Carlson, Erin E.

Abstract Genetic risks in breast cancer remain only partly understood. Here, we report the results of a genome-wide association study of germline DNA from 4,658 women, including 252 women experiencing a breast cancer recurrence, who were entered on the MA.27 adjuvant trial comparing the aromatase inhibitors (AI) anastrozole and exemestane. Single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) of top significance were identified in the gene encoding MIR2052HG, a long noncoding RNA of unknown function. Heterozygous or homozygous individuals for variant alleles exhibited a ∼40% or ∼63% decrease, respectively, in the hazard of breast cancer recurrence relative to homozygous wild-type individuals. Functional genomic studies in lymphoblastoid cell lines and ERα-positive breast cancer cell lines showed that expression from MIR2052HG and the ESR1 gene encoding estrogen receptor-α (ERα) was induced by estrogen and AI in a SNP-dependent manner. Variant SNP genotypes exhibited increased ERα binding to estrogen response elements, relative to wild-type genotypes, a pattern that was reversed by AI treatment. Further, variant SNPs were associated with lower expression of MIR2052HG and ERα. RNAi-mediated silencing of MIR2052HG in breast cancer cell lines decreased ERα expression, cell proliferation, and anchorage-independent colony formation. Mechanistic investigations revealed that MIR2052HG sustained ERα levels both by promoting AKT/FOXO3-mediated ESR1 transcription and by limiting ubiquitin-mediated, proteasome-dependent degradation of ERα. Taken together, our results define MIR2052HS as a functionally polymorphic gene that affects risks of breast cancer recurrence in women treated with AI. More broadly, our results offer a pharmacogenomic basis to understand differences in the response of breast cancer patients to AI therapy. Cancer Res; 76(23); 7012–23. ©2016 AACR.

Abstract Purpose: Tamoxifen and raloxifene, are primary prevention strategies for women at high risk of breast cancer (Visvanathan, 2013). Recent advances in genetic studies of breast cancer risk have identified common susceptibility loci that explain 14% of familial risk for breast cancer in the general population (Michailidou, 2013). However, it is not known if these loci are risk factors for breast cancer among high-risk women treated with SERMs for breast cancer prevention. We hypothesized that the large risk reduction associated with SERMs, coupled with the fact that several breast cancer loci correlate with family history, may limit the contribution of these common genetic loci to breast cancer in this high risk population. We present the first report to evaluate 75 established breast cancer susceptibility loci, in the context of a polygenic risk score (PRS), as a risk factor for breast cancer among high risk women taking raloxifene and tamoxifen for breast cancer prevention. Methods: We conducted a matched case-control study of 594 cases (i.e., participants who developed breast cancer while on SERM therapy) and 1,171 matched controls selected from the 33,000 participants enrolled in the NSABP P-1 and P-2 breast cancer prevention trials. Genotypes of 75 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were available from a genome-wide association study conducted at the RIKEN Center for Genomic Medicine. We formed a quantitative PRS from reported per-SNP odds ratios (OR) for the 75 susceptibility loci. Conditional logistic regression was used to examine the PRS as a risk factor for breast cancer and to assess whether the PRS and breast cancer association differed by treatment type, family history, or other clinical characteristics. Analyses also examined associations of PRS with invasive vs. in situ cancer and ER-positive vs. ER-negative cancer. Results: The PRS ranged from 3.98 to 7.74, and a one unit change in PRS was associated with a 42% increase in breast cancer (OR=1.42; 95% CI: 1.18-1.70; P = 0.0002). There was evidence of a stronger association of PRS with breast cancer among women with no first-degree family history (OR=1.62, 95% CI: 1.18-2.21) compared to those with a positive family history (OR=1.32, 95% CI: 1.06-1.66) (Pintx<0.05). The PRS also appeared a stronger risk factor for ER-positive (OR=1.59, 95% CI: 1.25-2.02, P < 0.0002) vs. ER-negative (OR=1.05, 95% CI: 0.68-1.62, P=0.84) breast cancer, although differences did not reach statistical significance (Pintx=0.10). PRS and breast cancer associations were similar across tamoxifen and raloxifene treatments, age at trial entry, 5-year predicted Gail model risk, hysterectomy status, BMI, presence of atypical hyperplasia and invasive vs. in situ cancer. Conclusion: A polygenic risk score composed of 75 loci was a risk factor for ER-positive breast cancer, especially in the absence of a first-degree family history of breast cancer. Further, the PRS associations with breast cancer were similar for women taking tamoxifen or raloxifene for prevention. These data suggest that common genetic variation adds information on risk of ER-positive breast cancer in a high-risk population receiving SERMs. Citation Format: Celine M Vachon, Daniel J Schaid, James N Ingle, Matthew P Goetz, Donald L Wickerham, Michiaki Kubo, Erin E Carlson, Soonmyung Paik, Norman Wolmark, Yusuke Nakamura, Liewei Wang, Richard M Weinshilboum, Fergus J Couch. The contribution of common genetic variation to breast cancer risk among women receiving tamoxifen or raloxifene within the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP) P-1 and P-2 trials [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Seventh Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2014 Dec 9-13; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(9 Suppl):Abstract nr P6-10-03.

Abstract BACKGROUND Metformin, a widely used anti-diabetic drug, is being considered as a highly promising agent for treatment and prevention of many types of cancer, including breast cancer. Although the exact mechanism of action of metformin is unknown, it is thought that metformin is an AMPK activator. To better individualize metformin therapy and explore additional underlying molecular mechanism associated with metformin action, we conducted a metformin pharmacogenomic study using 266 genomic data-enriched lymphoblastoid cell lines (LCLs). METHODS Genome-wide microarray data were generated for all LCLs, including 1.3 million SNPs, 485K DNA methylation probes and 54K mRNA expression probe sets. Metformin cytotoxicity assay was performed using MTS assay. Genome-wide association (GWA) analyses and integrated analyses using all the genomic data and metformin cytotoxicity (IC50 value) were performed to identify top candidate genes for functional validation in breast cancer cell lines, MDA-MB 231 and Hs578T, using siRNA screening approach. Further mechanistic study was performed to investigate the role of candidates in regulation of AMPK activity. RESULTS GWA analyses in LCLs identified 198 mRNA expression probe sets and 210 DNA methylation probes associated with metformin IC50 with p-value <10-4, respectively. Analysis of 1.3 million SNPs found 12 loci (a region containing at least 1 SNP of p-value <10-5 and 1 SNP of p-value <10-3 within 50kb) that were associated with metformin IC50. Integrated SNP loci-mRNA expression-IC50 analysis indicated that the SNP loci on chromosome 16 was associated with metformin IC50 through a trans-regulation of expression of 7 genes with p-value <10-4. Integrated methylation-mRNA expression-IC50 analysis showed that 15 DNA methylation probes in 6 genes were associated with metformin IC50 through both cis- and trans-regulation of expression of 48 genes with p-value <10-4, including 4 methylation probes in 3 of those 6 genes that were cis-correlated with its own gene expression. Ingenuity pathway analysis of top 62 candidate genes identified four major pathways and 55 genes within those pathways were selected for functional validation in breast cancer cell lines. The knockdown experiment showed that down regulation of 25 genes significantly altered metformin sensitivity in MDA-MB231, and 14 of them also showed the same effect in Hs578T. Preliminary mechanistic experiment indicated that knockdown of 7 genes significantly reduced AMPK activity in MDA-MB231 and 3 of them had same effect in Hs578T. CONCLUSIONS GWAS using a genomic data-enriched LCL model system, together with functional validation in breast cancer cell lines, could help us to identify novel genetic and epigenetic biomarkers involved in metformin response and help us to better understand the mechanisms of metformin in cancer treatment. Citation Format: Nifang Niu, Xianglin Tan, Brooke L. Fridley, Daniel J. Schaid, Ryan P. Abo, Anthony Batzler, Erin E. Carlson, Gregory Jenkins, Sebastian Moran, Holger Andrea Heyn, Manel Esteller Badosa, Liewei Wang. Metformin pharmacogenomics: A genome-wide associate study to identify genetic and epigenetic biomarkers involved in metformin response. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 104th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2013 Apr 6-10; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2013;73(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 2271. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2013-2271

Abstract The FKBP5 gene encodes the FKBP51 immunophilin, a negative regulator of AKT. Variability in level of FKBP5 expression is a major factor contributing to variation in response to several classes of chemotherapeutic agents including gemcitabine, first line treatment for pancreatic cancer. Genetic variation of FKBP5 could influence its expression, function, and, ultimately, treatment response of pancreatic cancer. We set out to comprehensively study the role of genetic variation in FKBP5 identified by Next Generation DNA resequencing in response to gemcitabine treatment of pancreatic cancer by utilizing both tumor and germline DNA samples from 43 pancreatic cancer patients, including 19 paired tumor-normal samples. Genotype-phenotype association studies with overall survival (in tumor only) as well as with FKBP5 gene expression were performed using the same samples in which Next Generation DNA resequencing had been performed, followed by functional genomic studies of top selected single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). In-depth resequencing identified 404 FKBP5 SNPs in both normal and tumor DNA patient samples. SNPs with the smallest p-values for association with FKBP5 survival or expression were subjected to functional genomic studies. Electromobility shift assay (EMSA) showed that the rs73748206 “T” allele altered DNA-protein binding patterns, consistent with a significantly increased reporter gene activity. The effect of rs73748206 was also confirmed by mRNA expression studies using lymphoblastoid cell lines (LCL) derived from the same patients from whom DNA used for resequencing had been obtained. This comprehensive FKBP5 resequencing study provides insight into the role of inheritance in variation in response to gemcitabine therapy of pancreatic cancer. Citation Format: Katarzyna A. Ellsworth, Bruce W. Eckloff, Liang Li, Irene Moon, Brooke L. Fridley, Greg D. Jenkins, Erin Carlson, Abra Brisbin, Ryan Abo, William Bamlet, Gloria Petersen, Eric D. Wieben, Liewei Wang. Contribution of FKBP5 genetic variation to gemcitabine treatment and survival in pancreatic cancer. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 104th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2013 Apr 6-10; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2013;73(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 2209. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2013-2209

Abstract The selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERM) tamoxifen and raloxifene can reduce the occurrence of breast cancer in high-risk women by 50%, but this U.S. Food and Drug Administration-approved prevention therapy is not often used. We attempted to identify genetic factors that contribute to variation in SERM breast cancer prevention, using DNA from the NSABP P-1 and P-2 breast cancer prevention trials. An initial discovery genome-wide association study identified common single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) in or near the ZNF423 and CTSO genes that were associated with breast cancer risk during SERM therapy. We then showed that both ZNF423 and CTSO participated in the estrogen-dependent induction of BRCA1 expression, in both cases with SNP-dependent variation in induction. ZNF423 appeared to be an estrogen-inducible BRCA1 transcription factor. The OR for differences in breast cancer risk during SERM therapy for subjects homozygous for both protective or both risk alleles for ZNF423 and CTSO was 5.71. Significance: This study identified novel, functionally polymorphic genes involved in the estrogen-dependent regulation of BRCA1 expression, as well as a novel mechanism for genetic variation in SERM therapeutic effect. These observations, and definition of their underlying mechanisms, represent steps toward pharmacogenomically individualized SERM breast cancer prevention. Cancer Discov; 3(7); 812–25. ©2013 AACR. See related commentary by Machiela and Chanock, p. 728 This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 705

Abstract Background: Controversy exists regarding the association between CYP2D6 enzyme activity and tamoxifen effectiveness in the adjuvant treatment of invasive breast cancer; however, this association in the primary prevention of breast cancer is unknown. Methods: We conducted a nested case–control study in the context of the NSABP P1 and P2 prevention trials to determine the impact of CYP2D6 genotype, CYP2D6 inhibitor use, and metabolizer status (CYP2D6 genotype combined with CYP2D6 inhibitor use), on breast cancer events. Women who developed breast cancer (both noninvasive and invasive) while on 5 years of selective estrogen receptor modulators therapy (cases) were matched to controls free of breast cancer. Comprehensive CYP2D6 genotyping was conducted for alleles associated with absent (*3, *4, *5, and *6), reduced (*10, *17, and *41), and increased (*1XN and *2XN) enzyme activity. Information regarding the use of CYP2D6 inhibitors was recorded. Results: A total of 591 cases were matched to 1,126 controls and DNA was genotyped in more than 97%. In patients treated with tamoxifen, there was no association of CYP2D6 genotype [OR (extensive/poor metabolizer): 0.90; 95% CI: 0.46–1.74, P = 0.74), use of a potent CYP2D6 inhibitor (OR 0.92; 95% CI: 0.575–1.486), or CYP2D6 metabolizer status (OR 1.03; 95% CI: 0.669–1.607) with breast cancer occurrence. Likewise, there was no association between any CYP2D6 metabolism parameter with breast cancer events in raloxifene-treated patients. Conclusion: In the NSABP P1 and P2 clinical trials, alterations in CYP2D6 metabolism are not associated with either tamoxifen or raloxifene efficacy. Clin Cancer Res; 17(21); 6944–51. ©2011 AACR.

Abstract Increased mammographic density (MD), the proportion of dense tissue visible on a mammogram, is a strong risk factor for breast cancer, common in the population and clusters in families. We conducted the first genome-wide linkage scan to identify genes influencing MD. DNA was obtained from 889 relatives (756 women, 133 men) from 89 families. Percent MD was estimated on 618 (82%) female family members using a validated computer-assisted thresholding method. The genome-wide scan included 403 microsatellite DNA markers with an average spacing of 9 cM. Fine mapping of a region of chromosome 5p (5p13.1-5p15.1) was done using 21 additional closely spaced DNA markers. Linkage analyses were conducted to quantify the evidence for a gene responsible for MD across the genome. The maximum log odds for linkage (LOD) score from the genome-wide scan was on chromosome 5p (LOD = 2.9, supporting linkage by a factor of 102.9 or 794 to 1) with a 1-LOD interval spanning 28.6 cM. Two suggestive regions for linkage were also identified on chromosome 12 (LOD = 2.6, 1-LOD interval of 14.8 cM; and LOD = 2.5, 1-LOD interval of 17.2 cM). Finer mapping of the region surrounding the maximum LOD on chromosome 5p resulted in stronger and statistically significant evidence for linkage (LOD = 4.2) and a narrowed 1-LOD interval (13.4 cM). The putative locus on chromosome 5p is likely to account for up to 22% of variation in MD. Hence, 1 or more of the 45 candidate genes in this region could explain a large proportion of MD and, potentially, breast cancer. [Cancer Res 2007;67(17):8412–8]