Grill, Warren M.

Abstract Selective activation of smaller diameter over large diameter nerve fibers represents a broad challenge in the electrical modulation of neural activity for clinical applications. For example, off-target activation of motor nerve fibers has been implicated in several failed vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) clinical trials by precluding achieving current amplitudes sufficient to activate the therapeutically targeted small diameter fibers. In this study, we evaluated the use of high-frequency (HF) stimulation to block unwanted activation of large diameter fibers evoked by traditional low-frequency (LF) VNS in a large animal (swine) model. We demonstrate that HF can eliminate specific unwanted LF-evoked components from neural recordings with high selectivity – along with their associated off-target physiological responses - while preserving the activation of smaller diameter fibers driving intended physiological responses. Conversely, block of the smaller diameter fibers was only observed at HF amplitudes much higher than amplitudes commonly used for HF block clinically. We found that in addition to blocking the LF-evoked compound action potential, lower HF amplitudes also drive asynchronous activity which can easily be overlooked. Only at high amplitudes did HF block LF-evoked activation without concomitant asynchronous activation. These data have numerous implications for existing and future LF and HF block neuromodulation therapies.

Cervical vagal nerve stimulation (VNS) is an FDA approved treatment for epilepsy and depression and is currently being evaluated for treatment of numerous other disorders including pain, anxiety, and inflammation. VNS also received European market approval for heart failure, bronchoconstriction, and diabetes; however, approval for these indications was based on studies in animals, such as dogs and rats, whose vagal nerve size may not have been representative of humans. When subjected to double‐blinded, randomized, sham controlled studies for subsequent U.S. approval, many of these CE‐marked VNS indications failed to meet their primary efficacy endpoints. More than 100,000 patients have undergone VNS, but despite the efficacy of vagal nerve stimulation in a subset of patients, many fail to reach stimulation levels that result in alleviation of symptoms without triggering unwanted side effects. Post hoc studies of the patient population suggested that VNS may not engage the intended fiber pathways in humans, despite engagement in preclinical studies in mouse, rat, or dog. Stimulation parameters were limited in these studies as higher parameters caused side effects such as cough, voice alteration, and dyspnea. Discrepancies between stimulation amplitude needed for intended effect versus unwanted side effect could be directly related to the relative size of the vagus nerve across animal models, variations in fascicle organization, or variations in branching patterns. To address translating improvements in VNS from the lab to the clinic, we evaluated the swine as a potential model for approximating the clinical environment. The size and fascicular organization of the swine vagus nerve is more representative of the human nerve than previously used models. We used a combination of histology, microdissection, and ultrasound to establish a distinct bimodal organization of groups of fascicles stemming from one large fascicle at the inferior (nodose) ganglion, an organization we have termed ‘vagotopy’. We demonstrated that with the use of ultrasound we can visualize the fascicular organization in vivo , an approach that could be used clinically to target stimulation of either sensory fibers or parasympathetic efferents, depending on therapeutic intent. These advances in a clinically relevant model not only inform electrode placement for target engagement, but provide an approach for reduction of side effects. Support or Funding Information Acknowledgements Funded by TL1TR002380 andThe Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) Biological Technologies Office (BTO) Targeted Neuroplasticity Training Program under the auspices of Doug Weber and Tristan McClure‐Begley through the Space and Naval Warfare Systems Command (SPAWAR) Systems Center with (SSC) Pacific grants no. N66001‐17‐2‐4010, and the NIH SPARC Program Award OT2 OD025340.

Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) is FDA‐approved and CE‐marked for a diverse set of conditions including epilepsy, depression, heart failure, and others. Despite widespread adoption and perceived efficacy, a post‐hoc analysis of patients treated for heart failure using VNS revealed that only 12% of patients showed stimulation evoked heart rate changes one‐year post‐implant. This finding is not unexpected given that A‐type nerve fibers have the lowest activation thresholds, and they innervate neck muscles, causing contractions that patients will not tolerate. Therefore, muscle responses at lower amplitudes may have prevented application of higher amplitudes required to achieve cardiac effects in clinical trials of VNS for heart failure. Understanding therapy‐limiting side effects to VNS and finding ways to mitigate them are critical for optimizing VNS for clinical therapies. We developed a swine model of VNS which closely approximates the size and fascicular organization of the cervical vagus nerve observed in humans. The clinical LivaNova stimulation electrode was used as advised by a practicing neurosurgeon. We hypothesized that neck muscle responses are mediated by somatic branches of the vagus nerve as opposed to direct electrical activation of the muscle fibers. Further, we hypothesized that stimulation evoked responses depend on the location of the stimulation electrode on the vagus nerve. We measured compound nerve action potentials using intrafascicular electrodes placed within the vagus to identify activation of different nerve fiber types by conduction velocity. The downstream effects of nerve fiber activation, i.e. changes in heart rate and neck muscle responses (EMG), were measured using an arterial catheter and intramuscular electrodes, respectively. We then used a neuromuscular junction blocking agent, as well as systematic transection of somatic vagus nerve branches, to specifically identify the pathways causing neck muscle contractions. Two pathways contributed to VNS‐evoked neck muscle responses: activation of nerve fibers in the recurrent laryngeal branch of the cervical vagus nerve at low amplitudes and in the superior laryngeal branch at higher amplitudes. Lesser activation of the superior laryngeal branch could be achieved by moving the stimulation electrode caudally down the length of the vagus. This work represents a step towards mitigating intolerable side effects of VNS, thereby allowing maximization of intended target engagement and therapeutic benefit. Support or Funding Information The Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) Biological Technologies Office (BTO) Targeted Neuroplasticity Training Program under the auspices of Doug Weber and Tristan McClure‐Begley through the Space and Naval Warfare Systems Command (SPAWAR) Systems Center with (SSC) Pacific grants no. N66001‐17‐2‐4010, and the NIH SPARC Program Award OT2 OD025340.