Deshmukh, Ashlesha

Abstract Selective activation of smaller diameter over large diameter nerve fibers represents a broad challenge in the electrical modulation of neural activity for clinical applications. For example, off-target activation of motor nerve fibers has been implicated in several failed vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) clinical trials by precluding achieving current amplitudes sufficient to activate the therapeutically targeted small diameter fibers. In this study, we evaluated the use of high-frequency (HF) stimulation to block unwanted activation of large diameter fibers evoked by traditional low-frequency (LF) VNS in a large animal (swine) model. We demonstrate that HF can eliminate specific unwanted LF-evoked components from neural recordings with high selectivity – along with their associated off-target physiological responses - while preserving the activation of smaller diameter fibers driving intended physiological responses. Conversely, block of the smaller diameter fibers was only observed at HF amplitudes much higher than amplitudes commonly used for HF block clinically. We found that in addition to blocking the LF-evoked compound action potential, lower HF amplitudes also drive asynchronous activity which can easily be overlooked. Only at high amplitudes did HF block LF-evoked activation without concomitant asynchronous activation. These data have numerous implications for existing and future LF and HF block neuromodulation therapies.

AbstractBackground and PurposeSpinal cord stimulation (SCS) is approved by the Food and Drug Administration for treating chronic intractable pain in the back, trunk, or limbs through stimulation of the dorsal column. Numerous studies have used swine as an analog of the human spinal cord to better understand SCS and further improve its efficacy. We performed high‐resolution imaging of the porcine spinal cord with intact dura mater using micro‐computed tomography (μCT) to construct detailed 3‐dimensional (3D) visualizations of the spinal cord and characterize the morphology of the dorsal and ventral rootlets.MethodsWe obtained spinal cords from Yorkshire/Landrace crossbred swine (N = 7), stained samples with osmium tetroxide, and performed μCT imaging of the T12‐T15 levels at isotropic voxel resolutions ranging from 3.3 to 50 μm. We measured the anatomical morphology using the 3D volumes and compared our results to measurements previously collected from swine and human spinal cords via microdissection techniques in prior literature.ResultsWhile the porcine thoracic‐lumbar spinal cord is a popular model for SCS, we highlight multiple notable differences compared to previously published T8‐T12 human measurements including rootlet counts (porcine dorsal/ventral: 12.2 ± 2.6, 26.6 ± 3.4; human dorsal/ventral: 5.3 ± 1.3, 4.4 ± 2.4), rootlet angles (porcine ventral‐rostral: 161 ± 1°, ventral‐caudal: 155 ± 6°, dorsal‐rostral: 148 ± 9°, dorsal‐caudal: 142 ± 6°; human ventral‐rostral: 170 ± 3°, ventral‐caudal: 22 ± 10°, dorsal‐rostral: 171 ± 3°, dorsal‐caudal: 15 ± 7°), and the presence and count of dorsal rootlet bundles.ConclusionsDetailed measurements and highlighted differences between human and porcine spinal cords can inform variations in modeling and electrophysiological experiments between the two species. In contrast to other approaches for measuring the spinal cord and rootlet morphology, our method keeps the dura intact, reducing potential artifacts from dissection.