Sparks, Brandon

Abstract Rumination syndrome (RS) is a common pediatric disorder of gut–brain interaction. However, a dearth of research on efficacious treatment to help guide clinical decision‐making remains. Thus, relying on well‐established treatment recommendations for other conditions with similar mechanisms or symptom profiles may be helpful; for example, conceptualizing RS treatment targets to address it as a “tic disorder of the gut” could be beneficial. To demonstrate the clinical utility of this conceptualization, we presented two cases that provide broad implications for treating pediatric RS. In both cases, akin to pediatric tic and related disorders, cognitive distress and physical discomfort were alleviated temporarily by rumination episodes. Thus, we recommend a targeted diagnostic assessment, including a functional analysis incorporating a transdiagnostic evaluation of symptoms. Close comanagement with specialty physicians and psychologists is also highly recommended. The patients represent complex yet standard cases seen in pediatric psychology outpatient clinics, suggesting the clinical utility of implications for psychologists and allied health professionals.

Abstract Objectives While guidelines exist for the diagnosis and management of pediatric celiac disease (CeD), current practices in North America are not well‐described. This study aimed to explore current practice patterns to identify gaps and direct future clinical, training and research initiatives. Methods A 23‐item survey designed by the Celiac Disease Special Interest Group was distributed electronically to its members. Questions explored four themes: (1) screening and diagnosis pre and post the coronavirus disease (COVID)‐19 pandemic, (2) treatment and monitoring, (3) family screening and transition of care, and (4) CeD focused training. Results The survey response rate was 10.8% (278/2552). Most respondents were from the United States (89.9%, n = 250) and Canada (8.6%, n = 24). While endoscopy remained the gold standard, serology‐based diagnosis was accepted by 47.5% (132/278). In response to the COVID‐19 pandemic, 37.4% of providers changed their diagnostic practice. Barriers to care included: lack of insurance coverage for dietitians, wait times, and lack of CeD focused training. During fellowship 69.1% (192/278) reported no focused CeD training. Conclusion Survey results revealed practice variation regarding the diagnosis and management of CeD in North America including a substantial proportion accepting non‐biopsy, serology‐based diagnosis, which increased during the COVID‐19 pandemic. Variations in screening, diagnosis, interval surveillance, and family screening were also identified. Dedicated CeD education in pediatric gastroenterology fellowship may be an opportunity for standardizing practice and advancing research. Future North American guidelines should take current care patterns into consideration and develop new initiatives to improve care of children with CeD.