Devens, Mary E.

ABSTRACT Lymphoma is one of the leading causes of cancer and cancer deaths and yet has not been amenable to population screening. The role of methylated DNA markers (MDMs) in the detection of lymphoma has not been extensively studied. We aimed to discover, validate, and test tissue–derived MDMs of lymphoma in archival plasma specimens. Reduced representation bisulfite sequencing (RRBS) was performed on a discovery set of frozen tissues. MDMs identified were converted to methylation–specific PCR assays and validated on independent formalin–fixed, paraffin‐embedded (FFPE) tissues. Target enrichment long–probe quantitative‐amplified signal (TELQAS) assays were developed and assayed in plasma–extracted, bisulfite‐converted DNA from independent treatment‐naïve lymphoma patients and healthy controls. Prediction of cancer status was modeled using random forest model with in silico cross‐validation. After discovery and validation in tissue, 16 TELQAS assays ( ZNF503 , VWA5B1 , HOXA9 , GABRG3 , ITGA5 , MAX.chr17.7190 , BNC1 , CDK20 , MAX.chr4.4069 , TPBG , DNAH14 , SYT6 , CACNG8 , FAM110B , ADRA1D , and NRN1 ) were selected for testing in plasma. These detected 78% (95% CI, 74%–82%) of lymphoma cases at 90% specificity. Excluding marginal zone and T‐cell lymphomas, sensitivity increased to 84% (80%–88%). MDMs in plasma show promise to detect lymphoma and are candidates for inclusion in multi‐cancer detection studies.

Introduction: Non-invasive assays are needed to better discriminate patients with prostate cancer (PCa) to avoid over-treatment of indolent disease. We analyzed 14 methylated DNA markers (MDMs) from urine samples of patients with biopsy-proven PCa relative to healthy controls and further studied discrimination of clinically significant PCa (csPCa) from healthy controls and Gleason 6 cancers. Methods: To evaluate the panel, urine from 24 healthy male volunteers with no clinical suspicion for PCa and 24 men with biopsy-confirmed disease across all Gleason scores was collected. Blinded to clinical status, DNA from the supernatant was analyzed for methylation signal within specific DNA sequences across 14 genes (HES5, ZNF655, ITPRIPL1, MAX.chr3.6187, SLCO3A1, CHST11, SERPINB9, WNT3A, KCNB2, GAS6, AKR1B1, MAX.chr3.8028, GRASP, ST6GALNAC2) by target enrichment long-probe quantitative-amplified signal assays. Results: Utilizing an overall specificity cut-off of 100% for discriminating normal controls from PCa cases across the MDM panel resulted in 71% sensitivity (95% CI: 49–87%) for PCa detection (4/7 Gleason 6, 8/12 Gleason 7, 5/5 Gleason 8+) and 76% (50–92%) for csPCa (Gleason ≥ 7). At 100% specificity for controls and Gleason 6 patients combined, MDM panel sensitivity was 59% (33–81%) for csPCa (5/12 Gleason 7, 5/5 Gleason 8+). Conclusions: MDMs assayed in urine offer high sensitivity and specificity for detection of clinically significant prostate cancer. Prospective evaluation is necessary to estimate discrimination of patients as first-line screening and as an adjunct to prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing.

Abstract Objective: Aberrantly methylated DNA may be used to detect minimal residual disease or early recurrence in breast cancer. As a 1st step, we aimed to develop an MDM panel to delineate between healthy women, stage I-III breast cancer in remission with no evidence of disease (NED), and metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Methods: We prospectively enrolled patients into 3 groups: healthy controls (adult females with a normal mammogram in past 12 months with no history of breast cancer), NED [stage I-III breast cancer with no clinical evidence of recurrence 6 months - 3 years post-treatment (adjuvant endocrine therapy allowed)], and MBC (collected either at initial diagnosis of untreated metastatic disease or radiographic progression). DNA was extracted from 6 mL of plasma derived from blood collected in LBgard tubes (Exact Sciences Corp., San Diego CA), and was bisulfite-treated and assayed by target enrichment long-probe quantitative amplified signal (TELQASTM) method for a panel of 15 previously identified MDMs [Table], normalized by the control gene, B3GALT6. Areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) were calculated for each MDM to assess discrimination of MBC from other groups. With 60 patients per group, we had greater than 80% power to detect a difference of 0.20 from the null AUC of 0.7. Results: We tested samples from 60 MBC (10 untreated, 50 recurrent), 60 NED, and 60 healthy women. The median age was 63 (IQR, 55-72) and was not different between groups. The NED group was all hormone-receptor (HR) positive, with 47 (78%) being human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative (HER2-) and 13 (22%) HER2+; 48 (80%) were stage I and 9 (15%) were N+. The MBC group had 35 (58%) patients with HR+/HER2- tumors, 11 (18%) HR+/HER2+, and 6 (10%) HR-/HER2-, 4 (7%) HR-/HER2+, with 4 (7%) unknown. Of the 41 MBC whose original stage and nodal status were known 9 (22%) were stage I and 22 (54%) were N+. The markers were able to discriminate between MBC and NED patient samples with AUCs from 0.97 to 0.72. AUCs for 10/15 MDMs (ITPRIPL1, EMX1, C17orf64, OSR2, TRIM67, CHST2, IFFO1, TRH, FAM59B, and MPZ) were >0.90. No difference in MDMs was observed between the healthy and NED groups. Conclusions: MDMs, assayed from plasma, appear highly discriminant for metastatic breast cancer cases in comparison to control patients with NED or healthy controls. Further clinical validation of this MDM panel in a larger cohort is warranted. Table 1. Plasma MDM discrimination of metastatic breast cancer (MBC) from healthy controls and previously treated breast cancer patients with no evidence of disease (NED) Citation Format: Karthik V. Giridhar, Fergus J. Couch, Jason P. Sinnwell, Seth W. Slettedahl, William R. Taylor, Douglas W. Mahoney, Patrick H. Foote, Maria C. O’Connell, Mariah J. Robran, Mary E. Devens, Anna M. Gonser, Nicole Larson, Karen A. Doering, Kelli N. Burger, Michael Kaiser, Hatim Allawi, Kathryn Ruddy, Janet Olson, John B. Kisiel. Plasma assay of methylated DNA markers (MDM) detects patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) compared to healthy controls and treated breast cancer patients with no evidence of disease [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-11-06.

7562 Background: Lymphoma is the 6th most common cancer and a top 10 cause of cancer deaths. To date, there are no blood test approaches to population screening, and accurate surveillance markers are limited. Methylated DNA markers (MDMs) are broadly informative for early detection of cancer but have not been extensively studied for lymphomas. We sought to discover and validate MDMs in DNA extracted from lymphoma tissue, then test these MDMs in archival blood plasma specimens. Methods: Reduced representation bisulfite sequencing (RRBS) was performed on DNA extracted from a discovery set of frozen tissues of classic Hodgkin lymphoma (CHL, n=24), non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL, n=78: T-cell-TCL (8); diffuse large B-cell-DLBCL (18); follicular-FL (12); mantle cell-MCL (20); marginal zone-MZL (15)), and lymphoma cell line samples (27); controls included benign lymph node (n=11) and healthy donor buffy coat (n=30). 30 MDMs were ranked by fold-change and AUC and used to design methylation-specific PCR assays for biological validation on independent DNA samples extracted from FFPE tissue from 13 normal lymph node and 63 lymphoma samples and 36 buffy coats from healthy patients. Target enrichment long-probe quantitative-amplified signal assays were developed for 16 MDMs and then assayed in plasma-extracted, bisulfite-converted DNA samples from 390 independent treatment-naïve lymphoma patients (100 CHL and 290 NHL:100 DLBCL, 73 FL, 41 MCL, 41 MZL, 35 TCL), and 210 controls without cancer. Lymphoma plasma samples and 159 controls were provided by the Lymphoma SPORE (CA97274); 51 controls came from a 7-county population archive. Classification of lymphoma cases vs controls was modeled with random forest method and cross-validated across 500 bootstrap samples of each dataset. Results: For MDMs tested in DNA from independent biological validation samples, cross-validated random forest models identified 60/63 cases (95% sensitivity) and 12/13 normal controls (92% specificity). In plasmas, a panel of 16 MDMs ( ZNF503, VWA5B1, HOXA9_5195, GABRG3, ITGA5, MAX_chr17_793, BNC1_2407, CDK20, MAX_chr4_184, TPBG, DNAH14, SYT2, CACNG8, FAM110B, and NRN1) detected 78% (95% CI, 74-82%) of lymphoma cases at 90% specificity. Excluding MZL and TCL, sensitivity increased to 84% (80-88%) including 26/49 (53% (38-67%)) of stage I and 59/71 (83% (71-90%)) of stage II cases. Conclusions: MDMs show promise to detect lymphoma. These markers could be evaluated as part of multicancer early detection testing and could also be evaluated as response markers to treatment and subsequent surveillance.[Table: see text]

5091 Background: Controversy surrounding prostate-specific antigen (PSA) based screening for prostate cancer (PCa) highlights the need for non-invasive assays that better discriminate patients with and without clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa). Such distinction avoids overtreatment in patients with absent or indolent disease while capturing pathology that would derive benefit from intervention. We analyzed the presence of specific methylated DNA markers (MDMs) within urine samples of patients with biopsy proven PCa and assessed the ability to discriminate these patients from healthy controls with no clinical suspicion for PCa. Methods: 24 healthy volunteers with no clinical suspicion for PCa were age-matched to 24 patients with biopsy-confirmed disease across all Gleason scores. Urine collected from subjects was centrifuged with the cell-free supernatant analyzed in a blinded fashion for methylation signal within specific DNA sequences across 14 genes ( HES5, ZNF655, ITPRIPL1, MAX.chr3.193, SLCO3A1, CHST11, SERPINB9, WNT3A, KCNB2, GAS6, AKR1B1, MAX.chr3.727, GRASP, ST6GALNAC2) by target enrichment long-probe quantitative-amplified signal assays. A patient was considered to have a positive MDM panel if any individual marker exceeded the corresponding100% specificity cut-off value (overall MDM panel specificity of 100%). MDM panel positivity was used to evaluate the sensitivity for distinguishing patients with PCa (any Gleason score) from controls as well as discriminate csPCa cancers from PCa Gleason 6. Results: Median age of healthy controls and PCa patients was 70 years (IQR 67-72) and 65 years (IQR 61-71), respectively. Median PSA was 6.4 (IQR 4.9-9.0) among PCa patients, including median PSA of 5 (IQR 4.0-6.1) for Gleason 6, and 7.8 (IQR 5.1-9.2) for Gleason ≥7 disease. Gleason 6, Gleason 7, and Gleason 8+ cancer was noted in 8, 10, and 6 patients, respectively. Utilizing an overall specificity cut-off of 100% for discriminating normal controls from PCa cases across the MDM panel revealed an overall sensitivity of 83% (95% CI: 63-95%) for detection of PCa (6 of 8 Gleason 6, 9 of 10 Gleason 7, 5 of 6 Gleason 8+) and 88% (95% CI: 62-98%) for csPCa (Gleason ≥ 7). When considering a 100% specificity threshold for controls and Gleason 6 patients, the sensitivity the MDM panel was 69% (95% CI: 41-89%) for csPCa (6 of 10 Gleason 7, 5 of 6 Gleason 8+). Conclusions: We describe a panel of 14 MDMs within urine that offer high specificity and sensitivity for detection of prostate cancers as well as selective identification of clinically significant disease states. Prospective comparison between urine MDMs and PSA blood testing is necessary to discern the differential clinical impact of each screening methodology.

INTRODUCTION: Nonendoscopic Barrett's esophagus (BE) screening may help improve esophageal adenocarcinoma outcomes. We previously demonstrated promising accuracy of methylated DNA markers (MDMs) for the nonendoscopic diagnosis of BE using samples obtained from a capsule sponge-on-string (SOS) device. We aimed to assess the accuracy of these MDMs in an independent cohort using a commercial grade assay. METHODS: BE cases had ≥ 1 cm of circumferential BE with intestinal metaplasia; controls had no endoscopic evidence of BE. The SOS device was withdrawn 8 minutes after swallowing, followed by endoscopy (the criterion standard). Highest performing MDMs from a previous study were blindly assessed on extracted bisulfite-converted DNA by target enrichment long-probe quantitative amplified signal (TELQAS) assays. Optimal MDM combinations were selected and analyzed using random forest modeling with in silico cross-validation. RESULTS: Of 295 patients consented, 268 (91%) swallowed the SOS device; 112 cases and 89 controls met the pre-established inclusion criteria. The median BE length was 6 cm (interquartile range 4–9), and 50% had no dysplasia. The cross-validated sensitivity and specificity of a 5 MDM random forest model were 92% (95% confidence interval 85%–96%) and 94% (95% confidence interval 87%–98%), respectively. Model performance was not affected by age, gender, or smoking history but was influenced by the BE segment length. SOS administration was well tolerated (median [interquartile range] tolerability 2 [0, 4] on 10 scale grading), and 95% preferred SOS over endoscopy. DISCUSSION: Using a minimally invasive molecular approach, MDMs assayed from SOS samples show promise as a safe and accurate nonendoscopic test for BE prediction.

Colorectal adenomas are precursors of CRC. Recently, the gut microbiota, i.e., the collection of microbes residing in our gut, has been recognized as a key player in CRC development. There have been a number of gut microbiota profiling studies for colorectal adenoma and CRC; however, fewer studies have considered the gut metabolome, which serves as the chemical interface between the host and gut microbiota. Here, we conducted a gut metabolome profiling study of colorectal adenoma and CRC and analyzed the metabolomic profiles together with paired microbiota composition profiles. We found several chemical signatures of colorectal adenoma that were associated with some gut microbes and potentially indicative of future CRC. This study highlights potential early-driver metabolites in CRC pathogenesis and guides further targeted experiments and thus provides an important stepping stone toward developing better CRC prevention strategies.

OBJECTIVES: Multitarget stool DNA (MT-sDNA) testing has grown as a noninvasive screening modality for colorectal cancer (CRC), but real-world clinical data are limited in the post-FDA approval setting. The effect of previous colonoscopy on MT-sDNA performance is not known. We aimed to evaluate findings of colorectal neoplasia (CRN) at diagnostic colonoscopy in patients with positive MT-sDNA testing, stratified by patient exposure to previous colonoscopy. METHODS: We identified consecutive patients completing MT-sDNA testing over a 39-month period and reviewed the records of those with positive tests for neoplastic findings at diagnostic colonoscopy. MT-sDNA test positivity rate, adherence to diagnostic colonoscopy, and the positive predictive value (PPV) of MT-sDNA for any CRN and neoplastic subtypes were calculated. RESULTS: Of 16,469 MT-sDNA tests completed, testing returned positive in 2,326 (14.1%) patients. After exclusion of patients at increased risk for CRC, 1,801 patients remained, 1,558 (87%) of whom underwent diagnostic colonoscopy; 918 of 1,558 (59%) of these patients had undergone previous colonoscopy, whereas 640 (41%) had not. Any CRN was found in 1,046 of 1,558 patients (PPV = 67%). More neoplastic lesions were found in patients without previous colonoscopy (73%); however, the rates remained high among those who had undergone previous colonoscopy (63%, P < 0.0001). The large majority (79%) of patients had right-sided neoplasia. DISCUSSION: MT-sDNA has a high PPV for any CRN regardless of exposure to previous colonoscopy. Right-sided CRN was found at colonoscopy in most patients with positive MT-sDNA testing, representing a potential advantage over other currently available screening modalities for CRC.

Abstract Purpose: Gastric adenocarcinoma is the third most common cause of cancer mortality worldwide. Accurate and affordable noninvasive detection methods have potential value for screening and surveillance. Herein, we identify novel methylated DNA markers (MDM) for gastric adenocarcinoma, validate their discrimination for gastric adenocarcinoma in tissues from geographically separate cohorts, explore marker acquisition through the oncogenic cascade, and describe distributions of candidate MDMs in plasma from gastric adenocarcinoma cases and normal controls. Experimental Design: Following discovery by unbiased whole-methylome sequencing, candidate MDMs were validated by blinded methylation-specific PCR in archival case–control tissues from U.S. and South Korean patients. Top MDMs were then assayed by an analytically sensitive method (quantitative real-time allele-specific target and signal amplification) in a blinded pilot study on archival plasma from gastric adenocarcinoma cases and normal controls. Results: Whole-methylome discovery yielded novel and highly discriminant candidate MDMs. In tissue, a panel of candidate MDMs detected gastric adenocarcinoma in 92% to 100% of U.S. and South Korean cohorts at 100% specificity. Levels of most MDMs increased progressively from normal mucosa through metaplasia, adenoma, and gastric adenocarcinoma with variation in points of greatest marker acquisition. In plasma, a 3-marker panel (ELMO1, ZNF569, C13orf18) detected 86% (95% CI, 71–95) of gastric adenocarcinomas at 95% specificity. Conclusions: Novel MDMs appear to accurately discriminate gastric adenocarcinoma from normal controls in both tissue and plasma. The point of aberrant methylation during oncogenesis varies by MDM, which may have relevance to marker selection in clinical applications. Further exploration of these MDMs for gastric adenocarcinoma screening and surveillance is warranted. Clin Cancer Res; 24(22); 5724–34. ©2018 AACR.

Abstract Background: Studies of colorectal cancer screening by multitarget stool DNA (MT-sDNA) show false-positive (FP) rates of 7% to 13%. It is unclear whether FP patients are at increased long-term risk of adverse outcomes. Methods: We compared subsequent clinical events among patients with apparent FP MT-sDNA with those in patients reported as true negative (TN). This was a retrospective cohort study of participants in pre-FDA approval MT-sDNA studies having nonadvanced or negative baseline colonoscopy findings from a single referral center. Per-protocol and calibrated cutoffs defined FP and TN groups. From the time of stool collection, we measured differences between FP and TN groups in time to death, subsequent cancer diagnosis, and onset of alarm symptoms. Results: Of 1,050 eligible patients, only 6 were lost to follow-up. Median age was 65.6 years [interquartile range (IQR), 56.8–72.3]; 54% were female. Median follow-up time was 4 years (IQR, 3.5–5.3). Eight aerodigestive (lung and gastrointestinal tract) cancers occurred. FP status by calibrated, but not per-protocol, cutoffs was associated with subsequent aerodigestive cancer; however, cumulative incidence did not exceed SEER expectations from the general population. By any cutoff method, FP status was not associated with mortality or alarm symptoms. Conclusions: Although FP status was associated with long-term aerodigestive cancers, new cases were not temporally related and did not exceed incidence estimates from general population. Impact: These observations do not justify aggressive follow-up evaluation for patients with FP MT-sDNA at this time. Larger studies are needed to confirm these early findings. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 26(4); 614–21. ©2016 AACR.