77%, p=0.005). Among the 87 mGBM and 82 hGBM receiving standard of care, median overall survival was longer for mGBM versus hGBM (2.24 vs 1.62 years, p=0.016). mGBM patients with +7/-10 (HR=2.60, p=0.035) or CDKN2A/B (HR=3.61, p=0.002) had poorer overall survival compared to mGBM patients without the corresponding alteration. On index MRI mGBM patients without contrast enhancement had better overall survival compared to hGBM (HR=0.50; p=0.003) whereas there was no survival difference between mGBM with enhancement and hGBM. mGBM with enhancement on index MRI likely represent undersampled, or early / evolving hGBM. mGBM patients with non-enhancing MRI, younger than 60, with long symptom profile including seizures, and some combination of non-anaplastic morphology, TERTp only, no homozygous deletion of CDKN2A/B, and low copy number complexity may represent other IDHwt glioma entities. Caution is advised in counseling, management, discussing prognosis, and inclusion in clinical trials.

Abstract BACKGROUND CNS ependymal tumors rarely demonstrate mixed subependymal and ependymal pathology. The clinical course of these tumors is difficult to predict, but prior studies have identified TERT mutations and loss of chromosome 6 as poor prognostic factors in these tumors when located in the posterior fossa. METHODS In this retrospective single-institution study, patients with a diagnosis of mixed subependymoma/ependymoma were identified and chart reviewed to describe demographics, pathological findings, treatment courses and clinical outcomes. RESULTS Eleven patients (median age 57, 2 female, 9 male) were identified. Ten tumors were in the posterior fossa and 1 in the cervical spine. At diagnosis, 2 underwent gross total resection, 8 underwent subtotal resection, and 1 was only biopsied. Radiotherapy was administered to 5 patients at initial diagnosis (54Gy in 30 fractions). Systemic therapy (temozolomide and bevacizumab) was administered at recurrence to 2 patients. Loss of chromosome 6 was present in 5 /11 patients and TERT mutations were present in 4/11 patients, with both present in 3/11 patients. Median progression-free survival (mPFS) was 90.1 months (95% CI: 90.1–NA), with 3 progression events observed at 22, 90, and 107 months. Median follow-up duration was 27.9 months. Receiving radiotherapy had a longer mPFS (98 vs 22 months, p=0.15), although non-significant. At the time of data cut-off none of the patients were deceased. CONCLUSIONS Mixed subependymoma/ependymoma is a rare diagnosis with varying clinical outcomes. Our case series demonstrated that the majority of patients did not exhibit the previously identified poor prognostic factors. Although non-significant due to limited case numbers, radiotherapy was suggestive of longer mPFS.

Abstract The 2021 WHO classification redefined glioblastoma IDH-wildtype (GBM), integrating histopathological and tumor molecular features. Diffuse astrocytic glioma lacking histologic features of necrosis and microvascular proliferation are classified as (molecular) GBM if the tumor is IDH- and H3-wildtype and has one or more additional tumor molecular alterations: TERT promoter mutation, EGFR amplification, or +7/-10. Due to the absence of histopathological features of classic GBM and presentation without enhancement on MRI in approximately 50% of cases, molecular GBM frequently resemble low-grade IDH-mutant gliomas. We hypothesized that MRI-based deep learning models could distinguish IDH-mutant glioma from molecular GBM. We retrospectively identified 97 individuals with molecular GBM, who were matched to 97 individuals with IDH-mutant glioma by age, sex, year of diagnosis, and enhancement on MRI. Of the 97 IDH-mutant gliomas, 51% were 1p/19q codeleted, 42% grade 2, 47% grade 3, and 10% grade 4. Preoperative postcontrast T1-weighted (T1C) and T2-weighted (T2) MRI sequences were used to train a 3D-DenseNet121 model. The model was validated on an independent prospective set of 150 IDH-mutant gliomas and 71 molecular GBM. The MRI-based deep learning model achieved an area under the receiver operator curve (AUC) of 0.75 (95% CI: 0.68-0.82) in the prospective validation set. Sex-stratified AUCs were 0.72 (95% CI: 0.59-0.85) for females and 0.76 (95% CI: 0.68-0.85) for males. Age stratified AUCs were 0.71 (95% CI: 0.60-0.83) for patients under 55 years of age and 0.64 (95% CI: 0.50-0.79) for patients older than 55. These results suggest that discriminative MRI features of IDH-mutant glioma and molecular GBM exist and can be identified from deep learning models. However, radiographic ambiguity exists and underscores the need for further optimization of the deep learning architecture or by integrating additional non-invasive modalities. For example, future work entails integrating germline variants into the model, including rs55705857, which is a causal variant for IDH-mutant glioma. With further validation and integration of multi-modal data, a noninvasive tool may support more personalized decision-making.

Abstract IDH-wildtype diffuse astrocytic gliomas with lower-grade histological features alongside specific genomic alterations (e.g., TERT promoter mutation, EGFR amplification, gain Chr7/loss Chr10) are presently diagnosed as glioblastoma, IDH-wildtype (GBM) under WHO 2021 criteria. Previous analyses categorized these into “early/evolving” or “surgically undersampled” GBMs. However, it remains unclear whether these tumors share identical clinical and prognostic features with histologic GBM. Data from IDH-wt molecular GBMs across six institutions were aggregated. Astrocytic IDH-wt tumors of any grade that lacked necrosis or microvascular proliferation on initial histopathology yet exhibited molecular alterations consistent with WHO 2021 GBM diagnosis, were included. Recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) was used to categorize patients into risk groups based on overall survival (OS). Among the 264 patients included, the median age was 60 years (IQR: 51-67), with 162 (61%) being male. Additionally, 210 (80%) were diagnosed since 2016, and 216 (82%) received chemoradiation plus adjuvant temozolomide (GBM-SOC). The median follow-up period was 3.9 years (95% CI: 3.4, 4.6). Identified univariate risk factors for worse survival included older age, biopsy-only status, EGFR amplification, absence of initial adjuvant treatment, low post-operative KPS, and tumor histologic grade of 3. RPA divided patients into four distinct survival groups (p<0.0001). The “best” risk group comprised lower grade (<=2) tumors (n=58, median OS (mOS): 40 months (95% CI: 33, NA)). The “second best” group included Grade 3 patients receiving GBM-SOC without steroids during initial RT (n=139, mOS: 25 months (95% CI: 22, 28)). The “second worst” group encompassed Grade 3 patients who were on steroids during initial RT while receiving GBM-SOC (n=38, mOS: 15 months (95% CI: 13, 20)). The “worst” group contained Grade 3 tumors that had not undergone SOC (n=29, mOS: 9 months (95% CI: 4, 26)). These data show that histologic features and treatment are strong indicators of patient outcomes.

Abstract Zanubrutinib is a second-generation Bruton Tyrosine Kinase (BTK) inhibitor, FDA-approved for Mantle Cell Lymphoma (MCL), designed to be more selective and potentially better tolerated than first-generation agents like Ibrutinib. Progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML), a rare but severe complication, has not previously been reported with Zanubrutinib. We report a 74-year-old woman with a germline CHEK2 mutation and asymptomatic MCL (CD5+, cyclin D1+, Ki67 10–20%) diagnosed in 2016, managed with surveillance. In 2023, she was also diagnosed with localized breast cancer treated with lumpectomy and exemestane. Later that year, she developed new headaches. Brain MRI revealed diffuse bilateral pachymeningeal enhancement, suspicious for lymphomatous spread, without parenchymal involvement. By early 2024, follow-up imaging showed stable pachymeningeal enhancement with new scattered punctate right frontal subcortical lesions, coinciding with systemic MCL progression. Spinal imaging revealed epidural and bone marrow involvement; CSF was negative for malignancy. Zanubrutinib was initiated in March 2024. By August 2024, new bilateral frontal and parietal fuzzy hyperintense and faintly enhancing white matter lesions emerged, while prior punctate lesions regressed. Biopsy confirmed PML with JC virus DNA by in situ hybridization and absence of B-cell clonality. Zanubrutinib was discontinued. Follow-up imaging showed regression of lesions without new enhancement, consistent with immune reconstitution. The initial subcortical punctate lesions remained stable. In 2025, she was diagnosed with localized pancreatic adenocarcinoma, precluding cytotoxic therapy initially due to concern for PML reactivation. However, as of May 2025, neuroimaging remains stable, and patient was started on palliative gemcitabine/paclitaxel. This is the first reported case of PML associated with Zanubrutinib. It underscores the importance of vigilance for PML even in patients without overt immunosuppression, especially those with overlapping malignancies and treatment exposures in the correct clinical context.

Abstract BACKGROUND The phase III ECOG-ACRIN E3F05 trial tested whether combined therapy with radiation and concomitant followed by adjuvant temozolomide is more effective than radiation alone in patients with grade II gliomas. The study incorporated 1p/19q analysis but predated assessment of IDH mutational status. We previously reported that the addition of temozolomide to radiotherapy significantly improved overall survival in grade II gliomas, with similar hazard ratios in co-deleted (0.56) and non-codeleted (0.53) tumors. Herein we incorporate the results of DNA methylation profiling to examine outcomes in IDHmt, non-codeleted subjects as well as co-deleted ones. METHODS All 172 subjects underwent 1p/19q co-deletion analysis as a stratification factor, 1p and 19q deletion analysis was performed on formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) gliomas by Fluorescent In Situ Hybridization (FISH) following standard methods, 97/172 (56.3%) had tissue with 60% or more tumor content available for DNA methylation profiling using Heidelberg classifier v12 and Bethesda Classifier 2.0 to ascertain classification as IDH mutant glioma and alternative evaluation of 1p/19q co-deletion status. RESULTS Of the 172 subjects, 74 (43.0%) had 1p/19q codeletion by FISH, 38 (22.1%) were IDHmt without codeletion, 14 (8.1%) were IDHwt, and 46 (26.7%) were non-codeleted with unknown IDH status (these include n=4 pts originally classified as 1p/19q undetermined). With a median follow-up of 130 months, the addition of TMZ to RT improved OS in patients with IDHmt, non-codeleted tumors (HR 0.15 (0.03-0.74)) and 10-year OS from 39% to 80%. In codeleted tumors, the addition of TMZ improved OS (HR 0.51 (0.19-1.42)) and 10-year OS from 68% to 90%. CONCLUSION The addition of temozolomide to radiation improves overall survival in both co-deleted and IDHmt, non-co-deleted grade II gliomas.

Abstract WSD0922-Fu is an oral, CNS-penetrant, small molecule EGFR inhibitor which potently inhibits EGFR aberrations specific to non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and glioblastoma (GBM). MC1914 (NCT04197934) is a first-in-human phase 1 trial in patients with EGFR aberrant recurrent GBM and NSCLC. After determining the maximum tolerated dose, adults with recurrent GBM were treated in two expansion cohorts: (a) non-surgical cohort (6/12 patients thus far): EGFRvIII mutation, first recurrence; food-effect study included (b) surgical cohort (6/6 patients), any EGFR mutation, any recurrence; window-of-opportunity study (WOO) included. Among these 12 patients, median age = 60 years; 50% female; 58% ECOG 0). All patients received prior radiation and temozolomide. After the WOO or food-effect study, patients were dosed at 120 mg BID (5 days on, 2 days off), and escalated to 160 mg BID (5 days on, 2 days off) based on tolerability. Common adverse events (>40%) are comparable to other EGFR inhibitors (acneiform rash, diarrhea, fatigue, xerosis, pruritis). Treatment-related grade 3+ adverse events were limited to lymphopenia (n = 1). WSD0922-Fu exposure in the fed state exceeded the fasted state (median plasma Cmax and AUC0-24h are 1.6x and 1.3x, respectively) with a delayed Tmax (6.0 vs 1.8 hours). For the WOO, time between last dose administered to tumor collection ranged between 4 - 13.5 hours. Median tumor WSD0922-Fu concentration was 0.76 µg/g; estimated median unbound tumor concentration was 24.9 ng/g and within expectations for pharmacodynamic effect. Median brain/plasma ratio = 0.59; median unbound brain/unbound plasma = 0.88. Enrollment to the non-surgical cohort is ongoing, so formal efficacy data remain immature. However, examples of clinical efficacy will be shown along with data on recurrence patterns. Phase 2 clinical trial development is in progress.

Abstract Background Disruption of the blood–brain barrier (BBB) in high-grade brain tumors is characterized by contrast accumulation on diagnostic imaging. This window of opportunity study correlates contrast imaging features with the tumor distribution of BBB-permeable (levetiracetam) and -impermeable (cefazolin) drugs. Methods Patients with a clinical diagnosis of a high-grade brain tumor underwent MRI for surgical planning. Cefazolin and levetiracetam were administered prior to skin incision, and serial plasma and image-registered tumor samples were collected during the operation. Drug levels were measured by LC-MS/MS, tissue drug levels were corrected for residual blood, and tumor-to-plasma concentration ratios were calculated. Intraoperative microdialysis was performed in a subset of patients to measure the same two drugs. Results Tumor (n = 125) and plasma (n = 261) samples were available for analysis from 42 operative cases. Across all samples, the tumor-to-plasma ratio was significantly lower for cefazolin (marginal mean [MM]: 0.15, 95% CI: 0.11–0.19) as compared to levetiracetam (MM: 0.70, 95% CI: 0.64–0.75; P < .001). When compared between contrast-enhancing and non-enhancing regions, tumor-to-plasma ratios for cefazolin varied by 4.4-fold (0.27, 95% CI: 0.20–0.35 vs. 0.06, 95% CI: 0.04–0.08, respectively; P < .001), and varied for levetiracetam by 1.4-fold (0.88, 95% CI: 0.78–0.97 vs. 0.61, 95% CI: 0.55–0.66, respectively; P < .001). These results were confirmed with the intra-operative microdialysis and a population pharmacokinetic analysis. Conclusions This study demonstrates significant inter- and intra-tumoral heterogeneity in drug delivery for both levetiracetam and cefazolin within high-grade brain tumors that is not necessarily predicted by clinical MR imaging and may reflect tumor-induced changes in both perfusion and BBB integrity.