Lin, Andrew

Abstract Background Repotrectinib, a next-generation ROS1/TRK tyrosine kinase inhibitor, is approved for ROS1 fusion-positive non-small cell lung cancer and NTRK fusion-positive solid tumors. Its side effects and safety management strategies require further characterization. Patients and Methods The safety profile of repotrectinib (treatment-emergent/related adverse events [TEAEs/TRAEs]) was established in patients who initiated treatment at the recommended dose (160 mg daily [QD] for 14 days, then 160 mg twice daily [BID]) across all cohorts of the global, multicenter phase 1/2 TRIDENT-1 study. AE management strategies were outlined. Results In 472 patients, the most common TRAEs (dizziness [58%] and dysgeusia [50%]) were likely TRK inhibition-related. Median relative dose intensity was 90%; 14% (n = 66/472) of patients did not increase their initial QD dose to BID (mostly due to CNS AEs). Rates of dizziness (median onset, 7 days) were similar in patients with/without baseline brain metastases. Dose modifications downgraded severity or resolved dizziness in 78% of patients; 58% of patients had pharmacologic intervention without dose modification. Dizziness was downgraded/resolved in 62% (n = 120/195) of patients who did not receive dose modification or pharmacologic intervention. Treatment-related cognitive impairment and weight gain occurred in 19% and 12% of patients, respectively. Treatment-emergent withdrawal pain occurred in 14% of patients (median resolution time, 2.1 weeks). Dose interruption and reduction from TRAEs occurred in 39% and 38% of patients, respectively; 10% reported later re-escalation back to 160 mg BID. Conclusion Many repotrectinib AEs, including neurological AEs secondary to TRK inhibition, were mitigated with appropriate management, including dose modification and/or pharmacologic intervention.

Abstract BACKGROUND Accurate molecular diagnosis of infiltrating brainstem tumors, including diffuse midline gliomas and IDH mutant astrocytomas, is essential for prognostication and optimal therapy. Surgical biopsy of the brainstem carries risk of permanent neurological deficits and may yield insufficient or non-diagnostic tissue. We hypothesized that minimally invasive “liquid biopsy” analyzing circulating tumor cell-free DNA (cfDNA) in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) could represent an alternative molecular diagnostic modality. METHODS We performed MSK-IMPACT, a New York State Department of Health authorized hybridization capture-based next-generation panel DNA sequencing clinical assay on 44 CSF samples from 37 unique patients with brainstem tumors. Ages at time of CSF collection ranged from 1–47 years (median: 29 years). For samples in which diagnostic alterations could not be detected, we performed a series of secondary analyses for known hotspot mutations such as H3F3A, IDH1/2, and BRAF, including manual review for mutant reads below the official clinical reporting threshold, as well as droplet digital PCR (ddPCR). RESULTS Among 44 samples included in this study, 10/44 (23%) samples had mutations detected by MSK-IMPACT using standard clinical calling criteria and 14 of the remaining 34 samples (41%) had supporting evidence of a diagnostically relevant mutation based on manual review. Testing by ddPCR was performed on 11 samples (based on DNA availability), uncovering 4 additional mutations. Overall positive diagnostic yield was 64% (28/44). In biopsied patients, CSF confirmed disease-defining mutations in 80% (16/20) of CSF samples, including H3F3A K28M (9/10; 90%) and IDH1/2 (5/6; 83%). Among 24 unbiopsied patients, a disease-defining mutation was identified in 60% (15/25) of CSF samples. CONCLUSIONS Analysis of CSF cfDNA in patients with brainstem tumors has a high diagnostic yield and obviates the need for tissue biopsy in a majority of patients. A tiered testing approach using next-generation sequencing and ddPCR assays helps maximize diagnostic information and sensitivity.