Karajannis, Matthias A

Abstract Purpose: Knowledge of prognostic factors and long-term survival in patients with diffuse hemispheric glioma, H3 G34–mutant (DHG, H3 G34), remains limited in this tumor with a poor prognosis. Experimental Design: This retrospective, multi-institutional study investigated prognostic variables for patients with DHG, H3 G34, and their association with progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Uni- and multivariable Cox proportional hazard models were applied with multiple imputed datasets. Results: A total of 153 patients (142 G34R, 9 G34V, 2 via DNA methylation) were included. The median age at diagnosis was 17 years (range, 2–45). Initial gross/near total resection (GTR/NTR) was achieved in 43% of patients. Radiation was given in 91% (85% focal irradiation), and initial chemotherapy was given in 87% [70% temozolomide-based (TMZ), 25% TMZ/lomustine, 5% non-TMZ]. Median OS was 24 months [interquartile range (IQR), 22–28] with a median PFS of 14 months (IQR, 12–19). Twelve patients (8%) were found to be long-term survivors (≥5 years). Exploratory multivariable analysis showed that adjuvant radiotherapy [HR, 0.076; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.033–0.17] and achieving GTR/NTR compared with < NTR (HR, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.33–0.78) were associated with improved PFS. Multivariable analysis showed improved OS with increasing age at diagnosis (HR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.57–0.87), initial radiotherapy (HR, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.15–0.96), and initial GTR/NTR compared with < NTR (HR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.37–0.97). Conclusions: This cohort highlights prognostic factors for patients with DHG, H3 G34, and describes relapse patterns and therapy approaches. Clinical trials and prospective registries are needed to improve outcomes.

Abstract Background Adult onset medulloblastoma (aMB) is a rare tumor with limited available evidence. We present a large multi-institutional retrospective cohort of aMB patients treated in the modern era, with an emphasis on understanding the role of chemotherapy at initial diagnosis. Methods We included 267 consecutive patients with aMB treated at 7 different institutions from 2000-present, controlling for chemotherapy regimen and cycles received. Results Treatment factors were highly intercorrelated with one another and with treating institution. Concurrent chemotherapy was not associated with overall survival (OS). Adjuvant chemotherapy was associated with OS on univariable analyses (HR = 0.55, P = .029) and on multivariable analysis when adjusting for risk status (HR 0.55, P = .026) but not when also adjusting for treating institution. Proton craniospinal irradiation was associated with improved survival on univariable (HR = 0.50, P = .019) and multivariable analysis adjusting for risk status (HR = 0.51, P = .024) but not when treating institution was also considered. On subgroup analysis, adjuvant chemotherapy was associated with improved survival in M0 (HR = 0.55, P = .043) but not M1 disease, in patients with subtotal resection (HR = 0.43, P = .048) but not those with GTR. Similarly, progression-free survival was improved with chemotherapy in patients with M0 (HR = 0.57, P = .032) but not M1 disease, and in patients with subtotal (HR = 0.50, P = .054) but not gross total resection. Conclusions There was no benefit of concurrent chemotherapy. Adjuvant chemotherapy was associated with improved overall survival and this effect was driven by select subgroups, specifically those with M0 disease and those with residual tumor. We could not confirm that these associations are independent of the treating institution.

Abstract BACKGROUND Accurate molecular diagnosis of infiltrating brainstem tumors, including diffuse midline gliomas and IDH mutant astrocytomas, is essential for prognostication and optimal therapy. Surgical biopsy of the brainstem carries risk of permanent neurological deficits and may yield insufficient or non-diagnostic tissue. We hypothesized that minimally invasive “liquid biopsy” analyzing circulating tumor cell-free DNA (cfDNA) in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) could represent an alternative molecular diagnostic modality. METHODS We performed MSK-IMPACT, a New York State Department of Health authorized hybridization capture-based next-generation panel DNA sequencing clinical assay on 44 CSF samples from 37 unique patients with brainstem tumors. Ages at time of CSF collection ranged from 1–47 years (median: 29 years). For samples in which diagnostic alterations could not be detected, we performed a series of secondary analyses for known hotspot mutations such as H3F3A, IDH1/2, and BRAF, including manual review for mutant reads below the official clinical reporting threshold, as well as droplet digital PCR (ddPCR). RESULTS Among 44 samples included in this study, 10/44 (23%) samples had mutations detected by MSK-IMPACT using standard clinical calling criteria and 14 of the remaining 34 samples (41%) had supporting evidence of a diagnostically relevant mutation based on manual review. Testing by ddPCR was performed on 11 samples (based on DNA availability), uncovering 4 additional mutations. Overall positive diagnostic yield was 64% (28/44). In biopsied patients, CSF confirmed disease-defining mutations in 80% (16/20) of CSF samples, including H3F3A K28M (9/10; 90%) and IDH1/2 (5/6; 83%). Among 24 unbiopsied patients, a disease-defining mutation was identified in 60% (15/25) of CSF samples. CONCLUSIONS Analysis of CSF cfDNA in patients with brainstem tumors has a high diagnostic yield and obviates the need for tissue biopsy in a majority of patients. A tiered testing approach using next-generation sequencing and ddPCR assays helps maximize diagnostic information and sensitivity.

Abstract Purpose: Neurofibromatosis type 2 (NF2) is a rare autosomal dominant disorder associated primarily with bilateral schwannomas seen on the superior vestibular branches of the eighth cranial nerves. Significant morbidity can result from surgical treatment of these tumors. Meningiomas, ependymomas, and other benign central nervous system tumors are also common in NF2. The lack of effective treatments for NF2 marks an unmet medical need. Experimental Design: Here, we provide recommendations from a workshop, cochaired by Drs. D. Gareth Evans and Marco Giovannini, of 36 international researchers, physicians, representatives of the biotechnology industry, and patient advocates on how to accelerate progress toward NF2 clinical trials. Results: Workshop participants reached a consensus that, based on current knowledge, the time is right to plan and implement NF2 clinical trials. Obstacles impeding NF2 clinical trials and how to address them were discussed, as well as the candidate therapeutic pipeline for NF2. Conclusions: Both phase 0 and phase II NF2 trials are near-term options for NF2 clinical trials. The number of NF2 patients in the population remains limited, and successful recruitment will require ongoing collaboration efforts between NF2 clinics. (Clin Cancer Res 2009;15(16):5032–9)