Hallemeier, Christopher L.

Abstract This literature‐based systematic review and associated guidelines provide evidence‐based paradigms for the management of locoregionally recurrent rectal cancer (LRRC). This multispecialty committee included gastrointestinal radiation and medical oncology, gastroenterology, radiology, and colorectal surgery. As is the standard, the previously described American Radium Society Appropriate Use Criteria methodology for this project was followed rigorously, with the Population, Intervention, Comparator, Outcome, Timing, and Study Design framework and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses methodology to assess the evidence. RAND/University of California Los Angeles consensus methodology (modified Delphi) was used to rate the appropriateness of treatment options. Published between January 1, 2013, and July 16, 2025, 116 peer‐reviewed trials provided the evidence: 10 were well‐designed randomized phase 2/3 trials, 29 were moderately well designed trials that accounted for most common biases (matched cohort and phase 2), 76 trials had design limitations (retrospective), and one was a meta‐analysis. Clinical cases were created as examples to illustrate current acceptable management of LRRC. Treatment and prognosis are influenced by prior therapy and the site(s) and extent of LRRC. The ability to achieve a margin‐negative surgical resection is the ultimate determinant of survival and local control. Preoperative systemic therapy, radiation therapy, or a combination of the two can facilitate tumor downsizing and improve the likelihood of a margin‐negative resection. An individualized multidisciplinary approach is required to ensure the best outcome. Although this review does not suggest a major alteration of current practice, it provides reassuring evidence of the importance of combined‐modality therapy.

PURPOSE External beam radiation therapy (EBRT) has gained delayed acceptance as a recommended first-line treatment modality for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), given limited evidence that it improves overall survival (OS). We analyzed individual patient data (IPD) from an international cohort to assess OS among patients with HCC treated with EBRT. METHODS We performed a systematic review of publications that assessed EBRT, met prespecified technical standards for HCC, and reported OS (search date December 15, 2022). Corresponding authors were invited to submit IPD for the study. We performed Kaplan-Meier survival analyses to determine OS and restricted mean survival time (RMST) stratified by Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage and treatment status (ie, treatment-naïve and experienced). We performed random effects Cox proportional hazards modeling to assess clinical characteristics associated with OS. RESULTS Data were provided on 4,913 patients treated with EBRT with a median follow-up time of 5.0 years. The median OS was 6.8 years (95% CI, 5.7 to 8.7) for BCLC-0 and 4.6 years (95% CI, 4.1 to 5.1) for BCLC-A. Among treatment-naïve patients, the median OS was not reached (95% CI, 8.6 to not reached) for BCLC-0 and was 5.4 years (95% CI, 4.5 to 6.7) for BCLC-A. In multivariable models, more advanced BCLC stage, higher tumor burden, worse performance status, and Child-Pugh class B or C were associated with a higher risk of mortality. Ablative radiation dose and more recent year of treatment were associated with a reduced risk of death. CONCLUSION To our knowledge, this study represents the largest multinational cohort of patients with HCC treated with EBRT. OS outcomes with EBRT for very early- and early-stage HCC appear to be comparable with resection, thermal ablation, and other ablative locoregional therapies. These data support the inclusion of EBRT in the BCLC HCC clinical decision-making process.

Abstract Introduction: Liver cancer remains a leading cause of cancer mortality globally with limited treatment options for patients (pts) with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma [HCC] and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma [iCCA][1,2,3,4]. We hypothesize that combining the intratumoral dendritic cell (DC) vaccination after external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) without (phase I) and with (phase II) systemic atezolizumab and bevacizumab (atezo/bev for HCC) would enhance tumor-specific immunity and improve clinical outcomes, and present preliminary results from our phase I/II trial (NCT03942328). Methods: Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were collected at baseline (PRE), after radiation (EBRT), and after completion of DC without or with atezo/bev (POST). Single-cell RNA sequencing with TCR sequencing were analyzed using CellRanger v7.0.1, Immunopipe, Seurat v5.3.0, & Gene-set enrichment analysis (GSEA). Long EFS (EFS-L) is defined as >=12 months (mo) for phase I and >=18mo for phase II, and short EFS (EFS-S) below that. Results: Seventeen patients have been analyzed to date (Phase I: n=8 [4 HCC, 4 iCCA]; Phase II: n=9 HCC). 674,106 cells were sequenced (146,843 PRE; 168,838 EBRT; 114,437 POST). GSEA for EFS-L vs EFS-S were comparable at PRE, EBRT and POST between phase I and phase II. EFS-S was associated with enrichment of interferon alpha (IFNα; B naïve, monocytes, pDC, cDC2, NK, Treg, CD8 Tcm and Tem at PRE and POST; B intermediate, CD4 Tem and NK at EBRT) and reactive oxygen species (ROS; PRE: pDC, CD8 Tcm, Tem. EBRT: CD4 Tem. POST: CD8 T naïve Tem, CD4 Tcm & Tem, cDC2) pathways. In contrast, EFS-L was associated with enrichment of WNT-β-catenin (WNT; CD14 mono at EBRT & POST, B intermediate at EBRT), TGFb (PRE: NK; EBRT: B intermed, CD4 Tem; POST: monocytes, CD4 naïve & Tem, pDC, cDC2), and angiogenesis (EBRT: NK; POST: monocytes, cDC2) pathways. Interestingly, enrichment of protein secretion pathway in NK cells was associated with EFS-L, but among other cells were associated with EFS-S (PRE: CD16 mono, Treg; POST: CD16 mono, CD4 & D8 Tem). Compared to phase I, addition of atezo/bev in phase II pts was associated with a significant increase in Gini coefficient (p<0.0001), suggesting expansion of certain TCR clones, along with a trend for increased Gini coefficient from Pre to Post in both phase I and II. Conclusions: Preliminary analysis of this study combining EBRT with intratumoral DC vaccination +/- PD-L1/VEGF blockade identified distinct treatment-related changes in systemic cellular immune profiles. Enhanced TCR clonal diversity in phase II suggests added immunologic benefit from PD-L1/VEGF blockade. As accrual continues, integrated analyses will identify systemic immune correlates of clinical benefit and resistance to this multimodal immunotherapy approach. Citation Format: Melody Wu, Panwen Wang, Chen Wu, Ying Li, Christopher L. Hallemeier, Thomas D. Atwell, Nguyen H. Tran, Andre de Menezes Silva Corraes, Kevin Regan, Zuoyi Shao, Rayaan Kamal, Haidong Dong, Lewis R. Roberts, Sean Park, Yi Lin, Lionel Aurelien Kankeu Fonkoua. Radiation-dendritic cell combination therapy drives systemic cellular immune shifts in liver cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2026; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2026 Apr 17-22; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2026;86(7 Suppl):Abstract nr 3741.

334 Background: Sarcopenia, or decreased skeletal muscle mass, has been associated with worse surgical and oncologic outcomes across multiple malignancies. This study investigates the impact of sarcopenia on outcomes after multimodal therapy for esophageal cancer. Methods: Retrospective observational cohort study including adult patients who underwent neoadjuvant therapy followed by esophagectomy for primary esophageal cancer from January 2000 - December 2021. A fully automated abdominal segmentation using deep convolutional neural network was utilized to calculate skeletal muscle index (SMI) from preoperative CT scans performed at our institution. Males with SMI <52.4 cm 2 /m 2 and females with SMI <38.5 cm 2 /m 2 at any point before surgery were classified as sarcopenic. The relationship between sarcopenia and patient demographics, operative details, and complications were explored using chi-square tests. The relationship between sarcopenia and disease-free survival and overall survival were investigated using parsimonious multivariable analysis retaining variables with p-value <0.05 using backward selection method. Results: We identified 200 patients meeting the study criteria with 142 (71%) having sarcopenia at any time prior to surgery. Patients with sarcopenia were significantly older [65.2 (59.6, 71.2) vs 63 (53.6, 67.5), p = .023] and more likely to have had open surgery [129 (90.8%) vs 46 (79.3%), p = .034]. There were no significant differences in sex, history of diabetes, coronary artery disease, renal disease, smoking, cancer type, cancer stage, tumor size, tumor location, or margin status between sarcopenic groups ( p > .05). Sarcopenic patients were significantly more likely to require blood transfusion ≥3 units after esophagectomy [79 (55.6%) vs 8 (13.8%), p < .001] or to experience complications requiring surgical intervention [36 (24.6%) vs 7 (12.1%), p = .048]. Multivariate analysis revealed that sarcopenia was associated with disease-free and overall survival (Table). Conclusions: Sarcopenia is a prognostic factor in patients undergoing multimodal therapy for esophageal cancer. Interventions that aim to prevent decreases in SMI after initiating neoadjuvant therapy should be investigated. Multivariate analysis with sarcopenia predicting outcomes. Disease free survivalHR (95% CI) p-value Overall survivalHR (95% CI) p-value Age 1.04 (1.02, 1.06) < .001 1.04 (1.02, 1.07) < .001 Epicenter Middle Upper 1.88 (1.21, 2.86)3.16 (1.67, 5.98) .001.005< .001 1.96 (1.26, 3.04)4.00 (1.90, 8.44) < .001.003< .001 Stage Stage II Stage III Stage IV 1.88 (0.95, 3.71)2.90 (1.46, 5.75)16.02 (6.12, 41.93) < .001.069.002< .001 1.65 (0.83, 3.25)2.76 (1.37, 5.55)10.14 (4.03, 25.53) < .001.151.005< .001 Cancer type - - 1.76 (1.03, 3.02) .039 Transfusion > 3 pRBC - - 1.54 (0.99, 2.40) .057 BMI prior to cancer diagnosis - - 0.98 (0.94, 1.01 .208 Sarcopenic 1.76 (1.16, 2.67) .007 1.64 (1.04, 2.60) .033

Objectives: For locally advanced rectal adenocarcinoma (R-ACA), a nonoperative management (NOM) approach has emerged as a guideline-supported treatment option. However, the variables associated with NOM receipt are unknown. Methods: Utilizing the National Cancer Database, we performed a retrospective cohort study of adults with stage 1 to 3 R-ACA managed with curative intent from 2004 to 2018. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients receiving NOM versus surgery. The secondary outcome was survival among NOM patients. Results: A total of 128,297 patients were included. In all, 115,888 (90.3%) received surgery and 12,409 (9.7%) received NOM. Receipt of NOM was associated with age above 70, Charlson-Deyo score of 0, race (Black, Asian or Pacific Islander, or other vs. White), insurance status, geographical region, treatment in a community facility, year of diagnosis (2012-2018 vs. 2004-2011), tumor grade 1 versus ≥ 2, clinical T-stage ≥ 2, and clinical N1 or N2 versus N0. In the NOM cohort, poorer overall survival was associated with age 70 and above, male sex, Charlson-Deyo score ≥ 1, insurance status, geographical region, rural urban density versus metro/urban, treatment in a community facility, year of diagnosis (2004-2011 vs. 2012-2018), clinical T4 versus T1, clinical N1 or N2 versus N0, grade 3 versus 1, treatment with a radiotherapy dose <45 Gy versus 45 to 54 Gy, and omission of chemotherapy. Conclusions: Several demographic factors and social determinants of health were associated with receipt of NOM and overall survival. With the increasing utilization of NOM, it will be important to understand the drivers of treatment decisions and influences on access to the desired treatment approach.

ABSTRACT Background Multimodality therapy incorporating a combination of cytoreductive surgery (CRS), intraperitoneal (IP) and systemic therapy continues to evolve for peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) However, treatment and outcomes vary depending on tumor of origin. Aims To develop Appropriate Use Criteria (AUC) guidelines to facilitate treatment decision‐making for patients with PC based on available evidence. Materials and Methods The American Radium Society (ARS) multidisciplinary expert panel performed a comprehensive systematic review. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐analyses (PRISMA) methodology was used. These studies were used to inform the expert panel, which then rated the appropriateness of various treatments in seven representative clinical scenarios through a well‐established modified Delphi consensus methodology. Results Treatment of PC is often treated with a combination of CRS and IP ± systemic chemotherapy but specific recommendations exist for different tumor types and outcomes vary. Discussion Treatment of PC is complex and varies depending on origin of primary tumor and extent of disease. These AUC assist in patient and treatment selection for different clinical scenarios. Conclusion A summary of recommendations is outlined to guide practitioners on the management of PC from different tumor origins.

Objectives: Esophageal cancer (EC) often presents with dysphagia due to tumor obstruction. Esophageal stenting has the potential of palliating dysphagia, improving nutrition, preventing aspiration, and improving quality of life (QoL) but may be associated with risks. The present systematic review and guidelines are intended to assist treatment decision-making when considering stent placement in patients with EC based on the available evidence. Methods: Using the population, intervention, comparator, outcome, timing and study design framework, the evidence was assessed using Cochrane and PRISMA 2020 methodology. Eligible studies included prospective phase II-III trials and retrospective analyses published between January 1, 2010 and December 3, 2024 in the Ovid Medline database. These references were assessed by American Radium Society (ARS) Appropriate Use Criteria (AUC) methodology. RAND-UCLA consensus methodology was used to rate the appropriateness of the use of stents. Results: ARS AUC recommendations include (1) esophageal stenting is usually not appropriate in patients with early-stage EC in whom upfront surgery is planned; (2) esophageal stenting is usually not appropriate in patients with locally-advanced EC in whom neoadjuvant/perioperative therapy and esophagectomy or definitive chemoradiation is planned; (3) esophageal stenting may be appropriate in the setting of metastatic EC, especially in patients with short life expectancy with limited treatment options; (4) esophageal stenting is usually not appropriate for benign stricture following curative-intent therapy; (5) esophageal stenting is usually not appropriate for locally recurrent tumor in the setting of prior radiation; and (6) esophageal stenting is usually appropriate for management of tracheoesophageal fistula before curative-intent treatment. Conclusions: This ARS AUC summary provides guidelines for the use of esophageal stents in patients with EC provides based on available evidence.

Objectives: This practice parameter was revised collaboratively by the American College of Radiology (ACR), and American Radium Society (ARS). Image-guided radiation therapy (IGRT) uses various imaging modalities to maximize the accuracy and precision of radiation treatment delivery. Methods: This practice parameter was developed according to the process described under the heading The Process for Developing ACR Practice Parameters and Technical Standards on the ACR website (https://www.acr.org/Clinical-Resources/Practice-Parameters-and-Technical-Standards) by the Committee on Practice Parameters–Radiation Oncology of the ACR Commission on Radiation Oncology in collaboration with the ARS. Results: This practice parameter for IGRT addresses qualifications and responsibilities of personnel, clinical IGRT implementation, documentation, quality control and improvement, safety, and patient education. Since the publication of the ACR–ASTRO Practice Parameter in 2019, there is now more clarity as to what criteria and parameters need to be documented in the medical record, a better appreciation of the large amount of imaging data, how to interpret such data, as well as the complex interactions of multiple systems in the implementation of IGRT. Conclusions: This practice parameter assists practitioners in the clinical use of IGRT. IGRT should complement and be used in combination with other quality assurance processes. IGRT is a rapidly evolving field, and practitioners should have a thorough understanding of its strengths and potential limitations.

e14551 Background: Extracellular vesicles (EVs) are microscopic particles released by all cell types with a distinct fingerprint reflecting the cell of origin. In patients with prostate cancer, PSMA+EVs have been associated with clinical outcomes. In this study, we investigated tumor-derived EVs (tdEVs) using the tumor-specific CD326 marker as a novel biomarker for pancreas ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Methods: The study included patients with localized PDAC treated on a prospective phase 2 clinical trial evaluating a 15-fraction chemoradiation (CRT) regimen. Blood samples were obtained after induction chemotherapy (C) (prior to CRT) and in follow-up. 20 healthy controls were included. High-resolution flow cytometry enumerated levels of fluorescent antibody labelled tumor-specific CD326 (EpCAM)-positive EVs. All samples were de-identified and randomly coded. The technologist responsible for EV analysis was blinded to patient information and clinical data. Each sample was run in triplicate. Flow cytometry data was analyzed with custom-built software to automatically determine and apply gates and generate reports with scatter plots and EV concentrations for each combination of markers and data summaries. Results: tdEV data were analyzed from 70 patients with pre-CRT samples. Patients had mean age 66 years (9.0 standard deviation), with 60% ECOG 0, 43% borderline resectable and 48% locally advanced. Patients had a median 8 cycles of C prior to CRT, and 70% proceeded to surgery after CRT. 2-year overall survival (OS) was 54%. Patient samples showed elevated total CD326 EVs compared to the healthy controls (p = 0.0005). Furthermore, patient CD326 EVs revealed two distinct subpopulations: small (120-1,000nm) and large (1,000-3,000nm) size CD326 EVs. No large CD326 subpopulation was found in healthy donor samples. Higher pre-CRT levels of total CD326 and large CD326 EVs were associated with decreased progression-free survival (PFS) (hazard ratio (HR) = 2.38, p = 0.013 and HR = 2.017, p = 0.021) on multivariable models with surgical resection. Resection was associated with increased PFS (p < 0.0001), and the interaction terms did not meet significance (p = 0.083 and p = 0.21). No differences in pre-CRT total or large CD326 EVs were identified between patients with or without surgical resection (p = 0.72 and p = 0.83). CA19-9 levels were not predictive of clinical outcomes in this trial and showed no association with EV levels. Conclusions: We present an association between clinical outcomes and tdEVs in PDAC, highlighting their potential as a novel, independent biomarker. If validated, tdEVs may offer an opportunity to personalize care and improve risk stratification.