Back to Authors

Garsa, Adam

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5451-1733

Mayo Clinic

University of Southern California

Citations 2

ACR–ARS Practice Parameter for Image-Guided Radiation Therapy (IGRT)
Garsa, Adam , Buckey, C, Freedman, Laura , Gros, Sebastien , Hallemeier, Christopher L. , Lo, Simon S. , Milano, Michael T. , Saeed, Hina , Ye, Jason C. , Schechter, Naomi R., Buckey, Courtney R, Davis, Brian J. , Hallemeier, Christopher Leigh , Small, William

American Journal of Clinical Oncology | June 20, 2025 | Volume: 48 | Issue: 11 | Pages: 529-539

10.1097/coc.0000000000001220 Get It

Objectives: This practice parameter was revised collaboratively by the American College of Radiology (ACR), and American Radium Society (ARS). Image-guided radiation therapy (IGRT) uses various imaging modalities to maximize the accuracy and precision of radiation treatment delivery. Methods: This practice parameter was developed according to the process described under the heading The Process for Developing ACR Practice Parameters and Technical Standards on the ACR website (https://www.acr.org/Clinical-Resources/Practice-Parameters-and-Technical-Standards) by the Committee on Practice Parameters–Radiation Oncology of the ACR Commission on Radiation Oncology in collaboration with the ARS. Results: This practice parameter for IGRT addresses qualifications and responsibilities of personnel, clinical IGRT implementation, documentation, quality control and improvement, safety, and patient education. Since the publication of the ACR–ASTRO Practice Parameter in 2019, there is now more clarity as to what criteria and parameters need to be documented in the medical record, a better appreciation of the large amount of imaging data, how to interpret such data, as well as the complex interactions of multiple systems in the implementation of IGRT. Conclusions: This practice parameter assists practitioners in the clinical use of IGRT. IGRT should complement and be used in combination with other quality assurance processes. IGRT is a rapidly evolving field, and practitioners should have a thorough understanding of its strengths and potential limitations.
Pretreatment metabolic tumor volume as a prognostic factor in HPV‐associated oropharyngeal cancer in the context of AJCC 8th edition staging
Floberg, John M. , DeWees, T.A. , Chin, R , Garsa, Adam , Dehdashti, Farrokh , Oppelt, Peter , DeWees, Todd A, DeWees, Todd A , Dehdashti, Farrokh , Nussenbaum, Brian A. , Oppelt, Peter J., Adkins, Douglas R. , Gay, Hiram A. , Thorstad, Wade

Head & Neck | July 27, 2018 | Volume: 40 | Issue: 10 | Pages: 2280-2287

10.1002/hed.25337 Get It

AbstractBackgroundThis study evaluates the prognostic significance of 18F‐fluorodeoxyglucose‐positron emission tomography ([F‐18]FDG‐PET)‐derived metabolic tumor volume (MTV) in human papillomavirus (HPV)‐associated oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinomas (OPSCCs) in the context of AJCC 8th edition staging.MethodsWe performed a retrospective study of HPV‐associated OPSCCs treated with postoperative or definitive radiation. The prognostic significance of pretreatment MTV for freedom from recurrence (FFR), freedom from distant metastasis (FFDM), and overall survival (OS) was determined using Kaplan‐Meier analysis. Multivariate analysis (MVA) was performed using Cox regression.ResultsIn this 153‐patient cohort, stratifying by the optimum MTV (24 cm3) was prognostic for FFR (P = .0002), FFDM (P = .001), and OS (P < .0001). Metabolic tumor volume (MTV) was prognostic of FFR in AJCC 8th edition stage I/II (P = .03), and stage III patients (P = .04). On multivariate analysis only MTV was a significant factor for OS.ConclusionMetabolic tumor volume (MTV) is a significant prognostic factor in HPV‐associated OPSCCs, independent of AJCC 8th edition stage.