Dozois, Eric

Abstract This literature‐based systematic review and associated guidelines provide evidence‐based paradigms for the management of locoregionally recurrent rectal cancer (LRRC). This multispecialty committee included gastrointestinal radiation and medical oncology, gastroenterology, radiology, and colorectal surgery. As is the standard, the previously described American Radium Society Appropriate Use Criteria methodology for this project was followed rigorously, with the Population, Intervention, Comparator, Outcome, Timing, and Study Design framework and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses methodology to assess the evidence. RAND/University of California Los Angeles consensus methodology (modified Delphi) was used to rate the appropriateness of treatment options. Published between January 1, 2013, and July 16, 2025, 116 peer‐reviewed trials provided the evidence: 10 were well‐designed randomized phase 2/3 trials, 29 were moderately well designed trials that accounted for most common biases (matched cohort and phase 2), 76 trials had design limitations (retrospective), and one was a meta‐analysis. Clinical cases were created as examples to illustrate current acceptable management of LRRC. Treatment and prognosis are influenced by prior therapy and the site(s) and extent of LRRC. The ability to achieve a margin‐negative surgical resection is the ultimate determinant of survival and local control. Preoperative systemic therapy, radiation therapy, or a combination of the two can facilitate tumor downsizing and improve the likelihood of a margin‐negative resection. An individualized multidisciplinary approach is required to ensure the best outcome. Although this review does not suggest a major alteration of current practice, it provides reassuring evidence of the importance of combined‐modality therapy.

INTRODUCTION: Advanced therapies infrequently achieve complete fistula closure in patients with Crohn's disease (CD). The primary objective of the STOMP2 clinical trial was to determine whether the implantable autologous cell therapy AVB-114 is effective in inducing remission of persistent Crohn's perianal fistulas versus standard of care. METHODS: Eligible patients had a single perianal fistula tract and had failed previous treatment or had documented medication intolerance to biologic or conventional CD therapy. All enrolled subjects underwent surgical fistula optimization and adipose tissue biopsy collection (to manufacture AVB-114) followed by 1:1 randomization to either standard of care (repeat fistula optimization including seton replacement) or AVB-114 implantation. The primary end point was combined fistula remission at 36 weeks, defined as closure of the external opening, no drainage of fluid despite gentle finger compression, and no collections >2 cm in at least 2 of the 3 dimensions on MRI. RESULTS: Subjects at 14 US sites were equally randomized to SoC (N = 24) or AVB-114 (N = 24). Week 36 combined remission was 8.3% and 45.8% for subjects randomized to SoC and AVB-114, respectively (38% difference, 95% CI 11%–60%; P = 0.0078). At week 36, MRI revealed no subjects with collections >2 cm, radiological improvement (≥50% decrease in the Magnetic Resonance Novel Index for Fistula Imaging in Crohn's Disease (MAGNIFI-CD) score from baseline) in 1 SoC subject and 3 AVB-114 subjects, and radiological healing (complete resolution of T2-weighted hyperintensity in fistula tract) in 2 SoC subjects and 5 AVB-114 subjects. Through week 36, there were 40 and 56 treatment emergent adverse events for SoC and AVB-114, respectively. There were no serious treatment emergent adverse events in the AVB-114 group through week 36. DISCUSSION: A significantly higher proportion of patients treated with AVB-114 achieved combined remission vs SoC, and the treatment was well tolerated. These data support the safety and efficacy of AVB-114 in persistent Crohn's perianal fistulas.

Objective: To develop and analyze a risk-adjusted cumulative sum (RA-CUSUM) chart as a potential method to monitor individual surgeon performance in robotic total mesorectal excision (TME) for rectal cancer. Background: Currently, surgeons lack real-time tools to monitor and enhance their performance beyond residency completion. While national quality programs exist, granular, individual-level data are crucial for continuous improvement. Previous studies suggest cumulative sum charts hold promise in identifying performance trends and outliers. Methods: This retrospective study analyzed data from 640 robotic TME cases performed by 12 surgeons at 2 institutions. RA-CUSUM charts were generated for 3 outcomes: (1) complications, (2) operative time, and (3) length of stay. Results: The overall RA-CUSUM curves for operative time and complications showed an initial learning phase, followed by a plateau or downward slope, indicating proficiency or improvement. However, individual surgeon curves revealed significant heterogeneity. Three surgeons consistently excelled in operative time, while 5 minimized complications most effectively. Potential quality improvement could be implemented to drive performance toward positive outliers. No differences were found in unadjusted outcomes, including conversion, number of lymph nodes harvested, and positive circumferential margins. Conclusions: The RA-CUSUM chart is a promising method for identifying individual surgeon performance in robotic TME. It could help surgeons, teams, and leaders identify improvement areas and benchmark themselves against positive outliers. Further studies are needed to explore the potential of RA-CUSUM for implementing interventions to improve surgical quality.

Background The purpose of this study is to describe our experience and outcomes in oncoplastic pelvic reconstruction for patients who underwent either vertical rectus abdominis musculocutaneous (VRAM) or omental flap following abdominoperineal resection (APR) at a single tertiary care institution. Methods All patients who underwent pelvic reconstruction following APR with either VRAM or omental flaps from January 1992 to January 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. Patient demographics and relevant comorbidities including chemotherapy and radiation therapy data were collected and analyzed. In addition, margin status at the time of oncologic resection was analyzed. Flap-specific data were collected for each approach. Oncologic data collected included cancer type, stage at time of APR, and rate of tumor recurrence within the flap. Results A total of 562 patients were identified who underwent pelvic reconstruction with either VRAM or omental pedicle flaps. Of these, 274 (48.8%) underwent VRAM reconstruction and 288 (51.2%) underwent omental flap reconstruction. All margins were negative at time of cancer ablation surgery. Complications data included: seroma (VRAM = 2 [0.36%]; omentum = 32 [5.69%], p < 0.0001), wound dehiscence (VRAM = 31 [5.52%]; omentum = 17 [3.02%], p = 0.022), abscess (VRAM = 4 [0.71%]; omentum = 27 [4.8%], p < 0.0001), cellulitis (VRAM = 2 [0.36%]; omentum = 10 [1.78%], p = 0.025). Statistical comparison of tumor recurrence between these two reconstructive approaches showed a significantly higher recurrence rate in omental flaps compared with VRAM flaps (p = 0.000127). Conclusion The results of this study suggest a significantly higher tumor recurrence rate in omental flap pelvic reconstruction compared with VRAM flaps. This knowledge has the potential to influence surgical planning and flap selection in pelvic reconstruction.