Perez, Edith A.

Abstract Background: Treatment of aromatase refractory metastatic breast cancer (MBC) is difficult and challenging. Estrogen receptor (ER) resistance causes enhanced expression of the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF).Several studies have shown that the ER interacts with the VEGF pathway and is an important mechanism of resistance. Therefore we embarked on a phase II study of fulvestrant, a complete ER suppressor and bevacizumab, a well studied VEGF monoclonal antibody in aromatase refractory MBC patients. Methods: A single stage phase II study with an interim analysis of fulvestrant and bevacizumab was conducted with these objectives: 6 month progression-free survival rate (PFS), tumor response, toxicity, and overall survival. Regimen: fulvestrant 250 mg day1 and 15 (cycle 1) then day 1 (cycle 2 and beyond) and bevacizumab 10mg/kg days 1 and 15 of each 4 weeks is a cycle. Results: At the time of interim analysis, 11/20 evaluable patients achieved 3-month progression-free survival status while remaining on treatment for at least 3 months, not meeting the protocol specified efficacy requirements and thus halting accrual. 36 patients were enrolled from September 2007-December 2008; 33 patients were evaluable. Number of prior metastatic chemotherapy regimens: 0 in 26 patients and 1 in 7 patients. 22 (67%) patients received prior hormonal therapy in the metastatic setting. 18 (55%) had measurable disease. A median of 6 cycles (range 1-19) were administered. 12/33 evaluable patients (95% CI:20-55%) achieved 6-month progression-free survival status while remaining on treatment for a least 6 months. Among 18 patients with measurable disease, 2 (11%) patients CI:1.4-35%) had a confirmed tumor reponse (both PR). Additionally, 2 patients had stable disease for greater than 6 months, for a clinical benefit rate of 22%. Median follow up was 8.5 months (range 1.7-17.5 months). Median progression-free survival was 6.2 months (95% CI:5.4-10.1 months). The 6 -month overall survival rate was 84.8% (95% CI 73.5-98%). The median dose level administered was 250 mg for fulvestrant and 10 mg/kg for bevacizumab for cycles 1-19. The most common grade 3/4 adverse events (AEs) were hypertension 2 (6%), headache pain 2 (6%), and confusion 2 (6%). There was 1 grade 5 central nervous system hemorrhage. 13 (39%) patients experienced a grade 3 non-hematologic AE and 4 (12%) experience a grade 4+ non-hematologic AE. Conclusion: Fulvestrant/bevacizumab is safe and tolerable. Although this regimen did not meet its statistical endpoint, 22% of evaluable patients with aromatase refractory diesease achieved clinical benefit with minimal toxicity. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2009;69(24 Suppl):Abstract nr 4096.

Abstract Background: Aromatase inhibitor (AI) therapy effectively increases disease-free survival in postmenopausal women (PMW) with ER+ and/or PR+ breast cancer (BCa). However, the use of AIs results in nearly complete ablation of estrogen production which can lead to accelerated bone loss and increased fracture risk. The Z-FAST study evaluated the efficacy and safety of zoledronic acid (ZOL) in preventing AI associated bone loss in PMW with early breast cancer (EBC) who received adjuvant letrozole (LET).Material and Methods: 602 PMW with stage I-IIIa ER+ and/or PR+ BCa starting LET (2.5 mg qd x 5 yrs) were randomized (1:1) to upfront ZOL (4 mg IV q 6 mos) vs delayed ZOL. The delayed arm (D) received ZOL when either the post-baseline T-score decreased to <-2 or a clinical fracture occurred. All patients (pts) were treated with calcium and vitamin D. The primary endpoint, the percent change in lumbar spine (LS) bone mineral density (BMD) at 12 mos, was previously reported (JCO; 25:829, 2007). The 5 year (5y) final study results are reported here.Discussion: Baseline characteristics were similar between groups. 180 pts in upfront ZOL arm (U) and 175 pts in D completed full 5y study. Of pts with BMD data available, U (n=140) showed a mean increase of 6.2% in LS BMD while D (n=132) showed a mean decrease of 2.4%, resulting in an absolute difference of 8.6% (p<0.001). U (n=141) showed a mean increase of 2.6% in total hip (TH) BMD while D (n=132) showed a mean decrease of 4.1%, resulting in an absolute difference of 6.7% (p<0.001). When BMD data in D was excluded after pts started ZOL (censored analysis), the absolute difference in LS and TH BMD between the two arms was 11.3% and 8.7%, respectively. Among pts with baseline LS T-score between -1 and -2, 27.9% (19) U pts [8.6% (7) D pts] returned to normal T-score (T-score >-1), and no U pts as compared to 4.9%(4) D pts became severely osteopenic (T <-2). 17.7% (53) D pts met criteria that required initiation of ZOL. Although the study was not designed to detect a significant difference in the fracture rate between treatment arms, fractures occurred in 10.7% (29) U pts and 12.4% (33) D pts. Administration of ZOL q 6 mos for up to 5y was safe and well tolerated. No serious renal adverse events suspected related to ZOL and no confirmed osteonecrosis of the jaw cases (ONJ) were reported. Disease recurrence including death due to disease progression was reported in 7.0%, 95% C.I. (3.7%-10.3%) from K-M (16) pts in U, and 8.8%, 95% C.I. (5.2%-12.5%) (21) pts in D.Conclusion: The 5y follow-up of the Z-FAST trial show that the overall difference in the percentage change in BMD between U and D, at both LS and TH, progressively increased from baseline through 5y. These data demonstrate that ZOL 4mg IV q 6 mos is effective in preventing bone loss associated with adjuvant AI therapy in PMW with EBC. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2009;69(24 Suppl):Abstract nr 4083.

Abstract Background: Despite the impressive results of the trastuzumab adjuvant therapy trials, 15% of patients (pts) with HER2 overexpressing or amplified breast cancer developed tumor relapse at 4 years. Lapatinib is a reversible tyrosine kinase inhibitor against ErbB1 and ErbB2. The current study was developed to assess the cardiac safety and feasibility of adding lapatinib to paclitaxel and trastuzumab following doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide as part of adjuvant therapy.Methods: A single-arm phase II study of doxorubicin (A, 60 mg/m2 day 1) and cyclophosphamide (C, 600 mg/m2 day 1) [q2w or q3w for 4 cycles]; followed by PTL: paclitaxel (P, 80 mg/m2 weekly), trastuzumab (T, 4 mg/kg loading dose then 2 mg/kg weekly), and lapatinib (L, 1000 mg PO daily which was later amended to 750 mg) [total of 12 weeks of treatment]; followed by T (6 mg/kg day 1, every 3 weeks) and L (1000 mg PO daily) [total of 40 weeks of treatment] was conducted. The primary endpoint was severe symptomatic congestive heart failure (CHF: New York Heart Association Class III or IV with a drop in left ventricular ejection fraction [LVEF] of at least 10 percentage points to below 50% confirmed by cardiologist) with secondary endpoints of cardiac death and grade 3+ cardiac adverse events (AEs).Results: From April 2007 to October 2008, 109 evaluable pts were enrolled and initiated study treatment. Median age was 51 (range 28-72). Median follow-up is 10.2 months. No pts experienced CHF or cardiac death while on active treatment. One pt had CHF and 1 pt died due to myocardial infarction (MI) after they went off study treatment. The pt with CHF refused further treatment after completing 2 cycles of PTL and had CHF 1.8 months post PTL discontinuation with LVEF of 45% and dyspnea on exertion. The pt with MI went off study treatment due to non-cardiac AEs after completing 2 cycles of PTL and died 2.9 months post PTL discontinuation. Mean LVEF at baseline was 63.6% (N=109, SD=5.7); end of AC was 63.3% (N=104, SD=6.4); end of PTL was 59.9% (N=89, SD=8.3); and cycle 12 was 59.7% (N=66, SD=7.1). Grade 3+ non-hematologic AEs with incidence >5% include diarrhea (N=42, 39% & included both 1000mg & later amended 750mg dosing), fatigue (N=15, 14%), nausea (N=7, 6%), vomiting (N=7, 6%), acne (N=6, 6%), and hypokalemia (N=6, 6%). Pre-treatment cardiac marker data (troponin-T, troponin-I, brain natriuretic peptide, creatine kinase MB isoenzyme) will also be presented.Conclusions: Preliminary data suggest that the inclusion of L does not add to the cardiac profile of T. Data from ALTTO and long-term follow data are needed to confirm the cardiac safety of this regimen. Cardiac marker data are being analyzed in the context of changes in LVEF. We gratefully acknowledge support from the Breast Cancer Research Foundation and GlaxoSmthKline for this study. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2009;69(24 Suppl):Abstract nr 3086.

Abstract Background: MA17 showed that adjuvant letrozole after 5 years of tamoxifen markedly reduced the risk of recurrence in women with ER+ early stage breast cancer and improved overall survival in women presenting with node +ve disease. Most trials of early adjuvant aromatase inhibitor therapy required women to be postmenopausal at diagnosis to be eligible. We report here on a subset of women in the MA17 trial who were premenopausal at initial diagnosis and in whom subsequent menopause, prior to randomization, may have influenced their outcome on extended adjuvant letrozole.Methods: Women randomized to MA17 were divided into 2 groups: 1) pre-menopausal (< 50 years of age but underwent bilateral oophorectomy at time when tamoxifen treatment started or < 50 years of age at the start of tamoxifen treatment but became amenorrheic during adjuvant chemotherapy or tamoxifen treatment) and 2) post-menopausal. Disease-free survival (DFS) from time of randomization for women in these two groups were summarized by Kaplan-Meier curves and compared based on log-rank test and Cox model.Results: 889 women were identified as premenopausal and 4,277 as postmenopausal. Treatment, age, race, duration of tamoxifen, prior adjuvant chemotherapy, and mastectomy were independently associated with menopausal status on multivariate analysis. The interaction between treatment and menopausal status was statistically significant for DFS (p=0.02), indicating that women diagnosed with pre-menopausal breast cancer had significantly greater benefit (Hazard ratio=0.25, 95% CI: 0.12-0.51) with letrozole treatment in terms of DFS than those with post-menopausal status (hazard ratio=0.69 with 95% CI from 0.52 to 0.91). In comparison with women treated with placebo, pre-menopausal women on letrozole had a significantly higher incidence of arthralgia (24 vs. 16%; p=0.004) but a lower incidence of vaginal bleeding (10 vs. 16%; p=0.01). Compared with placebo post-menopausal women receiving letrozole had a higher incidence of hot flashes/flashes (55 vs. 50%; p=0.001), arthralgia (25 vs. 21%; p=0.002), myalgia (15 vs. 12%; p=0.007) and alopecia (5 vs. 3%; p=0.003).Conclusions: Letrozole after tamoxifen was more effective in improving DFS in women who were premenopausal at primary diagnosis than those who were postmenopausal. Letrozole was well tolerated in premenopausal women. These data indicate that women who are premenopausal at the time of diagnosis but become postmenopausal anytime before, or during, adjuvant tamoxifen should be considered for extended adjuvant therapy with letrozole. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2009;69(24 Suppl):Abstract nr 13.

Abstract Abstract #6140 Background:
 Ixabepilone (ixa), the first in a new class of antineoplastic agents, showed clinical benefit in combination with capecitabine (C) in 2 large clinical trials in metastatic breast cancer (MBC) pts whose tumors were resistant to (study 046, JCO, 2007) or pretreated with anthracycline (A) and taxanes (T) (study 048). In 048, ixa + C, compared to C alone, demonstrated significant increases in PFS (HR 0.79 [0.69-0.90]) and ORR (43% vs 29%). A trend toward increased OS was seen both in 048 (HR 0.90 [0.78-1.03]) and in 046 (HR 0.90 [0.77-1.05]), which did not reach statistical significance. Similar to taxanes, dose-limiting peripheral neuropathy (PN) is a side effect associated with ixa treatment. Here we present the incidence rates, management of ixa-induced PN from 3 registrational studies in pts with MBC and an analysis of resolution time. Also, data on potential risk factors for PN are presented.
 Methods:
 Incidence of PN is summarized from a 2000 pt program from 3 multi-center clinical trials. In this program, almost 1100 pts with MBC received ixa either as a monotherapy (40 mg/m2 IV over 3h Q3w, N=126) in a phase II study, or in combination with C (1000 mg/m2 PO BID x14d Q3w) in 2 large phase III studies (N = 369 and N = 595). PN was evaluated every 4 weeks after completion of treatment until toxicity was resolved. Resolution of PN was defined as the time from onset of worst grade to baseline or grade 1. A Cox regression analysis was also performed on a dataset of 945 pts with different tumor types across multiple studies, receiving ixa as a monotherapy or in combination with C, to identify the potential risk factors for grade 3/4 PN.
 Results:
 Incidence rates of grade 3/4 PN and resolution time observed in 1 phase III study (046) and the phase II (081) have been published before (081: JCO, 25; 3407). Here we present the data from the final confirmatory phase III study (048).
 
 PN was effectively managed with dose reduction. After dose reduction, symptoms improved or did not worsen in the majority of pts, and a median of 2-3 additional treatment cycles were delivered. Pts with diabetes were at a higher risk of grade 3/4 PN (HR: 1.67 [1.00-2.78], p-value = 0.049).
 Conclusions:
 Incidence of ixa-associated PN was similar to that observed in trials of other T based regiments. Ixa-induced PN has a predictable median time to resolution of 5-6 weeks over 3 large studies. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2009;69(2 Suppl):Abstract nr 6140.

Abstract Abstract #6114 Introduction:
 Symptomatic patients (pts) with performance status (KPS) 70-80 with locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer (MBC) have worse prognosis than pts with good performance status and are often excluded from clinical trials. Ixabepilone (ixa), the first in a new class of antineoplastic agents, showed clinical benefit in 2 large clinical trials in combination with capecitabine (C) in MBC pts with tumors resistant to (study 046; JCO; 2007) or pretreated with anthracycline (A) and taxane (T) (study 048). In 048, ixa + C, compared to C alone, showed significant increases in PFS (HR 0.79 [0.69-0.90] and ORR (43% vs 29%). A trend toward increased OS was seen in 048 (HR 0.90 [0.78-1.03]) and 046 (HR 0.90 [0.77-1.05]) which did not reach statistical significance. In 046 and 048 trials, a survival benefit was seen with ixa + C in a predefined analysis in a subset of symptomatic KPS 70-80 pts (HR: 0.75 [0.58-0.98], 0.76 [0.60-0.96], respectively). We present a predefined pooled analysis of clinical outcomes in symptomatic pts from both studies to better evaluate the treatment effect in this subset.
 Methods:
 1973 pts with MBC previously treated with an A and T were randomized in phase III trials 046 and 048 to receive ixa (40mg/m2 IV over 3h Q3w) + C (1000mg/m2 PO BID x14d Q3w) or C alone (1250mg/m2 PO BID x14d Q3w). 606 pts from the 2 studies were KPS 70-80. Study outcomes included ORR, PFS and OS.
 Results:
 ORR, PFS and OS favored ixa + C in this pt population.
 
 In asymptomatic pts (KPS 90-100), similar improvement was observed in PFS and ORR; no benefit in OS was seen. Incidence of key treatment related grade 3/4 AEs for ixa + C in this subset of pts was similar to the overall population.
 Conclusions:
 In the pooled analysis, ixa + C demonstrates a survival benefit (2.8 mo) for symptomatic pts (KPS 70-80) failing A and T, which was consistently seen in this pt population in the individual studies as well, indicating that symptomatic pts can benefit from management of their disease and achieve overall clinical benefit with ixa combination. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2009;69(2 Suppl):Abstract nr 6114.

Abstract Abstract #3057 Introduction: Patients (pts) with ER/PR/HER2 negative advanced breast cancer (triple negative, TN, basal-like) have limited treatment options and a poor prognosis. Ixabepilone (ixa), the first in a new class of antineoplastic agents, showed clinical benefit in combination with capecitabine (C) in 2 large clinical trials in metastatic breast cancer (MBC) pts either resistant to (study 046; JCO, 2007) or pretreated with anthracycline (A) and taxanes (T) (study 048). In 048, ixa + C, compared to C alone, demonstrated significant increases in PFS (HR 0.79 [0.69-0.90]) and ORR (43 vs. 29%). A trend towards increased OS was seen in both 048 (HR 0.90 [0.78-1.03]) and 046 (HR 0.90 [0.77-1.05]), which did not reach statistical significance. Here we present a pooled analysis of efficacy endpoints (ORR, PFS and OS) in pts with TN disease from these 2 phase III studies.
 Methods: 1973 pts with MBC previously treated with A and T were randomized in 2 phase III trials (046 and 048) to receive either ixa (40 mg/m2 IV over 3h Q3w) + C (1000 mg/m2 PO BID x14d Q3w) or C alone (1250 mg/m2 PO BID x14d Q3w). Due to the similarity of the study populations, individual pt data from both studies was pooled to better evaluate treatment effect within pre-planned patient subgroups.
 Results: 443 pts had TN disease in the two studies combined. ORR and PFS were superior in pts receiving combination therapy compared to those on C alone with a trend towards improved survival that did not reach statistical significance.
 
 Conclusions: Ixa + C is the first combination to show statistically significant PFS benefit in pts with advanced TN breast cancer from a pooled analysis of 2 phase III trials. Clinical benefit was consistently seen pts with TN disease in the individual studies as well. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2009;69(2 Suppl):Abstract nr 3057.

Purpose We examined associations between tumor characteristics (human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 [HER2] protein expression, HER2 gene and chromosome 17 copy number, hormone receptor status) and disease-free survival (DFS) of patients in the N9831 adjuvant trastuzumab trial. Patients and Methods All patients (N = 1,888) underwent chemotherapy with doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide, followed by weekly paclitaxel with or without concurrent trastuzumab. HER2 status was determined by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) at a central laboratory, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN. Patients with conflicting local positive HER2 expression results but normal central laboratory testing were included in the analyses (n = 103). Results Patients with HER2-positive tumors (IHC 3+, FISH HER2/centromere 17 ratio ≥ 2.0, or both) benefited from trastuzumab, with hazard ratios (HRs) of 0.46, 0.49, and 0.45, respectively (all P < .0001). Patients with HER2-amplified tumors with polysomic (p17) or normal (n17) chromosome 17 copy number also benefited from trastuzumab, with HRs of 0.52 and 0.37, respectively (P < .006). Patients who received chemotherapy alone and had HER2-amplified and p17 tumors had a longer DFS than those who had n17 (78% v 68%; P = .04), irrespective of hormone receptor status or tumor grade. Patients with HER2-normal tumors by central testing (n = 103) seemed to benefit from trastuzumab, but the difference was not statistically significant (HR, 0.51; P = .14). Patients with hormone receptor–positive or –negative tumors benefited from the addition of trastuzumab, with HRs of 0.42 (P = .005) and 0.60 (P = .0001), respectively. Conclusion These results confirm that IHC or FISH HER2 testing is appropriate for patient selection for adjuvant trastuzumab therapy. Trastuzumab benefit seemed independent of HER2/centromere 17 ratio and chromosome 17 copy number.

Purpose In March 1998, Common Toxicity Criteria (CTC) version 2.0 introduced the collection of attribution of adverse events (AEs) to study drug. We investigate whether attribution adds value to the interpretation of AE data. Patients and Methods Patients in the placebo arm of two phase III trials—North Central Cancer Treatment Group Trial 97-24-51 (carboxyamino-triazole v placebo in advanced non–small-cell lung cancer) and American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Trial Z9001 (imatinib mesylate v placebo after resection of primary gastrointestinal stromal tumors)—were studied. Attribution was categorized as unrelated (not related or unlikely) and related (possible, probable, or definite). Results In total, 398 patients (84 from Trial 97-24-51 and 314 from Trial Z9001) and 7,736 AEs were included; 47% and 50% of the placebo-arm AEs, respectively, were reported as related. When the same AE was reported in the same patient on multiple visits, the attribution category changed at least once 36% and 31% of the time. AE type and sex (Trial Z9001) and AE type and performance status (Trial 97-24-51) were associated with a higher likelihood of AEs being deemed related. Conclusion Nearly 50% of AEs were reported as attributed to study drug on the placebo arm of two randomized clinical trials. These data provide strong evidence that AE attribution is difficult to determine, unreliable, and of questionable value in interpreting AE data in randomized clinical trials.

Abstract Disparities in clinical outcomes of breast cancer have been described among different racial and ethnic groups in the U.S. Convincing data exist showing that Latina women have a lower incidence of breast cancer but a higher breast cancer–related mortality rate compared with white women. Noticeable differences in breast cancer incidence are present even within different Latina subsets with a higher incidence in second- and third-generation women compared with foreign born. An increasing amount of data exists pointing to significant differences in the genetics and biology of breast cancer in Latinas as a significant contributor to the higher mortality, including a higher incidence of triple-negative breast cancers (which do not overexpress HER-2 protein and are negative for estrogen receptors and progesterone receptors). Other social and environmental factors are likely to play a significant role as well, including a lower rate of screening mammography, variable access to medical care, among others. Recent data are inconclusive regarding differences among racial/ethnic groups in the response to chemotherapy. Data on racial/ethnic variations in the pharmacogenomics of chemotherapy, endocrine treatments, and toxicity are more limited, with some data suggesting differences in frequencies of polymorphisms of genes involved in the metabolism of some of these agents. Further studies are needed on this subject.