Back to Authors

Budavari, Adriane I.

Mayo Clinic

Division of Hospital Internal Medicine, and

Citations 2

Culture-Proven Thorn-Associated Infections in Arizona: 10-Year Experience at Mayo Clinic
Simmons, Sierra C. , Budavari, Adriane I., Kusne, Shimon , Zhang, Nan , Vikram, Holenarasipur R. , Blair, Janis E. , Vikram, Holenarasipur R.

Open Forum Infectious Diseases | February 10, 2017 | Volume: 4 | Issue: 1 | Pages: No page available

10.1093/ofid/ofx017 Get It

AbstractBackgroundThorn injuries are common in the desert Southwest; however, the frequency and microbiology of thorn-associated infections have not been systematically described. Most information comes from case reports describing infections from atypical or environmental microorganisms. Our aim was to summarize the spectrum of thorn-associated infections.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective review of electronic health records for patients presenting to our institution from January 1, 2005 to December 31, 2014 for treatment of thorn-associated injuries and then focused on the patients with cultures.ResultsOf 2758 records reviewed, 1327 patients had thorn-associated injuries; however, only 58 (4.4%) had cultures. Of these patients, 37 (64%) had positive findings; 5 had polymicrobial infection. The most commonly identified organisms were Staphylococcus aureus (n = 22, 59.0%) and coagulase-negative Staphylococcus species (n = 8, 21.6%). Other pathogens included Nocardia species (n = 3, 8.1%), Streptococcus species (n = 2, 5.4%), Gram-negative bacteria (n = 2, 5.4%), Aspergillus species (n = 2, 5.4%), Paecilomyces lilacinus (n = 1, 2.7%), and Candida species (n = 1, 2.7%). There were no infections caused by Pantoea agglomerans, Sporothrix schenckii, or Coccidioides spp.ConclusionsIn contrast to most published case reports, we found that typical cutaneous microorganisms, such as Staphylococcus species, caused the majority of culture-positive, thorn-related infections.
Burnout in inpatient‐based versus outpatient‐based physicians: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
Roberts, Daniel L. , Cannon, Keith, Wellik, Kay E., Budavari, Adriane I., Wu, Qing Feng

Journal of Hospital Medicine | October 25, 2013 | Volume: 8 | Issue: 11 | Pages: 653-664

10.1002/jhm.2093 Get It

BACKGROUNDBurnout is a syndrome affecting the entirety of work life and characterized by cynicism, detachment, and inefficacy. Despite longstanding concerns about burnout in hospital medicine, few data about burnout in hospitalists have been published.PURPOSEA systematic review of the literature on burnout in inpatient‐based and outpatient‐based physicians worldwide was undertaken to determine whether inpatient physicians experience more burnout than outpatient physicians.DATA SOURCESFive medical databases were searched for relevant terms with no language restrictions. Authors were contacted for unpublished data and clarification of the practice location of study subjects.STUDY SELECTIONTwo investigators independently reviewed each article. Included studies provided a measure of burnout in inpatient and/or outpatient nontrainee physicians.DATA EXTRACTIONFifty‐four studies met inclusion criteria, 15 of which provided direct comparisons of inpatient and outpatient physicians. Twenty‐eight studies used the same burnout measure and therefore were amenable to statistical analysis.DATA SYNTHESISOutpatient physicians reported more emotional exhaustion than inpatient physicians. No statistically significant differences in depersonalization or personal accomplishment were found. Further comparisons were limited by the heterogeneity of instruments used to measure burnout and the lack of available information about practice location in many studies.CONCLUSIONSThe existing literature does not support the widely held belief that burnout is more frequent in hospitalists than outpatient physicians. Better comparative studies of hospitalist burnout are needed. Journal of Hospital Medicine 2013;8:653–664. © 2013 Society of Hospital Medicine