Kisiel, John B.

4577 Background: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. Though biannual ultrasound surveillance with or without alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) testing is recommended for at-risk patients, its sensitivity for early-stage HCC detection is suboptimal. We therefore evaluated performance of a biomarker panel incorporating methylated DNA markers (MDMs) and proteins for early HCC detection in at-risk patients with chronic liver disease. Methods: In an international, multicenter, case-control study, blood specimens were collected from patients with HCC per AASLD criteria and controls matched for age and liver disease etiology. All patients had underlying cirrhosis or chronic HBV infection. Whole blood was collected in cell-free DNA stabilizing and serum-separation tubes and shipped to a central laboratory for processing. The levels of 5 MDMs, AFP, and AFP-L3 were assessed along with age and sex. We used 537 samples in a 5-fold validation for developing a LASSO regression algorithm to classify samples as HCC positive or negative. Model robustness was tested by perturbing the data in silico and analyzing results with the predictive algorithm. Algorithm performance was compared to AFP alone and the GALAD score (Gender, Age, AFP-L3, AFP, and DCP). Results: The study included 136 HCC cases (81 early-stage—BCLC stage 0/A) and 401 controls. With specificity set at 89%, we developed a model using sex, AFP, and 3 MDMs (HOXA1, TSPYL5, B3GALT6) with higher sensitivity (70%) for early-stage HCC compared to GALAD (54%) or AFP (31% at 20 ng/mL or 52% at ≥7.7 ng/mL) (Table). The AUC for the HCC marker panel was 0.91 (95% CI 0.89 – 0.94) compared to GALAD (0.88; 95% CI 0.85 – 0.91) or AFP (0.84; 95% CI 0.81 – 0.87). The panel performed similarly in viral (AUC = 0.94) and non-viral (AUC = 0.89) etiologies. Conclusions: The robust algorithm based on novel blood-based biomarkers presented here provides higher sensitivity for early-stage HCC compared to other available blood-based biomarkers and, therefore, could significantly impact HCC clinical management and patient outcomes. Further clinical studies to validate the algorithm are ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT03628651 . [Table: see text]

4088 Background: Methylated DNA markers (MDMs) are broadly informative for early detection of colorectal cancer (CRC) but have not been extensively studied for post-treatment surveillance and disease monitoring. We aimed to assess the feasibility of novel CRC-associated MDMs for detection of distant recurrent CRC (rCRC) in plasma. Methods: A panel of 13 MDMs previously identified to be discriminant for primary CRC was selected. In a cross-sectional analysis of plasma samples, MDMs were assayed blindly (by target enrichment long-probe quantitative amplified signal assay) from 160 age/sex-balanced patients (60 healthy controls, 60 with resected CRC and no evidence of disease (NED), and 40 rCRC after primary tumor resection). Plasma-derived carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) was measured on all patients. Random forest modeling was used to derive a prediction algorithm of MDMs (with and without CEA) for the endpoint of rCRC relative to healthy controls. The accuracy of the algorithm was summarized as sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) in the test set. Results: Median patient age was 55 (interquartile range: 49-64) years. As shown in the Table below, a single MDM with the highest AUC was significantly better than CEA ( p= 0.02). On cross validation, CEA provided no additional improvement to the performance of the panel of 13 MDMs ( p= 0.2). The cross-validated panel of MDMs detected rCRC liver metastases with 96% (79-100%) sensitivity, lung metastases with 78% (40-97%) sensitivity, and peritoneal/nodal metastases with 57% (18-90%) sensitivity. Lesions with Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors sum > 4 cm were detected with 94% (73-100%) sensitivity and ≤4 cm with 78% (52-94%) sensitivity. Conclusions: Novel MDMs in plasma detect rCRC with promising accuracy. The clinical utility of MDMs for non-invasive post-treatment surveillance and treatment monitoring in CRC warrants further evaluation in longitudinal studies with sufficient follow-up to exclude sub-clinical recurrence in those with NED. [Table: see text]

Colorectal adenomas are precursors of CRC. Recently, the gut microbiota, i.e., the collection of microbes residing in our gut, has been recognized as a key player in CRC development. There have been a number of gut microbiota profiling studies for colorectal adenoma and CRC; however, fewer studies have considered the gut metabolome, which serves as the chemical interface between the host and gut microbiota. Here, we conducted a gut metabolome profiling study of colorectal adenoma and CRC and analyzed the metabolomic profiles together with paired microbiota composition profiles. We found several chemical signatures of colorectal adenoma that were associated with some gut microbes and potentially indicative of future CRC. This study highlights potential early-driver metabolites in CRC pathogenesis and guides further targeted experiments and thus provides an important stepping stone toward developing better CRC prevention strategies.

OBJECTIVES: Multitarget stool DNA (MT-sDNA) testing has grown as a noninvasive screening modality for colorectal cancer (CRC), but real-world clinical data are limited in the post-FDA approval setting. The effect of previous colonoscopy on MT-sDNA performance is not known. We aimed to evaluate findings of colorectal neoplasia (CRN) at diagnostic colonoscopy in patients with positive MT-sDNA testing, stratified by patient exposure to previous colonoscopy. METHODS: We identified consecutive patients completing MT-sDNA testing over a 39-month period and reviewed the records of those with positive tests for neoplastic findings at diagnostic colonoscopy. MT-sDNA test positivity rate, adherence to diagnostic colonoscopy, and the positive predictive value (PPV) of MT-sDNA for any CRN and neoplastic subtypes were calculated. RESULTS: Of 16,469 MT-sDNA tests completed, testing returned positive in 2,326 (14.1%) patients. After exclusion of patients at increased risk for CRC, 1,801 patients remained, 1,558 (87%) of whom underwent diagnostic colonoscopy; 918 of 1,558 (59%) of these patients had undergone previous colonoscopy, whereas 640 (41%) had not. Any CRN was found in 1,046 of 1,558 patients (PPV = 67%). More neoplastic lesions were found in patients without previous colonoscopy (73%); however, the rates remained high among those who had undergone previous colonoscopy (63%, P < 0.0001). The large majority (79%) of patients had right-sided neoplasia. DISCUSSION: MT-sDNA has a high PPV for any CRN regardless of exposure to previous colonoscopy. Right-sided CRN was found at colonoscopy in most patients with positive MT-sDNA testing, representing a potential advantage over other currently available screening modalities for CRC.

Abstract Background and Aims We aimed to evaluate the relationship of serum adalimumab trough levels (ATL) with disease activity of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients in a large, well-characterized referral center-based cohort. Methods We compared serum ATL between those with clinical, biochemical, or endoscopic/radiologic disease activity and those without. Results A total of 236 patients with IBD were included. Higher cutoff levels were associated with endoscopic and/or radiologic responses (cutoff value: 5.3 mcg/mL, P = 0.003) compared with improvement in C-reactive protein (cutoff value: 4.3 mcg/mL, P = 0.031). Conclusions Higher cutoff ATL was associated with endoscopic and/or radiologic response.

Objective: Alaska Native (AN) people have among the world’s highest rate of colorectal cancer (CRC). We assessed perceptions of AN people and their health care providers of a new take-home multitarget stool DNA test (MT-sDNA; Cologuard) relative to colonoscopy. Methods: Cross-sectional surveys of AN people aged 40 to 75 years (mailed) and providers (online). Results: Participants included 1616 AN patients (19% response rate) and 87 providers (26% response rate; 57% AN people). Over half (58%) of patients preferred colonoscopy for CRC screening, while 36% preferred MT-sDNA. Unscreened patients were significantly more likely to state a preference for MT-sDNA than previously screened patients (42% vs 31%, P < .05) as were younger patients (<60 years old) compared with older patients (40% vs 30%, P < .05). Most providers thought that MT-sDNA would improve screening rates (69%), would recommend if available (79%), and be implementable (79%). Perceived barriers differed substantially between patients and providers in both type and magnitude. Leading colonoscopy barriers reported by patients were travel (44%) and bowel preparation (40%), while providers thought that fear of pain (92%) and invasiveness of the test (87%) were the primary barriers. For MT-sDNA, patients’ belief that colonoscopy was better (56%) and not knowing how to do the test (40%) were primary barriers, while providers thought stool collection (67%) and having a stool sample in their home (63%) were leading barriers. Conclusions: This study found that MT-sDNA has potential acceptability among AN people and their health care providers. Both groups reported a willingness to use MT-sDNA and did not perceive major barriers to its use. This preference was especially true of unscreened and younger patients. The majority of providers indicated they would use MT-sDNA if available and that it would improve CRC screening rates. In this population, where colonoscopy access is limited, MT-sDNA has the potential to improve CRC screening adherence.

INTRODUCTION: Due to the rising incidence and mortality of colorectal cancer (CRC) in individuals < 55 years (Siegel R, et al, JNCI, 2017), American Cancer Society (ACS) guidelines now recommend average-risk CRC screening beginning at age 45 years. The multi-target stool DNA (mt-sDNA) test, an FDA-approved screening test for average-risk individuals ≥50 years, is one ACS-recommended option for this age group. To minimize invasive testing in the younger age group, a screening test with high specificity is necessary to triage patients for diagnostic colonoscopy. To date, most endorsed CRC screening tests have not been rigorously studied in younger age groups. The objective of this study (the Act Now study [NCT03728348]) is to quantify the specificity of the mt-sDNA test in average risk individuals ages 45-49. METHODS: Act Now is an ongoing prospective, cross-sectional, multi-center study in subjects ages 45-49 at average risk for CRC. 942 subjects are targeted for enrollment and will complete a mt-sDNA test prior to undergoing a screening colonoscopy (blinded to mt-sDNA test results). Specificity for advanced colorectal neoplasia will be determined by comparing mt-sDNA test results to the most advanced finding on colonoscopy, based on procedure report and histopathological findings. Due to the low prevalence of CRC in this age group, mt-sDNA test sensitivity will be a secondary measure. RESULTS: To date, 480 subjects have completed a mt-sDNA test and screening colonoscopy. A total of 468 subjects (97.5%) have no first-degree relative (FDR) with CRC and 12 subjects (2.5%) have an FDR diagnosed at age ≥60 years. No subject has had a previous screening colonoscopy. The study population has a mean age of 47.4 years and is 48.8% female. Self-reported race includes 84.2% white, 11.5% black/African American, 3.3% Asian, and 1.0% other. Self-reported ethnicity includes 95.2% not Hispanic or Latino, 4.6% Hispanic or Latino, and 0.2% other. The mean BMI of subjects is 29.6 kg/m 2 . Most subjects (67.1%) have never smoked cigarettes, while 21.9% are former smokers and 11.0% are current smokers. CONCLUSION: The ongoing Act Now study will quantify the specificity of the mt-sDNA test in average risk individuals ages 45-49. Given concerns regarding the resources required to screen this age group for CRC, a noninvasive screening test with high specificity and sensitivity will help to optimize use of colonoscopy resources.

INTRODUCTION: Despite the demonstrated effectiveness of average-risk screening, colorectal cancer (CRC) remains the 2 nd leading cause of cancer death in the US. For optimal prevention, CRC screening tools should be highly accurate, user-friendly, and broadly accessible. Patient and provider adoption of the FDA-approved, guideline-endorsed multi-target stool DNA (mt-sDNA) test has grown exponentially since its launch in 2014. Toward ongoing improvement in CRC screening effectiveness, we conducted a blinded case-control study to assess the detection accuracy of a mt-sDNA panel of novel, highly discriminant methylated DNA markers (MDMs). METHODS: We selected 12 candidate MDMs from prior whole methylome discovery and validation in tissue. Stool was obtained as part of previous large, multicenter studies and collected prior to or 7 days post-colonoscopy (prior to any clinically-indicated treatment). CRC, advanced adenoma (AA; size ≥1 cm, high-grade dysplasia, or ≥25% villous morphology), non-AA, or control (no neoplasia) status was defined by colonoscopy and histopathology. Samples were blinded to operators and randomized by characterization to balance the test sets prior to assessment. MDMs were quantified by target-specific DNA capture and Long-probe Quantitative Amplified Signal assay on bisulfite-converted DNA; fecal hemoglobin was quantified by immunoassay. Bootstrapping methods were used to select a panel of 3 MDMs, which was then 10-fold cross-validated; hemoglobin was also included, as was a colon epithelium-specific MDM to normalize stool MDM levels. RESULTS: Participant samples included 117 CRC, 120 AA, 161 non-AA, and 327 controls. Median age was 67 (IQR 61, 75) years; 51% were men. The AUC with best-fit was 0.97 for CRC and 0.84 for AA, and these high AUCs held up tightly on cross-validation (Figure 1). At 92% (95% CI 88-94%) specificity, sensitivity of the panel was 92% (95% CI 86-96%) for CRC. Neither CRC stage (Figure 2) nor CRC site significantly affected performance. At the same 92% specificity, sensitivity was 65% (95% CI 56-73%) for AAs overall, 67% (38-88%) for sessile serrated polyps ≥1 cm, and 71% (57-82%) for adenomas with villous features (Figure 3). CONCLUSION: These data support highly accurate performance of a novel panel of mt-sDNA markers for detecting both CRC (including early stage lesions) and AAs at greatest risk of progression. Prospective comparative studies are warranted to further establish the clinical potential of this novel screening tool.

INTRODUCTION: Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening is broadly endorsed for individuals 50–75 years of age. Given recent increases in CRC incidence and mortality for patients <50 years old, the American Cancer Society now recommends initiation of average-risk CRC screening at age 45 (Wolf AMD CA Cancer J Clin 2018). The performance of recommended tests, including the multi-target stool DNA (mt-sDNA; marketed as Cologuard™) test, has been minimally described in populations under 50 years old. To address this knowledge gap, we conducted a retrospective study of DNA markers (KRAS, BMP3, NDRG4) included in the mt-sDNA assay to quantify and compare tissue marker levels in sporadic CRC cases and normal colon controls from patients in 45–49 and 50–64 year-old age groups. Our primary hypothesis was that mt-sDNA marker levels would be statistically similar between cases in both age groups. METHODS: Patient samples were identified from a pathology tissue archive at Mayo Clinic, excluding those with inflammatory bowel disease or familial cancer syndromes. Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissues were reviewed by a GI pathologist for 45–49 year-old (n = 90) and 50–64 year-old (n = 96) CRC cases; normal colon samples (45–49, n = 76; 50–64, n = 92) were also included for comparison. DNA extracted from core punches was blinded and processed in a randomized order. Quantitative Allele specific Realtime Target and Signal amplification (QuARTS) assays were used to quantify KRAS mutations, and BMP3 and NDRG4 methylation. Marker level in each sample was reported as the QuARTS product of mutant KRAS , methylated BMP3 or NDRG4 relative to the ACTB product in each sample, reported as a percentage. At least 60 patients per group provided sufficient power to demonstrate differences in marker levels of ±25% between case groups and between control groups using the Wilcoxon Rank Sum test. RESULTS: CRC cases in the 45–49 vs 50–64 year-old groups did not differ significantly with respect to sex ( P = 0.77) or race/ethnicity ( P = 0.06); left-sided CRC was more common in the 45–49 vs 50–64 year-old group (87% vs. 72%; P = 0.02). None of the marker levels were statistically different between cases of the younger vs older groups or between controls of these groups (Figure 1). CONCLUSION: These data support the expectation of no age-related differences in CRC detection by mt-sDNA, as the relevant molecular markers, when they occur, are present at similar levels across age groups 45–49 and 50–64 years.