Domanico, Michael J.

e17617 Background: Abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB) is a cardinal symptom of endometrial cancer (EC). However, 90-95% of those with AUB will undergo invasive endometrial sampling with the finding of benign etiology. Our group has identified EC-related methylated DNA markers (MDMs) detectable in vaginal fluid obtained via self-collected tampon with high sensitivity to detect EC. To provide alternative vaginal fluid collection options, we compared total DNA recovery and detection of EC MDMs between tampon and swab collection methods. Methods: Patients ≥45 yrs with AUB or undergoing routine gynecologic care, and patients ≥18 yrs with biopsy-confirmed EC or atypical endometrial hyperplasia (AEH) were prospectively enrolled for paired vaginal fluid biospecimens collection. Participants self-collected vaginal fluid via tampon before provider-collected vaginal fluid sampling via swab immediately prior to clinically indicated endometrial sampling or hysterectomy. Cases (EC/AEH) and benign controls were determined by expert review. DNA was extracted from vaginal fluid. Bisulfite converted DNA was then used in long-probe quantitative amplified signal (LQAS) assays for 10 MDMs and 2 reference markers (RMs). Total DNA recovery using the RMs and detection of EC-specific MDMs were compared across sampling techniques. MDMs were standardized using the log of the ratio of the MDM and RM1. Standardized MDMs were compared between swabs and tampons using median and interquartile range (IQR). Results: A total of 40 eligible participants were evaluated in this study, 20 cases and 20 controls. Median time between tampon and swab collection was 27 hours (range 1-53). DNA quantity as measured using both RM1 and RM2 were comparable between swab and tampon in both cases and controls; MDM detection was also comparable between swab and tampon in both cases and controls (Table 1; 8 representative MDMs shown). Though not powered for sensitivity and specificity estimation, EC-related MDMs appear higher in EC cases vs controls, using either sample type. Conclusions: Sampling vaginal fluid with provider-collected swabs or self-collected tampons are both effective for detection of validated EC MDMs. Studies are ongoing to optimize an MDM panel to detect EC in vaginal fluid. Control Tampon Control Swab Case Tampon Case Swab RM1 3.5 [3.3-3.8] 4.2 [3.8-4.2] 3.6 [3.2-3.9] 4.2 [3.8-4.5] MDM1 0.5 [0.4-0.7] 0.4 [0.2-0.6] 1.3 [0.8-1.8] 1.1 [0.6-1.7] MDM2 1.5 [1.2-1.9] 0.9 [0.7-1.2] 3.2 [2.2-4.7] 2.9 [1.7-4.5] MDM3 0.5 [0.4-0.6] 0.4 [0.3-0.5] 1.5 [0.9-2.3] 1.0 [0.8-2.3] MDM4 0.9 [0.6-1.3] 0.5 [0.4-0.7] 2.3 [1.3-3.7] 1.9 [1.0-3.6] MDM5 1.3 [0.6-1.4] 0.8 [0.6-1.0] 3.3 [2.5-4.1] 3.1 [2.4-3.9] MDM6 1.6 [1.3-2.1] 1.2 [0.8-1.7] 3.3 [2.6-4.3] 3.1 [2.3-4.1] MDM7 1.5 [1.1-1.7] 1.0 [0.4-1.4] 3.5 [2.6-4.1] 3.3 [2.1-3.8] MDM8 0.5 [0.3-0.6] 0.5 [0.4-0.7] 1.8 [1.0-2.7] 1.7 [1.0-2.5] Median (IQR) for RM1 and 8 MDMs by case/control and sampling technique.

Abstract The multi-target stool DNA (mt-sDNA) test screens for colorectal cancer by analyzing DNA methylation/mutation and hemoglobin markers to algorithmically derive a qualitative result. A new panel of highly discriminant candidate methylated DNA markers (MDM) was recently developed. Performance of the novel MDM panel, with hemoglobin, was evaluated in a simulated screening population using archived stool samples weighted to early-stage colorectal cancer and prospectively collected advanced precancerous lesions (APL). Marker selection study (MSS) and separate preliminary independent verification studies (VS) were conducted utilizing samples from multi-center, case–control studies. Sample processing included targeted MDM capture, bisulfite conversion, and MDM quantitation. Fecal hemoglobin was quantified using ELISA. Samples were stratified into 75%/25% training-testing sets; model outcomes were cross-validated 1,000 times. All laboratory operators were blinded. The MSS included 232 cases (120 colorectal cancer/112 APLs) and 490 controls. The VS featured 210 cases (112 colorectal cancer/98 APLs) and 567 controls; APLs were 86.7% adenomas and 13.3% sessile serrated lesions (SSL). Average age was 65.5 (cases) and 63.2 (controls) years. Mean sensitivity in the VS from cross-validation was 95.2% for colorectal cancer and 57.2% for APLs, with specificities of 89.8% (no CRC/APLs) and 92.4% (no neoplasia). Subgroup analyses showed colorectal cancer sensitivities of 93.4% (stage I) and 94.2% (stage II). APL sensitivity was 82.9% for high-grade dysplasia, 73.4% for villous lesions, 49.8% for tubular lesions, and 30.2% for SSLs. These data support high sensitivity and specificity for a next-generation mt-sDNA test panel. Further evaluation of assay performance will be characterized in a prospective, multi-center clinical validation study (NCT04144738). Prevention Relevance: This study highlights performance of the next-generation mt-sDNA test, which exhibits high sensitivity and specificity for detecting colorectal cancer and APLs. This noninvasive option has potential to increase screening participation and clinical outcomes. A multi-center, clinical validation trial is underway. See related commentary by Bresalier, p. 93

63 Background: Population-based colorectal cancer (CRC) screening can reduce mortality by detecting and removing advanced precancerous lesions (APL) and early-stage invasive disease. One guideline-included strategy is the multi-target stool DNA test (mt-sDNA), which combines detection of methylation DNA markers (MDMs), KRAS mutations, and fecal hemoglobin. Since the mt-sDNA pivotal study was conducted, novel biomarkers have been discovered. A panel of highly discriminant MDMs ( LASS4, LRRC4, PPP2R5C, and reference marker ZDHHC1) was identified through a blinded, case-control study of archival specimens. Here, we evaluated the performance of this novel mt-sDNA panel, combined with fecal hemoglobin, in archival stool samples weighted to early-stage CRC and prospectively collected APL, simulating a screening population. Methods: The verification study featured 777 samples—210 cases (112 CRC [49 stage I, 38 stage II, 17 stage III, and 8 stage IV] and 98 APL) and 567 controls (176 non-APL and 391 colonoscopy-negative)—from three trials (NCT01397747, NCT01260168, and NCT02503631). Median APL size was 12 mm (interquartile range: 10 mm to 15 mm), with 86.7% adenomas (n = 85) and 13.3% sessile serrated polyps (SSPs; n = 13). The average age was 65.5 years for cases (57% men) and 63.2 for controls (47% men). Samples were processed through homogenization, targeted MDM capture, bisulfite conversion, and MDM quantitation using Long‐probe Quantitative Amplified Signal (LQAS). Fecal hemoglobin was quantified using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Samples were split into stratified 75%/25% training-testing sets and model outcomes were cross-validated 1,000 times. Results: Mean performance from the cross-validation analysis is summarized in the table below. Overall sensitivity was 95.2% for CRC and 57.2% for APL, with specificities of 89.8% (no CRC/APL) and 92.4% (no neoplasia). Subgroup analyses showed high sensitivity for early-stage CRC, with 93.4% at stage I and 94.2% at stage II. By APL subtype, sensitivity was 82.9% for high-grade dysplasia, 73.4% for villous lesions, 49.8% for tubular lesions, and 30.2% for SSPs. Conclusions: These data support high sensitivity and specificity for a second-generation mt-sDNA panel. A multicenter pivotal trial evaluating the panel is underway (NCT04144738). [Table: see text]

INTRODUCTION: Despite the demonstrated effectiveness of average-risk screening, colorectal cancer (CRC) remains the 2 nd leading cause of cancer death in the US. For optimal prevention, CRC screening tools should be highly accurate, user-friendly, and broadly accessible. Patient and provider adoption of the FDA-approved, guideline-endorsed multi-target stool DNA (mt-sDNA) test has grown exponentially since its launch in 2014. Toward ongoing improvement in CRC screening effectiveness, we conducted a blinded case-control study to assess the detection accuracy of a mt-sDNA panel of novel, highly discriminant methylated DNA markers (MDMs). METHODS: We selected 12 candidate MDMs from prior whole methylome discovery and validation in tissue. Stool was obtained as part of previous large, multicenter studies and collected prior to or 7 days post-colonoscopy (prior to any clinically-indicated treatment). CRC, advanced adenoma (AA; size ≥1 cm, high-grade dysplasia, or ≥25% villous morphology), non-AA, or control (no neoplasia) status was defined by colonoscopy and histopathology. Samples were blinded to operators and randomized by characterization to balance the test sets prior to assessment. MDMs were quantified by target-specific DNA capture and Long-probe Quantitative Amplified Signal assay on bisulfite-converted DNA; fecal hemoglobin was quantified by immunoassay. Bootstrapping methods were used to select a panel of 3 MDMs, which was then 10-fold cross-validated; hemoglobin was also included, as was a colon epithelium-specific MDM to normalize stool MDM levels. RESULTS: Participant samples included 117 CRC, 120 AA, 161 non-AA, and 327 controls. Median age was 67 (IQR 61, 75) years; 51% were men. The AUC with best-fit was 0.97 for CRC and 0.84 for AA, and these high AUCs held up tightly on cross-validation (Figure 1). At 92% (95% CI 88-94%) specificity, sensitivity of the panel was 92% (95% CI 86-96%) for CRC. Neither CRC stage (Figure 2) nor CRC site significantly affected performance. At the same 92% specificity, sensitivity was 65% (95% CI 56-73%) for AAs overall, 67% (38-88%) for sessile serrated polyps ≥1 cm, and 71% (57-82%) for adenomas with villous features (Figure 3). CONCLUSION: These data support highly accurate performance of a novel panel of mt-sDNA markers for detecting both CRC (including early stage lesions) and AAs at greatest risk of progression. Prospective comparative studies are warranted to further establish the clinical potential of this novel screening tool.

341 Background: Precursors to 1/3 of colorectal cancer (CRC), serrated polyps have historically been underdetected by screening due to their inconspicuous, nonhemorrhagic, and proximal nature. New generation sDNA-MT show high sensitivity for both CRC and advanced adenomas (Gastroenterology 2012;142:248), but screen detection of serrated polyps by this approach requires further validation. Aim: To assess and compare noninvasive detection of sessile serrated polyps >1cm (SSP) by sDNA-MT and a commercial quantitative FIT. Methods: In a blinded prospective study, a single stool sample used for both tests was collected from 456 asymptomatic adults prior to screening or surveillance colonoscopy (criterion standard). All 29 patients with SSP were included as cases and all 232 with no neoplastic findings as controls. Buffered stool samples were processed and frozen on receipt; Exact Sciences performed sDNA-MT in batches using optimized analytical methods (Gastroenterology 2012;142:S770). The sDNA-MT panel targets methylated BMP3 (mBMP3) and NDRG4, mutant KRAS, β-actin, and hemoglobin. FIT (Polymedco OC-FIT Check) was performed in separate lab <2 days post defecation and evaluated at cutoffs of 50 (FIT-50) and 100 ng/ml (FIT-100). Results: Age/sex distributions were similar in cases and controls: 40% vs 45% > 65 years and 51% vs 59% women, p=NS respectively. SSP median size was 1.2cm (range 1-3cm), 93% were proximal, and 64% had synchronous diminutive polyps. Among sDNA-MT markers, mBMP3 proved highly discriminant for SSP detection (AUC=0.87, p<0.00001); other DNA markers were less informative and provided no incremental sensitivity. Hemoglobin alone showed no discrimination (AUC=0.50, p=NS). At matched specificities, SSP detection by stool mBMP3 was significantly greater than by either FIT-50 or FIT-100 (Table). Conclusions: From a screening and surveillance setting, SSP can be detected noninvasively by stool assay of exfoliated DNA markers, especially mBMP3. FIT appears to have no value in SSP detection. [Table: see text]

Abstract We have demonstrated that colorectal cancer (CRC) and advanced pre-cancers can be detected non-invasively by a manual multi-target stool DNA-based test (sDNA-MT) comprising exfoliated DNA markers (methylated BMP3 and NDRG4, mutant KRAS (7 mutations, codons 12, 13), plus β-actin) and fecal hemoglobin (Hb) (Lidgard, Gastroenterology 2012;142(5);S-770). We now report the clinical performance of this sDNA-MT test using an optimized automated analytic platform and logistic algorithm. This platform could facilitate the routine performance of sDNA-MT for CRC screening by molecular diagnostics capable clinical laboratories. Method: Stool samples were collected from 1003 subjects at 36 study sites after informed consent and prior to colonoscopy bowel preparation from those presenting for average risk CRC screening (283) or surveillance (176) at 2 sites. From referred subjects with CRC, Advanced Adenoma (AA) or Sessile Serrate Adenoma ≥ 1 cm, (SSA) stool was collected at least 7 days post-colonoscopy and prior to surgery or chemo-radiation (135; 21 sites) and similarly for subjects with no neoplastic findings on colonoscopy (Neg) (409; 13 sites). The study population included: cases (207), 58% male, median age 65 yrs. (38-87), CRC (93), AA (84), SSA ≥ 1 cm (30) and controls (796), 42% male, median age 65 yrs. (50-84), Neg (641) and non-advanced adenomas (NA) (155). Stool sample collection and DNA isolation were previously described. Automated methylation, mutation and actin assays were performed with a Hamilton STARlet fluid handler (Hamilton Robotics, Reno NV), and QuARTS (Quantitative Allele-specific Real-time Target and Signal amplification) run on an ABI 7500 FastDx real time thermal cycler (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). Fecal Hb (ng/ml buffer) analysis was performed by automated sandwich ELISA. A “Positive” or “Negative” result was determined with an algorithm that included the methylation and mutation results and a logistic regression score, which combines DNA marker results with Hb and actin results. Algorithm results exceeding a threshold were called “Positive”. The algorithm provided good discriminative ability, stability, sensitivity and specificity. Robustness was tested with computer simulations and statistical techniques (leave-one-out and 10-fold cross validation). Results: At a 90% nominal specificity, sDNA-MT sensitivity was 98% for CRC (91/93) [Stage: I, 95% (20/21), II, 100% (23/23), III 96% (26/27), IV 100% (7/7) and I-III combined 97% (69/71)], 57% (65/114) for precursors ≥1 cm (AA, SSA), and 86% (12/14) for precursors with high grade dysplasia. CRC patients were typically referred to colonoscopy for symptoms and test sensitivity may be elevated relative to that seen with screening. Conclusion: With this study using a novel automated sDNA-MT analytic platform with logistic algorithm, we corroborate our earlier findings using a manual process and demonstrate a platform that allows testing to be performed routinely by molecular diagnostic capable laboratories. The high sensitivity of sDNA-MT for CRC across all stages and for advanced precursors with high-grade dysplasia could lead to improved non-invasive CRC screening performance with wide accessibility to patients. A large multi-site pivotal CRC screening study (DeeP-C study clinicaltrials.gov, NCT01397747) to support such use is underway. Citation Format: Graham P. Lidgard, Michael J. Domanico, Janelle J. Bruinsma, James Light, Zubin D. Gagrat, Rebecca L. Oldham-Haltom, Keith D. Fourrier, Hatim Allawi, Tracy C. Yab, Julie A. Simonson, Mary Devens, Russell I. Heigh, David A. Ahlquist, Barry M. Berger. An optimized molecular stool test for colorectal cancer screening: Evaluation of an automated analytic platform and logistic algorithm. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Eleventh Annual AACR International Conference on Frontiers in Cancer Prevention Research; 2012 Oct 16-19; Anaheim, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Prev Res 2012;5(11 Suppl):Abstract nr B12.