Tao, Shengzhen

BackgroundDistortion‐free, high‐resolution diffusion imaging using DIADEM (Distortion‐free Imaging: A Double Encoding Method), proposed recently, has great potential for clinical applications. However, it can suffer from prolonged scan times and its reliability for quantitative diffusion imaging has not been evaluated.PurposeTo investigate the clinical feasibility of DIADEM‐based high‐resolution diffusion imaging on a novel compact 3T (C3T) by evaluating the reliability of quantitative diffusion measurements and utilizing both the high‐performance gradients (80 mT/m, 700 T/m/s) and the sequence optimization with the navigator acquisition window reduction and simultaneous multislice (multiband) imaging.Study TypeProspective feasibility study.Phantom/SubjectsDiffusion quality control phantom scans to evaluate the reliability of quantitative diffusion measurements; 36 normal control scans for B0‐field mapping; six healthy and two patient subject scans with a brain tumor for comparisons of diffusion and anatomical imaging.Field Strength/Sequence3T; the standard single‐shot echo‐planar‐imaging (EPI), multishot DIADEM diffusion, and anatomical (2D‐FSE [fast‐spin‐echo], 2D‐FLAIR [fluid‐attenuated‐inversion‐recovery], and 3D‐MPRAGE [magnetization prepared rapid acquisition gradient echo]) imaging.AssessmentThe scan time reduction, the reliability of quantitative diffusion measurements, and the clinical efficacy for high‐resolution diffusion imaging in healthy control and brain tumor volunteers.Statistical TestBland–Altman analysis.ResultsThe scan time for high in‐plane (0.86 mm2) resolution, distortion‐free, and whole brain diffusion imaging were reduced from 10 to 5 minutes with the sequence optimizations. All of the mean apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values in phantom were within the 95% confidence interval in the Bland–Altman plot. The proposed acquisition with a total off‐resonance coverage of 597.2 Hz wider than the expected bandwidth of 500 Hz in human brain could yield a distortion‐free image without foldover artifacts. Compared with EPI, therefore, this approach allowed direct image matching with the anatomical images and enabled improved delineation of the tumor boundaries.Data ConclusionThe proposed high‐resolution diffusion imaging approach is clinically feasible on C3T due to a combination of hardware and sequence improvements.Level of Evidence3Technical EfficacyStage 1 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2020;51:296–310.

BackgroundGradient nonlinearity (GNL) leads to biased apparent diffusion coefficients (ADCs) in diffusion‐weighted imaging. A gradient nonlinearity correction (GNLC) method has been developed for whole body systems, but is yet to be tested for the new compact 3T (C3T) scanner, which exhibits more complex GNL due to its asymmetrical design.PurposeTo assess the improvement of ADC quantification with GNLC for the C3T scanner.Study TypePhantom measurements and retrospective analysis of patient data.Phantom/SubjectsA diffusion quality control phantom with vials containing 0–30% polyvinylpyrrolidone in water was used. For in vivo data, 12 patient exams were analyzed (median age, 33).Field Strength/SequenceImaging was performed on the C3T and two commercial 3T scanners. A clinical DWI (repetition time [TR] = 10,000 msec, echo time [TE] = minimum, b = 1000 s/mm2) sequence was used for phantom imaging and 10 patient cases and a clinical DTI (TR = 6000–10,000 msec, TE = minimum, b = 1000 s/mm2) sequence was used for two patient cases.AssessmentThe 0% vial was measured along three orthogonal axes, and at two different temperatures. The ADC for each concentration was compared between the C3T and two whole‐body scanners. Cerebrospinal fluid and white matter ADCs were quantified for each patient and compared to values in literature.Statistical TestsPaired t‐test and two‐way analysis of variance (ANOVA).ResultsFor all PVP concentrations, the corrected ADC was within 2.5% of the reference ADC. On average, the ADC of cerebrospinal fluid and white matter post‐GNLC were within 1% and 6%, respectively, of values reported in the literature and were significantly different from the uncorrected data (P < 0.05).Data ConclusionThis study demonstrated that GNL effects were more severe for the C3T due to the asymmetric gradient design, but our implementation of a GNLC compensated for these effects, resulting in ADC values that are in good agreement with values from the literature.Level of Evidence: 4Technical Efficacy: Stage 2J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2018;48:1498–1507