Back to Authors

Ebeid, Walid

0000-0003-3466-8802

Mayo Clinic

Orthopedic Surgery Department, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt.

Citations 2

Identifying consensus and areas for future research in chondrosarcoma
Kurisunkal, Vineet , Botello, Eduardo , Boyle, Richard A. , Ebeid, Walid , Houdek, Matthew T. , Puri, Ajay , Brennan, Bernadette , Laitinen, Minna , Jutte, Paul C. , Lazarides, Alexander L. , Verspoor, F.G.M. , Visgauss, Julia D. , Jeys, Lee M , Morris, Guy V , Kurisunkal, Vineet , Botello, Eduardo , Ebeid, Walid , Houdek, Matthew T , Puri, Ajay , Ruggieri, Pietro , Brennan, Bernadette , Laitinen, Minna K , Couch, Cory , Rose, Peter, Sullivan, Mikaela, Tibbo, Meagan, Jutte, Paul , Visgauss, Julia D , Jeys, Lee , Ruggieri, Pietro

The Bone & Joint Journal | February 1, 2025 | Volume: 107-B | Issue: 2 | Pages: 246-252

10.1302/0301-620x.107b2.bjj-2024-0643.r1 Get It

AimsThe Birmingham Orthopaedic Oncology Meeting (BOOM), held in January 2024, convened 309 delegates from 53 countries to discuss and refine 21 consensus statements on the optimal management of chondrosarcoma.MethodsWith representation from Europe (43%; n = 133), North America (17%; n = 53), South America (16%; n = 49), Asia (13%; n = 40), Australasia (5%; n = 16), the Middle East (4%; n = 12), and Africa (2%; n = 6), the combined experience of treating bone sarcomas among attendees totalled approximately 30,000 cases annually, equivalent to 66 years of experience in the UK alone. The meeting’s process began with the formation of a local organizing committee, regional leads, and a scientific committee comprising representatives from 150 specialist units across 47 countries. Supported by major orthopaedic oncology organizations, the meeting used a modified Delphi process to develop consensus statements through online questionnaires, thematic groupings, narrative reviews, and anonymous pre-meeting polling.ResultsStrong (> 80%) consensus was achieved on 19 out of 21 statements, reflecting agreement among delegates. Key areas of consensus included the role of radiology in diagnosis and surveillance, the management of locally recurrent disease, and the treatment of dedifferentiated chondrosarcoma. Notably, there was agreement that routine chemotherapy has no role in chondrosarcoma treatment, and radiological surveillance is safe for intraosseous chondrosarcomas. Despite the overall consensus, areas of controversy remain, particularly regarding the treatment of atypical cartilage tumours and surgical margins. These unresolved issues underscore the need for further research and collaboration within the orthopaedic oncology community.ConclusionBOOM represents the largest global consensus meeting in orthopaedic oncology, providing valuable guidance for clinicians managing chondrosarcoma worldwide. The consensus statements offer a reference for clinical practice, highlight key research priorities, and aim to improve patient outcomes on a global scale.Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2025;107-B(2):246–252.
Controversies in orthopaedic oncology
Thorkildsen, Joachim , Kurisunkal, Vineet , Puri, Ajay , Houdek, Matthew T. , Boyle, Richard A. , Ebeid, Walid , Botello, Eduardo , Laitinen, Minna , Funovics, Philipp T. , Jeys, Lee M , Thorkildsen, Joachim , Kurisunkal, Vineet , Puri, Ajay , Ruggieri, Pietro , Houdek, Matthew T , Ebeid, Walid , Botello, Eduardo , Morris, Guy V , Laitinen, Minna K , Jeys, Lee , Ruggieri, Pietro

The Bone & Joint Journal | May 1, 2024 | Volume: 106-B | Issue: 5 | Pages: 425-429

10.1302/0301-620x.106b5.bjj-2023-1381 Get It

Chondrosarcoma is the second most common surgically treated primary bone sarcoma. Despite a large number of scientific papers in the literature, there is still significant controversy about diagnostics, treatment of the primary tumour, subtypes, and complications. Therefore, consensus on its day-to-day treatment decisions is needed. In January 2024, the Birmingham Orthopaedic Oncology Meeting (BOOM) attempted to gain global consensus from 300 delegates from over 50 countries. The meeting focused on these critical areas and aimed to generate consensus statements based on evidence amalgamation and expert opinion from diverse geographical regions. In parallel, periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) in oncological reconstructions poses unique challenges due to factors such as adjuvant treatments, large exposures, and the complexity of surgery. The meeting debated two-stage revisions, antibiotic prophylaxis, managing acute PJI in patients undergoing chemotherapy, and defining the best strategies for wound management and allograft reconstruction. The objectives of the meeting extended beyond resolving immediate controversies. It sought to foster global collaboration among specialists attending the meeting, and to encourage future research projects to address unsolved dilemmas. By highlighting areas of disagreement and promoting collaborative research endeavours, this initiative aims to enhance treatment standards and potentially improve outcomes for patients globally. This paper sets out some of the controversies and questions that were debated in the meeting.Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2024;106-B(5):425–429.