Clayton, Ellen Wright

Background: Susceptibility to cardiometabolic diseases (CDs) is shaped by genetic, socio-environmental, and lifestyle factors. We evaluated the associations of disease-specific polysocial risk scores (PSSs)— derived from social determinants of health (SDOH) and lifestyle factors—and genetic risk factors with six CDs, across self-identified race/ethnicity (SIRE) groups in the eMERGE IV cohort. Methods: The six CDs included: atrial fibrillation, coronary heart disease, chronic kidney disease, hyperlipidemia, obesity, and type 2 diabetes. Disease-specific PSSs were developed using machine-learning models based on 65 SDOH and lifestyle factors. Participants were grouped based on their SIRE as Asian, Black, Hispanic/Latino, and White. We evaluated PSS distributions across SIRE groups. Genetic risk was assessed through disease-specific polygenic risk scores (PRSs), monogenic etiologies, and family history (FamHx). High PSS and high PRS were defined as the top 5th percentile. Associations were tested using multivariable logistic regression; model performance was assessed using the C-statistic. Results: Among 20178 participants (50±15 years, 68% female, 40% non-White), the most frequently associated PSS components were physical activity, sleep, self-perceived health, and income. PSS distributions varied across SIRE groups, with Whites having the lowest and Black and Hispanic/Latinos the highest scores for most CDs (Figure 1). All PSSs were significantly associated with their respective CDs, independent of confounders (OR per 1 SD increase: 1.19–2.68; Figure 2-A). No significant interactions were observed between PSSs and PRSs or monogenic etiologies. However, significant interactions were noted between PSSs and FamHx for CKD and obesity. PSS and PRS effects on the odds of CDs were independent (Figure 2-B) and additive (Figure 2-C). Incorporating PSSs into models that included clinical and genetic risk factors improved predictive performance of risk prediction models (Figure 3). Conclusion: PSSs, reflecting socio-environmental and lifestyle disadvantage, varied significantly across SIRE groups and were associated with risk of six CDs, independent of and additive to PRS. Given the substantial variation in socio-environmental and lifestyle risks across SIRE groups, integrating these factors into risk prediction models for CDs may help address health disparities and enhance preventive efforts, especially in marginalized populations.

Purpose: The electronic Medical Records and Genomics (eMERGE) Phase III study was undertaken to assess clinical utility of returning medically actionable genomic screening results. We assessed pediatric clinical outcomes following return of pathogenic/likely pathogenic (P/LP) variants in autosomal dominant conditions with available effective interventions. Methods: The two eMERGE III pediatric sites collected outcome data and assessed changes in medical management at 6 and 12 months. Results: We returned P/LP results to 29 participants with outcome data. For 23 of the 29 participants, the P/LP results were previously unknown. Five of the 23 participants were already followed for conditions related to the P/LP variant. Of those receiving novel results and not being followed for the condition related to the P/LP result (n = 18), 14 (77.8%) had a change in healthcare after return of results (RoR). Following RoR, cascade testing of family members occurred for 10 of 23 (43.5%). Conclusions: The most common outcomes post-RoR included imaging/laboratory testing and health behavior recommendations. A change in healthcare was documented in 77.8% of those receiving results by 6 months. Our findings demonstrate how return of genomic screening results impacts healthcare in pediatric populations.

Abstract The public health impact of genomic screening can be enhanced by cascade testing. However, cascade testing depends on communication of results to family members. While the barriers and facilitators of family communication have been researched following clinical genetic testing, the factors impacting the dissemination of genomic screening results are unknown. Using the pragmatic Electronic Medical Records and Genomics Network‐3 (eMERGE‐3) study, we explored the reported sharing practices of participants who underwent genomic screening across the United States. Six eMERGE‐3 sites returned genomic screening results for mostly dominant medically actionable disorders and surveyed adult participants regarding communication of results with first‐degree relatives. Across the sites, 279 participants completed a 1‐month and/or 6‐month post‐results survey. By 6 months, only 34% of the 156 respondents shared their results with all first‐degree relatives and 4% did not share with any. Over a third (39%) first‐degree relatives were not notified of the results. Half (53%) of participants who received their results from a genetics provider shared them with all first‐degree relatives compared with 11% of participants who received their results from a non‐genetics provider. The most frequent reasons for sharing were a feeling of obligation (72%) and that the information could help family members make medical decisions (72%). The most common reasons indicated for not sharing were that the family members were too young (38%), or they were not in contact (25%) or not close to them (25%). These data indicate that the professional returning the results may impact sharing patterns, suggesting that there is a need to continue to educate healthcare providers regarding approaches to facilitate sharing of genetic results within families. Finally, these data suggest that interventions to increase sharing may be universally effective regardless of the origin of the genetic result.

A goal of the 3rd phase of the Electronic Medical Records and Genomics (eMERGE3) Network was to examine the return of results (RoR) of actionable variants in more than 100 genes to consenting participants and their healthcare providers. Each of the 10 eMERGE sites developed plans for three essential elements of the RoR process: Disclosure to the participant, notification of the health care provider, and integration of results into the electronic health record (EHR). Procedures and protocols around these three elements were adapted as appropriate to individual site requirements and limitations. Detailed information about the RoR procedures at each site was obtained through structured telephone interviews and follow-up surveys with the clinical investigator leading or participating in the RoR process at each eMERGE3 institution. Because RoR processes at each of the 10 sites allowed for taking into account differences in population, disease focus and institutional requirements, significant heterogeneity of process was identified, including variability in the order in which patients and clinicians were notified and results were placed in the EHR. This heterogeneity in the process flow for eMERGE3 RoR reflects the “real world” of genomic medicine in which RoR procedures must be shaped by the needs of the patients and institutional environments.

Abstract Objective We describe a stratified sampling design that combines electronic health records (EHRs) and United States Census (USC) data to construct the sampling frame and an algorithm to enrich the sample with individuals belonging to rarer strata. Materials and Methods This design was developed for a multi-site survey that sought to examine patient concerns about and barriers to participating in research studies, especially among under-studied populations (eg, minorities, low educational attainment). We defined sampling strata by cross-tabulating several socio-demographic variables obtained from EHR and augmented with census-block-level USC data. We oversampled rarer and historically underrepresented subpopulations. Results The sampling strategy, which included USC-supplemented EHR data, led to a far more diverse sample than would have been expected under random sampling (eg, 3-, 8-, 7-, and 12-fold increase in African Americans, Asians, Hispanics and those with less than a high school degree, respectively). We observed that our EHR data tended to misclassify minority races more often than majority races, and that non-majority races, Latino ethnicity, younger adult age, lower education, and urban/suburban living were each associated with lower response rates to the mailed surveys. Discussion We observed substantial enrichment from rarer subpopulations. The magnitude of the enrichment depends on the accuracy of the variables that define the sampling strata and the overall response rate. Conclusion EHR and USC data may be used to define sampling strata that in turn may be used to enrich the final study sample. This design may be of particular interest for studies of rarer and understudied populations.