Laack, N.

Abstract Background Vorasidenib is Food and Drug Administration‐approved for treatment of grade 2 isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH)–mutant gliomas and has demonstrated a benefit in progression‐free survival compared to a placebo. This study assessed the cost‐effectiveness of this treatment strategy compared to standard treatment: observation or chemoradiation (CRT). Methods The authors used an integrated Markov model to compare quality‐adjusted life‐years (QALY) gained and cost‐effectiveness of patients with IDH‐mutated low‐grade glioma (LGG) treated with vorasidenib, observation, or CRT. Outcomes were expressed as incremental cost‐effectiveness ratios (ICERs) per QALY gained. Treatment is considered cost‐effective if it meets the commonly accepted willingness‐to‐pay threshold of $100,000 per QALY gained. Results Based on model parameters, vorasidenib demonstrated an ICER of $356,756 per QALY when compared to CRT. When compared to observation, vorasidenib demonstrated an improved ICER of $215,191 per QALY. On one‐way sensitivity analysis compared to observation, median cost of vorasidenib and median overall survival were most likely to affect ICER with only marginal changes on analysis of other model factors. For ICER to become ≤$100,000 compared to observation, the cost of vorasidenib would need to drop to below $14,072 monthly or have a median survival gain of at least 11.9 years. The probabilistic sensitivity analysis demonstrated that vorasidenib was favored in none of 5000 Monte Carlo iterations. Conclusion Using the best available data, the current price of vorasidenib does not meet commonly accepted cost‐effectiveness thresholds in treatment of IDH‐mutated LGGs.

Abstract Introduction: Detectable circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is associated with inferior outcomes in Ewing sarcoma (ES); however, ctDNA clears in nearly all patients within 2 of the 6 chemotherapy cycles before radiotherapy (RT) or surgery. Given a 3-year EFS of 37% on AEWS 1221 (metastatic) and 5-year EFS of 78% on AEWS 1031 (localized), current ctDNA testing fails to predict most relapses. Extracellular vesicles (EVs) are microscopic particles studied as a biomarker in multiple cancer types. We hope to improve the sensitivity of ctDNA in ES and provide the first application of EVs in ES. Methods: cfDNA was isolated from 1mL plasma, quantified by Qubit, and sequenced as NEBNext Enzymatic Methyl-seq v2 libraries. We performed a systematic unsupervised clustering analysis of 27 ES plasma cfDNA profiles using 4 differentially methylated regions (DMR) subsets (63 strong DMRs, top 30, top 15, and 10 promoter-proximal loci), 3 clustering algorithms (k-means, Ward hierarchical, PAM), and k=2-5 clusters, testing associations with tumor burden and progression. EV analysis involved antibody detection against ES surface markers, including LINGO1, ENPP1, CDH11, and CD99. Concentrations of EVs were determined by standardized and calibrated high-resolution flow cytometry then analyzed with custom-built software to automatically determine and apply gates. Samples were de-identified, randomly coded, and run in triplicates. The senior research technologist responsible for EV analysis was blinded to patient information and clinical data. Results: EV analysis included 36 pre-RT samples from 16 metastatic and 20 localized ES patients from a prospectively maintained biobank, with 27 pre-RT samples in the cfDNA analysis and 19 healthy donor (HD) samples. 35 of 36 patients had chemotherapy before sample collection. cfDNA concentrations were markedly elevated in ES patients compared with HD (24.4 vs 4.6 ng/mL, p<0.0001), and 74% of ES samples exceeded the HD 95th-percentile detectability threshold (7.0 ng/mL). Across clustering configurations, ES cfDNA profiles consistently exhibited reproducible methylation substructure. One configuration (PAM clustering, k = 5, 63 strong DMRs) showed a modest but permutation-supported association with primary tumor size (nominal p ≈ 0.04; empirical p ≈ 0.03-0.04). ES samples had increased EV concentration compared to HD (p<0.001), with AUC 0.988 for distinguishing between ES and HD ENPP1 (p<0.0001). The highest ENPP1 EV values were in patients with large primary tumors (>8 cm vs. ≤ 8cm) and metastatic disease (p=0.066). Conclusions: cfDNA- and EV-based liquid biopsy provide encouraging signals for high ES detectability pre-RT. We also show the first study of EVs as a novel biomarker in ES, which may provide complementary information to ctDNA. Multimodal liquid biopsy in ES may identify candidate patients for systemic or local therapy escalation and facilitate personalized care. Citation Format: Roman O. Kowalchuk, Lilli J. Greiner, Yohan Kim, Rubia Noori, Jeffrey Szymanski, William S. Harmsen, Pradeep S. Chauhan, Adam C. Amundson, Andrea M. McMahon, Peter J. Schoettler, Wendy A. Allen-Rhoades, Stephanie F. Polites, Peter S. Rose, Kelly M. Bailey, Linda M. McAllister-Lucas, Anita Mahajan, Fabrice Lucien-Matteoni, Nadia N. Laack, Aadel A. Chaudhuri. Multimodal liquid biopsy of Ewing sarcoma reveals high sensitivity prior to radiotherapy [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2026; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2026 Apr 17-22; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2026;86(7 Suppl):Abstract nr 1149.