Back to Authors

Ediger, Tracy

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7080-486X

Mayo Clinic

Nationwide Children's Hospital

Citations 2

Measuring the Risk of Gluten Exposure: Development of the Gluten Exposure Risk Assessment in Pediatric Patients
Hale, Amy E. , Germone, Monique , Fahey, Lisa M. , Stahl, Marisa G. , Leonard, Maureen M. , Singh, Arunjot , Hajjat, Temara , Mallon, Daniel , Kerzner, Benny, Raber, Catherine , Badalyan, Vahe , Mehta, Pooja , Liu, Edwin , Shull, Mary , Absah, Imad , Ediger, Tracy , Jericho, Hilary , Khavari, Nasim, Jossen, Jackie , Wolf, Randi L. , Wong, Madison , Regis, Stephanie , Weisbrod, Vanessa , Silvester, Jocelyn A. , RAISE-CD, Stahl, Marisa , Verma, Ritu , Jericho, Hilary , Wolf, Randi L , Regis, Stephanie , Weisbrod, Vanessa , Silvester, Jocelyn A , Mallon, Daniel , Lee, Dale Young , RAISE-CD

American Journal of Gastroenterology | July 30, 2025 | Volume: 121 | Issue: 5 | Pages: 1251-1258

10.14309/ajg.0000000000003675 Get It

INTRODUCTION: Treatment of celiac disease (CeD) requires a strict gluten-free diet (GFD). Adherence is difficult to assess and influenced by many factors. Identification of potential gluten exposures is essential, but no validated screening measures exist in pediatrics. The aim of this study was to develop and validate a measure screening for gluten exposure risk in pediatric patients with CeD. METHODS: The Gluten Exposure Risk Assessment (GERA) was developed in 3 phases. First, items were generated and refined by a modified Delphi process. Next, psychometrics, factor structure, and validity were examined in a sample of caregivers of pediatric patients younger than 18 years with CeD at 12 pediatric celiac centers. Finally, the final measure was tested on an independent sample population using confirmatory factor analysis and test-retest data. RESULTS: A total of 134 items were generated representing up to 6 domains, with 36 items selected for initial testing. Based on psychometrics and confirmatory factor analysis data from 484 caregivers, the final measure included a total of a single screening question and 9 validated items representing 2 domains (Home, Outside). Repeat testing on a separate sample (N = 369) confirmed factor structure and validity of the final measure (Comparative Fit Index = 0.96, Tucker–Lewis index = 0.95, root mean square error of approximation = 0.06). DISCUSSION: The GERA is a valid screening measure, completed by caregivers, for assessment of gluten exposure in children and adolescents with CeD following a GFD. GERA is a useful tool for evaluating the potential of risk of gluten exposure and potential need for intervention.
Gluten‐free schooling: Navigating challenges and triumphs for children with celiac disease
Weisbrod, Vanessa , Khavari, Nasim, Absah, Imad , Mallon, Danny, Raber, Catherine , Badalyan, Vahe , Shull, Mary , Dunn, Ashley R., Wren, Anava, Mardini, Farah, Fahey, Lisa M. , Ediger, Tracy , Leonard, Maureen M. , López-Rivera, Javier A. , Jericho, Hilary , Jericho, Hilary , Weisbrod, Vanessa , Lee, Dale Young , Verma, Ritu , Dunn, Ashley, Silvester, Jocelyn A.

JPGN Reports | March 11, 2025 | Volume: 6 | Issue: 2 | Pages: 99-106

10.1002/jpr3.70013 Get It

ABSTRACTObjectivesCeliac disease (CeD), an autoimmune disorder triggered by gluten ingestion, induces intestinal inflammation and varied symptoms. Treatment entails a strict gluten‐free diet (GFD), posing challenges for students, especially in schools with limited food choices. Nonadherence worsens symptoms, yet research on CeD's impact on students is scarce.MethodsThe CeliacKIDS study, conducted across 11 United States academic medical centers, evaluated gluten exposure risk in pediatric CeD patients via a cross‐sectional survey from August 2020 to August 2021. Participants recruited from treating institutions were approved by respective Institutional Review Boards.ResultsOne hundred and sixty children aged 5–18 (65% female, 34% male, 1% other) participated. Only 12% had GF food options at school, 31% brought their own for celebrations, and 41% lacked gluten free (GF) snacks after school. Thirty‐six percent lacked a 504 plan, with 5% misinformed. Hand hygiene concerns included 24% using sanitizer and 10% rarely washing hands before eating. Sixty‐two percent disclosed CeD, 35% when prompted, and 3% refused, mainly 13‐year‐old males. Two percent hesitated to request GF options, and 2% consumed potentially gluten‐containing food from friends.ConclusionMany US schools provide GF accommodations under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) but lack national standards. Diverse GF options and education on GF‐safe practices are crucial for GFD adherence. Discrepancies in parent–child perceptions emphasize the need for better communication. Adolescents, particularly females aged 12–13 with 2+ years on a GF diet, face higher risks. Transparent family–school communication is vital for optimizing the school experience and ensuring GFD adherence. Comprehensive nationwide school training is essential for celiac patients' well‐being.