ABSTRACT Background and Objectives Non‐rhabdomyosarcoma soft tissue sarcomas (NRSTS) account for less than 4% of pediatric cancers. Treatment and outcomes have been described in adults, but pediatric data are lacking. The purpose of this study is to review our institution's outcomes of extremity NRSTS in pediatric patients. Methods Ninety‐eight (56 male: 42 female) pediatric patients with NRSTS of the extremity at our institution were reviewed. Mean age at diagnosis was 11 ± 5 years, and mean follow‐up was 12 ± 10 years. The most common diagnosis was synovial sarcoma (27%), and 60% were high‐grade. Results Treatment included surgical resection in all patients, with 33% receiving radiation and 37% receiving systemic therapy. 20‐year local recurrence‐ (LRFS) and metastatic disease‐free survival (MDFS) were 91% and 91%, respectively, with 92% disease specific survival (DSS). High grade tumors were associated with lower LRFS ( p = 0.02) and DSS ( p = 0.03). Tumor size < 5 cm demonstrated improved MDFS ( p = 0.03), and stage 3 tumors showed worse MDFS ( p < 0.01). Conclusions Treatment of pediatric NRSTS was variable, with large, deep, high‐grade tumors more likely to receive neoadjuvant and adjuvant treatments. Multidisciplinary treatment was associated with high rates of local control and durable survival. This study provides an extended follow‐up of pediatric patients to identify late complications.
Comparison of Proximal Tibial Endoprosthetic and Allograft‐Prosthetic Reconstruction
ABSTRACT Introduction The proximal tibia is a common location for bone tumors. Two contemporary reconstruction techniques for limb salvage are endoprosthetic replacement (EPR) and allograft‐prosthesis composite (APC). This study aimed to compare the long‐term oncologic and functional outcomes of EPR and APC reconstructions. Methods Thirty‐eight (19 APC and 19 EPR) patients underwent oncologic proximal tibia resection and reconstruction were reviewed. Patients undergoing APC reconstruction were younger than the EPR group (31 vs. 44 years, p = 0.049), and patients in the EPR group were more likely to have a diagnosis of metastatic disease (32% vs. 0%, p = 0.019). Results For all patients, the 10‐year disease‐specific survival was 63%. With death a competing risk, there was no difference in the 10‐year cumulative risk of failure (41% vs. 26%, p = 0.171) or amputation (11% vs. 19%, p = 0.690) between APC or EPR. There was no difference comparing EPR to APC in the proportion of patients with an extensor lag > 10° (42% vs. 26%, p = 0.495) or 10‐year knee society scores (85 vs. 85, p = 0.710). Conclusion EPR and APC have a similar complication profile and functional outcomes following proximal tibial resection and reconstruction.
Preoperative (Neoadjuvant) Combined Chemoradiotherapy in the Management of Localized Soft Tissue Sarcoma: A Retrospective Study
Background: Localized soft tissue sarcoma (STS) is primarily treated with surgical resection with or without radiotherapy (RT), while the role of chemotherapy (CT) as a radiosensitizer remains unclear. We report our single-institution experience with combined chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) in treating localized STS. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients with localized STS treated at Mayo Clinic with mitomycin, cisplatin, and doxorubicin (MitoAP) concurrently with RT between 1/1/85 and 12/12/19. Results: We identified 179 patients (median age 58 years; median tumor size 9.5 cm), with 83.8% of tumors located in the extremities or trunk. Among them, 77.1% received perioperative CT in addition to CCRT, with 95% of those treated in the neoadjuvant setting. Median RT dose was 50 Gray. The 5-year disease-specific survival (DSS) was 77.9% (95% confidence interval, CI: 70.8–83.4%). The addition of perioperative CT to CCRT was associated with improved DSS compared with CCRT alone (p = 0.01, Hazard Ratio, HR: 0.48, 95% CI: 0.27–0.85). Median post-CCRT tumor viability was 30% and did not differ by CT use (p = 0.39), but varied significantly by histology (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Our institutional protocol utilizing two cycles of MitoAP with RT was well tolerated. DSS in our cohort was similar to historical data using perioperative RT alone, suggesting no clear benefit from CCRT. However, the majority of patients in our cohort were classified as high risk, which may have attenuated a potential survival benefit in the absence of appropriate comparative controls. Furthermore, additional perioperative CT to CCRT was associated with improved DSS and differential histology-specific responses in tumor viability, suggesting that a more aggressive neoadjuvant and perioperative approach may be beneficial in selected patients.
Outcomes of soft-tissue reconstruction for isolated type III internal hemipelvectomy
Aims A type III internal hemipelvectomy includes resection of the pubic rami. Although bony reconstruction is not necessary, the integrity of the abdominal wall is deficient following resection. The aim of this study was to report the outcome of soft-tissue reconstruction following these resections. Methods We retrospectively reviewed all isolated type III internal hemipelvectomies which were undertaken at the Mayo Clinic (Rochester, USA) between January 2002 and December 2022. The group included 25 patients, of whom 14 (56%) were male. Their median age was 45 years (IQR 61 to 31) at the time of surgery. Most patients (n = 18; 72%) underwent resection for a sarcoma. Soft-tissue flaps were used in 21 patients (84%) and nine also had a mesh reconstruction. Results The five-year disease-specific survival was 65% following surgery, with significantly worse survival in patients with locally advanced tumour (35% (95% CI 12 to 100) vs 76% (95% CI 59 to 99); p = 0.036). Complications were common, with 21 patients (84%) having at least one complication, and 12 (48%) having several complications. Most commonly, this included seroma or haematoma (44%), wound dehiscence (40%), and infection (40%). The use of a soft-tissue flap did not significantly reduce the risk of infection (hazard ratio (HR) 0.68 (95% CI 0.14 to 3.28); p = 0.638) or seroma or haematoma (HR 0.31 (95% CI 0.30 to 4.14); p = 0.088), but patients who did not have a soft-tissue flap were significantly more likely to develop a hernia (odds ratio 9.0 (95% CI 1.14 to 71.03); p = 0.027). A total of three of 21 patients (14%) whose reconstruction involved a flap had donor site complications. Conclusion Soft-tissue reconstruction following a type III internal hemipelvectomy reduces the risk of postoperative hernia formation, with a low rate of donor site complications. This additional procedure should be considered for all patients undergoing this type of resection. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2026;108-B(4):561–566.
Optimizing Flap Selection for Urosymphyseal Fistula Repair: A Comparative Analysis of Surgical Outcomes
ABSTRACT Background There is limited data regarding the surgical outcomes of urosymphyseal fistula (USF) repair with primary repair or autologous tissue transfer. We performed a study to compare outcomes of USF repair with primary repair, VRAM flap, and omental flap. Methods We retrospectively identified patients with a diagnosis of USF who underwent fistula decompression and urinary tract reconstruction. The minimal follow‐up was 3 months. Patients with distal urethral obstruction, radiation cystitis, or a non‐viable sphincter underwent anterior exenteration and flap transfer. Results Fifty‐six patients were included. Eleven patients underwent surgical management for USF using primary repair (19.6%), 34 had omental flap‐based reconstruction (60.8%), and a VRAM flap was used in 11 patients (19.6%). The 90‐day rate of sepsis was lower with omentum flap transposition (3%) compared with VRAM flap (27%) or primary repair (18%, p = 0.041). The rate of fistula recurrence was lower in the omentum flap group compared with USF primary repair (30%) or VRAM flap repair group (27.3%, p = 0.04). On multivariable analysis, USF repair with the omentum flap decreased the odds of fistula recurrence 90 days after surgery compared with primary repair (OR 0.012, p = 0.011) but not when compared with VRAM. Conclusion The omentum flap may offer a better safety profile in terms of decreasing the rate of early sepsis and rate of fistula recurrence for USF repair in comparison to primary repair. There is limited evidence regarding the superiority of the omentum flap to decrease the rate of late fistula recurrence when compared with the VRAM flap.
Timing for Repair of Urosymphyseal Fistula After Diagnosis Determines the Incidence Postoperative Outcomes
ABSTRACT Purpose There is limited evidence regarding the optimal timing of urosymphyseal fistula (USF) repair. Our aim was to conduct a comparative analysis evaluating the postoperative complications and surgical outcomes among patients undergoing surgery for USF, comparing those treated in an early versus delayed fashion. Methods Fifty‐eight patients with diagnosis of USF and who underwent fistula decompression, pubic bone resection, and urinary tract reconstruction were included. Patients who underwent USF repair within 100 days of diagnosis were classified as having early repair, while those treated after 100 days were considered to have delayed repair. Results Thirty‐one underwent delayed USF repair (53.4%), while 27 underwent early repair (46.6%). Most patients were male (96.8%). The median age (72 years vs . 69 years, p = 0.13) and mean BMI (28.7 vs . 28.6, p = 0.97) were comparable between groups. The rate of overall 90‐day complications following USF repair was comparable between groups (77.4% vs . 63%, p = 0.228). We did not find a difference between the rates early complications among groups. The rates of long‐term recurrent pain (46.7% vs . 11.1%, p = 0.004), recurrent osteomyelitis (20% vs . 0%, p = 0.014), and fistula (23.3% vs . 3.7%, p = 0.033) were higher in the delayed USF repair group compared to the early USF repair group. The follow up time was similar between groups too (25.43‐months vs . 32.8‐months, p = 0.257). Conclusion While early USF repair might not affect the incidence of early complications within 90 days post‐surgery, it is associated with reduced rates of long‐term recurrent pain, recurrent osteomyelitis, and fistula recurrence compared to delayed USF repair.
Staged Reconstruction Is Not Necessary Following Oncologic Resection of Superficial Myxofibrosarcoma
Background: Myxofibrosarcomas are notoriously highly infiltrative soft-tissue sarcomas, making negative surgical margins difficult to obtain. Recently, vacuum-assisted closure (VAC) is used to delay wound closure until a negative margin has been achieved; however, this can delay care and increase costs. Our institution has historically performed single-stage resections with intraoperative frozen margin analysis and reconstruction in these patients. The purpose of this study is to report the outcomes of this technique. Methods: We reviewed 112 patients (62 males, mean age 70 ± 14 years) with superficial myxofibrosarcoma. Eighty-eight patients received preoperative radiation. All patients underwent surgical resection with intraoperative frozen margin analysis, and the planned reconstruction was performed in a single anesthetic. Results: The 10-year local recurrence-free survival was 90%; positive intraoperative frozen section (HR 7.44, p = 0.004) and final permanent margins (HR 8.53, p = 0.007) were associated with local recurrence. Intraoperative margins were negative in 103 (92%) of patients, 1 of which was positive on final permanent section. There were nine cases of microscopically positive margins, of which seven underwent immediate re-excision to a negative margin. The accuracy of frozen margin assessment for myxofibrosarcoma was between 92.92 and 98.23%. All patients underwent reconstruction at the time of resection, with 19% needing an additional procedure, most commonly due to a wound complication (12%). Conclusions: Multidisciplinary single-stage excision with intraoperative frozen margin assessment and soft-tissue reconstruction yields low rates of local recurrence in patients with superficial myxofibrosarcoma.
Skip Lesions in Chondrosarcoma: Is Whole Bone Imaging Necessary?
ABSTRACTBackgroundSkip lesions in bone sarcoma are a poorly described entity. Reports on skip lesions in osteosarcoma and Ewing sarcoma suggest that whole bone MRI should be obtained to evaluate for additional tumor foci given the association with worse outcomes. However, there is limited evidence to support whole bone imaging in chondrosarcoma.MethodsBetween 1995 and 2022, 129 patients with long bone chondrosarcoma were evaluated at our institution. Lesions were located most commonly in the femur in 64 patients and the humerus in 54 patients. All imaging studies and pathology reports were reviewed to determine the presence of skip lesions, defined as an area of histology‐confirmed chondrosarcoma that was separated from the primary lesion by normal bone on pathology.ResultsWhole bone imaging was obtained during initial staging in 107 patients with two‐thirds of patients receiving MRI, CT, or bone scan. Five patients (3.9%) were found to have skip lesions in the same bone as the primary tumor. There were no transarticular skip lesions. Skip lesions were detected in three patients with low grade chondrosarcoma (4.6%) and two patients with high grade chondrosarcoma (3.2%). All lesions were within 2 cm of the primary tumor. All were visible on MRI and CT of the primary site and one was visible on plain radiographs. The presence of skip lesions did not alter the type of surgical treatment in any patients.ConclusionSkip lesions in long bone chondrosarcoma are rare. All skip lesions in this study were in close proximity to the primary tumor and the same grade as the main lesion. Our results suggest that advanced imaging of the whole bone may be of low utility for evaluating the presence of skip lesions. The clinical significance of skip lesions in chondrosarcoma remains unclear, however, their presence did not impact the treatment plan in this series.
Long‐Term Functional Outcomes of Glenohumeral Arthrodesis Following Oncologic Resection
ABSTRACTBackgroundGlenohumeral arthrodesis is a demanding surgical procedure. However, it is an option for reconstruction an oncologic resection, especially for patients in whom the axillary nerve is compromised.MethodsWe reviewed 26 (12 male:14 female) glenohumeral arthrodeses (14 primary:12 revision) following an oncologic resection. The most common method of reconstruction was a free vascularized fibula autograft with a bulk allograft (n = 18). The median follow‐up was 22 years (IQR 19 years).ResultsMedian Musculoskeletal Tumor Society Scores and Toronto Extremity Salvage Scores at final follow‐up were 86% and 80%. MSTS scores were similar in patients receiving arthrodesis for primary versus secondary reconstruction. Fifteen (58%) patients had postoperative complications requiring reoperation. Most reoperations occurred with‐in the first 5 years postoperative, with two procedures occurring after 10‐years. Three patients were diagnosed with metastatic disease, one of which also had a local recurrence.ConclusionGlenohumeral arthrodesis provides satisfactory long‐term outcomes for primary and secondary management of shoulder girdle tumors. While early complication rates were high, long‐term complications were rare.
Identifying consensus and areas for future research in chondrosarcoma
AimsThe Birmingham Orthopaedic Oncology Meeting (BOOM), held in January 2024, convened 309 delegates from 53 countries to discuss and refine 21 consensus statements on the optimal management of chondrosarcoma.MethodsWith representation from Europe (43%; n = 133), North America (17%; n = 53), South America (16%; n = 49), Asia (13%; n = 40), Australasia (5%; n = 16), the Middle East (4%; n = 12), and Africa (2%; n = 6), the combined experience of treating bone sarcomas among attendees totalled approximately 30,000 cases annually, equivalent to 66 years of experience in the UK alone. The meeting’s process began with the formation of a local organizing committee, regional leads, and a scientific committee comprising representatives from 150 specialist units across 47 countries. Supported by major orthopaedic oncology organizations, the meeting used a modified Delphi process to develop consensus statements through online questionnaires, thematic groupings, narrative reviews, and anonymous pre-meeting polling.ResultsStrong (> 80%) consensus was achieved on 19 out of 21 statements, reflecting agreement among delegates. Key areas of consensus included the role of radiology in diagnosis and surveillance, the management of locally recurrent disease, and the treatment of dedifferentiated chondrosarcoma. Notably, there was agreement that routine chemotherapy has no role in chondrosarcoma treatment, and radiological surveillance is safe for intraosseous chondrosarcomas. Despite the overall consensus, areas of controversy remain, particularly regarding the treatment of atypical cartilage tumours and surgical margins. These unresolved issues underscore the need for further research and collaboration within the orthopaedic oncology community.ConclusionBOOM represents the largest global consensus meeting in orthopaedic oncology, providing valuable guidance for clinicians managing chondrosarcoma worldwide. The consensus statements offer a reference for clinical practice, highlight key research priorities, and aim to improve patient outcomes on a global scale.Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2025;107-B(2):246–252.