Benkhadra, Khalid

Purpose Neutropenic diet (ND) has historically been recommended to reduce infectious complications in patients with cancer. Although its use has declined over the past decade, recent studies, particularly in patients undergoing hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT), have renewed concern regarding the safety of a liberalized diet (LD). We performed a meta-analysis of studies comparing ND with LD in patients with cancer. Methods We searched MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane databases from inception through January 2026. Comparative studies evaluating ND versus LD in adults or children with cancer were included. Primary outcomes were major infections and bacteremia/fungemia; secondary outcomes were pneumonia, diarrhea, and mortality. Random-effects meta-analyses were performed to calculate pooled relative risks (RRs) with 95% CIs. Results Fifteen studies including 4,320 patients met criteria for analysis. ND was not associated with significant differences in major infections (RR, 1.02 [95% CI, 0.88 to 1.18]; P = .795), bacteremia/fungemia (RR, 0.97 [95% CI, 0.78 to 1.22]; P = .805), pneumonia (RR, 0.98 [95% CI, 0.59 to 1.63]; P = .933), diarrhea (RR, 1.12 [95% CI, 0.96 to 1.31]; P = .159), or mortality (RR, 0.94 [95% CI, 0.77 to 1.15]; P = .632). Sensitivity analyses restricted to randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were consistent. In hematologic malignancy/HSCT studies (9 studies; 1,769 patients), no differences were observed across outcomes. In RCTs limited to these patients (6 studies; 855 patients), ND was associated with lower bacteremia/fungemia risk (RR, 0.67 [95% CI, 0.47 to 0.95]; P = .023), with no differences in other outcomes. Conclusion ND was not associated with reductions in major infections, pneumonia, diarrhea, or mortality compared with LD. These findings do not support routine implementation of ND for patients with short-term neutropenia or lower-risk cancer populations although selected high-risk patients, particularly those undergoing HSCT or experiencing prolonged neutropenia related to hematologic malignancies, may still warrant cautious dietary practices.

e18574 Background: ND has historically been recommended to reduce infectious complications in cancer patients (pts). While the adoption of ND has declined over the last decade, recent studies - particularly in pts undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) - have raised uncertainty regarding the safety of LD. Herein, we performed a meta-analysis of studies directly comparing ND with LD in pts with cancer. Methods: We conducted a systematic search of MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane databases from inception through January 2026. Comparative retrospective and prospective studies were included if they were comparing ND with LD in adults or children with cancer. Primary outcomes were major infections and bacteremia/fungemia. Secondary outcomes were pneumonia, diarrhea, and all-cause mortality. Random-effects meta-analyses were performed to calculate pooled risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). The review followed PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Results: Fifteen studies enrolling 4,320 patients were included in the primary analysis. Six studies enrolled only adult patients, three were restricted to pediatric populations, and six included mixed adult and pediatric cohorts. Across these studies, ND was not associated with a significant reduction in major infections (RR 1.02, 95% CI 0.88–1.18; p=0.795), bacteremia/fungemia (RR 0.97, 95% CI 0.78–1.22; p=0.805), pneumonia (RR 0.98, 95% CI 0.59–1.63; p=0.933), diarrhea (RR 1.12, 95% CI 0.96–1.31; p=0.159), or all-cause mortality (RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.77–1.15; p=0.632). Sensitivity analyses restricted to RCTs showed consistent results. Subgroup analysis of hematological/HSCT studies (9 studies; 1,769 pts) also showed no differences across outcome. Analysis restricted to RCTs in hematologic/HSCT pts (6 studies; 855 pts) showed no differences in major infections, pneumonia, diarrhea, or mortality; however, ND was associated with a lower risk of bacteremia/fungemia (RR 0.67, 95% CI 0.47–0.95; p=0.023). Heterogeneity across studies was low to moderate. Conclusions: ND was not associated with reductions in major infections, pneumonia, diarrhea, or mortality compared with LD. A reduction in bacteremia/fungemia was observed in RCTs of hematologic malignancy and HSCT pts. Overall, these findings suggest that routine ND implementation is unnecessary for most cancer pts, although cautious dietary practices may remain reasonable in selected high-risk hematologic malignancy/HSCT populations.

3592 Background: Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is a frequent dose-limiting toxicity from oxaliplatin that impairs quality of life in gastrointestinal (GI) cancer patients (pts). While strategies to limit exposure exist, their impact on survival remains debated. We evaluated whether reduced oxaliplatin exposure (ROE) maintains survival while mitigating toxicity. Methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis (PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, EBM Reviews) of studies comparing ROE vs standard-duration oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy in GI cancers. ROE was defined as planned limitation of oxaliplatin exposure, including shortened duration (3-4 months), maintenance-based de-escalation, or stop-and-go strategies. Primary endpoints were disease-free survival (DFS) in curative settings, progression-free survival (PFS) in palliative settings, and overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints included grade ≥3 CIPN and grade ≥3 adverse events (AEs). Random-effects models used Hartung-Knapp-Sidik-Jonkman correction. Heterogeneity was assessed via I² and Cochran’s Q. Results: 24 studies, comprising 15 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and 9 retrospective cohorts, were included (N = 30,404 pts; ROE: 13,348; control: 17,056). Settings included adjuvant colorectal cancer (CRC; n = 14), metastatic CRC (mCRC; n = 5), gastric cancer (GC) (adjuvant n = 1, metastatic n = 3), and metastatic pancreatic cancer (PDAC) (n = 1). ROE strategies included shortened duration (n = 14), maintenance (n = 8), and stop-and-go (n = 2). In adjuvant CRC, ROE did not compromise DFS (HR 1.07; 95% CI, 0.98-1.16; p = 0.12; I² = 21.7%), including in high-risk subgroups (HR 1.14; 95% CI, 0.93-1.40; p = 0.14; I² = 38.9%); OS was also not different between groups (HR 1.00; 95% CI, 0.94-1.07; p = 0.89; I² = 0%), including high-risk pts (HR 1.01; 95% CI, 0.93-1.10; p = 0.68; I² = 0%). In mCRC, ROE showed no detriment to PFS (HR 1.11; 95% CI, 0.99-1.25; p = 0.07; I² = 0%) or OS (HR 1.06; 95% CI, 0.92-1.23; p = 0.33; I² = 0%). Similarly, in metastatic gastric cancer, PFS (HR 0.82; 95% CI, 0.34-1.99; p = 0.44; I² = 77.3%) and OS (HR 0.90; 95% CI, 0.67-1.21; p = 0.26; I² = 0%) were comparable. Findings remained concordant after restricting the analysis to only RCTs. Pooled analysis was not feasible for PDAC and adjuvant GC studies, but individual study findings were consistent with the above. ROE significantly reduced the risk of grade ≥3 CIPN (OR 0.32; 95% CI, 0.20-0.53; p < 0.001; I² = 80.6%) and overall grade ≥3 AEs (OR 0.65; 95% CI, 0.50-0.86; p = 0.01; I² = 59.9%). Conclusions: Across GI malignancies, ROE was not associated with inferior DFS, PFS, or OS and was associated with lower rates of severe neurotoxicity and high-grade AEs. These findings support planned limitation of oxaliplatin exposure as a strategy to improve the therapeutic index of oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy across disease settings.

Background Patients with substance use disorder (SUD) have high rates of hospitalization, readmission, and prolonged lengths of stay. Objectives To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of the impact of addiction consult services in the inpatient setting for patients with SUD. Methods Five databases were systematically searched from their earliest available records through January 2025. Two authors independently screened articles, extracted data, and assessed the quality of each study with the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for observational studies and the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized clinical trials. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) with 95% CIs were calculated for dichotomous outcomes, and mean differences were calculated for continuous outcomes. Results The search retrieved 20 studies that met inclusion criteria. The intervention for all studies was an addiction medicine consult, but the definition of this consult varied. The meta-analysis did not detect statistically significant differences in hospital length of stay, hospital readmission, or emergency department visits at 1 year among patients who received the consult compared with those who did not; however, many of these outcomes were likely underpowered. However, addiction medicine consults significantly improved the odds of inpatient initiation of medication for SUD (OR, 7.30; 95% CI, 3.30-16.13; P <.001) and postdischarge SUD treatment linkage and adherence (OR, 3.31; 95% CI, 2.06-5.32; P <.001). Conclusion Inpatient addiction consult services are associated with increased inpatient initiation of medication for SUD treatment and postdischarge treatment linkage and adherence. No clear association was identified between the consult and readmissions, emergency department utilization, or length of stay.

Abstract Disclosure: A. Al Nofal: None. K. Benkhadra: None. M. Nduwimana: None. A. Mohammad: None. A. Abbas: None. Z. Wang: None. M. Murad: None. Background: Hybrid closed-loop (HCL) systems for automated insulin delivery are increasingly used in diabetes management. However, their safety and efficacy in pregnant women with pre-existing type 1 diabetes remain uncertain. Aim: To assess the safety and effectiveness of HCL systems in pregnant women with pre-existing type 1 diabetes compared to current standard of care. Methods: A comprehensive search of several databases was conducted from inception to January 3rd, 2024. Pairs of independent reviewers screened abstracts. Abstracts included by at least one reviewer were reviewed in full text by a pair of independent reviewers. The DerSimonian and Laird random effects model with the Hartung-Knapp-Sidik-Jonkman method was used to pool effect sizes across the included studies. Results: Five randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with 274 pregnant women with type I diabetes met the inclusion criteria. Our meta-analysis showed no significant difference between HCL and standard of care regarding overall time in range (TIR), time above range (TAR), and time below range (TBR). However, overnight, women using HCL showed significantly higher TIR (mean difference: 10.18%, CI 7.42-12.94%) and lower TBR (mean difference: -0.67%, CI -0.91 to -0.43%) compared to those using standard care. Additionally, there were no significant differences between HCL and standard of care in term of LGA, SGA, neonatal hypoglycemia, and maternal severe hypoglycemia or hyperglycemia. Conclusion: HCL systems for management of pre-existing type I diabetes during pregnancy are associated with similar outcomes without increased risk of complications when compared to standard of care. This is derived from limited number of RCTs with low risk of bias but significant imprecision, which warrant low confidence. Presentation: Sunday, July 13, 2025

Abstract Context Women with preexisting diabetes mellitus (PDM) are at increased risk of pregnancy-related complications. Objective To summarize the available supporting evidence for the Endocrine Society guidelines about management of PDM in pregnancy. Data Sources MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, and other sources through February 2025. Study Selection Studies were selected by pairs of independent reviewers. Data Extraction Data were extracted by pairs of independent reviewers. Data Synthesis We included 17 studies. Meta-analysis showed no significant difference between hybrid closed-loop insulin pump (HCL) and standard of care regarding time in range (TIR), time above range (TAR), and time below range (TBR). HCL had better overnight TIR and TBR. For women with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), intermittent use of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) was not associated with a significant change in the risk of large for gestational age (LGA) neonates (2 randomized controlled trials [RCTs], 102 patients). Adding metformin to insulin was associated with a lower risk of LGA (2 RCTs, 1126 patients). Three retrospective studies (1724 patients) suggested increased neonatal complications when delivery was induced before 39 weeks of gestation (particularly before 38 weeks) in women with preexisting type 1 (T1DM) and T2DM, although this evidence was subject to likely confounding. One retrospective study showed no increase in neonatal complications with periconceptional exposure to glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists. We could not identify comparative studies assessing a screening question about the possibility of pregnancy or a carbohydrate restrictive diet. Conclusion This systematic review addresses various aspects of managing PDM in pregnancy and will support the development of the Endocrine Society guidelines.

e19543 Background: Primary Bone Lymphoma (PBL) is defined as a lymphoma originating in an osseous site with no systemic disease. It is rare, constituting around 1% of all lymphomas. Due to its rarity, ascertaining natural history and standard of care treatments are based primarily on small case series but there have been no systematic reviews, randomized control trials or meta-analysis to establish optimal treatment strategies. Methods: We searched MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus and other sources, from each database's inception to September 2022. Outcomes of interest included mortality and progression at different time points, as well as complete response and partial response. Meta-analysis was conducted using the random-effects model. Results: The number of studies matching our inquiry was 51 ranging from 1955 to 2019. Total patients studied were 5,847 of which 3,055 were male and the dominant histology was diffuse large B cell lymphoma with 3,816. Treatment primarily consisted of radiation therapy, chemotherapy, or a combination of the two. Overall mortality at 2, 5 and 10 years was 17%, 29% and 39% respectively. Complete response to initial treatment was noted in 73% of patients. Disease progression at 2 and 5 years was 26% and 29% respectively. Patients aged older than 60 years and multiple sites of disease in the skeleton (such as axial and spine etc.) had worse outcomes with RR 1.76 (P value 0.0027) and 1.133 (P value 0.0167) respectively. Additionally, patients who underwent chemotherapy with radiation vs radiation alone had improved outcomes with a relative risk of 0.38 (P value of 0.0001). Patients who underwent radiation treatment in addition to chemotherapy tended to have improved outcomes with a relative risk of 0.60 but this was not statistically significant with a P value of 0.068. Conclusions: We performed a systematic review to determine the characteristics and current treatment of PBL. The analysis demonstrates the rarity and heterogenicity of the disease. The current standard of care is for chemoradiation, but this is based primarily on old case studies. Our study confirms the utility of multimodal treatment with a tendency for improved outcomes. However, further prospective trials are needed to determine the necessity of multimodal treatment given this hypothesis generating study. [Table: see text]

Abstract Background Osteoporosis and osteopenia are associated with increased fracture incidence in postmenopausal women. We aimed to determine the comparative effectiveness of various available pharmacological therapies. Methods We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, ISI Web of Science, and Scopus for randomized controlled trials that enrolled postmenopausal women with primary osteoporosis and evaluated the risk of hip, vertebral, or nonvertebral fractures. A network meta-analysis was conducted using the multivariate random effects method. Results We included 107 trials (193,987 postmenopausal women; mean age, 66 years; 55% white; median follow-up, 28 months). A significant reduction in hip fractures was observed with romosozumab, alendronate, zoledronate, risedronate, denosumab, estrogen with progesterone, and calcium in combination with vitamin D. A significant reduction in nonvertebral fractures was observed with abaloparatide, romosozumab, denosumab, teriparatide, alendronate, risedronate, zoledronate, lasofoxifene, tibolone, estrogen with progesterone, and vitamin D. A significant reduction in vertebral fractures was observed with abaloparatide, teriparatide, parathyroid hormone 1-84, romosozumab, strontium ranelate, denosumab, zoledronate, risedronate, alendronate, ibandronate, raloxifene, bazedoxifene, lasofoxifene, estrogen with progesterone, tibolone, and calcitonin. Teriparatide, abaloparatide, denosumab, and romosozumab were associated with the highest relative risk reductions, whereas ibandronate and selective estrogen receptor modulators had lower efficacy. The evidence for the treatment of fractures with vitamin D and calcium remains limited despite numerous large trials. Conclusions This network meta-analysis provides comparative effective estimates for the various available treatments to reduce the risk of fragility fractures in postmenopausal women.

Abstract Background Several treatments are available to reduce the risk of fragility fractures associated with osteoporosis. The choice of treatment requires knowledge of patients’ values and preferences. The aim of the present study was to summarize what is known about the values and preferences relevant to the management of osteoporosis in women. Methods We conducted a comprehensive search of several databases for studies reported in any language that had included women who had already started or were about to start any pharmacological therapy for osteoporosis. Pairs of reviewers independently selected the studies and extracted the data. The results were synthesized narratively. Results We included 26 studies reporting on 15,348 women (mean age, 66 years). The women considered the effectiveness and adverse events equally, followed by the convenience of taking the drug and its effect on daily routine (less frequent dosing was preferred, the oral route was preferred, and the injectable route was preferred over oral if given less frequently). The treatment cost and duration were less important factors for decision making. Fear of breast cancer and fear of resuming uterine bleeding were common reasons for not choosing estrogen therapy. Calcium and vitamin D were viewed as safe and natural. Across the studies, the preferences were not affected by age, previous drug exposure, or employment status. Conclusions Women starting osteoporosis medications value effectiveness and side effects equally and prefer medications given less frequently. Injectable drugs appear acceptable if given less frequently. More research on patient values and preferences is needed to guide decision making in osteoporosis.