Rosenfeld, A B

Abstract The Mayo Clinic Florida Integrated Oncology Building will be the home of the first spot-scanning only carbon/proton hybrid therapy system by Hitachi, Ltd. It will provide proton beams up to kinetic energies of 230 MeV and carbon beams up to 430 MeV n −1 for clinical deployment. To provide adequate radiation protection, the Geant4 (v10.6) Monte Carlo toolkit was utilized to quantify the ambient dose equivalent at a 10 mm depth ( H *(10)) for photons and neutrons. To perform accurate calculations of the ambient dose equivalent, three-dimensional computer-aided design files of the entire planned facility were imported into Geant4, as well as certain particle system components such as the bending magnets, fast Faraday cup, and gantry. Particle fluence was scored using 60 cm diameter spheres, which were strategically placed throughout areas of interests. Analytical calculations were performed as first-pass design checks. Major shielding slabs were optimized using Geant4 simulations iteratively, with more than 20 alternative designs evaluated within Geant4. The 430 MeV n −1 carbon beams played the most significant role in concrete thickness Requirements. The primary wall thickness for the carbon fixed beam room is 4 meters. The presence of the proton gantry structure in the simulation caused the ambient dose equivalent to increase by around 67% at the maze entrance, but a decrease in the high energy beam transport corridor. All shielding primary and secondary goals for clinical operations were met per state regulation and national guidelines.

Abstract Proton therapy has a distinct dosimetric advantage over conventional photon therapy due to its Bragg peak profile. This allows greater accuracy in dose delivery and dose conformation to the target, however it requires greater precision in setup, delivery and for quality assurance (QA) procedures. The AAPM TG 224 report recommends daily range and spot position checks with tolerance on the order of a millimetre. Daily QA systems must therefore be efficient for daily use and be capable of sub-millimetre precision however few suitable commercial systems are available. In this work, a compact, real-time daily QA system is optimised and characterised for proton range verification using an ad-hoc Geant4 simulation. The system is comprised of a monolithic silicon diode array detector embedded in a perspex phantom. The detector is orientated at an angular offset to the incident proton beam to allow range in perspex to be determined for flat proton fields. The accuracy of the system for proton range in perspex measurements was experimentally evaluated over the full range of clinical proton energies. The mean R 100 , R 90 and R 80 ranges measured with the system were accurate within ±0.6 mm of simulated ranges in a perspex phantom for all energies assessed. This system allows real-time read-out of individual detector channels also making it appropriate for temporal beam delivery diagnostics and for spot position monitoring along one axis. The system presented provides a suitable, economical and efficient alternative for daily QA in proton therapy.

PurposeMicrodosimetry is a vital tool for assessing the microscopic patterns of energy deposition by radiation, which ultimately govern biological effect. Solid‐state, silicon‐on‐insulator microdosimeters offer an approach for making microdosimetric measurements with high spatial resolution (on the order of tens of micrometers). These high‐resolution, solid‐state microdosimeters may therefore play a useful role in characterizing proton radiotherapy fields, particularly for making highly resolved measurements within the Bragg peak region. In this work, we obtain microdosimetric measurements with a solid‐state microdosimeter (MicroPlus probe) in a clinical, spot‐scanning proton beam of small spot size.MethodsThe MicroPlus probe had a 3D single sensitive volume on top of silicon oxide. The sensitive volume had an active cross‐sectional area of 250 μm × 10 μm and thickness of 10 μm. The proton facility was a synchrotron‐based, spot‐scanning system with small spot size (σ ≈ 2 mm). We performed measurements with the clinical beam current (≈1 nA) and had no detected pulse pile‐up. Measurements were made in a water‐equivalent phantom in water‐equivalent depth (WED) increments of 0.25 mm or 1.0 mm along pristine Bragg peaks of energies 71.3 MeV and 159.9 MeV, respectively. For each depth, we measured lineal energy distributions and then calculated the dose‐weighted mean lineal energy, . The measurements were repeated for two field sizes: 4 × 4 cm2 and 20 × 20 cm2.ResultsFor both 71.3 MeV and 159.9 MeV and for both field sizes, increased with depth toward the distal edge of the Bragg peak, a result consistent with Monte Carlo calculations and measurements performed elsewhere. For the 71.3 MeV, 4 × 4 cm2 beam (range at 80% distal falloff, R80 = 3.99 cm), we measured keV/μm at WED = 2 cm, and keV/μm at WED = 3.95 cm. For the 71.3 MeV, 20 × 20 cm2 beam, we measured keV/μm at WED = 2.6 cm, and keV/μm at WED = 3 cm. For the 159.9 MeV, 4 × 4 cm2 beam (R80 = 17.7 cm), keV/μm at WED = 5 cm, and keV/μm at WED = 17.6 cm. For the 159.9 MeV, 20 × 20 cm2 beam, keV/μm at WED = 5 cm, and keV/μm at WED = 17.6 cm.ConclusionsWe performed microdosimetric measurements with a novel solid‐state, silicon‐on‐insulator microdosimeter in a clinical spot‐scanning proton beam of small spot size and unmodified beam current. For all of the proton field sizes and energies considered, the measurements of were in agreement with expected trends. Furthermore, we obtained measurements with a spatial resolution of 10 μm in the beam direction. This spatial resolution greatly exceeded that possible with a conventional gaseous tissue‐equivalent proportional counter and allowed us to perform a high‐resolution investigation within the Bragg peak region. The MicroPlus probe is therefore suitable for applications in proton radiotherapy.

PurposeThis work aims to characterize a proton pencil beam scanning (PBS) and passive double scattering (DS) systems as well as to measure parameters relevant to the relative biological effectiveness (RBE) of the beam using a silicon on insulator (SOI) microdosimeter with well‐defined 3D sensitive volumes (SV). The dose equivalent downstream and laterally outside of a clinical PBS treatment field was assessed and compared to that of a DS beam.MethodsA novel silicon microdosimeter with well‐defined 3D SVs was used in this study. It was connected to low noise electronics, allowing for detection of lineal energies as low as 0.15 keV/μm. The microdosimeter was placed at various depths in a water phantom along the central axis of the proton beam, and at the distal part of the spread‐out Bragg peak (SOBP) in 0.5 mm increments. The RBE values of the pristine Bragg peak (BP) and SOBP were derived using the measured microdosimetric lineal energy spectra as inputs to the modified microdosimetric kinetic model (MKM). Geant4 simulations were performed in order to verify the calculated depth‐dose distribution from the treatment planning system (TPS) and to compare the simulated dose‐mean lineal energy to the experimental results.ResultsFor a 131 MeV PBS spot (124.6 mm R90 range in water), the measured dose‐mean lineal energy increased from 2 keV/μm at the entrance to 8 keV/μm in the BP, with a maximum value of 10 keV/μm at the distal edge. The derived RBE distribution for the PBS beam slowly increased from 0.97 ± 0.14 at the entrance to 1.04 ± 0.09 proximal to the BP, then to 1.1 ± 0.08 in the BP, and steeply rose to 1.57 ± 0.19 at the distal part of the BP. The RBE distribution for the DS SOBP beam was approximately 0.96 ± 0.16 to 1.01 ± 0.16 at shallow depths, and 1.01 ± 0.16 to 1.28 ± 0.17 within the SOBP. The RBE significantly increased from 1.29 ± 0.17 to 1.43 ± 0.18 at the distal edge of the SOBP.ConclusionsThe SOI microdosimeter with its well‐defined 3D SV has applicability in characterizing proton radiation fields and can measure relevant physical parameters to model the RBE with submillimeter spatial resolution. It has been shown that for a physical dose of 1.82 Gy at the BP, the derived RBE based on the MKM model increased from 1.14 to 1.6 in the BP and its distal part. Good agreement was observed between the experimental and simulation results, confirming the potential application of SOI microdosimeter with 3D SV for quality assurance in proton therapy.