Back to Authors

Depauw, Nicolas

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0486-6149

Mayo Clinic

Harvard University

Citations 2

Prospective, randomized dose-escalation trial with proton-based radiation for skull base and cervical spine chondrosarcomas: 30-year outcomes from PROG 85-26
Ioakeim‐Ioannidou, Myrsini, Yeap, Beow Y., Soetan, Z. , Hegazy, Rana , Todary, Engy S. , Tejada, Athena, Adams, Judith E., Kooy, Hanne M., Zieminski, Stephen, Nielsen, G. Petur, Hung, Yin P. , Rosenberg, Andrew , Shankar, Ganesh M. , Cunnane, Mary E. , Chang, Yuh-Shin , Gardner, Paul A. , Giap, Fantine , DeLaney, Thomas F. , Hug, Eugen B., MacDonald, Shannon M. , Packard, Daniel, Hung, Yin P , Kim, Daniel W. , Packard, Daniel George , Hegazy, Rana, Adams, Judith, Depauw, Nicolas , Rosenberg, Andrew, Tobert, Daniel G , Curry, William T. , Coté, Gregory M. , Kelly, Hillary R. , Chen, Yen‐Lin , Liu, Kevin X , Shih, Helen A.

Neuro-Oncology | December 17, 2025 | Volume: 28 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 968-977

10.1093/neuonc/noaf289 Get It

Abstract Background To determine if dose escalation improves outcomes for chondrosarcomas (CHS) of the base of the skull (BOS) and the cervical spine (CS). Methods A prospective, randomized, dose-escalation trial was designed for patients with CHS of the BOS and CS. Patients were randomly assigned to 70 Gy (RBE) or 76 Gy (RBE). The primary endpoint was local failure (LF). Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), progression-free survival (PFS), and treatment-related toxicities. Results Between 1987 and 2007, 105 patients were randomized, median follow-up was 29.2 years (IQR, 26.7-32.4). Forty-six patients were assigned to 70 Gy (RBE) and 59 were assigned to 76 Gy (RBE). LF at 5-, 10-, and 20 years were 7%, 9%, and 11% for 70 Gy (RBE), and 10%, 15%, and 19% for 76 Gy (RBE) (P = .16). Like LF rates, there was no benefit in dose escalation for OS (P = .28) and CSS (P = .22). Progression-free survival at 5-, 10-, and 20 years was 93%, 89%, and 77% for the low-dose group and 83%, 71%, and 59% for the high-dose group (P = .069). Late RT injury ≥ grade 3 was reported in a total of 19 (18%) patients across both dose levels, with 11% in the low-dose group and 24% in the high-dose group (P = .13). Conclusions This is the first and largest trial of patients with grade I/II BOS and CS CHS evaluating dose escalation for tumor control. Proton-based RT is effective and safe for these tumors, but there is no apparent benefit in dose escalation. Clinical Trial Information NCT00592748.
Characterization of proton pencil beam scanning and passive beam using a high spatial resolution solid‐state microdosimeter
Tran, Linh T. , Chartier, Lachlan, Bolst, David , Pogossov, Alex , Guatelli, Susanna , Petasecca, Marco , Lerch, Michael , Prokopovich, Dale A., Reinhard, Mark I., Clasie, B. , Depauw, Nicolas , Kooy, Hanne M., Flanz, J., McNamara, Aimee L. , Beltran, Chris , Perevertaylo, Vladimir L. , Jackson, Michael , Rosenfeld, Anatoly , Furutani, Keith, Guatelli, S , Rosenfeld, A B , Beltran, Chris J , Paganetti, Harald , Furutani, Keith M.

Medical Physics | September 9, 2017 | Volume: 44 | Issue: 11 | Pages: 6085-6095

10.1002/mp.12563 Get It

PurposeThis work aims to characterize a proton pencil beam scanning (PBS) and passive double scattering (DS) systems as well as to measure parameters relevant to the relative biological effectiveness (RBE) of the beam using a silicon on insulator (SOI) microdosimeter with well‐defined 3D sensitive volumes (SV). The dose equivalent downstream and laterally outside of a clinical PBS treatment field was assessed and compared to that of a DS beam.MethodsA novel silicon microdosimeter with well‐defined 3D SVs was used in this study. It was connected to low noise electronics, allowing for detection of lineal energies as low as 0.15 keV/μm. The microdosimeter was placed at various depths in a water phantom along the central axis of the proton beam, and at the distal part of the spread‐out Bragg peak (SOBP) in 0.5 mm increments. The RBE values of the pristine Bragg peak (BP) and SOBP were derived using the measured microdosimetric lineal energy spectra as inputs to the modified microdosimetric kinetic model (MKM). Geant4 simulations were performed in order to verify the calculated depth‐dose distribution from the treatment planning system (TPS) and to compare the simulated dose‐mean lineal energy to the experimental results.ResultsFor a 131 MeV PBS spot (124.6 mm R90 range in water), the measured dose‐mean lineal energy increased from 2 keV/μm at the entrance to 8 keV/μm in the BP, with a maximum value of 10 keV/μm at the distal edge. The derived RBE distribution for the PBS beam slowly increased from 0.97 ± 0.14 at the entrance to 1.04 ± 0.09 proximal to the BP, then to 1.1 ± 0.08 in the BP, and steeply rose to 1.57 ± 0.19 at the distal part of the BP. The RBE distribution for the DS SOBP beam was approximately 0.96 ± 0.16 to 1.01 ± 0.16 at shallow depths, and 1.01 ± 0.16 to 1.28 ± 0.17 within the SOBP. The RBE significantly increased from 1.29 ± 0.17 to 1.43 ± 0.18 at the distal edge of the SOBP.ConclusionsThe SOI microdosimeter with its well‐defined 3D SV has applicability in characterizing proton radiation fields and can measure relevant physical parameters to model the RBE with submillimeter spatial resolution. It has been shown that for a physical dose of 1.82 Gy at the BP, the derived RBE based on the MKM model increased from 1.14 to 1.6 in the BP and its distal part. Good agreement was observed between the experimental and simulation results, confirming the potential application of SOI microdosimeter with 3D SV for quality assurance in proton therapy.