Back to Authors

Odukoya, AbdulLateef

Mayo Clinic

Mayo Clinic

Citations 2

Comparison of clinical, radiographic and genomic alterations between histologic and molecular glioblastoma, IDH -wildtype
Lachance, Daniel H , Decker, Paul A. , Kosel, Matthew , Odukoya, AbdulLateef, Maqbool, Muhammad Asad , Jenkins, Robert B. , Eckel‐Passow, Jeanette E. , Odukoya, Lateef A , Kollmeyer, Thomas M. , Praska, Corinne E, Odukoya, AbdulLateef A, Tobin, William Oliver, Galanis, Evanthia , Giannini, Caterina , Vaubel, Rachel A, Ida, Cris M, Jenkins, RB , Eckel-Passow, Jeanette E , Odukoya, Lateef A , Lachance, Daniel , Decker, Paul A. , Drucker, Kristen , Praska, Corinne , Kizilbash, Sani H. , Shafqat, Shameel , Tobin, W. Oliver , Parney, Ian F. , Burns, Terry C. , Galanis, Evanthia , Giannini, Caterina , Vaubel, Rachael A. , Ida, Cristiane M.

Neuro-Oncology Advances | December 16, 2025 | Volume: 8 | Issue: 1 | Pages: No page available

10.1093/noajnl/vdaf260 Get It

Abstract Background Glioblastoma IDH-wildtype (GBM) may be diagnosed histologically (hGBM) or based on molecular features when microvascular proliferation and histologic necrosis are absent (mGBM). Clinical and radiographic distinction between hGBM and mGBM remains unclear. Methods 101 hGBM cases were matched to 109 mGBM cases by age, sex, year of diagnosis, and TERT promoter mutation (TERTp) status. Clinical outcome, radiographic, and molecular features were compared across mGBM and hGBM. Results Median time from first MRI to diagnosis was longer for mGBM versus hGBM (34 vs 7 days, p < .001). mGBM more often presented with seizures (51% vs 26%, p < .001), gliomatosis pattern (12% vs 2%, p = .005), basal ganglia involvement (17% vs 0%, p < .001). Contrast enhancement appeared on MRI for 98% (96/98) of hGBM and 50% (54/107) of mGBM (p < .001). mGBM with non-enhancing MRI were rarely multifocal (2% vs 30%, p < .001). mGBM harbored fewer total copy number alterations (median 20 vs 16.5, p = .029), less often had EGFRamp (34% vs 48%, p = .051), isolated chromosome 10 loss (84% vs 96%, p = .013), and CDKN2A/B homozygous deletion (56% vs 77%, p = .005). Median overall survival was longer for mGBM (2.16 vs 1.44 years, p < .001), and for mGBM without MRI contrast enhancement versus hGBM with enhancement (3.11 vs 1.62 years, adjusted p = .003). mGBM without +7/−10 or without CDKN2A/B homozygous deletion had longer survival and time-to-progression versus hGBM with these alterations. Conclusion mGBM with MRI enhancement may represent undersampled or early/evolving hGBM. mGBM that are non-enhancing, present with seizures, prolonged time to diagnosis, absent CDKN2A/B alteration or +7/−10 may represent other IDH-wildtype entities.
PATH-104. Comparison of clinical, radiographic and genomic alterations between classic and molecular glioblastoma, IDH-wildtype (updated report)
Decker, Paul, Kollmeyer, Thomas , Kosel, Matthew , Odukoya, AbdulLateef, Kizilbash, Sani H. , Maqbool, Asad, Ida, Cris, Jenkins, Robert B. , Passow, Jeanette E. Eckel, Kollmeyer, Thomas M. , Kizilbash, Sani H , Lachance, Daniel Honore , Drucker, Kristen , Praska, Corinne , Maqbool, Asad, Shafqat, Shameel , Tobin, W. Oliver , Burns, Terry C. , Parney, Ian F. , Galanis, Evanthia , Giannini, Caterina , Vaubel, Rachael A.

Neuro-Oncology | November 11, 2025 | Volume: 27 | Issue: Supplement_5 | Pages: v266-v266

10.1093/neuonc/noaf201.1056 Get It

Abstract Glioblastoma (GBM) diagnosis integrates morphology and tumor molecular alterations. Patients with classic morphology are designated as histologic GBM (hGBM). Patients without classic morphology harboring TERT promoter mutation (TERTp), or epidermal growth factor receptor amplification (EGFRamp), or combined gain of chromosome 7 and loss of 10 (+7/-10) designate molecular GBM (mGBM). We compared radiographic features, genomic alterations, and clinical outcome between hGBM and mGBM. 109 mGBM Mayo Clinic cases diagnosed between 1993-2021 were matched to 101 cGBM by age, sex, year of diagnosis, and TERT promoter (TERTp) status. Clinical and radiographic data abstraction was blinded. Progression-free and overall survival were compared across groups in the subset of patients who received standard of care. Contrast enhancement was present on index MRI (MRI at diagnosis) for 98% (96/98) hGBM and 50% (54/107) mGBM (p<0.0001) patients. mGBM tumors harbored fewer total copy number alterations (median of 16.5 vs 20, p=0.029) and were less likely to have CDKN2A/B homozygous deletion (56% vs 77%, p=0.005). Among the 87 mGBM and 82 hGBM receiving standard of care, median overall survival was longer for mGBM versus hGBM (2.24 vs 1.62 years, p=0.016). mGBM patients with +7/-10 (HR=2.60, p=0.035) or CDKN2A/B (HR=3.61, p=0.002) had poorer overall survival compared to mGBM patients without the corresponding alteration. On index MRI mGBM patients without contrast enhancement had better overall survival compared to hGBM (HR=0.50; p=0.003) whereas there was no survival difference between mGBM with enhancement and hGBM. mGBM with enhancement on index MRI likely represent undersampled, or early / evolving hGBM. mGBM patients with non-enhancing MRI, younger than 60, with long symptom profile including seizures, and some combination of non-anaplastic morphology, TERTp only, no homozygous deletion of CDKN2A/B, and low copy number complexity may represent other IDHwt glioma entities. Caution is advised in counseling, management, discussing prognosis, and inclusion in clinical trials.