Lizarazo, Maria Jose

Background Intensive care units are high-acuity environments characterized by time pressure, medical complexity, and organizational demands. These conditions may influence clinicians’ ability to provide patient-centered care and contribute to forms of care perceived as fragmented or dehumanizing. Objective To examine how ICU clinicians describe and make sense of the pressures shaping everyday critical care practice, and how these pressures give rise to interacting patterns of care, including those described as hurry, blur, burden, and cruelty. Methods We conducted a qualitative study using focus groups with ICU clinicians from a large academic health system. Discussions were informed by the concept of the pathologies of care as sensitizing concepts. Four focus groups were held with physicians, nurses, advanced practice nurses, and a social worker ( N = 14). Transcripts were analyzed using directed content analysis with both deductive and inductive coding. Results Clinicians described these patterns not as discrete phenomena but as interrelated, context-dependent processes shaped by shared operational pressures such as time constraints, workload, and information demands. These dynamics were often viewed as inherent to the structure and culture of ICU care and were described as co-occurring and compounding. Communication emerged as both a contributor to and a potential mechanism for mitigation, alongside system-level strategies such as reducing documentation burden and leveraging artificial intelligence to support care delivery. Conclusions Patterns reflected in hurry, blur, burden, and cruelty are best understood as emergent properties of complex care systems. Addressing these dynamics may require system-level approaches to improve communication, reduce workload pressures, and support more patient-centered, humanizing care.

Abstract Older adults with dementia account over 15% of intensive care unit (ICU) admissions and face higher risks of functional decline and complications. We systematically evaluated the difference in ICU-related outcomes in patients with and without dementia, (e.g., mortality, resuscitation and code status decisions, complications, duration of life support and hospital stay). Searches were performed in MEDLINE, EMBASE, SCOPUS, and Web of Science between 2003 and 2024. A random-effects meta-analysis was done of odds ratios (OR) and mean differences (MD) and their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated. Fifteen studies, including 1,231,037 patients (12% with dementia), met the inclusion criteria. Adjusted analysis showed that patients with dementia had a higher risk of ICU mortality (OR = 1.05, 95% CI 1.00–1.11), 30-day mortality (OR = 1.54, 95% CI 1.47–1.62) and 12-month mortality (OR = 1.95, 95% CI 1.88–2.02). They were less likely to receive mechanical ventilation (OR = 0.73, 95% CI 0.62–0.85, I2 0.0%) and more likely to develop delirium (OR = 4.80, 95% CI 1.81–12.72). In patients with dementia, ICU stays were slightly shorter (MD = –1 day, 95% CI –1.7 to –0.4), and discharge home was less common (OR = 0.40, 95% CI 0.39–0.42). Older adults with dementia experienced greater risk of mortality and delirium, alongside less aggressive intervention use and healthcare utilization (i.e., shorter ICU stays). These findings underscore the need for prospective studies to optimize ICU decision-making and post-discharge care for this vulnerable population.