Back to Authors

Whitcomb, David C.

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4462-1410

Mayo Clinic

University of Pittsburgh

Citations 22

Prevalence and Associated Factors of Abdominal Pain and Disability at 1-Year Follow-up After an Attack of Acute Pancreatitis
Gougol, Amir , Machicado, Jorge D. , Matta, Bassem , Pothoulakis, Ioannis , Slivka, Adam, Yadav, Dhiraj , Paragomi, Pedram , Whitcomb, David C. , Papachristou, Georgios I.

Pancreas | November 4, 2019 | Volume: 48 | Issue: 10 | Pages: 1348-1353

10.1097/mpa.0000000000001434 Get It

Objective The aim of the study was to report the prevalence and predictors of abdominal pain and disability 1 year after an acute pancreatitis (AP) attack. Methods Patients were prospectively enrolled between December 2012 and April 2016. Enrolled subjects were contacted at a median of 13 months after enrollment. Multivariable regression models were used to determine factors independently associated with abdominal pain at follow-up. Results Response rate was 71% (110/155). Of respondents, median age was 51 years, 58% were female, and 14% had severe AP. At follow-up, 24% of patients reported abdominal pain (65% intermittent, 35% constant), 10% used analgesics regularly, and 6% had regular opioids use. Furthermore, 41% of patients experienced pain-related interference with work or daily activities, and 8% developed disability. On regression analysis, idiopathic etiology (odds ratio [OR], 3.8; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.1–13.6) failure (OR, 3.3; 95% CI, 1.1–7.9), and recurrent AP (OR, 2.9; 95% CI, 1.1–10.6) were independently associated with abdominal pain at follow-up. Disability at follow-up was associated with younger age, current smoking, and intensive care unit admission (all P < 0.05). Conclusions Abdominal pain and disability are potential long-term sequelae of AP. Certain pre-existing factors and pancreatitis features are associated with these outcomes at one-year follow-up of AP.
Genetic Risk Score in Diabetes Associated With Chronic Pancreatitis Versus Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
Goodarzi, Mark O. , Nagpal, Tanvi, Greer, Phil J. , Cui, Jinrui, Chen, Yii‐Der I., Pankow, James S. , Rotter, Jerome I. , Alkaade, Samer, Amann, Stephen T. , Baillie, John , Banks, Peter A. , Conwell, Darwin L. , Coté, Gregory A. , Forsmark, Christopher E., Gardner, Timothy B. , Gelrud, Andrés , Guda, Nalini M. , LaRusch, Jessica, Lewis, Michele D. , Money, Mary E. , Muniraj, Thiruvengadam , Romagnuolo, Joseph , Sandhu, Bimaljit S., Sherman, Stuart , Wilcox, C. Mel, Park, Walter G. , Andersen, Dana K. , Hart, Phil A. , Yadav, Dhiraj , Whitcomb, David C. , Whitcomb, David C , Rotter, Jerome I , Pankow, James S , Lewis, Michele D , Nagpal, Tanvi, Guo, Xiuqing , Brand, Randall E. , Papachristou, Georgios I. , Singh, Vikesh K. , Pandol, Stephen J. , Bellin, Melena D.

Clinical and Translational Gastroenterology | June 22, 2019 | Volume: 10 | Issue: 7 | Pages: e00057

10.14309/ctg.0000000000000057 Get It

Introduction: Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a complication of chronic pancreatitis (CP). Whether pancreatogenic diabetes associated with CP-DM represents a discrete pathophysiologic entity from type 2 DM (T2DM) remains uncertain. Addressing this question is needed for development of specific measures to manage CP-DM. We approached this question from a unique standpoint, hypothesizing that if CP-DM and T2DM are separate disorders, they should be genetically distinct. To test this hypothesis, we sought to determine whether a genetic risk score (GRS) based on validated single nucleotide polymorphisms for T2DM could distinguish between groups with CP-DM and T2DM. Methods: We used 60 T2DM single nucleotide polymorphisms to construct a weighted GRS in 1,613 subjects from the North American Pancreatitis Study 2 and 2,685 subjects from the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis, all of European origin. Results: The mean GRS was identical between 321 subjects with CP-DM and 423 subjects with T2DM (66.53 vs 66.42, P = 0.95), and the GRS of both diabetic groups was significantly higher than that of nondiabetic controls (n = 3,554, P < 0.0001). Exploratory analyses attempting to enrich the CP-DM group for pancreatogenic diabetes, such as eliminating diabetes diagnosed before CP, requiring pancreas-specific comorbidities, or removing those with a family history of diabetes, did not improve the ability of the GRS to distinguish between CP-DM and T2DM. Discussion: Recognizing that we lacked a gold standard to define CP-DM, our study suggests that CP-DM may be a subtype of T2DM, a notion that should be tested in future, large prospective studies.
Acute Pancreatitis Task Force on Quality: Development of Quality Indicators for Acute Pancreatitis Management
Vivian, Elaina , Cler, Leslie, Conwell, Darwin L. , Coté, Gregory A. , Dickerman, Richard, Freeman, Martin L. , Gardner, Timothy B. , Hawes, Robert H. , Kedia, Prashant , Krishnamoorthi, Rajesh , Oduor, Hellen , Ross, Andrew , Sethi, Amrita , Varadarajulu, Shyam , Vege, Santhi Swaroop , Wassef, Wahid , Wilcox, C. Mel, Yadav, Dhiraj , Ellison, Ashton , Habash, Samar, Rastegari, Sheila , Reddy, Rathan , Yen, Timothy , Tarnasky, Paul R., Pandol, Stephen J. , Papachristou, Georgios I. , Whitcomb, David C. , Wu, Bechien U. , Brooks, Mary Rachel

American Journal of Gastroenterology | June 14, 2019 | Volume: 114 | Issue: 8 | Pages: 1322-1342

10.14309/ajg.0000000000000264 Get It

INTRODUCTION: Detailed recommendations and guidelines for acute pancreatitis (AP) management currently exist. However, quality indicators (QIs) are required to measure performance in health care. The goal of the Acute Pancreatitis Task Force on Quality was to formally develop QIs for the management of patients with known or suspected AP using a modified version of the RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Methodology. METHODS: A multidisciplinary expert panel composed of physicians (gastroenterologists, hospitalists, and surgeons) who are acknowledged leaders in their specialties and who represent geographic and practice setting diversity was convened. A literature review was conducted, and a list of proposed QIs was developed. In 3 rounds, panelists reviewed literature, modified QIs, and rated them on the basis of scientific evidence, bias, interpretability, validity, necessity, and proposed performance targets. RESULTS: Supporting literature and a list of 71 proposed QIs across 10 AP domains (Diagnosis, Etiology, Initial Assessment and Risk Stratification, etc.) were sent to the expert panel to review and independently rate in round 1 (95% of panelists participated). Based on a round 2 face-to-face discussion of QIs (75% participation), 41 QIs were classified as valid. During round 3 (90% participation), panelists rated the 41 valid QIs for necessity and proposed performance thresholds. The final classification determined that 40 QIs were both valid and necessary. DISCUSSION: Hospitals and providers managing patients with known or suspected AP should ensure that patients receive high-quality care and desired outcomes according to current evidence-based best practices. This physician-led initiative formally developed 40 QIs and performance threshold targets for AP management. Validated QIs provide a dependable quantitative framework for health systems to monitor the quality of care provided to patients with known or suspected AP.
Chronic Pancreatitis
Schwarzenberg, Sarah Jane , Uç, Aliye , Zimmerman, Bridget, Wilschanski, Michael , Wilcox, C. Mel , Werlin, Steven L. , Troendle, David M. , Tang, Gong , Slivka, Adam, Sherman, Stuart , Shah, Uzma , Sandhu, Bimaljit S., Romagnuolo, Joseph , Rhee, Sue, Pohl, John F. , Perito, Emily R. , Ooi, Chee Y. , Nathan, Jaimie D. , Muniraj, Thiruvengadam , Morinville, Véronique D., McFerron, Brian A. , Mascarenhas, Maria R., Maqbool, Asim , Liu, Quin , Lin, Tom K. , Lewis, Michele D. , Husain, Sohail Z. , Heyman, Melvin B. , Guda, Nalini M. , Gonska, Tanja , Giefer, Matthew J. , Gelrud, Andrés , Gariepy, Cheryl E. , Gardner, Timothy B. , Freedman, Steven D., Forsmark, Christopher E., Fishman, Douglas S., Coté, Gregory A. , Conwell, Darwin L. , Barth, Bradley, Banks, Peter A. , Anderson, Michelle A. , Amann, Stephen T. , Alkaade, Samer, Abu‐El‐Haija, Maisam , Abberbock, Judah , Lowe, Mark E. , Yadav, Dhiraj , Lewis, Michele, Lewis, Michele D , Whitcomb, David C. , Singh, Vikesh K. , Himes, Ryan , Brand, Randall E. , Bellin, Melena D.

Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition | February 2, 2019 | Volume: 68 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 566-573

10.1097/mpg.0000000000002279 Get It

ABSTRACTObjectives:The aim of the present study was to investigate the natural history of chronic pancreatitis (CP); patients in the North American Pancreatitis Study2 (NAPS2, adults) and INternational Study group of Pediatric Pancreatitis: In search for a cuRE (INSPPIRE, pediatric) were compared.Methods:Demographics, risk factors, disease duration, management and outcomes of 224 children and 1063 adults were compared using appropriate statistical tests for categorical and continuous variables.Results:Alcohol was a risk in 53% of adults and 1% of children (P < 0.0001); tobacco in 50% of adults and 7% of children (P < 0.0001). Obstructive factors were more common in children (29% vs 19% in adults, P = 0.001). Genetic risk factors were found more often in children. Exocrine pancreatic insufficiency was similar (children 26% vs adult 33%, P = 0.107). Diabetes was more common in adults than children (36% vs 4% respectively, P < 0.0001). Median emergency room visits, hospitalizations, and missed days of work/school were similar across the cohorts. As a secondary analysis, NAPS2 subjects with childhood onset (NAPS2‐CO) were compared with INSPPIRE subjects. These 2 cohorts were more similar than the total INSPPIRE and NAPS2 cohorts, including for genetic risk factors. The only risk factor significantly more common in the NAPS2‐CO cohort compared with the INSPPIRE cohort was alcohol (9% NAPS2‐CO vs 1% INSPPIRE cohorts, P = 0.011).Conclusions:Despite disparity in age of onset, children and adults with CP exhibit similarity in demographics, CP treatment, and pain. Differences between groups in radiographic findings and diabetes prevalence may be related to differences in risk factors associated with disease and length of time of CP.
Standard Operating Procedures for Biospecimen Collection, Processing, and Storage
Fisher, William E., Cruz‐Monserrate, Zobeida , McElhany, Amy L., Hart, Phil A. , Ghosh, Ria , Buren, George Van , Fishman, Douglas S., Rinaudo, Jo Ann, Serrano, José , Srivastava, Sudhir , Mace, Thomas A. , Topazian, Mark , Feng, Ziding , Yadav, Dhiraj , Hughes, Steven J. , Liu, Robert Y., Lu, Emily Y., Orr, Robert Scott, Abouhamze, Amer, Troendle, David M. , Uç, Aliye , Lowe, Mark E. , Conwell, Darwin L. , Whitcomb, David C. , Serrano, Jose , Lesinski, Gregory B , Ghosh, Ria, Pandol, Stephen J. , Orr, Robert, Steen, Hanno , Sellers, Zachary M.

Pancreas | October 16, 2018 | Volume: 47 | Issue: 10 | Pages: 1213-1221

10.1097/mpa.0000000000001171 Get It

Abstract High-quality and well-annotated biorepositories are needed to better understand the pathophysiology and biologic mechanisms of chronic pancreatitis (CP) and its consequences. We report a methodology for the development of a robust standard operating procedure (SOP) for a biorepository based on the experience of the clinical centers within the consortium to study Chronic Pancreatitis, Diabetes and Pancreas Cancer Clinical Centers (CPDPC), supported by the National Cancer Institute and the National Institute for Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases as a unique multidisciplinary model to study CP, diabetes, and pancreatic cancer in both children and adults. Standard operating procedures from the CPDPC centers were evaluated and consolidated. The literature was reviewed for standard biorepository operating procedures that facilitated downstream molecular analysis. The existing literature on biobanking practices was harmonized with the SOPs from the clinical centers to produce a biorepository for pancreatic research. This article reports the methods and basic principles behind the creation of SOPs to develop a biorepository for the CPDPC. These will serve as a guide for investigators developing biorepositories in pancreas research. Rigorous and meticulous adherence to standardized biospecimen collection will facilitate investigations to better understand the pathophysiology and biologic mechanisms of CP, diabetes, and pancreatic cancer.
PROspective Evaluation of Chronic Pancreatitis for EpidEmiologic and Translational StuDies
Yadav, Dhiraj , Park, Walter G. , Fogel, Evan L. , Li, Liang , Chari, Suresh T. , Feng, Ziding , Fisher, William E., Forsmark, Christopher E., Habtezion, Aida , Hart, Phil A. , Hughes, Steven J. , Othman, Mohamed O. , Rinaudo, Jo Ann, Serrano, José , Srivastava, Sudhir , Topazian, Mark , Conwell, Darwin L. , Serrano, Jose , Jeon, Christie Y. , Pandol, Stephen J. , Tirkes, Temel , Van Den Eeden, Stephen K , Whitcomb, David C. , Chari, Suresh T

Pancreas | October 16, 2018 | Volume: 47 | Issue: 10 | Pages: 1229-1238

10.1097/mpa.0000000000001170 Get It

Abstract Prospective Evaluation of Chronic Pancreatitis for Epidemiologic and Translational Studies (PROCEED) is the first prospective, observational cohort study of chronic pancreatitis (CP) in the United States. The primary goals of PROCEED are to define disease progression, test the predictive capability of candidate biomarkers, and develop a platform to conduct translational and mechanistic studies in CP. Using objective and consensus-driven criteria, PROCEED will enroll adults at different stages of CP—controls, suspected CP, and definite CP. In addition to collecting detailed information using structured case report forms and protocol-mandated evaluations at baseline and during follow-up, PROCEED will establish a linked biorepository of blood, urine, saliva, stool, pancreatic fluid, and pancreatic tissue. Enrollment for PROCEED began in June 2017. As of July 1, 2018, nine clinical centers of the Consortium for the Study of Chronic Pancreatitis, Diabetes, and Pancreatic Cancer are enrolling, and 350 subjects have completed baseline evaluation. In conclusion, PROCEED will provide the most accurate and reliable estimates to date on progression of CP. The established cohort and biorepository will facilitate numerous analyses, leading to new strategies for diagnosis, methods to monitor disease progression, and treatment of CP.
Evaluation of a Mixed Meal Test for Diagnosis and Characterization of PancrEaTogEniC DiabeTes Secondary to Pancreatic Cancer and Chronic Pancreatitis
Hart, Phil A. , Andersen, Dana K. , Castonguay, Alicia C. , Bajaj, Mandeep , Bradley, David , Contreras, Noemy, Habtezion, Aida , Korc, Murray , Kudva, Yogish C. , Petrov, Maxim S. , Yadav, Dhiraj , Yuan, Ying , Rinaudo, Jo Ann, Srivastava, Sudhir , Serrano, José , Goodarzi, Mark O. , Kudva, Yogish, Serrano, Jose , Mather, Kieren J. , Bajaj, Mandeep, Bellin, Melena D. , Whitcomb, David C. , Bajaj, Mandeep

Pancreas | October 16, 2018 | Volume: 47 | Issue: 10 | Pages: 1239-1243

10.1097/mpa.0000000000001168 Get It

Abstract Pancreatogenic diabetes mellitus is most commonly the result of chronic pancreatitis but can also occur secondary to pancreatic cancer. The early identification of pancreatogenic diabetes and distinction from the more prevalent type 2 diabetes are clinically significant; however, currently, there is no validated method to differentiate these diabetes subtypes. We describe a study, “Evaluation of a Mixed Meal Test for Diagnosis and Characterization of PancrEaTogEniC DiabeTes Secondary to Pancreatic Cancer and Chronic Pancreatitis: the DETECT study,” that seeks to address this knowledge gap. The DETECT study is a multicenter study that will examine differences in hormone and glucose excursions after a mixed meal test. The study will also create a biorepository that will be used to evaluate novel diagnostic biomarkers for differentiating these diabetes subtypes.
Nutrition and Inflammatory Biomarkers in Chronic Pancreatitis Patients
Greer, Julia B., Greer, Phil J. , Sandhu, Bimaljit S., Alkaade, Samer, Wilcox, C. Mel , Anderson, Michelle A. , Sherman, Stuart , Gardner, Timothy B. , Lewis, Michele D. , Guda, Nalini M. , Muniraj, Thiruvengadam , Conwell, Darwin L. , Coté, Gregory A. , Forsmark, Christopher E., Banks, Peter A. , Tang, Gong , Stello, Kim, Gelrud, Andrés , Slivka, Adam, Whitcomb, David C. , Yadav, Dhiraj , Whitcomb, David C , Lewis, Michele D , Brand, Randall E.

Nutrition in Clinical Practice | August 13, 2018 | Volume: 34 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 387-399

10.1002/ncp.10186 Get It

Abstract Background Chronic pancreatitis (CP) patients frequently experience malabsorption and maldigestion, leading to micronutrient and macronutrient deficiencies. Comorbid diabetes and lifestyle habits, such as alcohol consumption, may impact nutrition status. Methods We compared micronutrient antioxidant, bone metabolism, serum protein, and inflammatory marker levels in 301 CP patients and 266 controls with no known pancreatic disease. We analyzed serum prealbumin and retinol binding protein; vitamins A, D, E, and B12; osteocalcin; tumor necrosis factor‐α; and C‐reactive protein (CRP). We also evaluated biomarkers among subsets of patients, examining factors including time since diagnosis, body mass index, alcohol as primary etiology, diabetes mellitus, vitamin supplementation, and pancreatic enzyme replacement. Results After correcting for multiple comparisons, CP patients had significantly lower levels than controls of the following: vitamin A (40.9 vs 45.4 μg/dL) and vitamin E (α‐tocopherol [8.7 vs 10.3 mg/L] and γ‐tocopherol [1.8 vs 2.2 mg/L]), as well as osteocalcin (7.9 vs 10 ng/mL) and serum prealbumin (23 vs 27 mg/dL). Both patients and controls who took vitamin supplements had higher serum levels of vitamins than those not taking supplements. Compared with controls, in controlled analyses, CP patients had significantly lower levels of vitamins A, D, and E (both α‐tocopherol and γ‐tocopherol). CP patients also had significantly lower levels of osteocalcin, serum prealbumin, and retinol binding protein, and higher CRP. Conclusions CP patients demonstrated lower levels of selected nutrition and bone metabolism biomarkers than controls. Diabetes and alcohol did not impact biomarkers. Vitamin supplements and pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy improved nutrition biomarkers in CP patients.
Recurrent Acute Pancreatitis
Guda, Nalini M. , Muddana, Venkata , Lévy, Philippe, Garg, Pramod Kumar , Coté, Gregory A. , Uç, Aliye , Varadarajulu, Shyam , Vege, Santhi Swaroop , Chari, Suresh T. , Forsmark, Chris E. , Yadav, Dhiraj , Reddy, D. Nageshwar , Tenner, Scott, Johnson, Colin, Akisik, Fatih , Saluja, Ashok K. , Lerch, Markus M. , Mallery, J. Shawn, Freeman, Martin L. , Vege, Santhi S, Whitcomb, David C. , Chari, Suresh T

Pancreas | June 12, 2018 | Volume: 47 | Issue: 6 | Pages: 653-666

10.1097/mpa.0000000000001053 Get It

Abstract Recurrent acute pancreatitis (RAP) is a clinically significant problem globally. The etiology remains unclear in approximately 10% to 15% of patients despite a thorough workup. Data on natural history and efficacy of treatments are limited. We aimed to establish criteria for diagnosis, evaluate the causative factors, and arrive at a consensus on the appropriate workup and management of patients with RAP. The organizing committee was formed, and a set of questions was developed based on the current evidence, controversies, and topics that needed further research. After a vetting process, these topics were assigned to a group of experts from around the world with special interest in RAP. Data were presented as part of a workshop on RAP organized as a part of the annual meeting of the America Pancreatic Association. Pretest and Posttest questions were administered, and the responses were tabulated by the current Grades of Recommendation Assessment, Development and Evaluation system. The consensus guidelines were established in the format of a diagnostic algorithm. Several deficiencies were identified with respect to data on etiology, treatment efficacies, and areas that need immediate research.
Cellular distribution of secretin receptor expression in rat pancreas
Ulrich, Charles D., Wood, Paul G., Hadac, Elizabeth M., Kopras, Elizabeth J. , Whitcomb, David C. , Miller, Laurence J.

American Journal of Physiology-Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology | December 24, 2017 | Volume: 275 | Issue: 6 | Pages: G1437-G1444

10.1152/ajpgi.1998.275.6.g1437 Get It

Secretin is an important regulator of pancreatic function, but the molecular basis of its actions is not well understood. We have, therefore, used in situ autoradiography, photoaffinity labeling, and RNase protection assays with healthy rat pancreas, dispersed acinar cells, and pancreas depleted of acinar cells to explore the cellular distribution and molecular identity of high-affinity secretin receptors in this complex organ. The autoradiographic examination of125I-labeled [Tyr10]rat secretin-27 binding to normal pancreas demonstrated saturable and specific high-affinity binding sites on both acinar and duct cells, with a uniform lobular distribution, but with no binding above background over islets or vascular structures. Photoaffinity labeling demonstrated that the ductular binding site in acinar cell-depleted copper-deficient rat pancreas represented the same glycoprotein with a molecular weight of 50,000–62,000 that was present on acinar cells. RNase protection assays confirmed the molecular identity of the secretin receptors expressed on these distinct cells. The apparent absence or extreme low density of similar secretin receptors on islets and pancreatic vascular structures suggests that the pharmacological effects of secretin on those cells may either be indirect or mediated by another secretin family receptor that recognizes this hormone with lower affinity.