Back to Authors

Toffolon, Melissa

Mayo Clinic

2Actionable Data Consulting, Anchorage, AK, AK;

Citations 3

Abstract 2474: Non-completion of colorectal cancer screening among Alaska Native people in an intervention trial
Jeffries, Lauren , Toffolon, Melissa, Klejka, Joseph , Kaur, Judith S. , Redwood, Diana , Flanagan, Christie A. , Jeffries, Lauren, Rutten, Lila J. Finney , Kisiel, John B.

Cancer Research | April 3, 2026 | Volume: 86 | Issue: 7_Supplement | Pages: 2474-2474

10.1158/1538-7445.am2026-2474 Get It

Abstract Background: The Alaska Tribal Health System is working to increase colorectal cancer (CRC) screening among Alaska Native peoples. It is unknown why people who initially agree to screening might not follow through to complete their screening. Methods: As part of a larger intervention investigating multi-target stool DNA (mt-sDNA) test use in rural Alaska communities, we interviewed Alaska Native people who had agreed to scheduling a colonoscopy or having a mt-sDNA kit sent to their home but who did not complete their selected test. Results: Of 531 Alaska Native people who initially agreed but did not complete screening, 299 (56%) were able to be contacted for a follow-up survey. Of those, 256 (86%) answered the survey; 187/224 (83%) who had chosen mt-sDNA, and 69/75 (93%) who had chosen colonoscopy. Reported reasons for non-completion of stool DNA test kits included being busy or forgetting, being uncomfortable doing a stool test, and not knowing how to do the test or concerns over how to return the kit for processing. Reasons for non-completion of colonoscopy included scheduling issues, physical health issues, travel, and housing barriers, as well as cost, fear, and being too busy. Of note, many respondents in both groups indicated they would still be interested in CRC screening in the future or were currently pursuing screening. Conclusions: This was the first exploration of reasons for non-adherence to CRC screening after initial test request by Alaska Native people. Many of the identified themes are amenable to health care system changes for future interventions to improve screening outreach and uptake. Citation Format: Diana Redwood, Christie A. Flanagan, Lauren Jeffries, Melissa Toffolon, Joseph Klejka, Lila J. Finney Rutten, Judith S. Kaur, John B. Kisiel. Non-completion of colorectal cancer screening among Alaska Native people in an intervention trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2026; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2026 Apr 17-22; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2026;86(7 Suppl):Abstract nr 2474.
Colorectal cancer screening barriers, facilitators, and promotion recommendations by Alaska Native people who are non‐adherent to colorectal cancer screening
Toffolon, Melissa, Jeffries, Lauren , Bailie, Danika, Rutten, Lila Finney, Kisiel, John, Redwood, Diana , Flanagan, Christie A. , Jeffries, Lauren, Kisiel, John B.

The Journal of Rural Health | August 6, 2025 | Volume: 41 | Issue: 3 | Pages: No page available

10.1111/jrh.70067 Get It

Abstract Purpose We examined barriers and facilitators to colorectal cancer (CRC) screening among Alaska Native individuals who had never been screened or were not up to date with screening guidelines. Methods As part of a larger study investigating the use of the multitarget stool DNA test in rural Alaska communities, we conducted focus groups and in‐depth interviews with 28 never screened or not up‐to‐date Alaska Native people in two remote communities between November 2022 and July 2023. Participants shared their barriers to CRC screening and offered suggestions to improve programs to better reach those who are guideline discordant. Findings General screening barriers included lack of knowledge, fear of discovering you have cancer, and cultural health beliefs. Colonoscopy‐specific barriers included embarrassment from knowing the local medical staff, having rectal area viewed or touched, fear of pain and injury, difficulty scheduling a procedure due to traditional food gathering activities, lack of provider referrals/reminders, and the high cost of air travel required to get to a colonoscopy facility. Stool DNA‐specific concerns included not feeling that it was as good as colonoscopy, lack of privacy to do the test, and hesitancy collecting stool samples. Suggestions for increasing screening rates included increasing access via paid air transportation, using local indigenous languages, improving provider relationships and reminder systems, and providing CRC and screening education using trusted messengers. Conclusions This was the first exploration of the perceptions of CRC screening among guideline discordant Alaska Native people. Identified themes can be used to improve screening program outreach effectiveness in the future.
Provider- and System-Level Barriers and Facilitators to Colonoscopy and Multi-Target Stool DNA for Colorectal Cancer Screening in Rural/Remote Alaska Native Communities
Redwood, Diana , Toffolon, Melissa, Flanagan, Christie A. , Kaur, Judith S. , Jeffries, Lauren , Zenku, Manusake, Lent, Jennifer, Bachtold, Joseph F., Flanagan, Christie , Kisiel, John, Kaur, Judith Salmon, Redwood, Diana G , Kisiel, John B. , Jeffries, Lauren

International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health | November 7, 2023 | Volume: 20 | Issue: 22 | Pages: 7030

10.3390/ijerph20227030 Get It

The Alaska Tribal Health System is working to increase colorectal cancer (CRC) screening among Alaska Native people, who experience the highest CRC rates in the world. This study examined CRC screening provider- and system-level barriers and facilitators from the perspective of healthcare providers serving Alaska Native people in rural/remote communities. A total of 28 provider (physicians, advanced practice, and Community Health Aides/Practitioners) interviews were held from 1 February to 30 November 2021. Colonoscopy provider-level barrier themes included time, competing priorities, and staffing, while system-level barriers included travel costs, weather, and the COVID-19 pandemic. Multi-target stool DNA (mt-sDNA) barrier themes included test viability and unfamiliarity, and previous stool tests experiences. For both tests, limited medical record reminders was a major barrier. Facilitator themes for both tests included community outreach, cultural competency and patient navigation, and clinic/system improvements. In-depth interviews with tribal health providers showed that adding mt-sDNA testing may help address system-level colonoscopy barriers such as waitlists and travel costs, but other barriers remain. Further research is needed into patient barriers and facilitators, as well as the effectiveness of integrating mt-sDNA into a geographically dispersed tribal health system to reduce cancer disparities and build equity in CRC prevention among Alaska Native people.