Back to Authors

Sherwood, Marissa

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8522-0982

Mayo Clinic

University Health Network

Citations 1

A multi-institutional retrospective cohort of adult-onset medulloblastoma in the modern era
Bonm, Alipi V , Rutenberg, Michael S. , Therkelsen, Kate E. , Herbst, John J., Sanaf, Anurag, Sherwood, Marissa , McGranahan, Tresa , Cimino, Patrick J. , Castro, L. Nicolas Gonzalez , Tsang, Derek S. , Karajannis, Matthias A. , Nagpal, Seema , Barber, Jason , Nagpal, Seema , Barber, Jason , Taylor, Lynne P , Gonzalez Castro, L Nicolas , Cimino, Patrick J , Karajannis, Matthias A , Bonm, Alipi V. , Herbst, John, Rhee, John Yohan , Amdur, Robert J. , Shih, Helen A.

Neuro-Oncology Advances | January 22, 2025 | Volume: 7 | Issue: 1 | Pages: No page available

10.1093/noajnl/vdae231 Get It

Abstract Background Adult onset medulloblastoma (aMB) is a rare tumor with limited available evidence. We present a large multi-institutional retrospective cohort of aMB patients treated in the modern era, with an emphasis on understanding the role of chemotherapy at initial diagnosis. Methods We included 267 consecutive patients with aMB treated at 7 different institutions from 2000-present, controlling for chemotherapy regimen and cycles received. Results Treatment factors were highly intercorrelated with one another and with treating institution. Concurrent chemotherapy was not associated with overall survival (OS). Adjuvant chemotherapy was associated with OS on univariable analyses (HR = 0.55, P = .029) and on multivariable analysis when adjusting for risk status (HR 0.55, P = .026) but not when also adjusting for treating institution. Proton craniospinal irradiation was associated with improved survival on univariable (HR = 0.50, P = .019) and multivariable analysis adjusting for risk status (HR = 0.51, P = .024) but not when treating institution was also considered. On subgroup analysis, adjuvant chemotherapy was associated with improved survival in M0 (HR = 0.55, P = .043) but not M1 disease, in patients with subtotal resection (HR = 0.43, P = .048) but not those with GTR. Similarly, progression-free survival was improved with chemotherapy in patients with M0 (HR = 0.57, P = .032) but not M1 disease, and in patients with subtotal (HR = 0.50, P = .054) but not gross total resection. Conclusions There was no benefit of concurrent chemotherapy. Adjuvant chemotherapy was associated with improved overall survival and this effect was driven by select subgroups, specifically those with M0 disease and those with residual tumor. We could not confirm that these associations are independent of the treating institution.