Young, Michael J

Background and Purpose Informed consent (IC) practices for endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) in acute stroke are not well elucidated. We investigated the roles and specialties of those obtaining EVT IC, aiming to provide insights for enhancing the process. Methods We conducted a survey from July- December 2023 among acute stroke care clinicians. Utilizing Qualtrics, we disseminated a questionnaire through various national and international online platforms. This analysis summarizes the characteristics of individuals who obtain IC at respondents’ institution. Results Among 168 respondents, 71% were staff physicians, 70% practiced in the US and 70% worked at academic centers. Neurology (77%) was the most common specialty obtaining EVT IC, followed by neurosurgery (41%), radiology (30%) and emergency medicine (EM) (10%). Staff physicians were the most frequently involved (61%), followed by fellows (43%), residents (48%) and advanced practice providers (APPs) (36%). Comparatvely, non-US institutions were more likely to utilize neurologists alone (50% vs 31%, P = 0.016) and staff physicians (76% vs 54%, P = 0.008), while US institutions more often utilized neurosurgeons (51% vs 18%, P < 0.001), APPs (43% vs 18%, P = 0.002) and residents (56% vs 28%, P = 0.001). Non-academic institutions used EM (25% vs 5%, P < 0.001) and APPs (50% vs 31%, P = 0.031), while academic institutions commonly utilized neurosurgeons (48% vs 18%, P = 0.001), residents (59% vs 13%, P < 0.001) and fellows (52% vs 18%, P < 0.001). Conclusion Neurologists and staff physicians are the primary providers obtaining EVT IC, with variations based on region and institution type. Future efforts to optimize the IC process should integrate various specialties and be widely adaptable.