Silvester, Jocelyn A

ABSTRACT Background Coeliac disease is due to an acquired, lifelong gluten‐specific immune response resulting in a gluten‐dependent chronic immune‐mediated enteropathy associated with gastrointestinal and extraintestinal morbidity. Strictly avoiding dietary gluten is the only available management but has never been subjected to rigorous efficacy assessment now required for a pharmaceutical agent. Gluten‐free diet (GFD) is partially and inconsistently effective, but it places a high burden on patients, families, the food industry, and regulators and is defined inconsistently around the world, highlighting the need for effective and convenient adjunctive pharmacological therapies. Aims To summarize key patient, scientific, and regulatory considerations for coeliac disease drug development based on a multi‐stakeholder meeting focused on accelerating clinical trials. Methods A pre‐competitive meeting convened by the Beyond Celiac Coalition (May 2024) included patients with coeliac disease, academic experts, pharmaceutical industry representatives, and participants from the US Food and Drug Administration. Moderated panel addressed patient priorities, symptom and histologic endpoints, biopsy and histology methods, gluten challenge design, clinical trial duration, and regulatory expectations. Themes were synthesized qualitatively with focus on trial design implications and unresolved questions. Results Participants described high symptom burden and psychosocial impact despite gluten‐free diet adherence underscoring unmet therapeutic need in coeliac disease. Regulatory perspectives emphasized the need for clinically meaningful improvement and evidence of intestinal benefit, framed as symptom and histology co‐primary endpoints in clinical trials. These expectations were discussed as most applicable to trial populations with both clinically meaningful symptoms and active histologic injury at baseline; for other phenotypes, it was emphasized that endpoint strategy, the role of gluten exposure, and trial duration should be tailored case by case to the population and mechanism of action. Practical challenges identified included endpoint selection and definition, discordance between symptoms and histology, selecting fit‐for‐purpose symptom measures; standardizing biopsy acquisition and central histology reads to address patchiness and variability, pre‐specifying definitions of meaningful histologic change given ongoing uncertainty about healing, and trial feasibility. Controlled gluten exposure was discussed as a tool to improve interpretability of efficacy outcomes, with careful consideration of dose, duration, patient burden and safety. Discussion addressed the ideal length of the double‐blind period, including a shorter 24‐week double‐blind study with an open‐label extension versus a 52‐week double‐blind design. Trial duration should balance scientific rigour, patient retention, and the need for longer‐term safety and durability data, with flexibility to tailor the approach to context. Conclusions Progress in coeliac disease drug development will require patient‐centred, scientifically robust but feasible trial designs with appropriate endpoints, justified use of gluten exposure, consideration of improved biomarkers to reduce patient burden and early regulatory engagement. Continued multi‐stakeholder collaboration, including dedicated consideration of paediatric drug development, is essential to advance effective therapies.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Recent changes in European diagnostic criteria allow for serologic diagnosis of celiac disease in children. Those guidelines have not been adopted in North America; hence, we aim to assess the positive predictive value (PPV) of tissue transglutaminase (tTG) immunoglobulin A (IgA) assays used in North America in identifying histologic findings of celiac disease. METHODS Multicenter retrospective cohort study of children (<18 years) with an elevated tTG IgA within 6 months of an esophagogastroduodenoscopy between January 2016 and December 2021. Biopsy-confirmed celiac disease was determined by the presence of intraepithelial lymphocytosis and villous atrophy. The primary outcomes were the PPV of an elevated tTG IgA and tTG IgA greater than or equal to 10 times the upper limit of normal (10× ULN). RESULTS Overall, 4019 children (63.3% female; 9% type 1 diabetes, 2% Down syndrome) were included. Histologic findings were consistent with celiac disease for 3321 children (PPV = 82.6% [95% CI, 81.4–83.8]). Among the 1739/4019 (43.2%) children with tTG IgA greater than or equal to 10× ULN, 1651 had biopsy-confirmed celiac disease (PPV10× = 94.9% [95% CI, 93.8–95.9]). Five percent (88/1739) of children did not have histologic findings of celiac disease, including 41/1739 (2%) with normal histology. Diagnostic accuracy of tTG IgA varied widely among assays used in North America (PPV range: 71.5%–88.8%; PPV10× range: 89.3%–97.3%). Assays performed worse in children with type 1 diabetes (PPV10× 89% [95% CI, 83.5–92.8]). CONCLUSIONS Elevated tTG IgA in isolation is insufficient to confidently diagnose celiac disease. As tTG assay performance varied widely, diagnostic confirmation by a specialist prior to dietary changes is essential.

INTRODUCTION: Treatment of celiac disease (CeD) requires a strict gluten-free diet (GFD). Adherence is difficult to assess and influenced by many factors. Identification of potential gluten exposures is essential, but no validated screening measures exist in pediatrics. The aim of this study was to develop and validate a measure screening for gluten exposure risk in pediatric patients with CeD. METHODS: The Gluten Exposure Risk Assessment (GERA) was developed in 3 phases. First, items were generated and refined by a modified Delphi process. Next, psychometrics, factor structure, and validity were examined in a sample of caregivers of pediatric patients younger than 18 years with CeD at 12 pediatric celiac centers. Finally, the final measure was tested on an independent sample population using confirmatory factor analysis and test-retest data. RESULTS: A total of 134 items were generated representing up to 6 domains, with 36 items selected for initial testing. Based on psychometrics and confirmatory factor analysis data from 484 caregivers, the final measure included a total of a single screening question and 9 validated items representing 2 domains (Home, Outside). Repeat testing on a separate sample (N = 369) confirmed factor structure and validity of the final measure (Comparative Fit Index = 0.96, Tucker–Lewis index = 0.95, root mean square error of approximation = 0.06). DISCUSSION: The GERA is a valid screening measure, completed by caregivers, for assessment of gluten exposure in children and adolescents with CeD following a GFD. GERA is a useful tool for evaluating the potential of risk of gluten exposure and potential need for intervention.

INTRODUCTION: Determine contemporary rates of early mucosal recovery in children with celiac disease (CeD). METHODS: Multicenter retrospective cohort study in Canada and the United States. Children diagnosed with CeD between 2016 and 2021 who underwent a follow-up biopsy within 15 months of diagnosis were included. RESULTS: Overall, 96 of 130 children (74%) had mucosal recovery, including 48% children (12/25) who were assessed within 3 months. Musculoskeletal symptoms at diagnosis were the only clinical characteristic associated with persistent enteropathy. DISCUSSION: While mucosal recovery can occur within months, more than a quarter of children with CeD had persistent enteropathy within 15 months of treatment.

AbstractObjectivesThe prevalence of celiac disease (CeD) is increasing, yet it is still underdiagnosed, in part because of its heterogeneous presentation. Diagnostic criteria are evolving and management with strict adherence to a gluten‐free diet is challenging for many. We aimed to characterize the clinical presentation of CeD among a large multicenter cohort of pediatric patients and to identify factors associated with gluten‐free diet adherence.MethodsPatients with CeD aged 0–18 years were recruited from 11 United States health centers. Parents completed surveys about gluten‐free diet adherence and patient electronic health records were reviewed. Logistic regression analyses were performed to identify risk factors associated with gluten exposure.ResultsCharts were reviewed for 460 children with a median age of 6.4 years. Abdominal pain was reported in 57% of the cohort, but diverse symptoms were identified. Parent surveys were completed for 455 participants. Sixty‐five (14%) participants were at high risk for gluten exposure based on parental reports of weekly or daily gluten exposure or eating gluten by choice in the past year. Participants under the age of 5 years had a lower risk of gluten exposure, while participants without repeat serology testing 18 months after initial diagnosis were at higher risk of gluten exposure.ConclusionsIn a large, multicenter cohort of pediatric CeD patients, clinical presentation is highly variable, necessitating a high index of suspicion to make a diagnosis. Parent surveys indicate that 14% of patients are at high risk of gluten exposure, with patient age and lack of close follow‐up associated with gluten‐free diet adherence.

Abstract Objectives While guidelines exist for the diagnosis and management of pediatric celiac disease (CeD), current practices in North America are not well‐described. This study aimed to explore current practice patterns to identify gaps and direct future clinical, training and research initiatives. Methods A 23‐item survey designed by the Celiac Disease Special Interest Group was distributed electronically to its members. Questions explored four themes: (1) screening and diagnosis pre and post the coronavirus disease (COVID)‐19 pandemic, (2) treatment and monitoring, (3) family screening and transition of care, and (4) CeD focused training. Results The survey response rate was 10.8% (278/2552). Most respondents were from the United States (89.9%, n = 250) and Canada (8.6%, n = 24). While endoscopy remained the gold standard, serology‐based diagnosis was accepted by 47.5% (132/278). In response to the COVID‐19 pandemic, 37.4% of providers changed their diagnostic practice. Barriers to care included: lack of insurance coverage for dietitians, wait times, and lack of CeD focused training. During fellowship 69.1% (192/278) reported no focused CeD training. Conclusion Survey results revealed practice variation regarding the diagnosis and management of CeD in North America including a substantial proportion accepting non‐biopsy, serology‐based diagnosis, which increased during the COVID‐19 pandemic. Variations in screening, diagnosis, interval surveillance, and family screening were also identified. Dedicated CeD education in pediatric gastroenterology fellowship may be an opportunity for standardizing practice and advancing research. Future North American guidelines should take current care patterns into consideration and develop new initiatives to improve care of children with CeD.

Objectives:Patients with Trisomy 21 (T21) commonly have gastrointestinal symptoms and diseases that prompt evaluation with esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD). Our objective is to characterize duodenal histological abnormalities in these patients when undergoing EGD. A secondary aim is to explore associations of histologic findings with different therapies.Methods:Patients 30 years old or younger with T21 who underwent EGD from 2000 to 2020 at 6 hospitals were included in this retrospective cohort study. Duodenal biopsies were categorized based on reported histopathology findings as normal or abnormal. Abnormal pathology reports were reviewed and categorized into villous atrophy (VA) and duodenitis without VA. The VA group was further categorized based on the presence or absence of celiac disease (CD).Results:We identified 836 patients with T21 who underwent EGD, 419 (50.1%) of whom had duodenal histologic abnormalities. At the time of the first (index) abnormal duodenal biopsy, 290 of 419 had VA and of those, 172 of 290 met CD diagnostic criteria, while 118 of 290 did not meet CD criteria (nonspecific VA). Among the patients with an abnormal biopsy, acid suppression at the time of the index biopsy was less common in patients with VA‐CD compared to patients without VA or patients with nonspecific VA (12.2% vs 45.7% vs 44.9%).Conclusions:Half of the T21 patients in this cohort had abnormal duodenal biopsies including a subgroup with nonspecific VA. In this cohort, acid suppression use was more prevalent in patients with abnormalities other than CD.