Roberts, Daniel L.

Background Patients with substance use disorder (SUD) have high rates of hospitalization, readmission, and prolonged lengths of stay. Objectives To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of the impact of addiction consult services in the inpatient setting for patients with SUD. Methods Five databases were systematically searched from their earliest available records through January 2025. Two authors independently screened articles, extracted data, and assessed the quality of each study with the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for observational studies and the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized clinical trials. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) with 95% CIs were calculated for dichotomous outcomes, and mean differences were calculated for continuous outcomes. Results The search retrieved 20 studies that met inclusion criteria. The intervention for all studies was an addiction medicine consult, but the definition of this consult varied. The meta-analysis did not detect statistically significant differences in hospital length of stay, hospital readmission, or emergency department visits at 1 year among patients who received the consult compared with those who did not; however, many of these outcomes were likely underpowered. However, addiction medicine consults significantly improved the odds of inpatient initiation of medication for SUD (OR, 7.30; 95% CI, 3.30-16.13; P <.001) and postdischarge SUD treatment linkage and adherence (OR, 3.31; 95% CI, 2.06-5.32; P <.001). Conclusion Inpatient addiction consult services are associated with increased inpatient initiation of medication for SUD treatment and postdischarge treatment linkage and adherence. No clear association was identified between the consult and readmissions, emergency department utilization, or length of stay.

Abstract Background: Refugee, immigrant, and asylee populations face significant barriers to healthcare access, including linguistic, cultural, socioeconomic, and institutional challenges. The Refugee Education and Clinic Team (REACT) is a student-run free clinic in Maricopa County, Arizona, providing subacute care and referrals to federally qualified health centers (FQHCs). This study evaluates patient demographics, clinical needs, social determinants of health (SDH), and follow-up outcomes to identify barriers to long-term care integration. Methods: A retrospective chart review of all REACT patients (2022–2024) was conducted using electronic health records. Data on demographics, SDH, chief complaints, prescriptions, referrals, and follow-up outcomes were analyzed using descriptive statistics and logistic regression. Results: The cohort (n=95) was predominantly uninsured (63%) and faced significant social barriers, including food insecurity (30.5%), employment challenges (30.5%), and language barriers (28.4%). Musculoskeletal pain and general health check-ups were the most common concerns. Older patients had higher-than-expected rates of possible hypertension. Nearly 90% received primary care provider (PCP) referrals, yet follow-up rates remained low, with only 42% attending or planning to still attend the referred visit after their initial clinic visit with us. Successful phone outreach was a significant predictor (OR: 0.5, 95% CI: 0.31-0.77) of PCP visit attendance by multivariate logistic regression. Conclusion: REACT serves a unique population with distinct barriers to care. While the clinic facilitates healthcare entry, limited follow-up adherence highlights the need for enhanced outreach, geographically optimized referrals, and integrated allied health services to improve care continuity.

BACKGROUNDWith the advent of limits to resident duty hours and the size of teaching services, many academic institutions have introduced nonteaching services, often triaging perceived better teaching cases to the resident services.OBJECTIVETo compare resident versus faculty perceptions of ideal cases for teaching services and compare these perceptions with actual triage decisions made by faculty who assigned patients to either teaching or nonteaching services.DESIGNResidents and hospitalist faculty were surveyed about their perceptions of ideal and actual teaching admissions, first with qualitative, open‐ended questions and then with quantitative, specific questions generated from responses to the first survey. Characteristics of patients admitted to teaching and nonteaching services were analyzed retrospectively and compared with resident and faculty perceptions.RESULTSResidents and faculty agreed that rare cases, patients with unique physical findings, and a variety of pathology were ideal for teaching services and that social admissions, benefactors, and patients with chronic or functional pain were not. Residents believed that traditional (“bread and butter”) medicine cases were under‐represented on the teaching services. Although residents perceived that they received a disproportionate number of older patients, outside transfers, patients with chronic pain, and patients with cancer, the only statistically significant difference was in patient age, with the teaching service actually receiving younger patients (66.7 vs 69.3 years; P = 0.008).CONCLUSIONSResidents and faculty have similar views about ideal teaching cases, but a triage system based on perceived educational merit creates the possibility of resident misperceptions about their case mix, even if patients are distributed relatively equitably. Journal of Hospital Medicine 2014;9:508–514. © 2014 Society of Hospital Medicine

BACKGROUNDGeneral internists suffer higher rates of burnout and lower satisfaction with work‐life balance than most specialties, but the impact of inpatient vs outpatient practice location is unclear.METHODSPhysicians in the American Medical Association Physician Masterfile were previously surveyed about burnout, depression, suicidal ideation, quality of life, fatigue, work‐life balance, career plans, and health behaviors. We extracted and compared data for these variables for the 130 internal medicine hospitalists and 448 outpatient general internists who participated. Analyses were adjusted for age, sex, hours worked, and practice setting.RESULTSThere were 52.3% of the hospitalists and 54.5% of the outpatient internists affected by burnout (P = 0.86). High scores on the emotional exhaustion subscale (43.8% vs 48.1%, P = 0.71) and on the depersonalization subscale (42.3% vs 32.7%, P = 0.17) were common but similar in frequency in the 2 groups. Hospitalists were more likely to score low on the personal accomplishment subscale (20.3% vs 9.6%, P = 0.04). There were no differences in symptoms of depression (40.3% for hospitalists vs 40.0% for outpatient internists, P = 0.73) or recent suicidality (9.2% vs 5.8%, P = 0.15). Rates of reported recent work‐home conflict were similar (48.4% vs 41.3%, P = 0.64), but hospitalists were more likely to agree that their work schedule leaves enough time for their personal life and family (50.0% vs 42.0%, P = 0.007).CONCLUSIONSBurnout was common among both hospitalists and outpatient general internists, although hospitalists were more satisfied with work‐life balance. A better understanding of the causes of distress and identification of solutions for all internists is needed. Journal of Hospital Medicine 2014;9:176–181. © 2014 Society of Hospital Medicine

BACKGROUNDBurnout is a syndrome affecting the entirety of work life and characterized by cynicism, detachment, and inefficacy. Despite longstanding concerns about burnout in hospital medicine, few data about burnout in hospitalists have been published.PURPOSEA systematic review of the literature on burnout in inpatient‐based and outpatient‐based physicians worldwide was undertaken to determine whether inpatient physicians experience more burnout than outpatient physicians.DATA SOURCESFive medical databases were searched for relevant terms with no language restrictions. Authors were contacted for unpublished data and clarification of the practice location of study subjects.STUDY SELECTIONTwo investigators independently reviewed each article. Included studies provided a measure of burnout in inpatient and/or outpatient nontrainee physicians.DATA EXTRACTIONFifty‐four studies met inclusion criteria, 15 of which provided direct comparisons of inpatient and outpatient physicians. Twenty‐eight studies used the same burnout measure and therefore were amenable to statistical analysis.DATA SYNTHESISOutpatient physicians reported more emotional exhaustion than inpatient physicians. No statistically significant differences in depersonalization or personal accomplishment were found. Further comparisons were limited by the heterogeneity of instruments used to measure burnout and the lack of available information about practice location in many studies.CONCLUSIONSThe existing literature does not support the widely held belief that burnout is more frequent in hospitalists than outpatient physicians. Better comparative studies of hospitalist burnout are needed. Journal of Hospital Medicine 2013;8:653–664. © 2013 Society of Hospital Medicine

Objective. To report an unusual cause of coma in an adult.Design. Case report.Setting. University teaching hospital.Patient. A previously healthy 53-year-old man initially presented with altered mental status and progressed to coma. He was found to be substantially hyperammonemic and did not improve with lactulose therapy and continuous venovenous hemodialysis.Results. Biochemical testing revealed previously undiagnosed ornithine transcarbamylase deficiency, and the patient responded to arginine, sodium phenylacetate, and sodium benzoate.Conclusion. Even in adult patients with no known history, inborn errors of metabolism must be considered in the differential diagnosis of unexplained coma. Defects of the urea cycle can present with an unprovoked hyperammonemic coma.