Cytomegalovirus-related Complications and Management in Facial Vascularized Composite Allotransplantation: An International Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study
Background. There is a paucity of data on the impact of cytomegalovirus (CMV) serostatus and CMV infection on outcomes in facial vascularized composite allotransplantation. Methods. This international, multicenter, retrospective cohort study presents data on CMV and basic transplant-related demographics, including pretransplant viral D/R serostatus, and duration of antiviral prophylaxis. CMV-related complications (viremia, disease), allograft-related complications (rejection episodes, loss), and mortality were analyzed. Results. We included 19 patients, 4 of whom received CMV high-risk transplants (D+/R−). CMV viremia was noted in 6 patients (all 4 D+/R− patients and 2 D−/R+), mostly within the first-year posttransplant, shortly after discontinuation of antiviral prophylaxis (median 2 mo). CMV disease occurred in 2 D+/R− patients. The high-risk group experienced relatively more rejection episodes per month follow-up. None of D+/R− patients suffered allograft loss due to rejection (longest follow-up: 121 mo). Conclusions. D+/R− patients were at increased risk of CMV-related complications. Although a higher number of rejections was noted in this group, none of the D+/R− patients lost their allograft or died because of CMV or rejection. Thus, CMV D+/R− face transplantation can likely be safely performed with prophylaxis, active surveillance, and prompt treatment.
Multitarget Stool DNA Screening in Clinical Practice: High Positive Predictive Value for Colorectal Neoplasia Regardless of Exposure to Previous Colonoscopy
OBJECTIVES: Multitarget stool DNA (MT-sDNA) testing has grown as a noninvasive screening modality for colorectal cancer (CRC), but real-world clinical data are limited in the post-FDA approval setting. The effect of previous colonoscopy on MT-sDNA performance is not known. We aimed to evaluate findings of colorectal neoplasia (CRN) at diagnostic colonoscopy in patients with positive MT-sDNA testing, stratified by patient exposure to previous colonoscopy. METHODS: We identified consecutive patients completing MT-sDNA testing over a 39-month period and reviewed the records of those with positive tests for neoplastic findings at diagnostic colonoscopy. MT-sDNA test positivity rate, adherence to diagnostic colonoscopy, and the positive predictive value (PPV) of MT-sDNA for any CRN and neoplastic subtypes were calculated. RESULTS: Of 16,469 MT-sDNA tests completed, testing returned positive in 2,326 (14.1%) patients. After exclusion of patients at increased risk for CRC, 1,801 patients remained, 1,558 (87%) of whom underwent diagnostic colonoscopy; 918 of 1,558 (59%) of these patients had undergone previous colonoscopy, whereas 640 (41%) had not. Any CRN was found in 1,046 of 1,558 patients (PPV = 67%). More neoplastic lesions were found in patients without previous colonoscopy (73%); however, the rates remained high among those who had undergone previous colonoscopy (63%, P < 0.0001). The large majority (79%) of patients had right-sided neoplasia. DISCUSSION: MT-sDNA has a high PPV for any CRN regardless of exposure to previous colonoscopy. Right-sided CRN was found at colonoscopy in most patients with positive MT-sDNA testing, representing a potential advantage over other currently available screening modalities for CRC.