Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have improved survival for patients with early-stage NSCLC who are candidates for surgical resection. ICIs enhance antitumor responses and improve a variety of perioperative outcomes when used in the neoadjuvant, adjuvant, or perioperative setting. This review summarizes immunotherapies currently approved for neoadjuvant, adjuvant, and perioperative treatment of resectable NSCLC and the supporting evidence for approval. Gaps in data and future areas of clinical interest of using immunotherapies to maximize survival outcomes are also discussed.
Emerging Immunotherapy and Antibody-Derived Therapeutics for the Treatment of Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Review
Background: In the last decade, a surge of advancements in and approvals of immunotherapies has revolutionized the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Even as an increasing number of immune checkpoint inhibitors and antibody–drug conjugates gained FDA approval for the remarkable response and durable remission they imparted to some patients, persistent challenges of primary and acquired resistance, imperfect predictive biomarkers, and toxicity remain. Methods: This review identifies and summarizes the most significant emerging clinical data being reported for immunotherapies in NSCLC. Results: We found that the most recent clinical trials are centered on antibody–drug conjugates, bispecific and multispecific antibodies, cellular therapies, and immunocytokines, while other ongoing trials continue to explore new monoclonal antibodies as well as a variety of immunotherapy modalities. Conclusions: Immunotherapy in NSCLC remains an area of rapid advancement, with the potential for further improvements in safety and efficacy as monotherapy and in multimodal approaches.
Abstract LB418: RELATIVITY-104 Part 2: translational analyses in the programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) ≥ 1% and non-squamous (NSQ) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) subgroup
Abstract Background: In Part 2 of the phase 2 RELATIVITY-104 study of first-line nivolumab (NIVO) plus relatlimab (RELA) with platinum-doublet chemotherapy (PDCT) vs NIVO + PDCT in patients with metastatic NSCLC, NIVO + RELA + PDCT demonstrated improved clinical benefit, including overall survival, in the prespecified subgroup of tumor PD-L1 expression ≥ 1%, which was further enriched in NSQ tumor histology. Baseline lymphocyte-activation gene 3 (LAG-3) expression was associated with enriched efficacy for both NIVO + RELA + PDCT and NIVO + PDCT. In a comparative transcriptomic analysis, NSQ and squamous tumors demonstrated distinct immune signatures, with NSQ tumors exhibiting higher expression of LAG-3 ligands and greater enrichment for combination therapy benefit by PD-L1 expression. To further elucidate the mechanism of action of NIVO + RELA + PDCT, we report additional exploratory translational data in the PD-L1 ≥ 1% NSQ subgroup for Part 2 of RELATIVITY-104. Methods: Patients with untreated metastatic NSCLC were randomized 1:1 to NIVO 360 mg + RELA 360 mg + PDCT or NIVO 360 mg + PDCT Q3W. Exploratory endpoints included translational analyses in the PD-L1 ≥ 1% NSQ subgroup. Gene expression data from pretreatment tumor RNA sequencing were normalized and analyzed for associations with clinical outcomes. Pre- and on-treatment peripheral blood samples were collected for high-dimensional flow cytometry immunophenotyping using a validated 24-marker LAG-3-specific panel that used drug-tolerant, noncompeting clones for LAG-3, PD-1, and CTLA-4. Statistical associations between biomarkers and clinical outcomes were assessed using logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards models. Data are from the May 2, 2025, database lock. Results: In the NIVO + RELA + PDCT arm, immune signatures demonstrated a significantly lower hazard ratio (HR) in the PD-L1 ≥ 1% NSQ subgroup, while stromal signatures demonstrated a significantly higher HR. T exhausted progenitor signature subsets, as well as ICOS+ CD4+ T cells, at baseline were shown to enrich for survival with NIVO + RELA + PDCT. Clinical benefit was observed across all baseline LAG-3 expression levels (< 1% and ≥ 1%); however, on-treatment increases in LAG-3+ T cells were associated with longer progression-free survival and a higher objective response rate with NIVO + RELA + PDCT. In the NIVO + PDCT arm, increases in LAG-3 cell populations were associated with lower response. Conclusions: In the RELATIVITY-104 study, the on-treatment immune dynamics of LAG-3+ T cells correlated with the benefit of NIVO + RELA + PDCT vs NIVO + PDCT in patients with PD-L1 expression ≥ 1% and NSQ NSCLC. Immune signatures including progenitor T exhausted signatures associated with improved outcomes with NIVO + RELA + PDCT. These data support the mechanistic rationale for adding anti-LAG-3 to anti-PD-1 + PDCT in PD-L1 ≥ 1% NSQ NSCLC. Citation Format: Jaclyn Neely, Annie Yu, Nicolas Girard, Manuel Cobo-Dols, Mauricio Burotto, Luis Paz-Ares, Vamsidhar Velcheti, Martin Reck, Srijata Samanta, Anila Qureshi, Priyanka Kasbekar, Charlie Garnett-Benson. RELATIVITY-104 Part 2: translational analyses in the programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) ≥ 1% and non-squamous (NSQ) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) subgroup [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2026; Part 2 (Late-Breaking, Clinical Trial, and Invited Abstracts); 2026 Apr 17-22; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2026;86(8_Suppl):Abstract nr LB418.
Characterization and clinical management of adverse events following treatment with repotrectinib: a TRIDENT-1 analysis
Abstract Background Repotrectinib, a next-generation ROS1/TRK tyrosine kinase inhibitor, is approved for ROS1 fusion-positive non-small cell lung cancer and NTRK fusion-positive solid tumors. Its side effects and safety management strategies require further characterization. Patients and Methods The safety profile of repotrectinib (treatment-emergent/related adverse events [TEAEs/TRAEs]) was established in patients who initiated treatment at the recommended dose (160 mg daily [QD] for 14 days, then 160 mg twice daily [BID]) across all cohorts of the global, multicenter phase 1/2 TRIDENT-1 study. AE management strategies were outlined. Results In 472 patients, the most common TRAEs (dizziness [58%] and dysgeusia [50%]) were likely TRK inhibition-related. Median relative dose intensity was 90%; 14% (n = 66/472) of patients did not increase their initial QD dose to BID (mostly due to CNS AEs). Rates of dizziness (median onset, 7 days) were similar in patients with/without baseline brain metastases. Dose modifications downgraded severity or resolved dizziness in 78% of patients; 58% of patients had pharmacologic intervention without dose modification. Dizziness was downgraded/resolved in 62% (n = 120/195) of patients who did not receive dose modification or pharmacologic intervention. Treatment-related cognitive impairment and weight gain occurred in 19% and 12% of patients, respectively. Treatment-emergent withdrawal pain occurred in 14% of patients (median resolution time, 2.1 weeks). Dose interruption and reduction from TRAEs occurred in 39% and 38% of patients, respectively; 10% reported later re-escalation back to 160 mg BID. Conclusion Many repotrectinib AEs, including neurological AEs secondary to TRK inhibition, were mitigated with appropriate management, including dose modification and/or pharmacologic intervention.
Treatments and Outcomes After Platinum-Based Chemotherapy and Anti–PD-(L)1 in NSCLC
ImportanceEffective treatments for advanced or metastatic non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are limited. Understanding clinical treatment patterns is critical for understanding unmet medical needs.ObjectiveTo describe clinical treatment patterns and outcomes, including time to treatment discontinuation, progression-free survival, and overall survival, in patients who received platinum-based chemotherapy and anti–programmed cell death 1 protein or programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-[L]1) regimens.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis retrospective cohort study used data from 2018 to 2023 from a US nationwide, electronic health record–derived, deidentified database with median duration of follow-up of 7.8 (range, 0-65.0) months. Patients 18 years or older with advanced or metastatic NSCLC in second- and third-line treatment settings were included. Eligible patients had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1, received platinum-based chemotherapy and anti–PD-(L)1 therapy in 1 (combination) or 2 (sequential) lines, and initiated at least 1 subsequent treatment between January 1, 2018, and June 30, 2023. Exclusion criteria included disease progression within 8 weeks after anti–PD-(L)1 treatment initiation. Follow-up was until death or last available data through June 30, 2023.ExposuresAntineoplastic drugs following platinum-based chemotherapy and anti–PD-(L)1 treatment.Main Outcomes and MeasuresTime to treatment discontinuation, progression-free survival, and overall survival were analyzed overall and by initial treatment. Exploratory subgroup analyses were stratified by patient characteristics and index treatment without adjustment for group differences.ResultsIn the 1793 patients (974 [54.3%] male) included in the analysis, mean (SD) age at index treatment was 67.4 (9.4) years and median time from advanced diagnosis to index treatment was 10.5 (range, 1.1-103.8) months. The most common index treatments were docetaxel plus ramucirumab (314 [17.5%]), docetaxel monotherapy (158 [8.8%]), and carboplatin plus paclitaxel (136 [7.6%]). Overall, median time from index treatment to treatment discontinuation was 3.71 (95% CI, 3.48-3.94) months; median progression-free survival, 5.29 (95% CI, 5.03-5.52) months; and median overall survival, 11.20 (95% CI, 10.48-11.93) months. In exploratory analyses, these outcomes were numerically shorter in patients who received chemotherapy monotherapy as index treatment vs the overall group; medians were numerically longer in patients who received index treatments of immuno-oncology monotherapy or chemotherapy plus immuno-oncology combination therapy.Conclusions and RelevanceIn this retrospective cohort study of patients with advanced or metastatic NSCLC, results underscored a significant need for novel treatments, including immuno-oncology combinations.