Allen-Rhoades, Wendy A

ABSTRACT Background and Objectives Non‐rhabdomyosarcoma soft tissue sarcomas (NRSTS) account for less than 4% of pediatric cancers. Treatment and outcomes have been described in adults, but pediatric data are lacking. The purpose of this study is to review our institution's outcomes of extremity NRSTS in pediatric patients. Methods Ninety‐eight (56 male: 42 female) pediatric patients with NRSTS of the extremity at our institution were reviewed. Mean age at diagnosis was 11 ± 5 years, and mean follow‐up was 12 ± 10 years. The most common diagnosis was synovial sarcoma (27%), and 60% were high‐grade. Results Treatment included surgical resection in all patients, with 33% receiving radiation and 37% receiving systemic therapy. 20‐year local recurrence‐ (LRFS) and metastatic disease‐free survival (MDFS) were 91% and 91%, respectively, with 92% disease specific survival (DSS). High grade tumors were associated with lower LRFS ( p = 0.02) and DSS ( p = 0.03). Tumor size < 5 cm demonstrated improved MDFS ( p = 0.03), and stage 3 tumors showed worse MDFS ( p < 0.01). Conclusions Treatment of pediatric NRSTS was variable, with large, deep, high‐grade tumors more likely to receive neoadjuvant and adjuvant treatments. Multidisciplinary treatment was associated with high rates of local control and durable survival. This study provides an extended follow‐up of pediatric patients to identify late complications.

ABSTRACT Purpose We studied histologic Ewing sarcoma (ES) tumor response at local control surgery to explore associations between histologic response and chemotherapy practice changes over time and confirm its prognostic significance in the modern era. Methods We reviewed clinical data for 126 patients with ES treated at Mayo Clinic from 1977 to 2022, analyzing the percentage necrosis as a prognostic factor across chemotherapy regimens (including modern interval‐compressed VDC‐IE). Results In the historical cohort, 5‐year event‐free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) for patients with ≤5% versus greater than 5% viable tumor were 76% versus 59% ( p = 0.01) and 83% versus 62% ( p = 0.01). Review of 104 specimens by two pathologists identified the percentage remaining viable tumor as more reproducible than the percentage necrosis and/or fibrosis. On multivariable analysis of patients with localized disease ( n = 87), pelvic tumors and greater than 5% viable tumor remained independent risk factors for poor survival (EFS: hazard ratio [HR] 3.1, p < 0.01; OS: HR 2.1, p = 0.048). The modern cohort consisted of 22 patients. No patients with tumor size less than 8 cm at diagnosis and 100% necrosis after surgery had events; four of seven with tumors greater than 8 cm had events despite 100% necrosis. Conclusions Our results validate the historical threshold of greater than 5% viable tumor with older chemotherapy regimens but not with modern interval‐compressed VDC‐IE. In addition, inter‐rater reliability for the percentage viable is more reproducible than the percentage necrosis. Although numbers are small, tumors less than 8 cm with no viable tumor appear to be a favorable subgroup and suggest risk stratification using a combination of tumor size and any viable tumor should be evaluated in ES.

ABSTRACT Background Decision‐making (DM) dynamics between adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with cancer, parents, and oncologists remain underexplored in diverse populations. We examined cancer treatment DM preferences among an ethnically and socioeconomically diverse group of AYAs and their parents. Procedure We surveyed AYAs with cancer ( n = 75) and their parents ( n = 52) participating in the Texas KidsCanSeq study. Among AYA‐parent pairs, we compared preferred and actual treatment DM roles. We explored associations among DM roles, having pediatric‐to‐adult care transition discussions, and clinical and sociodemographic characteristics. We report AYAs’ and parents’ preferences for involvement in shared decision‐making (SDM) with oncologists about cancer treatment. Results AYAs’ DM role preferences varied: 44% preferred to equally share DM with parents, 31% preferred AYA‐led DM, and 25% preferred parent‐led DM. Parents who preferred parent‐led DM had younger AYAs than parents who preferred equally shared DM ( p = 0.011). For actual DM, 48% of AYAs reported DM was equally shared, 24% reported DM was AYA‐led, and 28% reported DM was parent‐led. Most AYAs had their preferred role (73%). AYAs’ actual role did not significantly differ from their own or their parents’ preferences (both p > 0.05). Approximately half of AYAs reported recent pediatric‐to‐adult care transition discussions. AYAs’ DM preferences and participation in transition discussions did not significantly differ along clinical or sociodemographic characteristics (all p > 0.05). AYAs and parents perceived high importance across all aspects of SDM with oncologists. Conclusion In this diverse study population, AYAs desired engagement in treatment DM and SDM. Although specific role preferences varied, opportunities existed to increase discussion around pediatric‐to‐adult care transition.

AbstractBackgroundPatients with alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma (ARMS) have inferior outcomes compared to patients with embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma (ERMS) and more effective chemotherapy options are needed for these patients. Vinorelbine is a semisynthetic vinca alkaloid that has clinical activity in relapsed rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) when used alone or in combination with cyclophosphamide.AimsThe goal of our study was to evaluate whether RMS histology subtype influences response rate to vinorelbine alone or in combination.Materials & MethodsFive Phase 2 trials that enrolled RMS patients were included in the meta‐analysis. Two studies evaluated vinorelbine alone, two studies evaluated vinorelbine in combination with low dose oral cyclophosphamide, and one study evaluated vinorelbine and intravenous cyclophosphamide in combination with temsirolimus or bevacizumab. All RMS patients had relapsed or refractory disease and had received at least one prior therapy. Response was reported according to RECIST1.1 and was defined as a complete or partial response. Response data was obtained from published results or from trial principal investigator. RMS NOS patients were grouped with ERMS patients for this analysis. Summary estimates comparing differences between ARMS and ERMS response rates were generated using a random‐effects model to account for heterogeneity among the studies.ResultsOne hundred fifty‐six enrolled patients evaluable for response were included in the meta‐analysis, 85 ARMS, 64 ERMS and 7 RMS‐NOS. The combined effect generated from the random‐effects model demonstrated a 41% increase (p = 0.001, 95% CI; 0.21–0.60) in response to vinorelbine as a single agent or in combination in patients with ARMS compared to patients with ERMS. There was no significant difference in the rate of progressive disease between patients with ARMS compared to ERMS (p = 0.1, 95%CI; −0.26–0.02).DiscussionVinorelbine is an active agent for the treatment of relapsed or refractory RMS and a meta‐analysis of Phase 2 studies shows that radiographic responses in patients with ARMS were significantly higher than ERMS or RMS‐NOS.ConclusionThese data support further investigation of vinorelbine in newly diagnosed patients with RMS particularly those with alveolar histology.

AbstractChildren and adolescents with rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) comprise a heterogeneous population with variable overall survival rates ranging between approximately 6% and 100% depending on defined risk factors. Although the risk stratification of patients has been refined across five decades of collaborative group studies, molecular prognostic biomarkers beyond FOXO1 fusion status have yet to be incorporated prospectively in upfront risk‐based therapy assignments. This review describes the evolution of risk‐based therapy and the current risk stratification, defines a new risk stratification incorporating novel biomarkers, and provides the rationale for the current and upcoming Children's Oncology Group RMS studies.

ARST1321, a trial of patients with advanced soft tissue sarcoma, was the first National Clinical Trials Network study codeveloped by pediatric and adult consortia with two treatment cohorts. We report on the findings of a survey to identify barriers to enrolling adolescent and young adult patients (15–39 years) onto the nonchemotherapy arm. The survey response rate was 31% with a 70% completion rate. Common identified reasons for low accrual in order of decreasing frequency included insufficient funding, lack of study awareness or interest, competing trials, toxicity concerns, philosophical differences in the therapy backbone, and regulatory and infrastructure barriers. Clinical Trials.gov ID: NCT02180867.