Redwood, Diana

Abstract Background: The Alaska Tribal Health System is working to increase colorectal cancer (CRC) screening among Alaska Native peoples. It is unknown why people who initially agree to screening might not follow through to complete their screening. Methods: As part of a larger intervention investigating multi-target stool DNA (mt-sDNA) test use in rural Alaska communities, we interviewed Alaska Native people who had agreed to scheduling a colonoscopy or having a mt-sDNA kit sent to their home but who did not complete their selected test. Results: Of 531 Alaska Native people who initially agreed but did not complete screening, 299 (56%) were able to be contacted for a follow-up survey. Of those, 256 (86%) answered the survey; 187/224 (83%) who had chosen mt-sDNA, and 69/75 (93%) who had chosen colonoscopy. Reported reasons for non-completion of stool DNA test kits included being busy or forgetting, being uncomfortable doing a stool test, and not knowing how to do the test or concerns over how to return the kit for processing. Reasons for non-completion of colonoscopy included scheduling issues, physical health issues, travel, and housing barriers, as well as cost, fear, and being too busy. Of note, many respondents in both groups indicated they would still be interested in CRC screening in the future or were currently pursuing screening. Conclusions: This was the first exploration of reasons for non-adherence to CRC screening after initial test request by Alaska Native people. Many of the identified themes are amenable to health care system changes for future interventions to improve screening outreach and uptake. Citation Format: Diana Redwood, Christie A. Flanagan, Lauren Jeffries, Melissa Toffolon, Joseph Klejka, Lila J. Finney Rutten, Judith S. Kaur, John B. Kisiel. Non-completion of colorectal cancer screening among Alaska Native people in an intervention trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2026; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2026 Apr 17-22; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2026;86(7 Suppl):Abstract nr 2474.

Abstract Background: Alaska Native people are committed to increasing colorectal cancer (CRC) screening to reduce the high rate of CRC in this population. We conducted a community-level cluster randomized controlled trial (RCT) to evaluate the impact of multi-target stool DNA test introduction (mt-sDNA; Cologuard® Exact Sciences, Madison WI) on CRC screening in southwest Alaska Native communities using a mt-sDNA pre-processing lab in Anchorage, Alaska. Methods: A total of 32 rural/remote Alaska Native communities were evenly randomized to either high intensity patient navigation or medium intensity mailed health education compared to 14 communities receiving standard of care (screening recommendations at health care visits). The intervention was conducted from April 2021-February 2023. Outcome measures included CRC screening completion within 12 months and method used (mt-sDNA vs colonoscopy). Results: A total of 2032 Alaska Native participants (mean [SD] age, 56 [8.4] years; 817 women [40%]) were enrolled: 587 participants randomized to usual care, 696 participants randomized to the mailed education arm, and 749 participants randomized to the patient navigation arm. The mt-sDNA test was significantly preferred over colonoscopy by both mailed education participants (68%) and patient navigation participants (71%) (p<0.01). Mt-sDNA was somewhat more preferred by older participants ages 65-75 (79%) vs younger participants ages 45-54 (64%). Both men (71%) and women (68%) significantly preferred mt-sDNA compared with colonoscopy (p<0.01). Overall, 38% of those in the patient navigation intervention completed screening compared with 33% in the mailed education intervention and 10% in the usual care arm. No significant differences were observed in mt-sDNA completion between the patient navigation arm (154 participants [40%]) and the mailed education arm (100 participants [36%]) (p= 0.34). Colonoscopy completion (not including follow-up colonoscopies after abnormal stool tests) was higher in both the patient navigation arm (112 participants [44%]) and the mailed education arm (87 participants [43%]) compared with usual care (38 participants [14%]). Over 61% of kits sent to participants were completed and returned, however, 38% of the kits were not able to be processed, primarily because of mail transit time exceeding the manufacturer’s collection-to-processing limitation of 72 hrs. Conclusions: In this RCT among Alaska Native peoples who were not up to date with CRC screening recommendations, both a mailed education intervention and a patient navigator facilitated intervention were effective at increasing CRC screening compared with usual care. Participants overwhelmingly preferred mt-sDNA for screening but limitations in getting samples to the lab in time for analysis meant that about one-third of mt-sDNA samples were unable to be processed. These findings show that screening outreach and mt-sDNA use can substantially increase CRC screening, but shipping and weather issues remain to be addressed for expanding use of mt-sDNA in rural/remote Alaskan communities. Citation Format: Diana Redwood, Christie Flanagan, Lauren Jeffries, Peter Holck, Danika Bailie, Christine Desnoyers, Joseph Klejka, Lila Rutten, John Kisiel. Increase in colorectal cancer screening among rural and remote Alaska Native peoples using the multi-target stool DNA: A randomized controlled trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 18th AACR Conference on the Science of Cancer Health Disparities; 2025 Sep 18-21; Baltimore, MD. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2025;34(9 Suppl):Abstract nr A148.

Abstract Purpose We examined barriers and facilitators to colorectal cancer (CRC) screening among Alaska Native individuals who had never been screened or were not up to date with screening guidelines. Methods As part of a larger study investigating the use of the multitarget stool DNA test in rural Alaska communities, we conducted focus groups and in‐depth interviews with 28 never screened or not up‐to‐date Alaska Native people in two remote communities between November 2022 and July 2023. Participants shared their barriers to CRC screening and offered suggestions to improve programs to better reach those who are guideline discordant. Findings General screening barriers included lack of knowledge, fear of discovering you have cancer, and cultural health beliefs. Colonoscopy‐specific barriers included embarrassment from knowing the local medical staff, having rectal area viewed or touched, fear of pain and injury, difficulty scheduling a procedure due to traditional food gathering activities, lack of provider referrals/reminders, and the high cost of air travel required to get to a colonoscopy facility. Stool DNA‐specific concerns included not feeling that it was as good as colonoscopy, lack of privacy to do the test, and hesitancy collecting stool samples. Suggestions for increasing screening rates included increasing access via paid air transportation, using local indigenous languages, improving provider relationships and reminder systems, and providing CRC and screening education using trusted messengers. Conclusions This was the first exploration of the perceptions of CRC screening among guideline discordant Alaska Native people. Identified themes can be used to improve screening program outreach effectiveness in the future.

The Alaska Tribal Health System is increasing colorectal cancer (CRC) screening among Alaska Native (AN) peoples, who experience the highest CRC rate in the world. Through a clinical trial (NCT04336397), AN people living in rural/remote Alaska were offered either the previously unavailable multi-target stool DNA test (mt-sDNA; Cologuard®) or colonoscopy. From April 2022 to August 2024, 113 (59%) people who completed mt-sDNA testing and 51 (39%) who completed a colonoscopy procedure participated in a survey on factors influencing their screening test choice. The majority of mt-sDNA participants (79%) were aware of the colonoscopy option, while most colonoscopy participants (72%) reported being unaware of the mt-sDNA option. Key mt-sDNA preference themes included not having to travel, less time commitment, childcare and work responsibilities, physical limitations, greater convenience, and the test being less invasive and dangerous than a colonoscopy. In contrast, colonoscopy preference themes included wanting to adhere to screening recommendations, be proactive about preventative health, family history of cancer, awareness of the higher CRC risk among AN peoples, as well as the belief that colonoscopy is more reliable and accurate since it is performed by medical providers. These findings underscore the complex factors influencing CRC screening preferences among rural and remote AN people. Limited access to medical facilities, financial burdens, and personal commitments, along with personal factors, have a substantial bearing on the screening decision-making process. Recognizing and addressing these multifaceted influences can help CRC screening programs better meet community member needs and preferences, ultimately improving screening rates and colorectal health outcomes.

The Alaska Tribal Health System is working to increase colorectal cancer (CRC) screening among Alaska Native people, who experience the highest CRC rates in the world. This study examined CRC screening provider- and system-level barriers and facilitators from the perspective of healthcare providers serving Alaska Native people in rural/remote communities. A total of 28 provider (physicians, advanced practice, and Community Health Aides/Practitioners) interviews were held from 1 February to 30 November 2021. Colonoscopy provider-level barrier themes included time, competing priorities, and staffing, while system-level barriers included travel costs, weather, and the COVID-19 pandemic. Multi-target stool DNA (mt-sDNA) barrier themes included test viability and unfamiliarity, and previous stool tests experiences. For both tests, limited medical record reminders was a major barrier. Facilitator themes for both tests included community outreach, cultural competency and patient navigation, and clinic/system improvements. In-depth interviews with tribal health providers showed that adding mt-sDNA testing may help address system-level colonoscopy barriers such as waitlists and travel costs, but other barriers remain. Further research is needed into patient barriers and facilitators, as well as the effectiveness of integrating mt-sDNA into a geographically dispersed tribal health system to reduce cancer disparities and build equity in CRC prevention among Alaska Native people.

AbstractIntroductionData on cigarette smoking prevalence among Alaska Native and American Indian (ANAI) people are limited to cross-sectional studies or specific subpopulations. Using data from the Alaska Education and Research toward Health (EARTH) Study 10-year follow-up, this study assessed patterns of smoking from baseline and factors associated with current use.Aims and MethodsEARTH Study urban south central ANAI participants (N = 376; 73% women) provided questionnaire data on smoking at baseline and 10-year follow-up. Multivariable-adjusted logistic regression assessed whether gender, cultural factors (Tribal identity, language spoken in the home), depressive symptoms (PHQ-9), baseline smoking status, and baseline cigarettes per day (CPD) were associated with current smoking at follow-up.ResultsCurrent smoking was 27% and 23% at baseline and follow-up, respectively. Of baseline smokers, 60% reported smoking at follow-up (77% men, 52% women). From multivariable-adjusted analyses, the odds of current smoking at follow-up were lower among women than men, those who never or formerly smoked versus currently smoked at baseline, and smoking <10 CPD compared with ≥10 CPD at baseline. PHQ-9 score or cultural variables were not associated with smoking at follow-up. Smoking fewer baseline CPD was associated with former smoking status (ie, quitting) at follow-up among women, but not men.ConclusionsOur project is among the first to longitudinally explore smoking within an ANAI cohort. While we observed persistent smoking during a 10-year period, there were important differences by gender and CPD in quitting. These differences may be important to enhance the reach and efficacy of cessation interventions for ANAI people.ImplicationsThis study contributes novel longitudinal information on cigarette smoking prevalence during a 10-year period among Alaska Native and American Indian (ANAI) people. Prior data on smoking prevalence among ANAI people are limited to cross-sectional studies or specific subpopulations. Our project is among the first to longitudinally explore smoking prevalence within an ANAI cohort. We observed persistent smoking during a 10-year period. The study also contributes information on differences by gender and cigarettes smoked per day in quitting. These findings have implications for enhancing the reach and efficacy of cessation interventions for ANAI people.

Objective: Alaska Native (AN) people have among the world’s highest rate of colorectal cancer (CRC). We assessed perceptions of AN people and their health care providers of a new take-home multitarget stool DNA test (MT-sDNA; Cologuard) relative to colonoscopy. Methods: Cross-sectional surveys of AN people aged 40 to 75 years (mailed) and providers (online). Results: Participants included 1616 AN patients (19% response rate) and 87 providers (26% response rate; 57% AN people). Over half (58%) of patients preferred colonoscopy for CRC screening, while 36% preferred MT-sDNA. Unscreened patients were significantly more likely to state a preference for MT-sDNA than previously screened patients (42% vs 31%, P < .05) as were younger patients (<60 years old) compared with older patients (40% vs 30%, P < .05). Most providers thought that MT-sDNA would improve screening rates (69%), would recommend if available (79%), and be implementable (79%). Perceived barriers differed substantially between patients and providers in both type and magnitude. Leading colonoscopy barriers reported by patients were travel (44%) and bowel preparation (40%), while providers thought that fear of pain (92%) and invasiveness of the test (87%) were the primary barriers. For MT-sDNA, patients’ belief that colonoscopy was better (56%) and not knowing how to do the test (40%) were primary barriers, while providers thought stool collection (67%) and having a stool sample in their home (63%) were leading barriers. Conclusions: This study found that MT-sDNA has potential acceptability among AN people and their health care providers. Both groups reported a willingness to use MT-sDNA and did not perceive major barriers to its use. This preference was especially true of unscreened and younger patients. The majority of providers indicated they would use MT-sDNA if available and that it would improve CRC screening rates. In this population, where colonoscopy access is limited, MT-sDNA has the potential to improve CRC screening adherence.