Niaz, Talha

Aortic dilation following single ventricle palliation is increasingly recognized, although its long-term clinical implications remain unclear. We present the case of a 38-year-old male born with a bicuspid aortic valve, d-transposition of the great arteries, ventricular septal defect, right ventricular hypoplasia with a straddling right atrioventricular valve. He was palliated with Fontan circulation and developed severe neo-aortic root and arch dilation with native aortic valve stenosis, requiring surgical intervention. His neo-aortic root measured 81 × 65 mm, necessitating a Bentall procedure with total arch and native aortic valve replacement. This case underscores the variable progression of aortic dilation in patients with palliated single ventricle physiology and the need for strict surveillance and individualized management. Larger cohort studies are needed to further refine the criteria for surgical intervention in this unique population.

Background Early detection of left and right ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD and RVSD respectively) in children can lead to intervention to reduce morbidity and death. Existing artificial intelligence algorithms can identify LVSD and RVSD in adults using a 12‐lead ECG; however, its efficacy in children is uncertain. We aimed to develop novel artificial intelligence–enabled ECG algorithms for LVSD and RVSD detection in pediatric patients. Methods and Results We identified 10 142 unique pediatric patients (age≤18) with a 10‐second, 12‐lead surface ECG within 14 days of a transthoracic echocardiogram, performed between 2002 and 2022. LVSD was defined quantitatively by left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). RVSD was defined semiquantitatively. Novel pediatric models for LVEF ≤35% and LVEF <50% achieved excellent test areas under the curve of 0.93 (95% CI, 0.89–0.98) and 0.88 (95% CI, 0.83–0.94) respectively. The model to detect LVEF <50% had a sensitivity of 0.85, specificity of 0.80, positive predictive value of 0.095, and negative predictive value of 0.995. In comparison, the previously validated adult data‐derived model for LVEF <35% achieved an area under the curve of 0.87 (95% CI, 0.84–0.90) for LVEF ≤35% in children. A novel pediatric model for any RVSD detection reached a test area under the curve of 0.90 (0.87–0.94). Conclusions An artificial intelligence–enabled ECG demonstrates accurate detection of both LVSD and RVSD in pediatric patients. While adult‐trained models offer good performance, improvements are seen when training pediatric‐specific models.

Background: Whole-genome sequencing in families enables deciphering of congenital heart disease causes. A shared genetic basis for familial bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) and hypoplastic left heart syndrome (HLHS) was postulated. Methods: Whole-genome sequencing was performed in affected members of 6 multiplex BAV families, an HLHS cohort of 197 probands and 546 relatives, and 813 controls. Data were filtered for rare, predicted-damaging variants that cosegregated with familial BAV and disrupted genes associated with congenital heart disease in humans and mice. Candidate genes were further prioritized by rare variant burden testing in HLHS cases versus controls. Modifier variants in HLHS proband-parent trios were sought to account for the severe developmental phenotype. Results: In 5 BAV families, missense variants in 6 ontologically diverse genes for structural ( SPTBN1 , PAXIP1 , and FBLN1 ) and signaling ( CELSR1 , PLXND1 , and NOS3 ) proteins fulfilled filtering metrics. CELSR1 , encoding cadherin epidermal growth factor laminin G seven-pass G-type receptor, was identified as a candidate gene in 2 families and was the only gene demonstrating rare variant enrichment in HLHS probands ( P =0.003575). HLHS-associated CELSR1 variants included 16 missense, one splice site, and 3 noncoding variants predicted to disrupt canonical transcription factor binding sites, most of which were inherited from a parent without congenital heart disease. Filtering whole-genome sequencing data for rare, predicted-damaging variants inherited from the other parent revealed 2 cases of CELSR1 compound heterozygosity, one case of CELSR1 - CELSR3 synergistic heterozygosity, and 4 cases of CELSR1 - MYO15A digenic heterozygosity. Conclusions: CELSR1 is a susceptibility gene for familial BAV and HLHS, further implicating planar cell polarity pathway perturbation in congenital heart disease.

Background: Videoscopic left cardiac sympathetic denervation (LCSD) is an effective antifibrillatory, minimally invasive therapy for patients with potentially life-threatening arrhythmia syndromes like long QT syndrome (LQTS). Although initially used primarily for treatment intensification following documented LQTS-associated breakthrough cardiac events while on beta-blockers, LCSD as 1-time monotherapy for certain patients with LQTS requires further evaluation. We are presenting our early experience with LCSD monotherapy for carefully selected patients with LQTS. Methods: Among the 1400 patients evaluated and treated for LQTS, a retrospective review was performed on the 204 patients with LQTS who underwent LCSD at our institution since 2005 to identify the patients where the LCSD served as stand-alone, monotherapy. Clinical data on symptomatic status before diagnosis, clinical, and genetic diagnosis, and breakthrough cardiac events after diagnosis were analyzed to determine efficacy of LCSD monotherapy. Result: Overall, 64 of 204 patients (31%) were treated with LCSD alone (37 [58%] female, mean QTc 466±30 ms, 16 [25%] patients were symptomatic before diagnosis with a mean age at diagnosis 17.3±11.8 years, 5 had [8%] ≥1 breakthrough cardiac event after diagnosis, and mean age at LCSD was 21.1±11.4 years). The primary motivation for LCSD monotherapy was an unacceptable quality of life stemming from beta-blocker related side effects (ie, beta-blocker intolerance) in 56/64 patients (88%). The underlying LQTS genotype was LQT1 in 36 (56%) and LQT2 in 20 (31%). There were no significant LCSD-related surgical complications. With a mean follow-up of 2.7±2.4 years so far, only 3 patients have experienced a nonlethal, post-LCSD breakthrough cardiac event in 180 patient-years. Conclusions: LCSD may be a safe and effective stand-alone therapy for select patients who do not tolerate beta-blockers. However, LCSD is not curative and patient selection will be critical when potentially considering LCSD as monotherapy.