Kwong, Raymond Y.K.

Importance Current risk prediction guidelines for hypertrophic cardiomyopathy predict only sudden cardiac death and are imperfect, leading to avoidable deaths and unnecessary implantable cardioverter defibrillators. Objective To combine prospectively collected clinical history, imaging, genetic, and biomarker data to improve risk prediction of adverse events in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Design, Setting, and Participants A total of 2750 patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy were prospectively enrolled in the registry-based study from 44 sites in North America and Europe with expertise in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging. Participants were enrolled from April 1, 2014, to April 7, 2017. Exposures Patients underwent a health history questionnaire, blood sampling for biomarkers and genotyping, and contrast-enhanced CMR. Patients were followed up yearly by telephone and through records review regarding event documentation. Main Outcomes and Measures The predefined composite adjudicated primary end point was time to first event for hypertrophic cardiomyopathy–related deaths; nonfatal sustained ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) requiring cardioversion or defibrillation; and left ventricular (LV) assist device implant or heart transplant. A secondary end point was a composite of sudden cardiac death and nonfatal VA events. The elastic-net method identified the most important predictors. Cox proportional hazards regression assessed associations with time to the first end point. Results Of the 2750 prospectively enrolled patients, 2698 (98%) had analyzable data after 9 were excluded because they had hypertrophic cardiomyopathy phenocopies and 43 withdrew. Of these remaining patients, 1919 (71%) were male, mean age was 50 years (SD, 11 years), and 423 (16%) were from underrepresented racial and minority groups. The mean follow-up was 6.9 years (SD, 2.1 years). The primary event model in 104 patients included LV scar as a percentage of LV mass by late gadolinium enhancement (LGE%; hazard ratio [HR], 1.86; 95% CI, 1.58-2.20; P < .001), LV mass index (HR, 1.09; 95% CI, 1.01-1.17; P = .03), LV end-systolic volume index (HR, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.12-1.46; P < .001 ), all per 10-unit increase, history of heart failure at study entry (HR, 2.89; 95% CI, 1.75-4.77; P < .001), and log N-terminal pro–B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP; HR, 1.41; 95% CI, 1.17-1.70; P < .001) level per log unit, (C index for all, 0.77). An LGE percentage of the LV mass of 9% or higher substantially increased the primary composite event rate ( P = .001). The secondary sudden cardiac death and VA risk factor model (in 69 patients) included LGE%, LV mass index, LV ejection fraction, and log(NT-proBNP) (C index, 0.76). Conclusions and Relevance These results provide prospective evidence for incorporating cardiac magnetic resonance and NT-proBNP in the evaluation of patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01915615

Introduction: Impaired left atrial (LA) function may limit optimal cardiac performance, reflecting both LA load and atrial dysfunction in HFpEF. The link between MRI-derived LA characteristics and exercise capacity in HFpEF has not been studied. Hypothesis: We hypothesized that total LA emptying fraction (LAEF) is reduced in HFpEF vs. healthy controls and LA functional impairment would be correlated with LV diastolic dysfunction, vascular dysfunction, and exercise intolerance. As LA hypertension may increase right ventricular load and limit increases in pulmonary perfusion with exercise, the correlation of LAEF with ventilatory efficiency (VE/VCO2 slope) was also examined. Methods: Baseline exercise, echo, and cardiac MRI data from RELAX (a study of sildenafil in HFpEF) in patients in sinus rhythm with a measureable LAEF by MRI (n=100) were utilized. Healthy volunteers (n=21) were included for comparison. LAV was measured by the biplane area-length method using 2-/4-chamber SSFP CMR. LAEF was defined as total (ΔLAVmax-min), passive/conduit (ΔLAVmax-before atrial contraction ), and active (ΔLAVbefore atrial contraction-min), each divided by maximal LAV. Results: As compared to controls, LAEF (particularly passive conduit function) was reduced in HFpEF (Table 1). In HFpEF, patients with lower LAEF had a larger LA, more echo diastolic dysfunction, higher PA systolic pressure and NT-proBNP, reduced aortic distensibility, worse exercise capacity, and ventilatory inefficiency (Table 2). Conclusions: LA function is impaired in HFpEF, may serve as a marker of chronic LA hypertension and may contribute to impaired exercise intolerance and ventilatory inefficiency.