Mosley, Thomas H.

Abstract Background This study aimed to examine if the association of cerebral perfusion with gait speed differs across systolic blood pressure (SBP) and age. Methods Cerebral perfusion was measured via arterial spin labeled (ASL)-MRI among community-dwelling adults aged 31–94 years in the population-based Mayo Clinic Study of Aging. Usual gait speed was assessed over 5.6 meters on an electronic mat. Sex- and body mass index (BMI)-adjusted linear regression models estimated cross-sectional gait speed associations with ASL and modifying effects of age and SBP using 3-way and 2-way interaction terms between continuous age, SBP, and ASL. Results report estimated differences in gait speed per standard deviation (SD) lower ASL for exemplar SBPs and ages. Results Among 479 participants (mean age 67.6 years; 44% women; mean gait speed 1.17 m/s), ASL relations to gait speed varied by age (ASL-x–age interaction: p = .001) and SBP (ASL-x–SBP interaction: p = .009). At an SBP of 120 mmHg, each SD lower ASL was associated with a 0.04 m/s (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.01, 0.07) slower gait speed at 65 years, 0.07 m/s (0.04, 0.10) at 75 years, and 0.09 m/s (0.05, 0.13) at 85 years. At an SBP of 140 mmHg, ASL associations with gait speed were attenuated to 0.01 (−0.01, 0.04), 0.04 (0.02, 0.06), and 0.06 (0.04, 0.09) m/s slower gait speed at ages 65, 75, and 85, respectively. Conclusion Poorer cerebral perfusion is associated with clinically meaningful slower gait speeds, particularly with older age, while higher perfusion markedly attenuates age differences in gait speed.

Introduction: Accelerated cognitive decline is influenced by vascular aging. Arterial stiffness and pressure amplification, measures of vascular aging, are associated with lower cognitive performance though their association with cognitive domains has been understudied. Hypothesis: Arterial stiffness and pressure amplification are associated with lower global and domain-specific cognition among a sample of Caucasian and African American (AA) older adults. Methods: In a cross-sectional study of 4618 members from visit 5 (2011-2013) of ARIC (mean age: 75 years, 41% men, 20% AA), we measured arterial stiffness (carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (cfPWV)) and pressure amplification (pulse pressure amplification (PPA), central pulse pressure (cPP) and carotid systolic blood pressure (cSBP)) using the Omron VP-1000 Plus device. Race-specific 25th percentile cut points were estimated for each measure. Domain-specific cognitive function was examined using the Delayed Word Recall Test (memory), Digit Symbol Substitution Test (executive function/processing speed), and Word Fluency Test (language). Test-specific z scores were calculated from sample means and standard deviations. A global cognition z score was generated by averaging the test-specific z scores. Linear regression was used to estimate the associations between race-specific 25th percentile dichotomies for arterial stiffness and pressure amplification measures with test-specific and global cognition z scores, adjusted for age, sex, education, ApoE4, heart rate, smoking and body mass index. Results: Among AAs, there was no significant association between measures of arterial stiffness and pressure amplification with either global or the domain-specific measures of cognition. Among Caucasians, all measures of arterial stiffness and pressure amplification were associated with lower global cognitive z scores (cfPWV: Beta (β) =-0.11, 95% Confidence Interval (CI): -0.19, -0.04; PPA: β=-0.11, 95% CI: -0.19, -0.03; cPP: β=-0.11, 95% CI: -0.18, -0.04; cSBP: β=-0.12, 95% CI: -0.20, -0.05). All measures of arterial stiffness and pressure amplification also were associated with lower executive function/processing speed (cfPWV: β=-0.09, 95% CI: -0.16, -0.03; PPA: β=-0.15, 95% CI: -0.22, -0.08; cPP: β=-0.14, 95% CI: -0.21, -0.07; cSBP: β=-0.13, 95% CI: -0.20, -0.07). High cfPWV was associated with lower memory (β=-0.12, 95% CI: -0.20, -0.04); and high cSBP was associated with lower language (β=-0.12, 95% CI: -0.20, -0.04). Conclusions: Arterial stiffness and measures of pressure amplification are inversely associated with global and domain-specific cognition in Caucasian older adults, but not in a smaller sample of AAs. Further study of the role of modifiable components of arterial aging on the preservation of cognition, particularly executive function/psychomotor speed, in older adulthood is warranted.

Background: As a high-flow, low-impedance organ, the brain is sensitive to excessive pressure and flow pulsatility. Increased pulsatility and arterial stiffness are hypothesized to contribute to cerebral microvascular damage linked to cognitive impairment. The association of arterial stiffness with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and dementia in a biethnic population is not well characterized, and the association of pressure amplification with MCI and dementia is relatively unexplored. Objectives: To quantify the cross-sectional association of arterial stiffness, measured by aortic pulse wave velocity (PWV), and pressure amplification with MCI and dementia in a biethnic population of older adults. Methods: We included 4,945 adults (2,903 females; 1,069 African Americans; mean age 75 years) from the population-based ARIC-NCS. The Omron VP-1000 plus system was used to measure arterial stiffness (carotid-femoral PWV (cfPWV)) and pressure amplification measures (central systolic blood pressure (cSBP), central pulse pressure (cPP), and pulse pressure amplification (PPA)). A neurologist and neuropsychologist classified MCI and dementia using psychometric assessments, medical history, cerebral magnetic resonance imaging, and physical examinations, with adjudication by a third reviewer. We used multinomial logistic regression to evaluate associations of race-specific 25th percentile cut points of PWV and pressure amplification with normal cognition (reference), MCI and dementia. We stratified by race and adjusted for age, sex, and heart rate, ApoE4, education, smoking status, and study center. Results: There were 760 Caucasians with MCI and 110 with dementia, and 201 African Americans with MCI and 47 with dementia. Among Caucasians, those with lower PPA had a higher prevalence of dementia, odds ratio (OR)=1.84 (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.15, 2.97), comparing participants below the 25th percentile to those above it, and those with higher cSBP had a higher prevalence of MCI, OR=1.33 (95% CI: 1.09, 1.63), comparing participants above the 75th percentile to those below it. Also among Caucasians, those with higher cPP had a higher prevalence of MCI, OR=1.25 (95%CI: 1.01, 1.55), and dementia, OR=1.66 (95% CI: 1.00, 2.73), comparing participants above the 75th percentile to those below it. There were no statistically significant associations with cfPWV, among African Americans, and no evidence for effect modification by hypertension or diabetes. Conclusion: Arterial stiffness and components of pressure amplification were associated with MCI and dementia in Caucasians but not in African Americans, possibly due to the limited sample size. Longitudinal characterization of the observed associations is warranted to determine whether these measures are independent predictors of MCI and dementia among Caucasian and African American older adults.

AbstractIntroductionSlower mobility is associated with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and dementia. We examined the interaction of endurance with gait speed on prevalent MCI and dementia.MethodsCross‐sectional multinomial regression in the ARIC cohort (n = 2844 participants; 71 to 94 years; 44% men; 18% Black persons) with cognitive status (normal/MCI/dementia), 4 m gait speed, and endurance (2 minute walk [2MW]).ResultsFaster gait speed (up to but not above 1 m/s) and better 2MW were separately associated with lower dementia risk. Good performance in both (2MW = 200 m, gait speed = 1.2 m/s) was associated with 99% lower dementia (Relative Prevalence Ratio [RPR] = 0.01 [95% CI: 0.0 to 0.06]) and 73% lower MCI, RPR = 0.27 (0.15 to 0.48) compared to poor performance in both (2MW = 100 m, gait speed = 0.8 m/s). Models incorporating a gait speed‐by‐2MW interaction term outperformed gait speed‐only models (P < .001).DiscussionGait speed relationships with dementia diminish at faster gait speeds. Combining endurance with gait speed may yield more sensitive markers of MCI and dementia than gait speed alone.

AbstractBackgroundDementia disproportionately impacts people of color in the U.S.. Whether these disparities are due to differences in vascular risk factors, cognitive reserve, or AD pathophysiology remains unclear.MethodBlack and White participants from four U.S. communities were recruited into the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study at ages 45‐64. Vascular risk factors were evaluated in midlife and at multiple visits over 30+ years, as were markers of cognitive reserve, with expert classification of dementia. In participants with brain MRI, brain volumes were evaluated in association with dementia. In nondemented participants in the ARIC‐PET ancillary study, florbetapir PET scans were used to quantify brain cortical amyloid; differences in levels by race, vascular risk factors, and white matter hyperintensities (WMH) were evaluated.ResultIn 15744 ARIC participants, dementia was more common in Black vs White participants. Although midlife vascular risk factors were related to dementia, the impact of these risk factors on dementia risk and cortical volumes didn’t differ by race. Lower education was nonsignificantly more strongly associated with dementia in Blacks vs Whites, and an APOE e4 allele was more strongly associated with dementia in Whites. In ARIC‐PET (N=322), vascular risk factors from midlife were associated with PET amyloid, without similar associations for late‐life risk factors; these associations did not significantly differ by race. WMH volume was more strongly associated (cross‐sectionally) with PET amyloid in Blacks vs Whites, but differences were not statistically significantly different. Finally, Blacks had an over two‐fold increased odds of elevated florbetapir PET vs Whites, independent of vascular risk factors, demographics, WMH volume, cognitive status, and APOE genotype.ConclusionConsideration of racial disparities in dementia should consider vascular risk, cognitive reserve, and social determinants of health, across the life course. Vascular risk factors do not appear to differentially impact dementia risk or brain amyloid in Blacks vs Whites, but the greater prevalence of these risk factors in Blacks must be considered. Although the A/T/N framework may clarify underlying biology contributing to Alzheimer’s disease, inclusion of these additional factors is needed to understand and reduce racial disparities in dementia rates.

AbstractBackgroundImaging‐based markers of cerebrovascular disease are associated with adverse health events, including incident dementia. However, only infarcts ≥3mm are typically considered in clinical and research settings. Recent evidence demonstrates that smaller infarcts in individuals during mid‐life, particularly when co‐occurring with larger infarcts, may be clinically relevant to cognitive decline, incident stroke, and stroke mortality. We aimed to determine if there was a similar compounding of risk for incident dementia among those with both smaller and larger infarcts at midlife.MethodThe ARIC study is a multi‐site longitudinal cohort study which began in 1987. At visit 3 (1993‐95), brain 1.5T MRI scans were completed in 1881 participants with self‐reported Black/White race and no history of stroke (Mean age=62.9±4.9, 40% Male, 50% Black). Infarcts were identified on T2 and proton density weighted images, with smaller infarcts defined as those <3mm and larger infarcts defined as ≥3mm. All participants were followed prospectively for incident dementia using a combination of medical record surveillance, telephone interviews, in‐person assessments, and expert adjudicated dementia status at three in‐person exams (2011‐2013, 2015‐17, 2018‐19). Cox regression was used to determine the association between infarct group [none(referent), smaller only, larger only, both] and incident dementia adjusted for age, sex, education, site‐race, APOE4, and competing risk of mortality.ResultAmong 1881 participants, 539 incident dementia cases were identified over 25 years of follow‐up. 1611 participants were infarct‐free, 50 participants had only smaller infarcts, 185 had only larger infarcts, and 35 participants had both. Compared to those with no infarcts, participants with both smaller and larger infarcts were over 2.5 times more likely to develop dementia [Hazard Ratio(HR)=2.61; 95% Confidence Interval(CI)=1.44, 4.72]. Associations were in similar directions but had wider and indeterminate confidence intervals when comparing the smaller infarcts only (HR=1.22; 95%CI=0.70, 2.13) or larger infarcts only (HR=1.27; 95%CI=0.92, 1.74) to the no infarct group. Of the 35 participants with both smaller and larger infarcts, all but two either died or developed dementia.ConclusionA midlife infarct burden including both smaller and larger lesions may represent a vulnerability to dementia beyond the risk conferred by either smaller or larger infarcts alone.

Abstract We investigated the cross-sectional associations of speech-in-noise performance with magnetic resonance imaging brain volumes among 588 cognitively normal participants (77±4 years, 56% female) from the Aging and Cognitive Health Evaluation in Elders Study (randomized trial embedded in the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study) baseline in 2018-19 (N=427, with hearing loss) and ARIC (N=161, normal hearing) Visit 6/7 in 2016-17/2018-19. Central auditory processing was measured by Quick Speech-in-Noise (QuickSIN) test; range: 0 to 30, lower scores=worse performance. In models adjusted for demographic and disease covariates, every 5-point decrease in QuickSIN score was associated with smaller volumes of the temporal lobe overall (-0.07SD, 95% CI:-0.13,-0.01) as well as subregions including but not limited to those important for auditory processing (amygdala:-0.13SD, 95% CI:-0.21,-0.04; middle temporal gyrus:-0.08SD, 95% CI:-0.15,-0.00; superior temporal gyrus:-0.08SD, 95% CI:-0.15,-0.01). Further research is needed to understand the mechanisms underlying these observed associations.

Abstract Brain imaging-based biomarkers of neuropathology are associated with mobility in older adults, but the relation of regional microstructural integrity to gait speed in the context of a broader neuropathological profile is less understood. We examined cross-sectional associations of microstructural integrity with 4-meter usual-pace gait speed (cm/s) in a subsample of ARIC study participants who completed 3T MRI brain scans with diffusion tensor imaging(2011-13; n=1785; mean age=76.2±5.3, 60% Female, 28% Black). We considered total brain and six regional averages of fractional anisotropy (FA; lower=worse microstructural integrity) and mean diffusivity (MD; higher=worse microstructural integrity): frontal, temporal, parietal, occipital, anterior and posterior corpus callosum. Associations were tested in multivariable linear regression models adjusted for demographics, cardiovascular risk factors, and with and without additional neuropathological indices: total brain volume, white matter hyperintensities, infarcts, and microhemorrhages. When modeled separately, all neuropathology indices were associated with slower gait speed. Every standard deviation(SD) higher total brain FA was associated with +2.56 cm/s gait speed (95%CI: 1.64,3.48) and every SD higher MD was associated with -4.27 cm/s gait speed (-5.34,-3.20). All regional estimates were comparable. When adjusted for all other neuropathology indices, only posterior corpus callosum FA (β=1.72; 0.67,2.77), total MD (β=-1.63; -3.02,-0.25), frontal lobe MD (β=-1.76; -3.03,-0.48), and temporal lobe MD (β=-1.40; -2.78,-0.02) remained significantly associated with gait speed. Microstructural integrity is an informative measure of brain pathology in relation to mobility, with regional measures tied to executive, memory, and somatosensory function being more informative when a broader neuropathological profile is considered.

AbstractAimWe investigate if periodontal disease is prospectively associated with cerebrovascular and neurodegenerative markers of dementia and Alzheimer's pathology.Materials and MethodsN = 1306 participants (Visit 5 mean age = 76.5 [standard deviation = 5.4] years) in the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities study with completed dental exams at Visit 4 underwent brain magnetic resonance imaging scans at Visit 5 while N = 248 underwent positron emission tomography scans. Participants were classified as edentulous or, among the dentate, by the modified Periodontal Profile Class. Brain volumes were regressed on periodontal status in linear regressions. Cerebrovascular measures and β‐amyloid positivity were regressed on periodontal status in logistic regressions.ResultsPeriodontal disease was not associated with brain volumes, microhaemorrhages, or elevated β‐amyloid. Compared with periodontally healthy individuals, odds ratios [95% confidence interval] for all‐type infarcts were 0.37 [0.20, 0.65] for severe tooth loss and 0.56 [0.31, 0.99] for edentulous participants.ConclusionsWithin the limitations of this study, periodontal disease was not associated with altered brain volumes, microhaemorrhages, or β‐amyloid positivity. Tooth loss was associated with lower odds of cerebral infarcts.