Jairath, V

Abstract Background The expanding use of biologic and small-molecule therapies for ulcerative colitis (UC) has raised concerns regarding perioperative safety. We conducted a network meta-analysis to compare short-term postoperative complications associated with preoperative exposure to these agents in patients undergoing colorectal surgery. Methods We systematically searched PubMed, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library through September 15, 2025, for cohort studies of adults with UC who were exposed to biologic or small-molecule therapy within 12 weeks prior to surgery. Interventions included biologic therapy, small-molecule therapy, and no biologic or small-molecule therapy (control). The primary outcome was overall postoperative complications at 30 and 90 days. Venous thromboembolism (VTE) was assessed as a key secondary outcome. Random-effects network meta-analysis was performed using risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results Sixteen retrospective cohort studies involving 3235 patients were included. At 30 days, ustekinumab and tofacitinib were associated with lower overall postoperative complication rates than control (RR: 0.29; 95% CI: 0.09-0.96; and RR: 0.66; 95% CI: 0.46-0.96, respectively). Anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) therapy was associated with higher complication rates compared with vedolizumab, ustekinumab, and tofacitinib at 30 days (RR: 1.27; 95% CI: 1.00-1.63; RR: 3.67; 95% CI: 1.12-12.03; and RR: 1.61; 95% CI: 1.14-2.27, respectively). At 90 days, anti-TNF therapy was associated with higher complication rates than control (RR 1.20, 95% CI 1.03-1.40), although the 90-day analysis was based on limited data. VTE rates were similar across treatments at both time points. Conclusion Preoperative ustekinumab and tofacitinib were associated with fewer 30-day postoperative complications than control or anti-TNF therapy, while vedolizumab was associated with fewer complications than anti-TNF therapy. At 90 days, anti-TNF therapy was associated with higher complication rates compared with control. These findings, particularly at 90 days based on limited data, should be interpreted with caution and require confirmation in well-designed prospective studies with rigorous adjustment for confounding factors.

Abstract Introduction Despite regulatory mandates for advanced therapy (AT) washout periods of up to 5 drug half-lives before enrolling patients in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) trials, the evidence base for these requirements is largely empirical, and whether shorter intervals independently increase the risk of serious infections in real-world practice remains unknown. Methods Using the OptumLabs Data Warehouse, we identified adult patients with IBD who initiated a new AT (tumor necrosis factor antagonists, vedolizumab, interleukin (IL)-12/23 or IL-23 antagonists, or Janus kinase inhibitors) between 2018 and 2023 using a class-specific new-user design. We examined whether exposure to AT within the preceding 12 months (vs no exposure to AT within that window) and timing of discontinuation (≤1 month, 1-<3 months, or 3-12 months) were associated with risk of serious infections using multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression. Results Among 21 564 AT initiators (47 ± 18 years; 52% female; 57% Crohn’s disease), 7490 (34.7%) had AT exposure within the preceding 12 months. Over a mean follow-up of 1.6 ± 0.9 y, 1955 (9.1%) experienced a serious infection. Prior AT exposure was associated with higher infection risk (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.19, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.07-1.33), consistent in inverse probability of treatment-weighted analyses (HR, 1.20 [1.06-1.37]). Among patients with prior exposure, timing of discontinuation was not associated with infection risk (HR, 1.17 [0.95-1.43] for ≤1 month vs 3-12 months; HR, 1.01 [0.83-1.22] for 1-<3 months), with no dose–response relationship on continuous modeling. Discussion AT exposure within the preceding 12 months is associated with modestly higher risk of serious infection after initiating a new AT in IBD, but timing of discontinuation does not independently influence this risk.

Abstract Introduction Despite progress in understanding placebo effects in clinical trials of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), there is a limited understanding of how socioeconomic factors of recruiting countries impact placebo rates. We investigated the association of socioeconomic factors across recruitment sites on placebo rates in IBD randomized controlled trials. Methods We examined the association of clinical and endoscopic remission and response to the weighted Gross National Index (GNI) per capita, Human Development Index (HDI), and out-of-pocket health expenditures as a percentage of current health expenditures (OOP_CHE) of identified trials using mixed effects linear regression. Results Across 76 trials (Crohn’s disease [CD]: n = 32; ulcerative colitis [UC]: n = 44), placebo response rates over time were largely stable, with a small increase across time in clinical remission for CD trials (β = 0.4% per increase in study year, 95% CI: 0.3%-0.84%, P = .04) and a small decrease across time in endoscopic response for UC trials (β = −1.39% per increase in study year, 95% CI: −1.79, −0.99, P < .001). Clinical response was most susceptible to changes in socioeconomic factors in IBD trials (β = −2.96% per 10 000 USD increase in study GNI, 95% CI: −4.98, −0.95%, P = .004; P < .05 for HDI and OOP_CHE). Across both conditions, decreases in clinical response were associated with increases in HDI and OOP_CHE (CD HDI: β = −1.15% per 0.01 increase in study HDI, 95% CI: −2.24, −0.06%, P = .04; UC HDI: β = −0.66% per 0.01 increase in study HDI, 95% CI: −1.19, −0.12%, P = .02). Discussion We found that placebo clinical response was most susceptible to influences of site-level socioeconomic wellbeing. These findings highlight that estimation of placebo rates in trial planning should account for geographic location of recruiting sites.

Abstract Background Upper gastrointestinal Crohn’s disease (UGICD) is an uncommon phenotype with limited management guidelines. We reviewed evidence on the safety and efficacy of pharmacological interventions for UGICD. Methods We searched MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane CENTRAL (1990-2025) for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and comparative observational studies evaluating pharmacological or dietary interventions for UGICD, including esophagus to jejunum. Two reviewers screened studies, extracted data, and assessed bias (Newcastle–Ottawa Scale). Primary outcomes were clinical remission and response. Due to limited, heterogeneous evidence, data are summarized descriptively. Results Of 1207 citations, 11 observational studies (nine retrospective, two prospective) and post-hoc analyses from two RCTs met the criteria, involving 387 patients. Most had ileocolonic involvement (280/387; 72.3%); only 8.5% (33/387) had isolated UGICD. Five studies (137 patients) reported esophageal CD. Follow-up ranged from 6 weeks to 28 years. Interventions and outcomes varied. Anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) drugs and corticosteroids, alone or combined with other treatments, were associated with improvements in clinical outcomes, endoscopic healing, and histology, but controlled data are lacking. Other therapies, including proton pump inhibitors, H2-receptor antagonists, enteric nutrition, immunomodulators, anti-integrins, and anti-interleukin12/23, showed moderate to minimal improvement. Conclusions Our systematic review highlights a paucity of evidence to inform therapeutic strategies in UGICD. Positive outcomes were reported for corticosteroids and anti-TNF, but from small observational and uncontrolled studies. Data for most advanced therapies remain limited, highlighting a large unmet need to inform clinical practice.

Abstract Background and Aims Seven new advanced therapies, belonging to three new classes, have been approved for the treatment of inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) since 2021. We examined trends in utilization of advanced therapies in the USA since 2021. Methods Using de-identified electronic health record data from 71 US health systems, we examined quarterly trends in utilization of different advanced therapies in patients with ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease between 2021 and 2025, using interrupted time-series analysis utilizing Prais–Winsten regression. Results In 11 093 patients with ulcerative colitis treated with advanced therapies, we observed an increase in use of upadacitinib (12.1% in Q2/2025; P < .001, compared with first quarter of prescription), interleukin-23p19 (IL23p19) antagonists (5.5%; P = .03), and ustekinumab (9.5%; P = .04), decline in use of tumor necrosis factor (TNF) antagonists (34.5%; P = .003), and stable use of vedolizumab (33.6%; P = .17) and sphingosine-1 phosphate receptor modulators (1.6%; P = .28). In 15 951 patients with Crohn’s disease treated with advanced therapies, we observed an increase in use of IL23p19 antagonists (15.0% in Q1/2025; P = .003) and upadacitinib (5.9%; P < .001) and decline in use of TNF antagonists (50.2%; P = .001) and ustekinumab (13.5%; P < .001). Conclusions Contemporary trends in advanced therapy utilization in patients with IBD suggest an increased utilization of upadacitinib and anti-interleukins, accompanied by a decline in use of TNF antagonists in the USA.

ABSTRACT Background Advanced therapies increase the risk of shingles in inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD). Aim To compare the risk of shingles with different advanced therapies in patients with IBD. Methods We identified patients with IBD who initiated treatment with tumour necrosis factor (TNF) antagonists, anti‐integrins, anti‐interleukins, Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors, or sphingosine‐1 phosphate receptor (S1PR) modulators between 2016 and 2022 and had follow‐up for at least 1 year before and after treatment initiation. We estimated the incidence rate (IR per 100 person‐year [PY]) of shingles (overall and complicated) and compared the risk with different advanced therapies through multinomial propensity score‐based inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW), with propensity scores estimated through generalised boosted models, accounting for disease characteristics, healthcare utilisation, comorbidities and prior and concomitant medications. Weighted Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for multiple treatment comparisons. Results We included 21,675 patients followed over 27 months. IRs per 100 PY of shingles and complicated shingles were: TNF antagonists 1.0/0.3, anti‐integrin agents 1.4/0.4, anti‐interleukins 1.2/0.5, JAK inhibitors 3.3/0.9 and S1PR modulators 2.0/1.0. After adjusting for confounding variables, JAK inhibitors were associated with higher risks of shingles than TNF antagonists (HR 2.19; 1.28–3.75), anti‐integrins (HR 1.87; 1.12–3.14) and anti‐interleukins (HR 1.70; 0.98–2.96). Conclusions JAK inhibitors were associated with 1.7–2.2‐fold higher risk of shingles than other advanced therapies.

Abstract Background and Aims Intestinal ultrasound (IUS) is increasingly used to monitor treatment efficacy in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) trials. However, standardized definitions for response, remission, and optimal assessment timing remain undefined. An international expert consensus meeting was held to establish IUS endpoints for clinical trials. Methods A panel of 35 international gastroenterologists and radiologists participated in a modified Delphi process, reviewing the literature and developing consensus statements. Agreement was defined as at least 75% consensus. Results Consensus was reached on 150 statements across four domains: general IBD (30 statements), luminal Crohn’s disease (CD) (43), perianal CD (51), and ulcerative colitis (UC) (26). For luminal CD and UC, ultrasound response was defined by: (1) a ≥25% reduction in bowel wall thickness (BWT) from baseline, or (2) multifactorial improvement, combining BWT reduction with ≥1 grade decrease in color Doppler signal (CDS) or another IUS parameter. Assessments were set at weeks 4-8 for the colon and week 12 for the terminal ileum. Ultrasound remission in luminal CD was defined as: (1) BWT normalization (≤3 mm) or (2) normalization of multiple parameters, including BWT, CDS, and all other IUS parameters. Similar remission criteria were proposed for UC, but the sigmoid BWT normal range (3-4 mm) remained uncertain. The bowel ultrasound score (BUSS) for CD and the Milan ultrasound criteria (MUC) for UC were supported as standardized scoring systems for trials. Conclusion This consensus provides standardized IUS definitions to enhance consistency in IBD trials, supporting the integration of IUS in future research.

Abstract Background and Aims The long-term efficacy and safety of upadacitinib in patients with moderate to severe Crohn’s disease (CD) were evaluated in the U-ENDURE Long-Term Extension (LTE) study. Here we report the results after 2 years of total maintenance treatment. Methods U-ENDURE is an ongoing 240-week LTE study conducted at 243 sites across 43 countries (first patient enrolled in LTE 21 March 2019). Patients who completed the 52-week maintenance study continued their previously assigned treatment, once-daily upadacitinib 15 mg or upadacitinib 30 mg. Efficacy was analyzed at week 48 of the LTE; safety was analyzed in the cumulative study population (combined 52 week maintenance and 48 week LTE) and the LTE study population only (cutoff date: 19 December 2023). Results From LTE week 0 to week 48, as-observed efficacy rates for clinical remission (per stool frequency/abdominal pain score, upadacitinib 15 mg: 78.3% to 82.9%; upadacitinib 30 mg: 84.7% to 76.6%; per CD Activity Index, upadacitinib 15 mg: 81.3% to 83.1%; upadacitinib 30 mg: 86.1% to 86.8%), endoscopic response (upadacitinib 15 mg: 59.6% to 67.1%; upadacitinib 30 mg: 71.2% to 69.6%), inflammatory biomarkers, and quality-of-life outcomes remained stable. The safety profile of the cumulative maintenance population observed through LTE week 48 was consistent with previous trials in the upadacitinib CD program. Treatment-emergent adverse event rates for the cumulative maintenance population were 283.1 and 273.4 events/100 patient-years for upadacitinib 15 mg and upadacitinib 30 mg, respectively. Event rates of serious treatment-­emergent adverse events were 16.0 events/100 patient-years for upadacitinib 15 mg and 14.6 events/100 patient-years for upadacitinib 30 mg. The most common adverse events of special interest (≥ 5.0 events/100 patient-years) were hepatic disorder, lymphopenia, creatine phosphokinase elevation, herpes zoster, and anemia. There was 1 treatment-emergent adverse event of suicide leading to death. Conclusion Sustained clinical, endoscopic, quality-of-life, and biomarker outcomes were observed in patients who were initial responders to upadacitinib and completed 2 years of maintenance therapy, with no new safety signals identified. Clinical trial identifier U-ENDURE; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03345823.

Introduction Targeted immunomodulators (eg, advanced therapies) effectively achieve symptomatic remission in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). However, ~25%–50% of patients with IBD achieving symptomatic remission with an advanced therapy may have continued endoscopically/radiologically active bowel inflammation, and it is uncertain whether changing alternative advanced therapies in asymptomatic patients with IBD will reduce bowel inflammation and achieve durable deep remission. Methods and analysis The QUality Outcomes Treating IBD to Target (QUOTIENT) study is an open-label, multicentre, pragmatic, randomised, controlled trial that aims to compare the efficacy and safety of switching to an alternative advanced therapy targeting endoscopic/radiological remission (treat-to-target) versus continuing the initial, or index, advanced therapy, in asymptomatic patients with IBD with moderate-to-severe endoscopic/radiological bowel inflammation. Enrolment is planned for ~250 participants in Canada/USA, randomised 1:1 to switching to alternative advanced therapy or continuing index advanced therapy, and then followed 104 weeks within routine clinical practice. Patient-reported outcomes measure efficacy and quality of life/treatment burden/safety. Primary endpoint is the time from randomisation to treatment failure. Ethics and dissemination The study is conducted in compliance with the protocol, ICH Good Clinical Practice, applicable regulatory requirements and appropriate review boards/independent ethics committees (approval numbers: Pro00077486; Pro00061437; STUDY00002062; 22-004171; i22-01269; IRB22-0890; IRB_00154397; 2000032384; SHIRB#2022.095-2; STUDY00007146; MMC#2024-18; REB#125290; 17784; Pro00142214; 20240660-01H), with documented written informed consent. Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journals, scientific presentations, and publicly available Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI) websites, including lay summaries. The Crohn’s & Colitis Foundation Education, Support, and Advocacy Department, and our patient advocacy stakeholder, will develop educational and marketing resources to communicate findings to a broad audience (>250 000 patients/caregivers/healthcare professionals). Trial registration number NCT05230173 .