Noori, Rubia

5068 Background: 177 Lu-PSMA-617 (LuPSMA) is a groundbreaking therapy for mPC, but biomarkers are urgently needed to improve patient selection. Plasma-derived EVs are emerging blood-based markers of tumor burden. Here, we analyzed levels of EVs of 123 patients (pts) from 4 cohorts: a pre- and during LuPSMA treatment for a contemporary prospective Mayo Clinic cohort, pre-treatment plasma levels of EVs for a historical Tulane cohort, localized prostate cancer (LPC) after radical prostatectomy (RP), and male healthy donors (HD). Methods: Blood samples were collected from 51 pts pre-cycles (pre-C) 1-3 of LuPSMA at Mayo Clinic from 12/2024-12/2025 and 26 pts pre-C1 at Tulane Cancer Center between 12/2018-1/2025. Small and large EVs were incubated with fluorescently conjugated antibodies (PSMA, STEAP1, CEACAM5, and TROP2) and enumerated using nanoscale flow cytometry. EVs from blood samples of 10 HD and 36 LPC post-RP from 6/2020-8/2024 at Mayo Clinic as controls. AUC-ROC and logistic regression analyses were performed to identify marker signatures associated with PSA50 response. Results: Baseline demographics are shown in the table. Median levels of PSMA, STEAP1, CEACAM5, and TROP2 EV/milliliter (mL) were all significantly higher for pts with mPC (pooled Tulane and Mayo cohorts) compared to LPC post-RP (p<0.001) and HD (p<0.001). In the Mayo cohort, 10 of 51 pts (20%) had undetectable PSA pre-C1. There were no significant differences in median pre-C1 plasma EV levels for these 4 different types of EVs comparing pts with undetectable vs detectable PSA. For 41 Mayo pts with detectable PSA pre-C1, 20 achieved PSA50 response at time of data cutoff (49%), while 7 pts (17%) had persistent PSA rise on LuPSMA. For pts who achieved PSA50, there was a significant decline in both CEACAM5 and TROP2 EVs/mL pre-C1 compared to pre-C3 (19 x 10 6 vs 5.8 x 10 6 , p=0.003 and 16 x 10 6 vs 5.5 x 10 6 , p<0.001, respectively), while no significant changes occurred for the 7 pts with no PSA response. A composite score of pre-C1 CEACAM5 and TROP2 EVs (large- and small-sized EVs) demonstrated the strongest association with PSA50 response (OR=2.96, 95% CI: 1.27-6.44, p=0.038), achieving AUC of 0.73. PSMA and STEAP1 EVs did not show any significant changes from pre-C1 to pre-C3. Conclusions: Plasma-derived EVs are a promising biomarker to identify patients who will benefit from LuPSMA. Longer follow-up and enrolling a larger cohort are underway. Clinical trial information: NCT06200103 . Median values for pre-LuPSMA (Mayo and Tulane), post-RP for LPC, and HD. Mayo mPC (n=51) Tulane mPC (n=26) LPC (n=36) HD (n=10) Age (range) 73 (57-87) 71 (54-83) 66 (56-77) 55 (50-57) Prior lines (range) 1 (1-3) 4 (1-11) - - Gleason score 9 8 7 - PSA (range) 1.0 (0-182) 75 (0.8-503) - - PSMA EV/mL 3.7 x 10 6 14 x 10 6 2.0 x 10 6 1.4 x 10 6 STEAP1 EV/mL 30 x 10 6 45 x 10 6 12 x 10 6 12 x 10 6 CEACAM5 EV/mL 17 x 10 6 5.1 x 10 6 3.7 x 10 6 3.9 x 10 6 TROP2 EV/mL 13 x 10 6 5.2 x 10 6 4.5 x 10 6 3.6 x 10 6

Abstract Introduction: Detectable circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is associated with inferior outcomes in Ewing sarcoma (ES); however, ctDNA clears in nearly all patients within 2 of the 6 chemotherapy cycles before radiotherapy (RT) or surgery. Given a 3-year EFS of 37% on AEWS 1221 (metastatic) and 5-year EFS of 78% on AEWS 1031 (localized), current ctDNA testing fails to predict most relapses. Extracellular vesicles (EVs) are microscopic particles studied as a biomarker in multiple cancer types. We hope to improve the sensitivity of ctDNA in ES and provide the first application of EVs in ES. Methods: cfDNA was isolated from 1mL plasma, quantified by Qubit, and sequenced as NEBNext Enzymatic Methyl-seq v2 libraries. We performed a systematic unsupervised clustering analysis of 27 ES plasma cfDNA profiles using 4 differentially methylated regions (DMR) subsets (63 strong DMRs, top 30, top 15, and 10 promoter-proximal loci), 3 clustering algorithms (k-means, Ward hierarchical, PAM), and k=2-5 clusters, testing associations with tumor burden and progression. EV analysis involved antibody detection against ES surface markers, including LINGO1, ENPP1, CDH11, and CD99. Concentrations of EVs were determined by standardized and calibrated high-resolution flow cytometry then analyzed with custom-built software to automatically determine and apply gates. Samples were de-identified, randomly coded, and run in triplicates. The senior research technologist responsible for EV analysis was blinded to patient information and clinical data. Results: EV analysis included 36 pre-RT samples from 16 metastatic and 20 localized ES patients from a prospectively maintained biobank, with 27 pre-RT samples in the cfDNA analysis and 19 healthy donor (HD) samples. 35 of 36 patients had chemotherapy before sample collection. cfDNA concentrations were markedly elevated in ES patients compared with HD (24.4 vs 4.6 ng/mL, p&lt;0.0001), and 74% of ES samples exceeded the HD 95th-percentile detectability threshold (7.0 ng/mL). Across clustering configurations, ES cfDNA profiles consistently exhibited reproducible methylation substructure. One configuration (PAM clustering, k = 5, 63 strong DMRs) showed a modest but permutation-supported association with primary tumor size (nominal p ≈ 0.04; empirical p ≈ 0.03-0.04). ES samples had increased EV concentration compared to HD (p&lt;0.001), with AUC 0.988 for distinguishing between ES and HD ENPP1 (p&lt;0.0001). The highest ENPP1 EV values were in patients with large primary tumors (&gt;8 cm vs. ≤ 8cm) and metastatic disease (p=0.066). Conclusions: cfDNA- and EV-based liquid biopsy provide encouraging signals for high ES detectability pre-RT. We also show the first study of EVs as a novel biomarker in ES, which may provide complementary information to ctDNA. Multimodal liquid biopsy in ES may identify candidate patients for systemic or local therapy escalation and facilitate personalized care. Citation Format: Roman O. Kowalchuk, Lilli J. Greiner, Yohan Kim, Rubia Noori, Jeffrey Szymanski, William S. Harmsen, Pradeep S. Chauhan, Adam C. Amundson, Andrea M. McMahon, Peter J. Schoettler, Wendy A. Allen-Rhoades, Stephanie F. Polites, Peter S. Rose, Kelly M. Bailey, Linda M. McAllister-Lucas, Anita Mahajan, Fabrice Lucien-Matteoni, Nadia N. Laack, Aadel A. Chaudhuri. Multimodal liquid biopsy of Ewing sarcoma reveals high sensitivity prior to radiotherapy [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2026; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2026 Apr 17-22; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2026;86(7 Suppl):Abstract nr 1149.

214 Background: 177 Lu-PSMA-617 (LuPSMA) has revolutionized care for patients (pts) with metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), but only half achieves PSA decline ≥50%. Biomarkers are urgently needed to improve pt selection. EVs and ctDNA released by cancer cells into the blood are emerging biomarkers to estimate overall tumor burden and capture tumor heterogeneity in mCRPC. Here, we analyzed pre-treatment plasma levels of tumor EVs and ctDNA in a pilot cohort of 35 pts with mCRPC treated with LuPSMA. Methods: Blood samples were collected pre-cycle 1 of LuPSMA at Tulane Cancer Center between 12/2018-1/2025. Plasma-derived small and large EVs were incubated with fluorescently conjugated antibodies and enumerated using nanoscale flow cytometry. ctDNA fraction was estimated from plasma cfDNA methylation WGS (∼10×) with ichorCNA. We also analyzed EVs from blood samples of male healthy donors (HD) and pts with localized prostate cancer (LPC) collected 1 day to 8 months after radical prostatectomy (post-RP) from 6/2020-8/2024 at Mayo Clinic as controls. Results: Median age at collection for 10 HD was 55 yrs and for 36 pts with LPC post-RP was 65 yrs. Median PSMA+ EV level was 2.0 x 10 6 /mL for post-RP and 1.4 x 10 6 /mL for HD. For 35 pts with mCRPC, 25 pts had complete data for analysis. Median PSMA+ EV level was 1.4 x 10 7 /mL, significantly higher than post-RP (p<0.001) and HD (p<0.001). At LuPSMA start, median age was 69 yrs (range 54-83), PSA was 82 ng/mL (range 0.8-503), median time from CRPC diagnosis to start was 50 months (range 6.9-285), median time from plasma collection to treatment initiation was 0.5 months (range 0-7.3). Median number of prior lines of life-extending therapy was 4 (range 1-11), including 100% androgen receptor pathway inhibitor and 75% docetaxel. Pts received median 4 cycles of LuPSMA. Median ctDNA fraction was 14.0% (range 0-51.1). Median time to reach nadir PSA for pts with any decline was 2.6 months. 15 pts (60%) achieved PSA40 (defined ≥40% decline in PSA from start to nadir) (range -99% to -42%) compared to 10 pts (40%) who did not (range -16% to rise), which predicted better median overall survival (OS) after LuPSMA start (40.7 v 6.0 months; HR 0.23, 95% CI, 0.07-0.71; p=0.0001). Pts were classified as LuPSMA responders using PSA40. Responders had a lower ratio of large to small PSMA+ EVs (0.30 v 0.53, p=0.0042) with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.83 (95% CI, 0.68-0.99), and a lower median ctDNA fraction (6.1% v 26.2%, p=0.0044) with an AUC of 0.83 (95% CI, 0.68-1.00). Incorporating both PSMA+ EV and ctDNA fraction together predicted PSA40 response with an AUC of 0.93 (95% CI, 0.84-1.00, p=0.0003). Conclusions: Using pre-LuPSMA plasma samples from a heavily pre-treated historical cohort, we integrated non-invasive liquid biopsy methods to successfully predict response to LuPSMA using PSA decline. Prospective validation is underway.