Back to Authors

Van Driest, Sara L

0000-0003-2580-1405

Mayo Clinic

Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville TN (A.M.G., G.D., C.M.S., E.H.F.-E., T.Y., A.M., J.D.M., S.L.V.D., Q.S.W., L.L.S., O.R.K., Y.W., S.B., Z.T.Y., D.W.M., B.M.K., W.-Q.W., M.B.S., D.M.R.).

Citations 2

Arrhythmia Variant Associations and Reclassifications in the eMERGE-III Sequencing Study
Glazer, Andrew M. , Davogustto, Giovanni , Shaffer, Christian M., Desai, Reshma R. , Farber‐Eger, Eric , Dikilitas, Ozan , Shang, Ning , Muhammad, Ayesha , Shaffer, Lauren Lee, Kalash, Olivia R., Bland, Harris T. , Yoneda, Zachary T. , Mitchell, Devyn , Kroncke, Brett M. , Jarvik, Gail P. , Gordon, Allan , Larson, Eric B. , Manolio, Teri A. , Luo, Jonathan Z. , Schaid, Daniel J. , Namjou, Bahram , Singhal, Ashutosh , Liu, Cong , Ralston, James D. , Leppig, Kathleen A. , Håkonarson, Håkon , Sleiman, Patrick , Sohn, Sunghwan , Network, the eMERGE, Denny, Joshua C. , Wei, Wei‐Qi, Shoemaker, M. Benjamin , Roden, Dan M. , Ralston, James D. , Farber-Eger, Eric H , Dikilitas, Ozan , Mosley, Jonathan D , Van Driest, Sara L , Wells, Quinn S , Wada, Yuko , Yoneda, Zachary T , Kroncke, Brett M , Kullo, Iftikhar J , Jarvik, Gail P , Gordon, Adam S , Manolio, Teri A , Mirshahi, Tooraj , Schaid, Daniel, Alsaied, Tarek , Hripcsak, George , McNally, Elizabeth M , Sohn, Sunghwan , Glessner, Joseph , Wei, Wei-Qi , George, Alfred L , Shoemaker, M Benjamin , Roden, Dan M. , Hakonarson, Hakon , Denny, Joshua C , Bland, Sarah T , Liu, Cong , Glazer, Andrew M , Vanoye, Carlos G. , Pacheco, Jennifer A. , Yang, Tao , Driest, Sara L. Van , Wells, Quinn S. , Wada, Yuko , Kullo, Iftikhar J. , Singh, Rajbir , Weng, Chunhua , McNally, Elizabeth M. , Chung, Wendy K. , Carrell, David , Network, the eMERGE, George, Alfred L.

Circulation | December 21, 2021 | Volume: 145 | Issue: 12 | Pages: 877-891

10.1161/circulationaha.121.055562 Get It

Background: Sequencing Mendelian arrhythmia genes in individuals without an indication for arrhythmia genetic testing can identify carriers of pathogenic or likely pathogenic (P/LP) variants. However, the extent to which these variants are associated with clinically meaningful phenotypes before or after return of variant results is unclear. In addition, the majority of discovered variants are currently classified as variants of uncertain significance, limiting clinical actionability. Methods: The eMERGE-III study (Electronic Medical Records and Genomics Phase III) is a multicenter prospective cohort that included 21 846 participants without previous indication for cardiac genetic testing. Participants were sequenced for 109 Mendelian disease genes, including 10 linked to arrhythmia syndromes. Variant carriers were assessed with electronic health record–derived phenotypes and follow-up clinical examination. Selected variants of uncertain significance (n=50) were characterized in vitro with automated electrophysiology experiments in HEK293 cells. Results: As previously reported, 3.0% of participants had P/LP variants in the 109 genes. Herein, we report 120 participants (0.6%) with P/LP arrhythmia variants. Compared with noncarriers, arrhythmia P/LP carriers had a significantly higher burden of arrhythmia phenotypes in their electronic health records. Fifty-four participants had variant results returned. Nineteen of these 54 participants had inherited arrhythmia syndrome diagnoses (primarily long-QT syndrome), and 12 of these 19 diagnoses were made only after variant results were returned (0.05%). After in vitro functional evaluation of 50 variants of uncertain significance, we reclassified 11 variants: 3 to likely benign and 8 to P/LP. Conclusions: Genome sequencing in a large population without indication for arrhythmia genetic testing identified phenotype-positive carriers of variants in congenital arrhythmia syndrome disease genes. As the genomes of large numbers of people are sequenced, the disease risk from rare variants in arrhythmia genes can be assessed by integrating genomic screening, electronic health record phenotypes, and in vitro functional studies. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier; NCT03394859.
Returning Results in the Genomic Era: Initial Experiences of the eMERGE Network
Wiesner, Georgia L. , Appelbaum, Paul S. , Aufox, Sharon , Bland, Harris T. , Zawatsky, Carrie L. Blout , Clayton, Ellen Wright , Harr, Margaret , Henrikson, Nora B. , Hoell, Christin , Holm, Ingrid A. , Jarvik, Gail P. , Lammers, Philip E. , Larson, Eric B. , Lindor, Noralane M. , Marasà, Maddalena , Myers, Melanie F. , Peterson, Josh F. , Prows, Cynthia A. , Ralston, James D. , Rasouly, Hila Milo , Sharp, Richard R. , Smith, Maureen E. , Driest, Sara L. Van , Williams, Janet L. , Wynn, Julia , Leppig, Kathleen A. , Appelbaum, Paul , Bland, Sarah T , Clayton, Ellen Wright , Henrikson, Nora , Holm, Ingrid A , Milo Rasouly, Hila , Sharp, Richard R , Smith, Maureen E , Van Driest, Sara L , Williams, Janet L , Myers, Melanie F , Jarvik, Gail P , Peterson, Josh F , Marasa, Maddalena , Hoell, Christin , Rahm, Alanna Kulchak , Christensen, Kurt D. , Chung, Wendy K. , Green, Robert C. , Kullo, Iftikhar J. , Williams, Marc S

Journal of Personalized Medicine | April 28, 2020 | Volume: 10 | Issue: 2 | Pages: 30

10.3390/jpm10020030 Get It

A goal of the 3rd phase of the Electronic Medical Records and Genomics (eMERGE3) Network was to examine the return of results (RoR) of actionable variants in more than 100 genes to consenting participants and their healthcare providers. Each of the 10 eMERGE sites developed plans for three essential elements of the RoR process: Disclosure to the participant, notification of the health care provider, and integration of results into the electronic health record (EHR). Procedures and protocols around these three elements were adapted as appropriate to individual site requirements and limitations. Detailed information about the RoR procedures at each site was obtained through structured telephone interviews and follow-up surveys with the clinical investigator leading or participating in the RoR process at each eMERGE3 institution. Because RoR processes at each of the 10 sites allowed for taking into account differences in population, disease focus and institutional requirements, significant heterogeneity of process was identified, including variability in the order in which patients and clinicians were notified and results were placed in the EHR. This heterogeneity in the process flow for eMERGE3 RoR reflects the “real world” of genomic medicine in which RoR procedures must be shaped by the needs of the patients and institutional environments.