Back to Authors

Newman, Neil B.

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5907-9484

Mayo Clinic

University of Miami

Citations 3

Executive Summary of the American Radium Society (ARS) Appropriate Use Criteria (AUC) for Adjuvant Therapy for Resected Adenocarcinoma of the Pancreas
Jethwa, Krishan R., Newman, Neil, Selfridge, J. Eva, Anker, Christopher J., Abood, G., Akselrod, Dmitriy, Attallah, Joseph, Hallemeier, Christopher L., Jin, Zhaohui, Kim, Ed, Kennedy, Timothy, Lee, Percy, Ling, Diane C., Miller, Eric D, Sharma, Navesh, Small, William, Tchelebi, Leila, Russo, Suzanne , Jethwa, Krishan R. , Newman, Neil B. , Anker, Christopher J. , Abood, Gerard, Akselrod, Dmitriy , Hallemeier, Christopher Leigh , Hassett, Leslie C. , Lee, Percy, Small, William , Tchelebi, Leila T.

American Journal of Clinical Oncology | August 20, 2026 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.1097/coc.0000000000001347 Get It

Objectives: Rates of locoregional recurrence and distant metastases are high following curative-intent resection for patients with localized pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Adjuvant therapies have been investigated with the intent to reduce the risk of recurrence and improve OS. The objective of this study is to update and summarize the current evidence for adjuvant therapy following surgical resection for nonmetastatic PDAC with a focus on high-level evidence and randomized controlled trials is provided. Methods: This multispecialty-led committee included gastrointestinal radiation and medical oncology, gastroenterology, radiology, and surgical oncology. Using the population, intervention, comparator, outcome, timing and study design framework, evidence regarding treatment outcomes was assessed using Cochrane and PRISMA methodology. Eligible studies included prospective and retrospective (n≥25) studies published between January 1, 2013 and February 13, 2026, from Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid EMBASE, Ovid Cochrane Database of Systematic Review, and Scopus databases. Study type and quality were assessed. Well-established RAND/UCLA consensus methodology (modified Delphi) was used to rate the appropriateness of the treatment options. Results: Of the 74 references used as evidence, 74 are categorized as therapeutic references. Study type and quality for the references were assessed, and included 31 well-designed studies (phase II randomized and phase III), 14 moderately well-designed studies that account for most common biases (matched cohort and phase II studies), 28 studies with design limitations (retrospective reviews), and 1 reference meta-analysis. Conclusions: This systematic review and guidelines provide up-to-date recommendations focusing on recent advancements for adjuvant treatment of resected PDAC using modern systemic therapy regimens and selective use of radiotherapy using modern techniques.
Executive summary of American Radium Society Appropriate Use Criteria for the treatment of locoregionally recurrent rectal cancer
Miller, Eric D. , Jethwa, Krishan R. , Dozois, E, Jin, Zhaohui, Abood, G., Akselrod, Dmitriy, Attallah, Joseph, Codipilly, D Chamil, Anker, Christopher J., Hallemeier, Christopher L. , Kennedy, Timothy, Lee, Percy, Ling, Diane C., Newman, Neil, Sharma, Navesh, Small, William, Tchelebi, Leila, Russo, Suzanne , Akselrod, Dmitriy , Dozois, Eric, Akselrod, Dmitriy , Small, William , Jethwa, Krishan , Dozois, Eric J. , Abood, Gerard, Codipilly, Don C. , Anker, Christopher J. , Hallemeier, Christopher Leigh , Hassett, Leslie C. , Lee, Percy, Newman, Neil B. , Tchelebi, Leila T.

Cancer | June 5, 2026 | Volume: 132 | Issue: 12 | Pages: No page available

10.1002/cncr.70464 Get It

Abstract This literature‐based systematic review and associated guidelines provide evidence‐based paradigms for the management of locoregionally recurrent rectal cancer (LRRC). This multispecialty committee included gastrointestinal radiation and medical oncology, gastroenterology, radiology, and colorectal surgery. As is the standard, the previously described American Radium Society Appropriate Use Criteria methodology for this project was followed rigorously, with the Population, Intervention, Comparator, Outcome, Timing, and Study Design framework and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses methodology to assess the evidence. RAND/University of California Los Angeles consensus methodology (modified Delphi) was used to rate the appropriateness of treatment options. Published between January 1, 2013, and July 16, 2025, 116 peer‐reviewed trials provided the evidence: 10 were well‐designed randomized phase 2/3 trials, 29 were moderately well designed trials that accounted for most common biases (matched cohort and phase 2), 76 trials had design limitations (retrospective), and one was a meta‐analysis. Clinical cases were created as examples to illustrate current acceptable management of LRRC. Treatment and prognosis are influenced by prior therapy and the site(s) and extent of LRRC. The ability to achieve a margin‐negative surgical resection is the ultimate determinant of survival and local control. Preoperative systemic therapy, radiation therapy, or a combination of the two can facilitate tumor downsizing and improve the likelihood of a margin‐negative resection. An individualized multidisciplinary approach is required to ensure the best outcome. Although this review does not suggest a major alteration of current practice, it provides reassuring evidence of the importance of combined‐modality therapy.
Executive Summary of the American Radium Society (ARS) Appropriate Use Criteria (AUC) for Locoregional Gastric Adenocarcinoma
Adenocarcinoma, Expert Panel Adjuvant Therapy for Treatment of Locoregional Gastric, Tchelebi, Leila T. , Jin, Zhaohui, Attallah, Joseph, Abood, G., Akselrod, Dmitriy, Codipilly, D. Chamil, Dozois, Eric J. , Hallemeier, Christopher L., Krishan, Jethwa, Kennedy, Timothy, Lee, Percy P., Ling, Diane, Newman, Neil B. , Sharma, Navesh K, Small, William, Russo, Suzanne , Tchelebi, Leila , Jin, Zhaohui , Abood, Gerard, Akselrod, Dmitriy , Anker, Christopher J. , Codipilly, Don C. , Hallemeier, Christopher Leigh , Lee, Percy , Miller, Eric D. , Sharma, Navesh, Small, William , Russo, Suzanne

American Journal of Clinical Oncology | February 19, 2026 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.1097/coc.0000000000001309 Get It

Objectives: To summarize recent high-quality trials and provide an update to the original 2022 American College of Radiology Appropriate Use Criteria for Treatment of Locoregional Gastric Adenocarcinoma. This multi-specialty-led committee included gastrointestinal radiation and medical oncology, gastroenterology, radiology, and surgical oncology. Methods: Using the population, intervention, comparator, outcome, timing, and study design framework, the evidence was assessed using Cochrane and PRISMA 2020 methodology. Eligible studies included prospective Phase II/II trials and select retrospective studies published between 5/1/2020 and 8/1/2025 in the Embase, Medline, and Pubmed databases. Study type and quality were assessed. Well-established RAND-UCLA consensus methodology (modified Delphi) was used to rate the appropriateness of the treatment options. Results: ARS AUC recommendations include adjuvant FLOT chemotherapy for localized gastric adenocarcinoma after neoadjuvant FLOT and surgery, poCT or perioperative chemoimmunotherapy for localized gastric adenocarcinoma, adjuvant chemotherapy +/− CRT for localized gastric adenocarcinoma that undergoes upfront surgery, and systemic therapy alone for localized gastric adenocarcinoma in a medically inoperable patient. Conclusions: This updated ARS AUC summary provides guidelines for the multimodality treatment of resectable gastric adenocarcinoma.