Gionfriddo, Michael R.

Background Intensive care units are high-acuity environments characterized by time pressure, medical complexity, and organizational demands. These conditions may influence clinicians’ ability to provide patient-centered care and contribute to forms of care perceived as fragmented or dehumanizing. Objective To examine how ICU clinicians describe and make sense of the pressures shaping everyday critical care practice, and how these pressures give rise to interacting patterns of care, including those described as hurry, blur, burden, and cruelty. Methods We conducted a qualitative study using focus groups with ICU clinicians from a large academic health system. Discussions were informed by the concept of the pathologies of care as sensitizing concepts. Four focus groups were held with physicians, nurses, advanced practice nurses, and a social worker ( N = 14). Transcripts were analyzed using directed content analysis with both deductive and inductive coding. Results Clinicians described these patterns not as discrete phenomena but as interrelated, context-dependent processes shaped by shared operational pressures such as time constraints, workload, and information demands. These dynamics were often viewed as inherent to the structure and culture of ICU care and were described as co-occurring and compounding. Communication emerged as both a contributor to and a potential mechanism for mitigation, alongside system-level strategies such as reducing documentation burden and leveraging artificial intelligence to support care delivery. Conclusions Patterns reflected in hurry, blur, burden, and cruelty are best understood as emergent properties of complex care systems. Addressing these dynamics may require system-level approaches to improve communication, reduce workload pressures, and support more patient-centered, humanizing care.

ABSTRACT Aims We aimed to examine the association between GLP‐1 RA use and suicidal ideation or behaviours through a systematic review of observational studies. Materials and Methods A comprehensive search of MEDLINE, PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL and PsycINFO was conducted from database inception through December 11, 2025. Observational studies investigating suicidal ideation, suicide attempts or complete suicide among adults using GLP‐1 RAs were included. Eligibility screening, data extraction and risk of bias assessments were performed independently and in duplicate, with disagreements resolved by a third reviewer. Results Forty‐three studies were included. Findings varied by study design. Some case reports suggested a temporal relationship between GLP‐1 RA use and suicidal ideation. Cross‐sectional studies and case–control studies identified a negative association between GLP‐1 RAs and suicide attempts. Pharmacovigilance and cohort studies showed more mixed results, with some studies identifying a positive association between semaglutide or liraglutide and suicidal ideation, while others paradoxically reported a negative association with suicidal behaviours (i.e., attempts and intentional self‐harm) or completed suicide. Conclusions While evidence does not support GLP ‐1 RAs as a causative agent for suicidality, due to multiple risk factors in this population, clinicians should routinely assess mental health status before and during GLP ‐1 RA treatment regardless of indication. Importantly, a history of concurrent mental health conditions should not preclude use of a GLP ‐1 RA ; rather, individual patient factors should be accounted for when making prescribing decisions.

Abstract Background Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related death, and the most common cancer diagnosed globally. Approximately 85% of lung cancer cases are non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). After initial surgical treatment, adjuvant therapy with conventional or targeted chemotherapy can help optimize survival. These treatments, however, must be tailored to each patients’ problematic situation, including cancer characteristics and goals of care. Shared decision making (SDM) is a method of care by which patients and clinicians work together to form plans of care that advance the patient’s problematic human situation. This method often requires evaluating alternative options, “trying them on” for fit given their practical demands and favorable and unfavorable effects. Tools used within the encounter can facilitate and support SDM conversations, yet none exist for considering care post-surgical treatment of NSCLC. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of a novel encounter tool for SDM, NSCLC Choice, compared to usual care at improving SDM and reducing decisional conflict for patients with resected early-stage NSCLC considering adjuvant treatment. Methods We will conduct a parallel, patient-level randomized trial comparing NSCLC Choice with usual care. Patients will be eligible if they are adults with stage >1B NSCLC eligible for postsurgical adjuvant chemotherapy. Allocation will be central and post-consent. Patients will be blinded to our trial hypothesis, instead of being invited to evaluate an educational intervention. Our primary outcome is SDM quality, which we will assess using participant reported measures (patient SDM-Q-9) obtained immediately post-encounter and an observer measure estimated from video recording of trial encounters in both arms (OPTION12). With resources to conduct a 100-patient trial, we will have >80% power to detect a 12-point medium difference between arms in patient-reported SDM-Q-9. We will also assess the secondary outcomes of knowledge about the disease and the features of treatment options using an ad hoc questionnaire, decisional conflict using the Decisional Conflict Scale, and patient and clinician satisfaction using the metrics used in prior SDM intervention trials. We will also determine encounter length using video recordings. Discussion In testing NSCLC Choice, we seek to determine the extent to which this intervention can improve care for patients with NSCLC considering adjuvant therapy after surgery. In addition, we expect to determine whether this intervention is satisfactory to participants and feasible in practice. If successful, this study will result in an evidence-based tool for promoting patient-centered conversations around NSCLC and cancer care those fits. Trial Registration: NCT06122064 ClinicalTrials.gov

The industrialisation of healthcare has transformed the expectation of individualised and compassionate caring for patients into the reality of efficient and standardised processing of people to achieve organisational goals. In this way, healthcare functions like a machine that processes patients via protocols and technologies. Though this standardisation is necessary for enhancing safe and efficient operations, it can also alienate organisations and their clinicians from their core mission, turning care into a transactional endeavour. Consequently, patients must adapt to the system’s needs and work to achieve its goals, adding unnecessary burden and limiting the benefits of their healing endeavour. In this opinion piece, the authors offer an alternative vision of care as the work of people who, in interaction, notice and respond to each patient’s problematic human situation. Healthcare organisations must reclaim this care as its core mission, and foster environments where patients and clinicians may engage in this adaptative and responsive practice. By doing so, healthcare can fulfil its purpose: to care for all in a way that is careful and kind.

ABSTRACT The purpose of this 1‐year study was to assess the effect of osteogenic loading combined with melatonin on musculoskeletal health and well‐being in a population with osteopenia. Participants were randomized into one of four groups and received mock loading plus plant fiber as placebo (ML/Placebo), mock loading plus 5 mg melatonin (ML/Melatonin), osteogenic loading plus placebo (OL/Placebo), and osteogenic loading plus 5 mg melatonin (OL/Melatonin). The loading protocol was designed to deliver multiples of body weight (MOB; 1‐2 MOB for mock loading and 1.5–4.2 MOB for osteogenic loading) to the upper body (targeting the arm, chest, and shoulders), core (targeting the spine and core stability), lower body (targeting the legs and hip) and postural (targeting the spine and posture). Following these interventions, musculoskeletal health was measured by DXA and functional testing using timed‐up‐and‐go (TUG) and sit‐to‐stand (STS) assessments. Markers of bone health (e.g., P1NP, CTX, CRP, cortisol, and melatonin) were assessed in urine collected during the night (10 pm–6 am). Mental health assessments were conducted using PSS, CES‐D, STAI and QualiOst. Time‐dependent increases in the amount of force exerted (in lbs) were observed in the OL groups for all musculoskeletal systems targeted, compared to those participants receiving ML. Over 12mos, compared to baseline, participants in the OL/Melatonin group had statistically significant increases in lumbar spine T‐scores (mean difference [MD] = 0.13, standard deviation [SD] = 0.05, p = 0.015) and BMD (MD = 0.013, SD = 0.006, p = 0.021). No other statistically significant effects were noted for T‐scores, BMD, or FRAX scores. Additionally, no significant differences were observed when T‐scores were compared between groups. Functional assessments at 12mos revealed increases in TUG times (MD = −1.7, SD = 0.3, p = 0.002) from baseline and deterioration for STS (MD = 2.8, SD = 0.59, p = 0.004) from month 03 for ML/placebo group, which did not occur for the other interventions. Correlation analysis revealed negative associations between TUG performance and CTX levels starting at 3mos in the OL/Melatonin group ( r = −0.960, p = 0.04). The change in STS repetitions over a 12‐month period (12mo–0mo) was negatively associated with the P1NP:CTX ratio ( r = −0.978, p = 0.02) and positively associated with melatonin levels in the OL/Melatonin group ( r = 0.958, p = 0.04). No changes in nocturnal output of CRP or cortisol and subject‐reported outcomes were observed for any of the interventions within and between groups. The results from this study reveal that osteogenic loading combined with melatonin may be an alternative therapeutic intervention for those with osteopenia.

Abstract Objective This study aims to describe the experience of implementing a psychosocial distress screening system for children with serious or chronic medical conditions. Methods Achieving RoutIne Screening for Emotional health (ARISE) was developed to systematically evaluate psychosocial distress in children with serious medical or chronic medical illnesses, by integrating patient-reported outcome measures (PROM) into care delivery. ARISE was developed using a user-centered approach with extensive input from patients, families, and healthcare professionals to overcome barriers to routine PROM collection and integration into care as usual. It comprises a system to capture PROMs and then relay results to clinicians for changing care. We sought to implement ARISE at four subspecialty pediatric clinics caring for patients with cystic fibrosis, sickle cell disease, hemophilia, and neurological malignancy. Results Problems with acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility represented barriers to implementation which were overcome by modifying the intervention using stakeholder input during the planning phase, leading to broad program acceptance. ARISE was implemented in three of the four clinics, in which 79.8% of eligible children and their family completed PROMs. Conclusion The ARISE program demonstrated the feasibility and effectiveness of integrating psychosocial screenings into subspecialty pediatric clinics, thereby enhancing the identification and management of psychosocial issues in children with serious and chronic medical illnesses.