Demaerschalk, Bart M.

Background and Purpose Stroke is a frequent manifestation of non-bacterial thrombotic endocarditis (NBTE), yet current knowledge largely stems from case reports and small case series. This systematic review summarizes stroke presentation, imaging features, management, and outcomes in patients with NBTE-related stroke. Methods We conducted a patient-level systematic review of published case reports and case series. PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and PsycINFO were searched from inception through August 2025 for studies reporting individual patients with NBTE-related stroke. Extracted data included demographics, vascular risk factors, stroke presentation, imaging features, NBTE etiology, treatment (unfractionated heparin/low-molecular-weight heparin [UFH/LMWH], vitamin K antagonists [VKA], direct oral anticoagulants [DOACs], and/or valvular surgery), and outcomes. Multivariable regression was used to explore factors associated with recurrent stroke and mortality. Results We included 236 patients with NBTE and stroke from 218 studies (median age 56 years [IQR: 43–63], 63% female). Left hemispheric stroke syndromes predominated among clinical presentations (27%), and multi-vessel territory ischemic infarcts (>2 territories) were observed in 65%. Conventional vascular risk factors were infrequent (0%−21%), whereas deep vein thrombosis (43%) and systemic embolism (41%) frequently preceded or coincided with stroke onset. Malignancy (70%) and autoimmune disease (25%) were the main NBTE etiologies. Anticoagulation was initiated in 70%, and 21% underwent valvular surgery. Over a median follow-up of 2.0 months, stroke recurred in 43% and death occurred in 49% of patients. Malignant etiology (aOR 10.3, P < 0.001) and metastases (aOR 3.9, P < 0.001) were associated with increased mortality, while VKA use (aOR 0.08, P < 0.001) and autoimmune etiology (aOR 0.1, P < 0.001) were associated with lower mortality. Malignancy (aOR 2.8, P < 0.001) and DOAC use (aOR 5.2, P = 0.012) were associated with increased risk of recurrent stroke. Conclusion NBTE should be considered in stroke patients lacking conventional vascular risk factors, particularly those with malignancy or autoimmune disease. Malignancy and DOAC use were associated with higher recurrent stroke risk, while VKA use was associated with lower mortality; however, these anticoagulant-class findings should be considered hypothesis-generating and interpreted cautiously given the case-report evidence base, small treatment subgroups, potential confounding, and limited follow-up. What this study adds By synthesizing patient-level data from published case reports and case series, this review provides a stroke-focused characterization of NBTE, including clinical presentation, infarct topography, underlying etiologies, management strategies, recurrent cerebrovascular events, and mortality. The findings highlight multifocal infarction, malignancy-associated NBTE, and recurrent stroke despite anticoagulation as key clinical concerns, while emphasizing that observed associations with anticoagulant class should be viewed as hypothesis-generating rather than definitive treatment guidance

Introduction: AI-driven software has been recommended as a means of triaging suspected large vessel occlusions (LVOs) on CT angiography (CTA), and different solutions are now commercially available. This study compared the performance of two software packages, Brainomix 360 Triage LVO and Rapid LVO, in prospective, real-world use. Methods: Consecutive patients scanned for suspected stroke at 3 comprehensive stroke centres from May to July 2024 (3 months) were included in the study. CTA, where available, was processed in real time by both Rapid and Brainomix software. Ground truth on vessel occlusion was ascertained using clinical review of electronic medical records. Occlusion location was coded as intracranial internal carotid artery terminus (ICA-T), middle cerebral artery (MCA) M1 or MCA M2. If more than one occlusion was observed, the most proximal of these was taken as the primary vessel affected. Results: There were 561 suspected stroke patients scanned during the study period across the three sites. Of these, CTA was sent for processing by both Rapid LVO and Brainomix 360 Triage LVO for 359 cases. Cases were excluded if no contrast was detected (n=17), leaving 342 cases (Table 1). Of these, proximal LVO (ICA-T or MCA M1) was confirmed in 14 cases and MCA M2 occlusions were present in 6 cases. Table 2 shows the LVO detection results for all cases from the two software packages. For both devices, sensitivity was higher when considering only proximal occlusions (ICA-T or M1). Performance was similar overall, but there was a trend towards differing sensitivity for more distal occlusions. As a composite measure, area under the curve (AUC) was higher for Brainomix than Rapid (Figure 1) but this difference was not significant. The positive predictive value (PPV) was low for both software packages due to the low incidence of LVO in the patient population. Conclusions: This study demonstrated consistent performance of two AI software devices, Brainomix 360 Triage LVO and Rapid LVO, for detection of LVO on CTA imaging, in prospective, real-world use. The low number of positive cases in the dataset (N=21) is a limitation of the study. There was a trend towards different performance for more distal vessel occlusion locations. Overall, the sensitivity observed in this dataset was in line with reports from previous retrospective studies for both software packages and underlines the importance of prospective evaluation to understand real-world performance.

Background: Stroke is a frequent manifestation of non-bacterial thrombotic endocarditis (NBTE), yet current knowledge largely stems from case reports and small series. This systematic review aimed to comprehensively describe stroke presentation, imaging features, management, and outcomes in NBTE patients. Methods: A comprehensive search of EMBASE, PubMed, MEDLINE, Web of Science and PsycINFO databases was conducted through September 2023. Studies reporting individual cases or case series of NBTE-related stroke were included. Extracted data included demographics, vascular risk factors, stroke presentation, imaging features, NBTE etiology, treatment modalities (unfractionated heparin/low molecular weight heparin (UFH/LMWH), warfarin, direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), and valvular intervention), stroke recurrence, and mortality. Multivariate regression was performed to identify predictors of recurrent stroke and mortality. Results: A total of 129 patients from 118 studies were included (median age 56 [IQR:44-64], 62% females). Right (28%) and left (26%) hemispheric stroke syndromes accounted for the majority of clinical presentation, and multivessel ischemic infarcts (>2 territories) were observed in 66%. Conventional vascular risk factors were infrequent (1%-21%), while deep vein thrombosis and systemic embolism occurred in 59% and 38% of patients, respectively, either preceding or coinciding with stroke onset. Malignancy and autoimmune diseases were identified in 72% and 22%, respectively. Anticoagulation was initiated in 66% and 21% underwent valvular treatment. Over a median follow-up of 1.3 months, stroke recurrence and death occurred in 48% and 50%, respectively. Malignancy significantly increased mortality risk (OR 16.8, P<0.001), while autoimmune-related NBTE (OR 0.2, P=0.029), and anticoagulation with UFH/LMWH (OR 0.3, P=0.011) and VKA (OR 0.09, P=0.002) reduced mortality. Recurrent stroke was more likely in patients with malignancy (OR 16.8, P=0.001) and those receiving DOACs (OR 6.2, P=0.057) Conclusion: NBTE should be considered in stroke patients lacking conventional risk factors, particularly with underlying malignancy or autoimmune disease. Malignancy and DOAC use may increase the risk of recurrent strokes in this patient population.

Introduction Software packages for quantification of CT perfusion parameters allow quick visualization of perfusion deficits to support clinical decision making in acute ischemic stroke (AIS). Several packages are now commercially available for automated quantification of ischemic core, penumbra volumes, and mismatch ratios to indicate eligibility for reperfusion therapies. This study explored the agreement between two software packages, Brainomix 360 e‐CTP and Rapid CTP, in prospective, real‐world use. Methods Consecutive patients scanned for suspected stroke at three comprehensive stroke centers over 90 days from May to July 2024 were included in the study. Eligibility for the current analysis was limited to discharge diagnosis of AIS and CTP imaging processed by both Brainomix and Rapid software. Software processing was conducted in real time after image acquisition. The presence of large vessel occlusion (LVO) was determined from review of electronic medical records. CTP core (CBF<30%) and penumbra (Tmax>6s) volumes from Brainomix and Rapid were recorded for each case. Mismatch ratios were calculated (penumbra÷core volume); positive mismatch was defined according to DEFUSE‐3 criteria (core<70ml, penumbra>15ml, mismatch ratio > 1.8). The correlations and linear regressions between Brainomix and Rapid were computed for core, penumbra and mismatch ratios, and their concordance for mismatch positivity was assessed. Results 137 patients were scanned and received a final diagnosis of AIS. Of these, only 38 had imaging processed by both Brainomix and Rapid. Median age was 69 years (interquartile range: 57‐77.5y); 16 (42%) were female; 13 (34%) had LVO. Linear models between Brainomix and Rapid's outputs for CBF and Tmax volumes are shown in Figure 1a and 1b. The correlation between software outputs for CBF volume was r=0.70 (p<.001), and for Tmax volume was r=0.72 (p<.001). Mismatch ratios were calculated for the 13 cases with LVO (Figure 1c). The linear model between mismatch ratios was not significant, with four Rapid outputs showing infinite mismatch ratios (due to having CBF volumes of 0ml). Concordance between software for mismatch positivity was good; 8/13 cases showed mismatch on both softwares; 1 case showed mismatch on Brainomix only; 1 for Rapid only; and 3 cases showed mismatch on neither software. Conclusion This prospective study, despite limited sample size (N=38), showed good correlations between Brainomix 360 e‐CTP and Rapid CTP for calculation of both core and penumbra volumes. Although mismatch ratios showed less agreement, the categorization of mismatch positivity showed good concordance between software platforms. image

After successfully implementing an acute care telemedicine program internally, health care institutions often consider expanding and scaling services externally beyond the initial organizational network. This report outlines important considerations when expanding acute care telemedicine services externally, including cultural alignment and agility, practice context, staffing models, telemedicine technology selection, interrelated services, legal and compliance considerations, quality assurance, risk management, financing, and integration with medical education. These factors may inform program leaders of major planning considerations, potential barriers, and could influence strategic planning. Prospectively identifying and resolving challenges prior to contracting with new external sites will facilitate smooth, successful implementation and high utilization of the acute care telemedicine service.

Background Telestroke emergency department (ED) workflow emulates that of in-person care, yet limitations of the virtual interaction may require accommodations. The optimal sequence of non-contrast head CT, cerebral CT angiogram, and decision to infuse IV thrombolytic is not defined for telestroke. Methods In this twenty-two-hospital multicenter retrospective study between 1/1/2024-12/31/2024, we characterized timing of ED CT angiograms, either bundled with the non-contrast head CT or non-bundled and performed after the IV-thrombolytic decision. The primary outcome was effect of bundling on door to needle time (DTN) when directed by telestroke. Timing of CT scans was determined by time stamps of scout images. Results In total, 5704 patients were included, with a median age of 65 years (Interquartile range, IQR 58-77) and NIHSS 8 (IQR 6-13). There were 4518 patients in the bundled group (n = 12 hospitals), with time from non-contrast CT to CTA of median 2 min (IQR 0-6 min; vs non-bundled (n = 10 hospitals): 7, 4-15 min; P = .0001). DTN was not statistically different between the groups, bundled vs not: median 47 min (IQR, 35-62 min) vs 54 min (IQR, 41-67 min, P = .21). Door in door out (DIDO) times also were unchanged (169, 117-254 vs 175, 123-247 min; P = .56). These findings, although showing no statistical difference, may have significance for clinical workflows and were consistent with the results of validation analyses conducted on individual patients. Conclusions Bundling non-contrast head CT with the CT angiogram before thrombolytic decision did not delay DTN times, trended to clinically improve times, and may be relevant for telestroke ED workflows.

Background and Purpose Informed consent (IC) practices for endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) in acute stroke are not well elucidated. We investigated the roles and specialties of those obtaining EVT IC, aiming to provide insights for enhancing the process. Methods We conducted a survey from July- December 2023 among acute stroke care clinicians. Utilizing Qualtrics, we disseminated a questionnaire through various national and international online platforms. This analysis summarizes the characteristics of individuals who obtain IC at respondents’ institution. Results Among 168 respondents, 71% were staff physicians, 70% practiced in the US and 70% worked at academic centers. Neurology (77%) was the most common specialty obtaining EVT IC, followed by neurosurgery (41%), radiology (30%) and emergency medicine (EM) (10%). Staff physicians were the most frequently involved (61%), followed by fellows (43%), residents (48%) and advanced practice providers (APPs) (36%). Comparatvely, non-US institutions were more likely to utilize neurologists alone (50% vs 31%, P = 0.016) and staff physicians (76% vs 54%, P = 0.008), while US institutions more often utilized neurosurgeons (51% vs 18%, P < 0.001), APPs (43% vs 18%, P = 0.002) and residents (56% vs 28%, P = 0.001). Non-academic institutions used EM (25% vs 5%, P < 0.001) and APPs (50% vs 31%, P = 0.031), while academic institutions commonly utilized neurosurgeons (48% vs 18%, P = 0.001), residents (59% vs 13%, P < 0.001) and fellows (52% vs 18%, P < 0.001). Conclusion Neurologists and staff physicians are the primary providers obtaining EVT IC, with variations based on region and institution type. Future efforts to optimize the IC process should integrate various specialties and be widely adaptable.

e13890 Background: Many oncology practices have reported continued use of telemedicine since onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. However, the future sustainability of telemedicine within oncology practices remains unclear, particularly because federal policies that enabled adoption in response to the public health emergency (PHE) have not been made permanent. Understanding similarities and differences in telemedicine utilization at high-volume oncology centers is crucial for shaping evidence-based policy that enables equitable access to oncology care across varying geographies. Methods: This is a cross-sectional, year-over-year, retrospective cohort analysis of trends in telemedicine utilization across all medical oncology clinical appointments conducted among adult patients (age >18) from January 2019 to December 2023 at Stanford Medicine Cancer Center (SM) – comprising multiple campuses in the California Bay Area – and the Mayo Clinic Comprehensive Cancer Center (MC) – a multiregional cancer practice with tertiary referral campuses in Minnesota, Florida, and Arizona, as well as community-based clinics throughout the Upper Midwest. Results: Both institutions exhibited a similar trend in telemedicine adoption over time. This was characterized by an initial surge in utilization following the PHE declaration in March 2020, followed by sustained utilization rates from 2021 to 2023. However, telemedicine use as a proportion of the overall practice differed significantly between institutions. At SM, the rate of telemedicine visits as a proportion of overall clinical practice was 60.3% (49,136/ 81,502) in 2021, 59.9% (52,247/ 87,215) in 2022, and 57.2% (55,007/ 96,163) in 2023. At MC, the proportion of telemedicine utilization was 12.8% in 2021 (23,873/186,086), 14.7% in 2022 (28,985/196,777), and 14.0% in 2023 (30,208/215,941). Deployment in the setting of new versus return visits also differed between institutions. In 2023, telemedicine accounted for 53.7% (6,440/11,998) of new and 57.7% (48,567/84,165) of return visits at SM, compared to 15.5% (3,359/21,728) and 13.8% (26,849/194,213) at MC. Additionally, while video visits were the predominant modality used to conduct telemedicine visits at both institutions from 2021 onward, in 2023 phone visits still made up 17.9% (5,394/30,208) of all telemedicine visits at MC, compared to just 5.4% (2,990/55,007) at SM. Conclusions: Stanford Medicine and Mayo Clinic exhibited a pattern of initial growth of telemedicine adoption in 2020, followed by sustained utilization from 2021-2023. We observed unique differences in the overall proportion, visit type deployment, and modality of telemedicine utilization between institutions. However, this study confirms telemedicine visits have remained a fixture of medical oncology care for many patients at these institutions since the COVID-19 pandemic.