Mahajan, Anita

ABSTRACT Background and Objectives Non‐rhabdomyosarcoma soft tissue sarcomas (NRSTS) account for less than 4% of pediatric cancers. Treatment and outcomes have been described in adults, but pediatric data are lacking. The purpose of this study is to review our institution's outcomes of extremity NRSTS in pediatric patients. Methods Ninety‐eight (56 male: 42 female) pediatric patients with NRSTS of the extremity at our institution were reviewed. Mean age at diagnosis was 11 ± 5 years, and mean follow‐up was 12 ± 10 years. The most common diagnosis was synovial sarcoma (27%), and 60% were high‐grade. Results Treatment included surgical resection in all patients, with 33% receiving radiation and 37% receiving systemic therapy. 20‐year local recurrence‐ (LRFS) and metastatic disease‐free survival (MDFS) were 91% and 91%, respectively, with 92% disease specific survival (DSS). High grade tumors were associated with lower LRFS ( p = 0.02) and DSS ( p = 0.03). Tumor size < 5 cm demonstrated improved MDFS ( p = 0.03), and stage 3 tumors showed worse MDFS ( p < 0.01). Conclusions Treatment of pediatric NRSTS was variable, with large, deep, high‐grade tumors more likely to receive neoadjuvant and adjuvant treatments. Multidisciplinary treatment was associated with high rates of local control and durable survival. This study provides an extended follow‐up of pediatric patients to identify late complications.

Abstract Background Vorasidenib is Food and Drug Administration‐approved for treatment of grade 2 isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH)–mutant gliomas and has demonstrated a benefit in progression‐free survival compared to a placebo. This study assessed the cost‐effectiveness of this treatment strategy compared to standard treatment: observation or chemoradiation (CRT). Methods The authors used an integrated Markov model to compare quality‐adjusted life‐years (QALY) gained and cost‐effectiveness of patients with IDH‐mutated low‐grade glioma (LGG) treated with vorasidenib, observation, or CRT. Outcomes were expressed as incremental cost‐effectiveness ratios (ICERs) per QALY gained. Treatment is considered cost‐effective if it meets the commonly accepted willingness‐to‐pay threshold of $100,000 per QALY gained. Results Based on model parameters, vorasidenib demonstrated an ICER of $356,756 per QALY when compared to CRT. When compared to observation, vorasidenib demonstrated an improved ICER of $215,191 per QALY. On one‐way sensitivity analysis compared to observation, median cost of vorasidenib and median overall survival were most likely to affect ICER with only marginal changes on analysis of other model factors. For ICER to become ≤$100,000 compared to observation, the cost of vorasidenib would need to drop to below $14,072 monthly or have a median survival gain of at least 11.9 years. The probabilistic sensitivity analysis demonstrated that vorasidenib was favored in none of 5000 Monte Carlo iterations. Conclusion Using the best available data, the current price of vorasidenib does not meet commonly accepted cost‐effectiveness thresholds in treatment of IDH‐mutated LGGs.

Abstract Background: Pediatric and AYA sarcomas are rare, biologically heterogeneous tumors with limited noninvasive biomarkers to guide diagnosis, personalized treatment, and disease monitoring. Standard-of-care evaluation relies on invasive biopsies that carry procedural risks and imaging modalities with limited sensitivity for detecting minimal residual disease and distinguishing tumor types. Cell-free DNA (cfDNA) methylation profiling offers a minimally invasive alternative capable of capturing tumor-derived epigenomic alterations and has consistently shown strong clinical utility in adult malignancies. However, genome-wide cfDNA methylation patterns across diverse pediatric and AYA sarcoma subtypes remain poorly defined. Methods: Plasma was collected from 93 pediatric and AYA patients (pediatric &lt;18 years; AYA 15-39 years) representing 27 Ewing sarcoma, 17 rhabdomyosarcoma, 11 liposarcoma, 10 chordoma, 8 synovial sarcoma, 7 chondrosarcoma, 6 osteosarcoma, and 6 fibrosarcoma cases, plus 19 matched healthy donors. cfDNA was isolated from 1 mL plasma, quantified by Qubit, and assessed by Bioanalyzer. Libraries were prepared using the NEBNext EM-seq v2 workflow with PCR cycles scaled to cfDNA input amount. Genome-wide sequencing (15× target depth) was followed by alignment, deduplication, and methylation calling. MultiQC was used to assess depth, duplication rate, conversion efficiency, and CpG coverage. Global methylation summaries were computed, and methylKit was used to generate per-CpG and 1-kb tiling matrices and initiate differential methylation analyses. Results: Ewing sarcoma patients had significantly higher plasma cfDNA concentrations than age- and sex-matched healthy donors (24.4 vs 4.6 ng/mL, p &lt; 0.0001), whereas cfDNA levels for other sarcoma subtypes overlapped with the healthy cohort. Low or undetectable cfDNA concentrations by Qubit were far more common among non-Ewing sarcoma samples (23 of 66) than Ewing sarcoma (1 of 27). All samples achieved sufficient CpG coverage for genome-wide methylation modeling. Global methylation summaries revealed no significant differences in mean β-values across sarcoma subtypes or versus healthy donors. An independent analysis of the Ewing subset identified 299 significant differentially methylated regions (DMRs), supporting the detectability of disease-specific methylation changes. Conclusions: These results demonstrate the feasibility of high-quality cfDNA methylome profiling across a large and diverse pediatric and AYA sarcoma cohort, including in plasma samples with cfDNA concentrations below the limit of detection. While global methylation levels appear broadly similar across subtypes, proof-of-concept DMR analysis in Ewing sarcoma suggests that subtype-specific epigenomic signatures could enable future noninvasive diagnostic tools for pediatric and AYA sarcomas. Citation Format: Lilli J. Greiner, Roman O. Kowalchuk, Jeff Szymanski, Pradeep S. Chauhan, Adam Amundson, Peter J. Schoettler, Wendy Allen-Rhoades, Stephanie F. Polites, Peter S. Rose, Kelly Bailey, Linda McAllister-Lucas, Anita Mahajan, Nadia Laack, Aadel Chaudhuri. Defining genome-wide cfDNA methylation landscapes in pediatric and adolescent and young adult (AYA) bone and soft-tissue sarcomas [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2026; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2026 Apr 17-22; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2026;86(7 Suppl):Abstract nr 7885.

Abstract Introduction: Detectable circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is associated with inferior outcomes in Ewing sarcoma (ES); however, ctDNA clears in nearly all patients within 2 of the 6 chemotherapy cycles before radiotherapy (RT) or surgery. Given a 3-year EFS of 37% on AEWS 1221 (metastatic) and 5-year EFS of 78% on AEWS 1031 (localized), current ctDNA testing fails to predict most relapses. Extracellular vesicles (EVs) are microscopic particles studied as a biomarker in multiple cancer types. We hope to improve the sensitivity of ctDNA in ES and provide the first application of EVs in ES. Methods: cfDNA was isolated from 1mL plasma, quantified by Qubit, and sequenced as NEBNext Enzymatic Methyl-seq v2 libraries. We performed a systematic unsupervised clustering analysis of 27 ES plasma cfDNA profiles using 4 differentially methylated regions (DMR) subsets (63 strong DMRs, top 30, top 15, and 10 promoter-proximal loci), 3 clustering algorithms (k-means, Ward hierarchical, PAM), and k=2-5 clusters, testing associations with tumor burden and progression. EV analysis involved antibody detection against ES surface markers, including LINGO1, ENPP1, CDH11, and CD99. Concentrations of EVs were determined by standardized and calibrated high-resolution flow cytometry then analyzed with custom-built software to automatically determine and apply gates. Samples were de-identified, randomly coded, and run in triplicates. The senior research technologist responsible for EV analysis was blinded to patient information and clinical data. Results: EV analysis included 36 pre-RT samples from 16 metastatic and 20 localized ES patients from a prospectively maintained biobank, with 27 pre-RT samples in the cfDNA analysis and 19 healthy donor (HD) samples. 35 of 36 patients had chemotherapy before sample collection. cfDNA concentrations were markedly elevated in ES patients compared with HD (24.4 vs 4.6 ng/mL, p&lt;0.0001), and 74% of ES samples exceeded the HD 95th-percentile detectability threshold (7.0 ng/mL). Across clustering configurations, ES cfDNA profiles consistently exhibited reproducible methylation substructure. One configuration (PAM clustering, k = 5, 63 strong DMRs) showed a modest but permutation-supported association with primary tumor size (nominal p ≈ 0.04; empirical p ≈ 0.03-0.04). ES samples had increased EV concentration compared to HD (p&lt;0.001), with AUC 0.988 for distinguishing between ES and HD ENPP1 (p&lt;0.0001). The highest ENPP1 EV values were in patients with large primary tumors (&gt;8 cm vs. ≤ 8cm) and metastatic disease (p=0.066). Conclusions: cfDNA- and EV-based liquid biopsy provide encouraging signals for high ES detectability pre-RT. We also show the first study of EVs as a novel biomarker in ES, which may provide complementary information to ctDNA. Multimodal liquid biopsy in ES may identify candidate patients for systemic or local therapy escalation and facilitate personalized care. Citation Format: Roman O. Kowalchuk, Lilli J. Greiner, Yohan Kim, Rubia Noori, Jeffrey Szymanski, William S. Harmsen, Pradeep S. Chauhan, Adam C. Amundson, Andrea M. McMahon, Peter J. Schoettler, Wendy A. Allen-Rhoades, Stephanie F. Polites, Peter S. Rose, Kelly M. Bailey, Linda M. McAllister-Lucas, Anita Mahajan, Fabrice Lucien-Matteoni, Nadia N. Laack, Aadel A. Chaudhuri. Multimodal liquid biopsy of Ewing sarcoma reveals high sensitivity prior to radiotherapy [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2026; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2026 Apr 17-22; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2026;86(7 Suppl):Abstract nr 1149.